Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Epidemiol ; 174(11 Suppl): S36-46, 2011 Dec 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22135392

RESUMO

Infectious respiratory pathogens were the suspected cause of 480 outbreaks investigated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Epidemic Intelligence Service officers during 1946-2005. All epidemic-assistance investigation reports and associated articles from scientific journals were reviewed. Investigations identified 25 different infectious respiratory pathogens including, most frequently, tuberculosis, influenza, and legionellosis. Other bacterial-, viral-, and fungal-related pathogens also were identified. Epidemic-assistance investigations were notable for first identifying Legionnaires disease and Pontiac fever, hantavirus pulmonary syndrome, and new strains of human and avian influenza, as well as emerging challenges (e.g., multidrug-resistant tuberculosis and pneumococcus). The investigations provided clinical insights into such diseases as pulmonary anthrax and identified high risks of serious respiratory illnesses for persons infected with human immunodeficiency virus, other immunocompromised persons, and persons with diabetes. They identified settings placing persons at high risk of acquiring disease, including nursing homes, prisons, homeless shelters, and hospitals. Travel also placed persons at risk. Key environmental factors related to spread of diseases and occupational risks for brucellosis and psittacosis were identified. The outbreak investigations constitute a wealth of prevention experience and provide the basis for recommendations to mitigate outbreaks and reduce future risks.


Assuntos
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S./história , Surtos de Doenças/história , Epidemiologia/história , Infecções Respiratórias/história , História do Século XX , História do Século XXI , Humanos , Infecções Respiratórias/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
2.
J Athl Train ; 41(4): 422-6, 2006.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17273468

RESUMO

CONTEXT: Athletic training education programs must provide the proper type and amount of clinical supervision in order for athletic training students to obtain appropriate clinical education and to meet Board of Certification examination requirements. OBJECTIVE: To assess athletic training students' perceptions of the type and amount of clinical supervision received during clinical education. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design. SETTING: 124 CAAHEP-accredited NCAA institutions. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: We obtained a national stratified random sample (by National Athletic Trainers' Association district) of undergraduate athletic training students from 61 Commission on Accreditation of Allied Health Education Programs-accredited athletic training education programs. A total of 851 athletic training students participated in the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Differences among athletic training students with first-aider/provider qualifications, student supervision during moderate-risk and increased-risk sports, program/institutional characteristics, type and amount of clinical supervision, and students' academic level and mean percentage of time spent in different types of clinical supervision. RESULTS: A total of 276 (32.4%) of the students reported that they supplied medical care and athletic training-related coverage beyond that of a first aider/provider. Athletic training students stating that they traveled with teams without supervision numbered 342 (40.2%). A significant difference was noted between the amount of supervision reported by sophomore and senior students ( P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Athletic training students do not seem to be receiving appropriate clinical supervision and are often acting outside the scope of clinical education.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA