Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Public Health Nurs ; 41(2): 328-337, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38265246

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Screening for intimate partner violence in the home is often challenging due to the lack of privacy. The aim of this study was to compare two different screening methods (paper-pencil vs. tablet) for identifying intimate partner violence during perinatal home visits. DESIGN: Randomized control trial. SAMPLE: Pregnant women (N = 416) in perinatal home visiting programs were randomized to either paper-pencil or computer assisted, intimate partner violence screening. MEASUREMENTS: The Abuse Assessment Screen was used to screen for physical and sexual IPV and Women's Experiences with Battering for emotional intimate partner violence. RESULTS: No significant differences in prevalence were found between the screening methods. Intimate partner violence prevalence rates for the year before and/or during pregnancy using paper-pencil was 21.8% versus 24.5% using tablets (p = .507). There were significant differences in prevalence among the three race/ethnic groups (Caucasian, 36.9%; African American, 26.7%; Hispanics, 10.6%; p < .001) and significant differences in rates across three geographical areas: urban 16.0%; rural 27.6%, suburban women 32.3% (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that both methods are useful for identifying intimate partner violence during perinatal home visits.


Assuntos
Violência por Parceiro Íntimo , Humanos , Feminino , Gravidez , Violência por Parceiro Íntimo/psicologia , Gestantes , Prevalência
2.
J Prof Nurs ; 34(1): 20-24, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29406133

RESUMO

In 2005 the American Association of Critical Care Nurses defined six Healthy Work Environment (HWE) standards for the clinical setting (AACN, 2005), which were reaffirmed and expanded in 2016 (AACN, 2016). These clinical standards were adapted for use in the academic setting by Fontaine, Koh, and Carroll in 2012. The intention of this article is threefold: to present a revised version of the academic workplace standards which are appropriate for all School of Nursing (SON) employees, staff as well as faculty; to proposes the addition of a seventh standard, self-care, which provides the foundation for all standards; and to describe the continuing implementation of these seven standards at the University of Virginia School of Nursing (UVA SON).


Assuntos
Liderança , Recursos Humanos de Enfermagem/normas , Escolas de Enfermagem/normas , Local de Trabalho/normas , Comunicação , Empatia , Humanos , Recursos Humanos de Enfermagem/psicologia , Autocuidado , Estados Unidos , Local de Trabalho/psicologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA