A Retrospective Analysis of Systemic Oncologic Treatment in Older Patients With Advanced Soft-tissue Sarcoma.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Almost half of all patients with soft-tissue sarcoma are over 65 years of age, and the proportion of older patients is increasing. Despite this, they have been underrepresented in clinical trials and only limited data are available to guide treatment decisions. The aim of this study was to investigate treatment patterns and outcomes in older patients with soft-tissue sarcoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients over 50 years old treated for advanced soft-tissue sarcoma at the Helsinki University Hospital between January 2000 and July 2020 were included. Data on patient and tumor characteristics, treatment, and survival were retrospectively collected. A total of 152 patients were included: 14.5% (n=22) were over 75 years old, 34.2% (n=52) were 65-74 and 51.3% (n=78) were 50-64 years old. RESULTS: The outcomes of the oldest group differed from those of younger patients; they were more likely to receive single-agent treatment as first-line therapy (90.9% vs. 28.8% and 24.4%, p<0.001) and had the lowest relative dose-intensity (70% vs. 88% and 95%, p<0.05). They experienced grade three to four hematological adverse events less frequently (38.1%, 56.9% and 72.7%, respectively, p=0.031), and received fewer lines of treatment (median of 1, 2 and 2, respectively, p=0.01). In patients aged ≥75 years, there was no association between further lines of therapy and improved survival. Compared to the youngest group, the oldest patients had a greater risk of dying (hazard ratio=1.7, 95% confidence interval=1.0-2.8, p=0.041) and their median overall survival was only 7.4 months, compared to 14.3 and 12.9 months in the two younger groups. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that older patients tolerate chemotherapy when treatment is tailored to their needs but may not benefit as much as younger patients.

Ultra-low-dose computed tomography and chest X-ray in follow-up of high-grade soft tissue sarcoma-a prospective comparative study.

Ultra-low-dose computed tomography (ULD-CT) may combine the high sensitivity of conventional computed tomography (CT) in detecting sarcoma pulmonary metastasis, with a radiation dose in the same magnitude as chest X-ray (CXR). Fifty patients with non-metastatic high-grade soft tissue sarcoma treated with curative intention were recruited. Their follow-up involved both CXR and ULD-CT to evaluate their different sensitivity. Suspected findings were confirmed by conventional CT if necessary. Patients with isolated pulmonary metastases were treated with surgery or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with curative intent if possible. The median effective dose from a single ULD-CT study was 0.27 mSv (range 0.12 to 0.89 mSv). Nine patients were diagnosed with asymptomatic lung metastases during the follow-up. Only three of them were visible in CXR and all nine in ULD-CT. CXR had therefore only a 33% sensitivity compared to ULD-CT. Four patients were operated, and one had SBRT to all pulmonary lesions. Eight of them, however, died of the disease. Two patients developed symptomatic metastatic recurrence involving extrapulmonary sites+/-the lungs between two imaging rounds. ULD-CT has higher sensitivity for the detection of sarcoma pulmonary metastasis than CXR, with a radiation dose considerably lower than conventional CT.Clinical trial registration: NCT05813808. 04-14-2023.