Assessing the usability of an immersive virtual reality grocery store in healthy controls.

BACKGROUND: Immersive virtual reality (IVR) as a research platform to study human behaviors is an emerging field and may be useful for studying self-care management, especially in the gap between formal healthcare recommendations and day-to-day living. Self-care activities, such as grocery shopping, can be challenging for people with chronic illness. We developed an IVR environment that simulates a real-life grocery store and conducted a usability study to demonstrate the safety and acceptability of IVR as an experimental environment. METHODS: This study was a three-arm randomized control trial involving 24 participants, conducted as a usability study to evaluate aspects of the experimental condition including the effectiveness of a training exposure, the occurrence of undesirable effects associated with IVR, and participants' experiences of realism, immersion, and spatial presence. The experiment, using a head mounted device and handheld controllers, included a 10-minute training exposure, followed by one of three unique 30-minute experimental conditions which exposed participants to different combinations of tasks and stimuli, and a post-experience interview. We measured controller errors, undesirable symptoms associated with IVR, and the perception of realism, immersion, and spatial presence. RESULTS: Participants used controllers effectively to interact within the IVR environment. Hand controller use errors were fewer during the experimental conditions compared to the training exposure. Minimal undesirable IVR symptoms were reported. Presence was rated in the middle range with no significant differences based on experimental condition. Overall, user experience feedback was positive. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that participants could engage in our IVR environment without excessive error or experiencing undesirable effects and confirmed that the virtual experience attained a level of presence necessary to effectively engage in the study. These findings give us confidence that this IVR intervention designed to explore instrumental activities of daily living is safe, effective and provides a credible, controlled simulated community-like setting.

The Texas Health Resources Clinical Scholars Program: Learning healthcare system workforce development through embedded translational research.

Introduction: Texas Health Resources (THR), a large, nonprofit health care system based in the Dallas-Fort Worth area, has collaborated with the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (UTSW) to develop and operate a unique, integrated approach for Learning Health System (LHS) workforce development. This training model centers on academic health system faculty members conducting later-stage translational research within a partnering regional care delivery organization. Methods: The THR Clinical Scholars Program engages early career UTSW faculty members to conduct studies that are likely to have an impact on care delivery at the health system level. Interested candidates submit formal applications to the program. A joint committee comprised of senior research faculty from UTSW and THR clinical leadership reviews proposals with a focus on the shared LHS needs of both institutions-developing high quality research output that can be applied to enhance care delivery. A key prioritization criterion for funding is the degree to which the research addresses a question relevant to THR as a high-volume network with multiple channels for consumers to access care. The program emphasis is on supporting embedded research initiatives using health system data to generate knowledge that will improve the quality and efficiency of care for the patient populations served by the participant organizations. Results: We discuss specific strategic and tactical components of the THR Clinical Scholars Program including an overview of the academic affiliation agreement between the collaborating organizations, criteria for successful program applications, data sharing, and funding. We also share project summaries from selected clinical scholars as examples of the LHS research done in the program to date. Conclusion: This experience report provides an implementation framework for other academic health systems interested in adopting similar LHS workforce training models with community partners.