Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Gynecol Oncol ; 163(3): 524-530, 2021 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34625284

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Aromatase inhibitors have been used empirically to treat a subset of patients with hormone receptor positive uterine leiomyosarcomas(LMS) and carcinosarcomas (UCS) mainly supported by retrospective data. We evaluated the activity of anastrozole in two rare cohorts; patients with recurrent/metastatic LMS and UCS enrolled in PARAGON, a basket trial of anastrozole in estrogen receptor (ER+)/progesterone receptor positive (PR+) gynecological cancers. METHOD: An investigator-initiated, single-arm, prospective open-label trial of anastrozole 1 mg/day in patients with ER &/or PR + ve LMS or UCS with measurable disease, treated until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was clinical benefit (complete/partial response + stable disease) rate (CBR) at 3 months. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival (PFS), quality of life and toxicity. RESULTS: 39 eligible patients were enrolled, 32 with LMS and 7 with UCS. For the LMS cohort CBR at 3 months was 35% (95% CI: 21-53%) with a median duration of clinical benefit of 5.8 months. Best response was a partial response in one patient. Two patients remained on treatment for more than one year. The median progression-free survival was 2.8 months (95% CI: 2.6-4.9). For the UCS cohort CBR at 3 months was 43% (95% CI: 16-75%) with a median duration of clinical benefit of 5.6 months. Stable disease was seen in 3 patients but no objective responses were seen. The median progression-free survival was 2.7 months (95% CI, 1.1-8.2). Safety was acceptable with 5/39 evaluable patients showing grade 3 toxicities. CONCLUSION: Whilst objective response rates with anastrozole are low, the clinical benefit rate and good tolerance suggests that aromatase inhibitor therapy may have a role in a subset of patients with metastatic LMS and UCS.


Assuntos
Anastrozol/uso terapêutico , Carcinossarcoma/tratamento farmacológico , Leiomiossarcoma/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Uterinas/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anastrozol/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Aromatase/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Aromatase/uso terapêutico , Carcinossarcoma/metabolismo , Carcinossarcoma/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Leiomiossarcoma/metabolismo , Leiomiossarcoma/patologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Metástase Neoplásica , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Receptores de Estrogênio/metabolismo , Receptores de Progesterona/metabolismo , Neoplasias Uterinas/metabolismo , Neoplasias Uterinas/patologia
2.
Gynecol Oncol ; 161(1): 160-165, 2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33608144

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Aromatase inhibitors are standard of care for low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas (LGESS), based on very high response rates reported in retrospective studies. We evaluated the activity of anastrozole in recurrent/metastatic LGESS patients enrolled in PARAGON, a basket trial of anastrozole in estrogen receptor (ER±)/progesterone receptor (PR+) gynecological cancers. METHOD: An investigator-initiated, single-arm, prospective open-label trial of anastrozole 1 mg/day in patients with ER ± PR + ve LGESS with measurable disease, treated until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was clinical benefit (complete/partial response + stable disease) rate (CBR) at 3 months. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival (PFS), quality of life and toxicity. RESULTS: 15 eligible patients were enrolled. CBR at 3 months was 73% (95% CI: 48-89.1%); unchanged at 6 months. Best response was 26.7%, including complete response in one (6.7%; 95% CI 1.2-29.8%), partial response in three (20%, 95% CI 7.1-45.2%) and stable disease in seven (46.7%). Four patients ceased treatment by 3 months due to progression. Median PFS was not reached (25th percentile: 2.9 months (95% CI: 1.2-NR)). PFS was 73.3%, 73.3% and 66% at 6, 12, and 18 months, respectively. Six patients remained on treatment for an average of 44.2 months (range 34.5-63.6) up until data cut. Toxicity was as expected, with 3 patients stopping due to adverse effects. CONCLUSION: The 26.7% objective response rate with anastrozole is lower than reported in retrospective series, but the CBR was high and durable. The results underscore the importance of prospective trials in rare cancers.


Assuntos
Anastrozol/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias do Endométrio/tratamento farmacológico , Tumores do Estroma Endometrial/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Anastrozol/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos Hormonais/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos Hormonais/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Aromatase/administração & dosagem , Inibidores da Aromatase/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias do Endométrio/metabolismo , Neoplasias do Endométrio/patologia , Tumores do Estroma Endometrial/metabolismo , Tumores do Estroma Endometrial/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gradação de Tumores , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Receptores de Estrogênio/metabolismo , Receptores de Progesterona/metabolismo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA