Maternal Reaction and Psychological Coping After Diagnosis of Congenital Heart Disease.

OBJECTIVES: A diagnosis of congenital heart disease (CHD) during fetal life or infancy can be devastating for parents, resulting in significant psychological stressors. The goals of this study were to (1) assess maternal resolution and adaptation to a new diagnosis of CHD, (2) explore how maternal resolution and adaptation relates to psychological well-being and (3) evaluate whether specific illness parameters impact resolution status. METHODS: This cross-sectional study evaluated resolution to diagnosis in the first 6 months of life for mothers of children with CHD. Mothers completed a Reaction to Diagnosis Interview (RDI) and psychological surveys assessing stress, depression, and coping skills. The RDI invites parents to discuss the diagnosis, changes in their thoughts and feelings since the diagnosis, and reflections on why they think they have a child with a medical condition. A chart review of the child recording illness parameters was also performed. RESULTS: Thirty-six mothers participated in this study. Twelve of their children had a prenatal diagnosis of CHD (33.3%). Seventeen mothers (47.2%) were unresolved to the diagnosis of CHD in their child, regardless of the timing or severity of the diagnosis. Twenty-four participants (68.6%) had significant or highly significant life stress and 9 participants (25.7%) had clinical concerns or met criteria for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. Nineteen mothers (55.9%) were at risk for clinical depression. Mothers unresolved to the diagnosis had higher rates of post-traumatic stress than those resolved to the diagnosis (47.1% vs. 10.5%, p = 0.03). Mothers of infants with a prenatal diagnosis of CHD reported significantly lower rates of life stress despite higher severity of heart defects (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE: Mothers of infants with CHD have similar proportions of resolution to diagnosis compared to mothers of children with other chronic diseases. They experience a high rate of symptoms of life stress, post-traumatic stress and clinical depression. Symptoms of post-traumatic stress are higher in mothers unresolved to the diagnosis. Identification of those at highest risk for poor adaptation to the diagnosis may allow for targeted psychological support services for those most vulnerable.

A diagnosis of congenital heart disease can result in significant parental stress and negatively impact parental and child bonding. Our study demonstrates that parents of infants with cardiac disease experience high rates of life stress, post-traumatic stress and clinical depression. Mothers unresolved to the diagnosis have higher rates of post-traumatic stress. Those who received a prenatal diagnosis had lower life stress despite greater disease severity. Identification of mothers at highest risk for poor adaptation to the diagnosis may allow for targeted psychological support services for those most vulnerable.

Longitudinal and bidirectional associations between family conflict and adolescents' e-cigarette use.

INTRODUCTION: This study examined potential longitudinal and bidirectional relationships between family conflict and adolescent e-cigarette use, and whether gender moderated these associations. METHODS: Adolescents (NT1 = 1334; Mage = 13.11, SD = 0.82; 52% female; 50% White) from the United States completed surveys in the spring of 2016 and again in the fall of 2017. RESULTS: Logistic regression analyses indicated that after controlling for previous e-cigarette use, family conflict was positively associated with a greater likelihood of e-cigarette use 6 months later. Results from multiple regression analyses indicated that after controlling for previous family conflict, e-cigarette use was associated with increases in later family conflict, particularly for girls. CONCLUSIONS: Study findings highlight reducing family conflict and supporting family functioning as a possible intervention target for adolescent e-cigarette use, a major public health problem.

Goal commitment predicts cannabis use for adolescents in treatment.

Background: Commitment to change is an innovative potential mediator and mechanism of behavior change (MOBC) that has not been examined in adolescents with cannabis use. The Adolescent Substance Abuse Goal Commitment (ASAGC) questionnaire is a reliable and valid 2-scale measure developed to assess the adolescent's commitment to either abstinence or harm reduction model for adolescents, which in addition to decrease in negative consequences includes consumption reduction as a stated treatment goal. The objective of this paper is to examine the ASAGC's ability to predict adolescent substance use treatment outcome. Methods: During Sessions 3 and 9 of a 10-week treatment program, therapists completed the ASAGC for 170 adolescents 13-18 years of age with alcohol use disorders, the majority of whom (82%) were diagnosed with co-occurring cannabis use disorder (CUD). Results: Logistic regression analyses assessing goal commitment regarding cannabis use at Session 3 indicated that commitment to both abstinence and harm reduction predicted cannabis use at Session 3. However, only commitment to abstinence predicted later cannabis use (assessed at Session 9 and during aftercare). When goal commitment at Session 9 was examined, only commitment to abstinence predicted cannabis use, concurrently and longitudinally. These results indicated that adolescents who had higher scores for commitment to abstinence were less likely to be positive for cannabis use. In contrast, harm reduction was not a significant predictor of cannabis use. Conclusions: Findings demonstrate that goal commitment consistently predicts cannabis use treatment outcome. Commitment to abstinence specifically is a salient predictor for concurrent and future cannabis use. Further prospective study is necessary to determine whether harm reduction may be an attainable goal for some youth given normative delayed neurodevelopmental processes of inhibitive behaviors.

Do women prefer care from female or male obstetrician-gynecologists? A study of patient gender preference.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether men should be encouraged to enter the medical specialty of obstetrics and gynecology. METHODS: A self-administered survey was designed for and distributed to patients (N=264) in 13 obstetrics and gynecology waiting rooms in Connecticut. The survey was used to determine whether there were any patient preferences with regard to the gender of physicians providing obstetric and gynecologic care within this population. In addition, the rationale for any preferences was analyzed. RESULTS: The majority of patients (66.6%) had no gender bias when selecting an obstetrician-gynecologist, and an even larger majority (198, 80.8%) felt that physician gender does not influence quality of care. There was no statistical difference in patient satisfaction based on physician sex. Respondents self-reporting gender bias rarely selected obstetrician-gynecologists based solely on this factor and frequently choose physicians of the sex that was not their indicated preference, suggesting that several factors other than gender preference are more important in physician selection. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of women surveyed did not select their obstetrician-gynecologists based solely on physician gender. Although a small percentage of survey respondents did indicate a gender preference, it rarely influenced physician selection and was only a minor consideration when compared with other desirable physician attributes.