Cell cycle control: many ways to skin a cat.

Thirty exponential cell divisions after fertilization would produce the number of cells in a baby mouse, but would not make a mouse. Sophisticated controls govern the cell cycle during development. These controls appear to play a central role in sculpting biological form. Rapid advances in our understanding of the machinery that drives the cell cycle provide a foundation for investigation of the molecular nature of cell cycle control in development. In this article, I emphasize that the design of the cell cycle machinery provides numerous inputs for regulation. I hope that the emphasis I have chosen will avert a tendency towards a narrow perception of cell cycle control.

Triggering the all-or-nothing switch into mitosis.

The past decade of cell cycle investigations has identified many roads not taken. The kinase that drives mitosis can be modulated by cyclins, by activating phosphorylation, by inhibitory phosphorylation and by binding of inhibitors, but one of these regulatory options controls the transition from G2 phase to mitosis in most circumstances. A switch-like mechanism integrates signals of cellular status and commits the cell to mitosis by abruptly removing inhibitory phosphate from preformed cyclin:Cdk1 complexes. The pathways that flip this switch alter the balance of modifying reactions to favor dephosphorylation, thereby generating a flood of mitotic kinase.

Chromosome association of minichromosome maintenance proteins in Drosophila mitotic cycles.

Minichromosome maintenance (MCM) proteins are essential DNA replication factors conserved among eukaryotes. MCMs cycle between chromatin bound and dissociated states during each cell cycle. Their absence on chromatin is thought to contribute to the inability of a G2 nucleus to replicate DNA. Passage through mitosis restores the ability of MCMs to bind chromatin and the ability to replicate DNA. In Drosophila early embryonic cell cycles, which lack a G1 phase, MCMs reassociate with condensed chromosomes toward the end of mitosis. To explore the coupling between mitosis and MCM-chromatin interaction, we tested whether this reassociation requires mitotic degradation of cyclins. Arrest of mitosis by induced expression of nondegradable forms of cyclins A and/or B showed that reassociation of MCMs to chromatin requires cyclin A destruction but not cyclin B destruction. In contrast to the earlier mitoses, mitosis 16 (M16) is followed by G1, and MCMs do not reassociate with chromatin at the end of M16. dacapo mutant embryos lack an inhibitor of cyclin E, do not enter G1 quiescence after M16, and show mitotic reassociation of MCM proteins. We propose that cyclin E, inhibited by Dacapo in M16, promotes chromosome binding of MCMs. We suggest that cyclins have both positive and negative roles in controlling MCM-chromatin association.

Chromosome association of minichromosome maintenance proteins in Drosophila endoreplication cycles.

Minichromosome maintenance (MCM) proteins are essential eukaryotic DNA replication factors. The binding of MCMs to chromatin oscillates in conjunction with progress through the mitotic cell cycle. This oscillation is thought to play an important role in coupling DNA replication to mitosis and limiting chromosome duplication to once per cell cycle. The coupling of DNA replication to mitosis is absent in Drosophila endoreplication cycles (endocycles), during which discrete rounds of chromosome duplication occur without intervening mitoses. We examined the behavior of MCM proteins in endoreplicating larval salivary glands, to determine whether oscillation of MCM-chromosome localization occurs in conjunction with passage through an endocycle S phase. We found that MCMs in polytene nuclei exist in two states: associated with or dissociated from chromosomes. We demonstrate that cyclin E can drive chromosome association of DmMCM2 and that DNA synthesis erases this association. We conclude that mitosis is not required for oscillations in chromosome binding of MCMs and propose that cycles of MCM-chromosome association normally occur in endocycles. These results are discussed in a model in which the cycle of MCM-chromosome associations is uncoupled from mitosis because of the distinctive program of cyclin expression in endocycles.

Mitotic regulators govern progress through steps in the centrosome duplication cycle.

Centrosome duplication is marked by discrete changes in centriole structure that occur in lockstep with cell cycle transitions. We show that mitotic regulators govern steps in centriole replication in Drosophila embryos. Cdc25(string), the expression of which initiates mitosis, is required for completion of daughter centriole assembly. Cdc20(fizzy), which is required for the metaphase-anaphase transition, is required for timely disengagement of mother and daughter centrioles. Stabilization of mitotic cyclins, which prevents exit from mitosis, blocks assembly of new daughter centrioles. Common regulation of the nuclear and centrosome cycles by mitotic regulators may ensure precise duplication of the centrosome.

Separation techniques based on the opposition of two counteracting forces to produce a dynamic equilibrium.

Useful compounds, whether produced by chemical synthesis or biological synthesis, often need to be purified from complex mixtures. Biochemists and chemists thus recognize the need for efficient new preparative purification techniques for product recovery. Such fractionation techniques must have high capacity and high resolution. In a novel group of separation methods suited to the preparative fractionation of proteins, antibiotics, and other classes of compounds, the chromatographic flow of a solute down the column is opposed by solute electrophoresis in the opposite direction. Useful separation is achieved when these two counteracting forces drive the solute to a unique equilibrium position within the separation chamber. The properties of chromatographic matrices, for example, gel-permeation matrices of various porosities, provide a means of establishing the unique equilibrium points. Extraordinary resolution and capacity are attainable by these methods.

Directing cell division during development.

Several evolutionarily conserved proteins constitute a universal mitotic trigger that is precisely controlled during the orderly cell divisions of embryogenesis. As development progresses, the mechanisms controlling this trigger change. Early divisions are executed by maternally synthesized gene products, and in Xenopus they are timed by the accumulation and periodic degradation of cyclin, a trigger component. Later, the zygotic genome assumes control, and in Drosophila, zygotic transcription is required for production of another trigger protein, the product of string. After this transition to zygotic control, pulses of string transcription define the timing of highly patterned embryonic cell divisions and cyclin accumulation is not rate limiting.

Comparative genomics of the eukaryotes.

A comparative analysis of the genomes of Drosophila melanogaster, Caenorhabditis elegans, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae-and the proteins they are predicted to encode-was undertaken in the context of cellular, developmental, and evolutionary processes. The nonredundant protein sets of flies and worms are similar in size and are only twice that of yeast, but different gene families are expanded in each genome, and the multidomain proteins and signaling pathways of the fly and worm are far more complex than those of yeast. The fly has orthologs to 177 of the 289 human disease genes examined and provides the foundation for rapid analysis of some of the basic processes involved in human disease.

Cdks and the Drosophila cell cycle.

Cyclin-dependent kinases play essential roles in driving the cell cycle. Much progress has been made in Drosophila over the past year in identifying the specific requirements for individual cyclins in particular cell cycle events. These studies encompass many aspects of the cell cycle, from the addition of a G1 phase to the cell cycle during embryogenesis to the role of cyclin degradation in progression through anaphase.

The making of a maggot: patterning the Drosophila embryonic epidermis.

Cell fates are instructed by signals emitted from specialized cell populations called organizers. The study of epidermal patterning in Drosophila is contributing novel insights concerning the establishment and action of such organizers. Juxtaposed rows of cells express either the wingless or hedgehog signaling molecules and thereby act as organizers of segment pattern. These signals mediate a mutually re-enforcing interaction between the two rows of cells to sustain organizer function. In a distinct and subsequent phase, wingless and hedgehog act to specify the fates of cells.

Limb morphogenesis: connections between patterning and growth.

Limb development is a complex process involving precise control of both patterning and growth. Great strides have been made in understanding limb morphogenesis and identifying essential patterning genes in Drosophila. Differential expression of these genes divides the future limb into territories, which will give rise to different regions of the adult appendage. Recent analyses have defined the role of territorial boundaries as organizers of both patterning and growth, highlighting the connection between these two processes. The organizing activity of territorial boundaries seems to be mediated through the activity of two locally produced morphogens: Wingless and Decapentaplegic. We propose a model in which these two molecules, distributed in a graded fashion, act in synergy to promote growth of the entire appendage. We also suggest that existence of growth inhibitors that counteract the action of Wingless and Decapentaplegic; by opposing the gradient of these growth factors, the inhibitors guide the near-uniform proliferation that shapes the imaginal discs from which the adult appendages are formed in Drosophila.

Size control: cell proliferation does not equal growth.

Division subdivides mass without increasing it. So one should not expect that an increase in cell division would make an organism bigger. Both classic and recent experiments confirm this simple rationale: altering proliferation produces normally sized body structures with either especially small or exceptionally large cells.

Cytoskeleton: centrosom-in absentia.

Recent results challenge long-held assumptions that centrosomes are essential organizers of mitotic spindles, but suggest that they couple spindle behavior with developmental and cellular events, perhaps by nucleating astral microtubules which mediate interactions with other cytoskeletal components.

The schedule of destruction of three mitotic cyclins can dictate the timing of events during exit from mitosis.

BACKGROUND: Degradation of the mitotic cyclins is a hallmark of the exit from mitosis. Induction of stable versions of each of the three mitotic cyclins of Drosophila, cyclins A, B, and B3, arrests mitosis with different phenotypes. We tested a recent proposal that the destruction of the different cyclins guides progress through mitosis. RESULTS: Real-time imaging revealed that arrest phenotypes differ because each stable cyclin affects specific mitotic events differently. Stable cyclin A prolonged or blocked chromosome disjunction, leading to metaphase arrest. Stable cyclin B allowed the transition to anaphase, but anaphase A chromosome movements were slowed, anaphase B spindle elongation did not occur, and the monooriented disjoined chromosomes began to oscillate between the spindle poles. Stable cyclin B3 prevented normal spindle maturation and blocked major mitotic exit events such as chromosome decondensation but nonetheless allowed chromosome disjunction, anaphase B, and formation of a cytokinetic furrow, which split the spindle. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that degradation of distinct mitotic cyclins is required to transit specific steps of mitosis: cyclin A degradation facilitates chromosome disjunction, cyclin B destruction is required for anaphase B and cytokinesis and for directional stability of univalent chromosome movements, and cyclin B3 degradation is required for proper spindle reorganization and restoration of the interphase nucleus. We suggest that the schedule of degradation of cyclin A, cyclin B, and then cyclin B3 contributes to the temporal coordination of mitotic events.

S-phase function of Drosophila cyclin A and its downregulation in G1 phase.

BACKGROUND: Cyclin E is the normal inducer of S phase in G1 cells of Drosophila embryos. Stable G1 quiescence requires the downregulation both of cyclin E and of other factors that can bypass the normal regulation of cell cycle progression. RESULTS: High-level expression of cyclin A triggered the G1/S transition in wild-type embryos and in mutant embryos lacking cyclin E. Three types of control downregulated this activity of cyclin A. First, cyclin destruction limited the accumulation of cyclin A protein in G1. Second, inhibitory phosphorylation of cdc2, the kinase partner of cyclin A, reduced the S-phase promoting activity of cyclin A in G1. Third, rux, a protein with unknown biochemical function, limited cyclin A function in G1. Overexpression of rux blocked S phase induction by coexpressed cyclin A and promoted the degradation of cyclin A. Rux also prevented a stable cyclin A mutant from inducing S phase, indicating that inhibition does not require cyclin destruction, and drove the nuclear localization of cyclin A. CONCLUSIONS: Cyclin A can drive the G1/S transition, but this function is suppressed by three types of control: cyclin A destruction, inhibitory phosphorylation of cdc2, and inhibition by rux. The partly redundant contributions of these three inhibitory mechanisms safeguard the stability of G1 quiescence until the induction of cyclin E. The action of rux during G1 resembles the action of inhibitors of mitotic kinases present during G1 in yeast, although no obvious sequence similarity exists.

Rux is a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor (CKI) specific for mitotic cyclin-Cdk complexes.

BACKGROUND: Roughex (Rux) is a cell-cycle regulator that contributes to the establishment and maintenance of the G1 state in the fruit fly Drosophila. Genetic data show that Rux inhibits the S-phase function of the cyclin A (CycA)-cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (Cdk1) complex; in addition, it can prevent the mitotic functions of CycA and CycB when overexpressed. Rux has no homology to known Cdk inhibitors (CKIs), and the molecular mechanism of Rux function is not known. RESULTS: Rux interacted with CycA and CycB in coprecipitation experiments. Expression of Rux caused nuclear translocation of CycA and CycB, and inhibited Cdk1 but not Cdk2 kinase activity. Cdk1 inhibition by Rux did not rely on inhibitory phosphorylation, disruption of cyclin-Cdk complex formation or changes in subcellular localization. Rux inhibited Cdk1 kinase in two ways: Rux prevented the activating phosphorylation on Cdk1 and also inhibited activated Cdk1 complexes. Surprisingly, Rux had a stimulating effect on CycA-Cdk1 activity when present in low concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: Rux fulfils all the criteria for a CKI. This is the first description in a multicellular organism of a CKI that specifically inhibits mitotic cyclin-Cdk complexes. This function of Rux is required for the G1 state and male meiosis and could also be involved in mitotic regulation, while the stimulating effect of Rux might assist in any S-phase function of CycA-Cdk1.

Fluctuations in cyclin E levels are required for multiple rounds of endocycle S phase in Drosophila.

The precise cell-cycle alternation of S phase and mitosis is controlled by alternating competence of nuclei to respond to S-phase-inducing factors [1]. Nuclei acquire competence to replicate at the low point in cyclin-dependent kinase (Cdk) activities that follows mitotic destruction of cyclins. The elevation of Cdk activity late in G1 is thought to drive cells into S phase and to block replicated DNA from re-acquiring replication competence [2]. Whereas mitosis is normally required to eliminate the cyclins prior to another cycle of replication, experimental elimination of Cdk activity in G2 can restore competence to replicate [3-6]. Here, we examine the roles of Cdks in the endocycies of Drosophila [7]. In these cycles, rounds of discrete S phases without intervening mitoses result in polyteny. Cyclins A and B are lost in cells as they enter endocycles [8,9], and pulses of Cyclin E expression drive endocycle S phases [10-12]. To address whether oscillations of Cyclin E expression are required for endocycles, we expressed Cyclin E continuously in Drosophila salivary glands. Growth of the cells was severely inhibited, and a period of DNA replication was induced but further replication was inhibited. This replication inhibition could be overcome by the kinase inhibitor 6-dimethylaminopurine (6-DMAP), but not by expression of subunits of the transcription factor E2F. These results indicate that endocycle S phases require oscillations in Cdk activity, but, in contrast to oscillations in mitotic cells, these occur independently of mitosis.

Drosophila grapes/CHK1 mutants are defective in cyclin proteolysis and coordination of mitotic events.

The Drosophila grapes (grp) gene, which encodes a homolog of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe Chk1 kinase, provides a cell-cycle checkpoint that delays mitosis in response to inhibition of DNA replication [1]. Grp is also required in the undisturbed early embryonic cycles: in its absence, mitotic abnormalities appear in cycle 12 and chromosomes fail to fully separate in subsequent cycles [2] [3]. In other systems, Chk1 kinase phosphorylates and suppresses the activity of Cdc25 phosphatase: the resulting failure to remove inhibitory phosphate from cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (Cdk1) prevents entry into mitosis [4] [5]. Because in Drosophila embryos Cdk1 lacks inhibitory phosphate during cycles 11-13 [6], it is not clear that known actions of Grp/Chk1 suffice in these cycles. We found that the loss of grp compromised cyclin A proteolysis and delayed mitotic disjunction of sister chromosomes. These defects occurred before previously reported grp phenotypes. We conclude that Grp activates cyclin A degradation, and functions to time the disjunction of chromosomes in the early embryo. As cyclin A destruction is required for sister chromosome separation [7], a failure in Grp-promoted cyclin destruction can also explain the mitotic phenotype. The mitotic failure described previously for cycle 12 grp embryos might be a more severe form of the phenotypes that we describe in earlier embryos and we suggest that the underlying defect is reduced degradation of cyclin A.

Transcribed genes are localized according to chromosomal position within polarized Drosophila embryonic nuclei.

When some genes are silenced, their positions within the nucleus can change dramatically [1] [2]. It is unclear, however, whether genes move to new positions when they are activated [3]. The chromosomes within the polarized nuclei of the fruit fly Drosophila have a well-characterized apical-basal orientation (the Rabl configuration [4]). Using a high-resolution in situ hybridization method [5], we found that each of 15 transcribed genes was localized as predicted by their chromosomal position and by the known polarized organization of the chromosomes. We also found that, within their specific apical-basal plane, most nascent transcript foci could occupy any radial position. There was no correlation between the apical-basal position of the transcribed locus and the final cytoplasmic site of localization of the RNA along the apical-basal axis of the cell. There was also no relationship between the distance of loci from the nuclear periphery and the amount of nascent mRNA decorating the gene. Our results are consistent with the view that effective transcription can occur without major re-localization of the genes themselves.

Evolutionary conservation of homeodomain-binding sites and other sequences upstream and within the major transcription unit of the Drosophila segmentation gene engrailed.

The engrailed (en) gene functions throughout Drosophila development and is expressed in a succession of intricate spatial patterns as development proceeds. Normal en function relies on an extremely large cis-acting regulatory region (70 kilobases). We are using evolutionary conservation to help identify en sequences important in regulating patterned expression. Sequence comparison of 2.6 kilobases upstream of the en coding region of D. melanogaster and D. virilis (estimated divergence time, 60 million years) showed that 30% of this DNA occurs in islands of near perfect sequence conservation. One of these conserved islands contains binding sites for homeodomain-containing proteins. It has been shown genetically that homeodomain-containing proteins regulate en expression. Our data suggested that this regulation may be direct. The remaining conserved islands may contain binding sites for other regulatory proteins.