Porocarcinomas with PAK1/2/3 fusions: a series of 12 cases.

AIMS: Porocarcinoma is a malignant sweat gland tumour differentiated toward the upper part of the sweat duct and may arise from the transformation of a preexisting benign poroma. In 2019, Sekine et al. demonstrated the presence of YAP1::MAML2 and YAP1::NUTM1 fusions in most poromas and porocarcinomas. Recently, our group identified PAK2-fusions in a subset of benign poromas. Herein we report a series of 12 porocarcinoma cases harbouring PAK1/2/3 fusions. METHODS AND RESULTS: Five patients were male and the median age was 79 years (ranges: 59-95). Tumours were located on the trunk (n = 7), on the thigh (n = 3), neck (n = 1), or groin area (n = 1). Four patients developed distant metastases. Microscopically, seven cases harboured a benign poroma component and a malignant invasive part. Ductal formations were observed in all, while infundibular/horn cysts and cells with vacuolated cytoplasm were detected in seven and six tumours, respectively. In three cases, the invasive component consisted of a proliferation of elongated cells, some of which formed pseudovascular spaces, whereas the others harboured a predominant solid or trabecular growth pattern. Immunohistochemical staining for CEA and EMA confirmed the presence of ducts. Focal androgen receptor expression was detected in three specimens. Whole RNA sequencing evidenced LAMTOR1::PAK1 (n = 2), ZDHHC5::PAK1 (n = 2), DLG1::PAK2, CTDSP1::PAK1, CTNND1::PAK1, SSR1::PAK3, CTNNA1::PAK2, RNF13::PAK2, ROBO1::PAK2, and CD47::PAK2. Activating mutation of HRAS (G13V, n = 3, G13R, n = 1, Q61L, n = 2) was present in six cases. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that PAK1/2/3 fusions is the oncogenic driver of a subset of porocarcinomas lacking YAP1 rearrangement.

Distinct regulations driving YAP1 expression loss in poroma, porocarcinoma and RB1-deficient skin carcinoma.

AIMS: Recently, YAP1 fusion genes have been demonstrated in eccrine poroma and porocarcinoma, and the diagnostic use of YAP1 immunohistochemistry has been highlighted in this setting. In other organs, loss of YAP1 expression can reflect YAP1 rearrangement or transcriptional repression, notably through RB1 inactivation. In this context, our objective was to re-evaluate the performance of YAP1 immunohistochemistry for the diagnosis of poroma and porocarcinoma. METHODS AND RESULTS: The expression of the C-terminal part of the YAP1 protein was evaluated by immunohistochemistry in 543 cutaneous epithelial tumours, including 27 poromas, 14 porocarcinomas and 502 other cutaneous tumours. Tumours that showed a lack of expression of YAP1 were further investigated for Rb by immunohistochemistry and for fusion transcripts by real-time PCR (YAP1::MAML2 and YAP1::NUTM1). The absence of YAP1 expression was observed in 24 cases of poroma (89%), 10 porocarcinoma (72%), 162 Merkel cell carcinoma (98%), 14 squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (15%), one trichoblastoma and one sebaceoma. Fusions of YAP1 were detected in only 16 cases of poroma (n = 66%), 10 porocarcinoma (71%) all lacking YAP1 expression, and in one sebaceoma. The loss of Rb expression was detected in all cases except one of YAP1-deficient SCC (n = 14), such tumours showing significant morphological overlap with porocarcinoma. In-vitro experiments in HaCat cells showed that RB1 knockdown resulted in repression of YAP1 protein expression. CONCLUSION: In addition to gene fusion, we report that transcriptional repression of YAP1 can be observed in skin tumours with RB1 inactivation, including MCC and a subset of SCC.

Correction of Severe Myelofibrosis, Impaired Platelet Functions and Abnormalities in a Patient with Gray Platelet Syndrome Successfully Treated by Stem Cell Transplantation.

Gray platelet syndrome (GPS) is an inherited disorder. Patients harboring GPS have thrombocytopenia with large platelets lacking α-granules. A long-term complication is myelofibrosis with pancytopenia. Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) could be a curative treatment. We report a male GPS patient with severe pancytopenia, splenomegaly and a secondary myelofibrosis needing red blood cells transfusion. He received an HSCT from a 10/10 matched HLA-unrelated donor after a myeloablative conditioning regimen. Transfusion independence occurred at day+21, with a documented neutrophil engraftment. At day+ 180, we added ruxolitinib to cyclosporine and steroids for a moderate chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD) and persistent splenomegaly. At day+240 GVHD was controlled and splenomegaly reduced. Complete donor chimesrism was documented in blood and marrow and platelets functions and morphology normalized. At day+ 720, the spleen size normalized and there was no evidence of marrow fibrosis on the biopsy. In GPS, HSCT may be a curative treatment in selected patients with pancytopenia and myelofibrosis.

Sialadenoma papilliferum-like intraductal papillary tumor with unveiling BRAF V600E and PIK3CA H1047R mutations: Case report with molecular analysis and literature review.

INTRODUCTION: Sialadenoma papilliferum (SP), a rare minor salivary gland tumor, shares morphological and genetic similarities with syringocystadenoma papilliferum. Recent studies have identified BRAF V600E or HRAS mutations in SP, suggesting its neoplastic nature. Despite being uncommon, SP poses diagnostic challenges due to its resemblance to other lesions like squamous papilloma. The emergence of sialadenoma papilliferum-like intraductal papillary tumor (SP-IPT) further complicates its classification, emphasizing the need for thorough investigation. CASE PRESENTATION: A 50-year-old male presented with a left palatal lesion histologically diagnosed as SP-IPT. Surgical resection revealed characteristic features, including papillary projections into cystically dilated ductal spaces. Immunohistochemistry confirmed positivity for pan-keratin AE1/AE3, cytokeratin 7, SOX10, and BRAF V600E. Whole-exome sequencing identified BRAF V600E and PIK3CA H1047R mutations. No recurrence was observed three months post-excision. DISCUSSION: SP-IPT's diagnostic complexity stems from its resemblance to SP without an exophytic papillary component. However, shared BRAF mutations suggest a close relationship between the two entities. Similarities with skin adnexal tumors underscore the importance of molecular markers in tumor classification. The identification of PIK3CA mutation in SP-IPT adds to its molecular diversity, warranting further investigation into its clinical significance. CONCLUSION: This study presents a case of SP-IPT with unique histological and molecular features, highlighting its diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. The co-occurrence of BRAF V600E and PIK3CA H1047R mutations suggests a distinct molecular profile in SP-IPT, necessitating further research to elucidate its biological behavior and clinical implications.