Long-term survival with first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a pooled analysis.

BACKGROUND: First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab prolongs survival versus chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We further characterized clinical benefit with this regimen in a large pooled patient population and assessed the effect of response on survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were pooled from four studies of first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced NSCLC (CheckMate 227 Part 1, 817 cohort A, 568 Part 1, and 012). Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate, duration of response, and safety were assessed. Landmark analyses of OS by response status at 6 months and by tumor burden reduction in responders to nivolumab plus ipilimumab were also assessed. RESULTS: In the pooled population (N = 1332) with a minimum follow-up of 29.1-58.9 months, median OS was 18.6 months, with a 3-year OS rate of 35%; median PFS was 5.4 months (3-year PFS rate, 17%). Objective response rate was 36%; median duration of response was 23.7 months, with 38% of responders having an ongoing response at 3 years. In patients with tumor programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) <1%, ≥1%, 1%-49%, or ≥50%, 3-year OS rates were 30%, 38%, 30%, and 48%. Three-year OS rates were 30% and 38% in patients with squamous or non-squamous histology. Efficacy outcomes in patients aged ≥75 years were similar to the overall pooled population (median OS, 20.1 months; 3-year OS rate, 34%). In the pooled population, responders to nivolumab plus ipilimumab at 6 months had longer post-landmark OS than those with stable or progressive disease; 3-year OS rates were 66%, 22%, and 14%, respectively. Greater depth of response was associated with prolonged survival; in patients with tumor burden reduction ≥80%, 50% to <80%, or 30% to <50%, 3-year OS rates were 85%, 72%, and 44%, respectively. No new safety signals were identified in the pooled population. CONCLUSION: Long-term survival benefit and durable response with nivolumab plus ipilimumab in this large patient population further support this first-line treatment option for advanced NSCLC.

Nivolumab with carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab for first-line treatment of advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: This international, randomized, double-blind phase III study (ONO-4538-52/TASUKI-52) evaluated nivolumab with bevacizumab and cytotoxic chemotherapy as first-line treatment for nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between June 2017 and July 2019, this study enrolled treatment-naïve patients with stage IIIB/IV or recurrent nonsquamous NSCLC without sensitizing EGFR, ALK, or ROS1 alterations. They were randomly assigned in a 1 : 1 ratio to receive nivolumab or placebo in combination with carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab every 3 weeks for up to six cycles, followed by nivolumab/placebo with bevacizumab until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by an independent radiology review committee (IRRC). RESULTS: Overall, 550 patients from Japan, Korea, and Taiwan were randomized; of these patients, 273 and 275 received the nivolumab and placebo combinations, respectively. In the present preplanned interim analysis with a median follow up of 13.7 months, the IRRC-assessed median PFS was significantly longer in the nivolumab arm than in the placebo arm (12.1 versus 8.1 months; hazard ratio 0.56; 96.4% confidence interval 0.43-0.71; P < 0.0001). The PFS benefit was observed across all patients with any programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression levels including PD-L1-negative patients. The IRRC-assessed objective response rates were 61.5% and 50.5% in the nivolumab and placebo arms, respectively. The incidence of treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or 4 was comparable between the two arms; treatment-related adverse events leading to death were observed in five and four patients in the nivolumab and placebo arms, respectively. CONCLUSION: The TASUKI-52 regimen should be considered a viable new treatment strategy for treatment-naïve patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC.

Effect of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors on pemetrexed plus platinum-induced hematological toxicities: a multicenter retrospective study using three propensity score analyses.

Hematological toxicities induced by pemetrexed plus platinum therapy remain a critical issue in clinical practice. We hypothesized that inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) can ameliorate pemetrexed-induced hematological toxicities through drug-drug interactions involving organic anion transporters. Thus, this study aimed to clarify whether RAS inhibitors (RASIs) could prevent pemetrexed plus platinum-induced hematological toxicities. We retrospectively analyzed data from 305 consecutive patients with non-small cell lung cancer or malignant pleural mesothelioma who received their first cycle of a pemetrexed plus platinum regimen and were treated with or without RASIs. The primary endpoint was the incidence of severe myelosuppression after the first cycle. Propensity score (PS)-matched, PS-adjusted, and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analyses were used. The number of patients with grade ≥3 hematological toxicities was 27 (8.9%). PS-matched analyses revealed that the concomitant use of RASIs was slightly associated with a lower risk of grade ≥3 hematological toxicities (odds ratio [OR], 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20-2.32; p = 0.536). Additionally, sensitivity analyses using PS-adjusted and IPTW methods demonstrated similar results (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.19-2.15; p = 0.463 and OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.11-1.29; p = 0.117, respectively). These findings suggest that RASIs might prevent pemetrexed plus platinum-induced hematological toxicities.

TATTON: a multi-arm, phase Ib trial of osimertinib combined with selumetinib, savolitinib, or durvalumab in EGFR-mutant lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Osimertinib is a potent, third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). The multi-arm phase Ib TATTON study (NCT02143466) was designed to assess the safety and tolerability of osimertinib in combination with other targeted therapies: selumetinib (MEK1/2 inhibitor), savolitinib (MET-TKI), or durvalumab [anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (anti-PD-L1) monoclonal antibody]. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer and disease progression on a prior EGFR-TKI were enrolled and allocated to dose-escalating cohorts combining osimertinib 80 mg orally (p.o.) once a day with selumetinib (25-75 mg p.o. twice a day; continuous or intermittent), savolitinib (600-800 mg p.o. once a day), or durvalumab (3-10 mg/kg intravenous every 2 weeks). RESULTS: At data cut-off (28 February 2018), 77 patients were enrolled and received osimertinib plus selumetinib (n = 36), savolitinib (n = 18), or durvalumab (n = 23). Most common adverse events (any grade), occurring in ≥20% of patients across dose groups, were: selumetinib arm-diarrhea (75%), rash (58%), nausea (47%); savolitinib arm-nausea (67%), rash (56%), vomiting (50%); durvalumab arm-rash (48%), vomiting (43%), diarrhea (39%). Dose-limiting toxicities were reported in the selumetinib 25 mg (n = 1), 50 mg (n = 1), and 75 mg (n = 4) continuous-dose groups, savolitinib 600 mg (n = 1) and 800 mg dose groups (n = 2), and durvalumab 10 mg/kg (n = 1) dose group. The objective response rate was 42% (95% confidence interval 26% to 59%), 44% (22% to 69%), and 43% (23% to 66%) in the selumetinib, savolitinib, and durvalumab arms, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate the feasibility of combining osimertinib 80 mg with selumetinib or savolitinib at identified tolerable, active doses. A combination of osimertinib with durvalumab was not feasible due to increased reporting of interstitial lung disease. Osimertinib-based combination therapies represent a compelling approach now being further investigated. CLINICAL TRIALS NUMBER: NCT02143466.

Prospective and clinical validation of ALK immunohistochemistry: results from the phase I/II study of alectinib for ALK-positive lung cancer (AF-001JP study).

BACKGROUND: Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusions need to be accurately and efficiently detected for ALK inhibitor therapy. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) remains the reference test. Although increasing data are supporting that ALK immunohistochemistry (IHC) is highly concordant with FISH, IHC screening needed to be clinically and prospectively validated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the AF-001JP trial for alectinib, 436 patients were screened for ALK fusions through IHC (n = 384) confirmed with FISH (n = 181), multiplex RT-PCR (n = 68), or both (n = 16). IHC results were scored with iScore. RESULT: ALK fusion was positive in 137 patients and negative in 250 patients. Since the presence of cancer cells in the samples for RT-PCR was not confirmed, ALK fusion negativity could not be ascertained in 49 patients. IHC interpreted with iScore showed a 99.4% (173/174) concordance with FISH. All 41 patients who had iScore 3 and were enrolled in phase II showed at least 30% tumor reduction with 92.7% overall response rate. Two IHC-positive patients with an atypical FISH pattern responded to ALK inhibitor therapy. The reduction rate was not correlated with IHC staining intensity. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed (i) that when sufficiently sensitive and appropriately interpreted, IHC can be a stand-alone diagnostic for ALK inhibitor therapies; (ii) that when atypical FISH patterns are accompanied by IHC positivity, the patients should be considered as candidates for ALK inhibitor therapies, and (iii) that the expression level of ALK fusion is not related to the level of response to ALK inhibitors and is thus not required for patient selection. REGISTRATION NUMBER: JapicCTI-101264 (This study is registered with the Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center).

Patient-reported outcomes with selpercatinib treatment in patients with RET-driven cancers in the phase I/II LIBRETTO-001 trial.

BACKGROUND: This post-hoc retrospective study describes long-term patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for REarranged during Transfection (RET)-altered non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), medullary thyroid cancer (MTC), non-MTC thyroid cancer (TC), and tumor agnostic (TA) patients (Data cut-off: January 2023) from the LIBRETTO-001 trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30). Patients with MTC also completed a modified version of the Systemic Therapy-Induced Diarrhea Assessment Tool (mSTIDAT). The proportion of patients with improved, stable, or worsened status after baseline was reported. PROs were summarized at 3 years (cycle 37) post-baseline for the NSCLC and MTC cohorts, and at 2 years (cycle 25) post-baseline for the TC and TA cohorts. Time-to-event outcomes (time to first improvement or worsening and duration of improvement) were reported. RESULTS: The baseline assessment was completed by 200 (63.3%), 209 (70.8%), 50 (76.9%), and 38 (73.1%) patients in the NSCLC, MTC, TC, and TA cohorts, respectively. The total compliance rate was 80%, 82%, 70%, and 85%, respectively. Approximately 75% (NSCLC), 81% (MTC), 75% (TC), and 40% (TA) of patients across all cohorts reported improved or stable QLQ-C30 scores at year 3 (NSCLC and MTC) or year 2 (TC and TA) with continuous selpercatinib use. Across cohorts, the median time to first improvement ranged from 2.0 to 19.4 months, the median duration of improvement ranged from 1.9 to 28.2 months, and the median time to first worsening ranged from 5.6 to 44.2 months. The total compliance rate for the mSTIDAT was 83.7% and the proportion of patients with MTC who reported diarrhea on the mSTIDAT was reduced from 80.8% at baseline to 35.6% at year 3. CONCLUSIONS: A majority of patients with RET-driven cancers improved or remained stable on most QLQ-C30 domains, demonstrating favorable health-related quality of life as measured by the QLQ-C30 during long-term treatment with selpercatinib.

Association between skin toxicity and efficacy of necitumumab in squamous non-small-cell lung cancer: a pooled analysis of two randomized clinical trials-SQUIRE and JFCM.

BACKGROUND: Efficacy of necitumumab [recombinant human monoclonal antibody that blocks the ligand binding epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)] in patients with squamous (SQ) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been confirmed in two randomized clinical trials (SQUIRE and JFCM). This study evaluated the association between efficacy and initial skin toxicity with necitumumab treatment by analyzing pooled data from two clinical trials (SQUIRE and JFCM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data of 635 patients with SQ-NSCLC (intent-to-treat population) treated with necitumumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin (N + GC) were pooled from two clinical trials (SQUIRE and JFCM). The relationship between skin toxicities developed by the end of the second cycle and efficacy was evaluated. Efficacy endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR). Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out for these endpoints. RESULTS: OS and ORR were associated with skin toxicity, whereas PFS was not. Patients with grade ≥2 or grade 1 skin toxicity had significantly longer OS compared to patients without skin toxicity (grade 0) in the N + GC group [median = 15.0 (grade ≥2); 12.7 (grade 1); 9.4 (grade 0) months; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.51 (grade ≥2 to grade 0); 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.40-0.64, P < 0.001 and HR = 0.64 (grade 1 to grade 0); 95% CI 0.52-0.80, P < 0.001]. In multivariate analysis, OS was significantly associated with skin toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: A significant association was found between necitumumab-induced skin toxicity and efficacy. These results are consistent with the previously reported association between other EGFR inhibitors-induced skin toxicity and efficacy.

Comparison of clinical outcomes of osimertinib and first-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in TKI-untreated EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer with leptomeningeal metastases.

BACKGROUND: Leptomeningeal metastases (LM) are devastating complications of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), has better penetration into the central nervous system than first-generation EGFR-TKIs, data on the distinct activity of EGFR-TKIs in untreated advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC with LM are lacking. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients treated with EGFR-TKIs for TKI-untreated common EGFR-mutated NSCLC with LM between July 2002 and July 2021 at the National Cancer Center Hospital. The patients were divided into two groups: patients treated with osimertinib (Osi group) and those treated with gefitinib or erlotinib [first-generation (1G)-TKI group]. RESULTS: Of the 967 patients, 71 were eligible, including 29 in the Osi group and 42 in the 1G-TKI group. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the Osi group were better than those in the 1G-TKI group (PFS: 16.9 months versus 8.6 months, P = 0.007, and OS: 26.6 months versus 20.0 months, P = 0.158). The LM-overall response rate (ORR) and LM-PFS were significantly better in the Osi group than in the 1G-TKI group (LM-ORR: 62.5% versus 25.7%, P = 0.007; LM-PFS: 23.4 months versus 12.1 months, P = 0.021). In the subgroup analysis of EGFR mutation status, LM-PFS for patients with exon 19 deletion was significantly longer in the Osi group than in the 1G-TKI group (32.7 months versus 13.4 months, P = 0.013), whereas those with L858R mutation in exon 21 did not differ between the two groups. In the multivariate analysis, osimertinib and exon 19 deletion were significant factors for better LM-PFS and OS. CONCLUSION: Osimertinib can be more effective for untreated common EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients with LM, especially those with exon 19 deletion, compared to first-generation TKIs.

Induction chemotherapy followed by gefitinib and concurrent thoracic radiotherapy for unresectable locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the lung: a multicenter feasibility study (JCOG 0402).

BACKGROUND: We conducted a feasibility study of induction chemotherapy followed by gefitinib and thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) for unresectable locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the lung. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received induction chemotherapy with cisplatin (80 mg/m(2), days 1 and 22) and vinorelbine (25 mg/m(2), days 1, 8, 22, and 29) followed by gefitinib (250 mg daily, beginning on day 43, for 1 year) and TRT (60 Gy/30 fractions, days 57-98). The primary end point was feasibility, which was defined as the proportion of patients who completed 60 Gy of TRT and received >75% of the planned dose of gefitinib without developing grade 2 or worse pneumonitis. RESULTS: Of the 38 enrolled patients, 23 patients [60.5% ; 80% confidence interval (CI) 48.8-71.3] completed treatment without experiencing grade 2 or worse pneumonitis. During the chemoradiation phase, grade 3-4 alanine aminotransferase elevations were observed in 37.1% of the patients. The overall response rate was 73.0% . The median survival time was 28.5 months (95% CI 22.5-38.2), and the 2-year survival rate was 65.4% . CONCLUSIONS: Although the results did not meet our criterion for feasibility, the toxicity was acceptable. This treatment warrants further evaluation among patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harboring epidermal growth factor receptor mutations.

First-line nivolumab + ipilimumab in advanced NSCLC: CheckMate 227 subpopulation analyses in Asian patients.

BACKGROUND: Nivolumab plus ipilimumab demonstrated clinically meaningful improvement in efficacy versus chemotherapy with a manageable safety profile in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and tumor programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥1% or <1% in Part 1 of CheckMate 227. Here we report efficacy and safety results for the Asian subpopulation. METHODS: Patients with stage IV/recurrent NSCLC were randomized 1 : 1 : 1 to nivolumab plus ipilimumab, nivolumab monotherapy, or chemotherapy (PD-L1 ≥1%) or nivolumab plus ipilimumab, nivolumab plus chemotherapy, or chemotherapy (PD-L1 <1%). Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival, objective response rate, duration of response, and safety were evaluated among patients in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. RESULTS: In the Asian subpopulation with PD-L1 ≥1%, 81 patients received nivolumab plus ipilimumab and 81 received chemotherapy. Median OS was not reached with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus 24.8 months with chemotherapy; 3-year OS rate was 53% versus 37% [hazard ratio (HR), 0.72; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47-1.11]. The 3-year progression-free survival rate was 26% versus 7% (HR, 0.65; 95% CI 0.45-0.96), objective response rate was 56% versus 37%, and median duration of response was 29.0 months (95% CI 15.0 months-not reached) versus 6.9 months (95% CI 3.9-11.1 months). Similar results were observed regardless of tumor PD-L1 expression and in Japanese patients. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 40% of patients receiving nivolumab plus ipilimumab and 36% receiving chemotherapy, in the overall Asian subpopulation (tumor PD-L1 expression ≥1% and <1%); no new safety signals were identified. CONCLUSIONS: At 3-year follow-up, nivolumab plus ipilimumab provided durable long-term efficacy benefits versus chemotherapy regardless of tumor PD-L1 expression in the Asian subpopulation, including Japanese patients. Consistent with findings for all randomized patients, these data support the use of nivolumab plus ipilimumab as first-line treatment of Asian patients with advanced NSCLC.

Phase II study of nedaplatin and docetaxel in patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the lung.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the lung has not advanced sufficiently. Nedaplatin is a second-generation platinum compound that is active against squamous cell carcinoma of the lung, with a response rate of ~40%. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the lung were treated with docetaxel (60 mg/m(2)) and nedaplatin (100 mg/m(2)) administered i.v. on day 1; these doses were determined in an earlier phase I study. The treatment cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. The primary end point was the response rate, and the secondary end points were overall survival, progression-free survival, and toxicity. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were enrolled. Eighteen of the patients were male, and the median age was 67 years. The objective response rate was 62%. The median progression-free survival time was 7.4 months. The median survival time was 16.1 months, and the 1-year survival rate was 66.7% (95% confidence interval 46.5% to 86.8%). The most common adverse event was neutropenia (grade 3/4, 86%). Non-hematological toxic effects were relatively mild. One patient died of sepsis. CONCLUSIONS: Combination chemotherapy with nedaplatin and docetaxel is highly active and has an acceptable toxicity. Further investigation of nedaplatin and docetaxel is warranted.

Characteristics and outcomes of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer who declined to participate in randomised clinical chemotherapy trials.

There are inadequate data on the outcomes of patients who declined to participate in randomised clinical trials as compared with those of participants. We retrospectively reviewed the patient characteristics and treatment outcomes of both participants and non-participants in the two randomised trials for chemotherapy-naive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Trial 1 compared four platinum-based combination regimens. Trial 2 compared two sequences of carboplatin plus paclitaxel and gefitinib therapies. Nineteen of 119 (16%) and 153 (37%) patients declined to participate in Trials 1 and 2, respectively. Among the background patient characteristics, the only variable associated with trial participation or declining was the patients' attending physicians (P<0.001). Important differences were not observed in the clinical outcomes between participants and non-participants, for whom the response rates were 30.6 vs 34.2% and the median survival times were 489 vs 461 days, respectively. The hazard ratio for overall survival, adjusted for other confounding variables, was 0.965 (95% confidence interval: 0.73-1.28). In conclusion, there was no evidence to suggest any difference in the characteristics and clinical outcomes between participants and non-participants. Trial designs and the doctor-patient relationship may have an impact on the patient accrual to randomised trials.

c-Ha-ras down regulates the alpha-fetoprotein gene but not the albumin gene in human hepatoma cells.

We studied the effects of transfection of the normal c-Ha-ras gene, rasGly-12, and its oncogenic mutant, rasVal-12, on expression of the alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and albumin genes in a human hepatoma cell line, HuH-7. The mutant and, to a lesser extent, the normal ras gene caused reduction of the AFP mRNA but not the albumin mRNA level in transfected HuH-7 cells. Cotransfection experiments with a rasVal-12 expression plasmid and a chloramphenicol acetyltransferase reporter gene fused to AFP regulatory sequences showed that rasVal-12 suppressed the activity of enhancer and promoter regions containing A + T-rich sequences (AT motif). In contrast, rasVal-12 did not affect the promoter activity of the albumin and human hepatitis B virus pre-S1 genes even though these promoters contain homologous A + T-rich elements. ras transfection appeared to induce phosphorylation of nuclear proteins that interact with the AFP AT motif, since gel mobility analysis revealed the formation of slow-moving complexes which was reversed by phosphatase treatment. However, similar changes in complex formation were observed with the albumin and hepatitis B surface antigen pre-S1 promoters. Therefore, this effect alone cannot explain the specific down regulation of the AFP promoter and enhancer activity. ras-mediated suppression of the AFP gene may reflect the process of developmental gene regulation in which AFP gene transcription is controlled by a G-protein-linked signal transduction cascade triggered by external growth stimuli.

Correlation of therapeutic outcome in non-small cell lung cancer and DNA damage assayed by polymerase chain reaction in leukocytes damaged in vitro.

A pilot study was conducted in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer to examine whether the gene-specific damage in mononuclear cells (MNCs) incubated with cisplatin in vitro correlates with chemotherapeutic outcome in cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Twenty-one patients received cisplatin-based chemotherapy, consisting of cisplatin (80 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1), vindesine (3 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1 and 8), with or without mitomycin (8 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1). MNCs from peripheral blood were obtained from each patient before chemotherapy. The cells were incubated with cisplatin for 3 h in vitro and the 2.7-kb fragment of the hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase gene was amplified by PCR for quantitation of DNA damage. There was a 4-fold interpatient variation in DNA damage in MNCs. Seven of 21 patients had a partial response to chemotherapy. When the dose of cisplatin required to reduce amplification of the hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase sequence by 63% (D63 value) of MNCs was compared in each patient (defined by a Poisson distribution as the dose that produced an average of one lesion per single strand of the 2.7-kb fragment), the mean D63 value in patients showing a partial response (n = 7; 52 +/- 11 micrograms/ml) was significantly lower than that in patients showing no change (n = 10; 81 +/- 20 micrograms/ml; P = 0.0045) and in patients with disease progression (n = 4; 115 +/- 34 micrograms/ml; P = 0.0012). The mean D63 in patients with no change was also significantly lower than that in the patients with disease progression (P = 0.0386). Seven (70%) of 10 patients with a D63 value < 70 micrograms/ml were responders. No relationship was observed between the D63 values and hematological and nonhematological toxicities. It is suggested that DNA damage in MNCs incubated by cisplatin treatment in vitro in responders was greater than that in nonresponders. Gene-specific damage in MNCs from peripheral blood incubated with cisplatin in vitro assayed by PCR may predict the chemotherapeutic response in cisplatin-based chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer.

Decreased accumulation as a mechanism of resistance to cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) in human non-small cell lung cancer cell lines: relation to DNA damage and repair.

The mechanism of resistance to cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) (CDDP) is still controversial, although several kinds of processes have been proposed. For elucidation of the mechanism of CDDP resistance in CDDP-resistant human non-small cell lung cancer cells (PC-9/0.5, 7.1-fold resistant), we examined the formation of DNA interstrand cross-links (ICL), one kind of DNA damage induced by CDDP, its repair, and intracellular accumulation of CDDP. We measured the frequency of CDDP-induced ICL by means of the alkaline elution technique and the amount of intracellular platinum for intracellular accumulation of CDDP by means of atomic absorption spectrophotometry in PC-9 (parental cell) and PC-9/0.5 cells. Formation of ICL in PC-9 cells exposed to 5 micrograms of CDDP per ml for 6 h was 5.85 times that in PC-9/0.5 cells. On the other hand, the ability to repair CDDP-induced ICL was identical in both cell lines. Intracellular accumulation studies revealed that PC-9 retained 5.07 times as much platinum as that in PC-9/0.5 after 3-h exposure to CDDP. It was conjectured that the decrease in the intracellular accumulation of CDDP might be the main cause of CDDP resistance in PC-9 cells, since the decreased accumulation was paralleled by the decreased level of ICL.

Phase I study and pharmacological analysis of cis-diammine(glycolato)platinum (254-S; NSC 375101D) administered by 5-day continuous intravenous infusion.

A phase I study of cis-diammine(glycolato)platinum (254-S; NSC 375101D) was conducted in 15 patients with refractory or relapsing malignancy by 5-day continuous i.v. infusion. Three to 5 patients per dose were given 50, 75, 87.5, or 100 mg/m2/120 h (10-20 mg/m2 daily for 5 days). Toxicity evaluation and pharmacokinetic analysis were performed in 15 and 14 patients, respectively. Thrombocytopenia and neutropenia were the dose-limiting toxicities at the maximum tolerated dose of 87.5 mg/m2/120 h (17.5 mg/m2/day); however, nonhematological toxicities including renal toxicity, nausea and vomiting, and peripheral neuropathy were mild and well tolerated. The nadir of platelets and neutrophils was observed 4 and 5 weeks, respectively, after the initiation of drug infusion. Plasma and urine samples were obtained during and after infusion for quantification by atomic absorption spectrophotometry of total and free platinum levels derived from 254-S. The maximum level of total platinum was obtained after 120 h of infusion, whereas the steady state concentration of free platinum in the patients given 75 mg/m2 or more was over 0.1 microgram/ml. Free platinum levels declined monophasically, with half-lives of 0.65-2.56 h/100 mg/m2 dose. The mean area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC) in the patients treated with 75 mg/m2 was 1069 micrograms/ml, which was similar to that obtained in the patients receiving 100 mg/m2 of 254-S by i.v. drip infusion over 30 min. There was a direct correlation between the dose administered and the AUC of platinum (R = 0.757, P = 0.002) or the steady state plasma concentration of free platinum (R = 0.763, P = 0.002). The percentage of platinum excreted in urine 144 h after the initiation of infusion ranged from 73.1 to 100% for each dose level. No significant relationship was established between creatinine clearance in patients before treatment and the AUC or steady state concentration of free platinum. The plasma platinum AUC showed a linear correlation with the percentage of change in leukocytes [formula: see text] (R = 0.736, P = 0.003). In conclusion, the recommended phase II dose for a continuous infusion of 254-S is 75.5 mg/m2/120 h every 6 hours.

In vitro evaluation of the new anticancer agents KT6149, MX-2, SM5887, menogaril, and liblomycin using cisplatin- or adriamycin-resistant human cancer cell lines.

A new model to predict antitumor activity of new analogues was developed, and the cross-resistance against cisplatin (CDDP) and Adriamycin (ADM) was examined. A preclinical evaluation of various new analogues using this new model was performed. The antitumor activities of KT6149, MX-2 (KRN8602), SM5887, menogaril (TUT-7), and liblomycin (NK313) were evaluated against four non-small cell lung cancer cell lines, PC-7, -9, -13, and -14; two small cell lung cancer cell lines, H69 and N231; four CDDP-resistant cell lines, PC-7/1.0, PC-9/0.5, PC-14/1.5, and H69/0.4; a human myelogenous leukemia cell line, K562; and its ADM-resistant subline, K562/ADM by clonogenic assay. The relative antitumor activities of these new analogues were compared with those of parental agents, mitomycin C, ADM, bleomycin, and several anticancer drugs, CDDP, daunomycin, vindesine, and etoposide. KT6149 was more active than mitomycin C against all lung cancer cell lines and the human myelogenous leukemia cell line. Menogaril showed greater activity than ADM, and MX-2 showed activity similar to ADM. However, the antitumor activity of SM5887 was lower than that of ADM. SM5887 and menogaril showed cross-resistance to K562/ADM. Nevertheless, the antitumor activity against K562/ADM of MX-2 was similar to that of the parental cell lines. The activity of liblomycin was similar to that of bleomycin. Thus, KT6149 appears to be the best analogue for use in a clinical trial against lung cancer. MX-2 was active even against ADM-resistant cancer cells. The values of relative resistance to CDDP or ADM were 4.7, 8.1, 7.5, 20.0, and 13.6 for PC-7/1.0, PC-9/0.5, PC-14/1.5, H69/0.4, and K562/ADM, respectively. CDDP-resistant cell lines showed no cross-resistance with other drugs in this study. K562/ADM showed cross-resistance against daunomycin, etoposide, and vindesine. In contrast, mitomycin C and bleomycin had nearly equal activity against K562 and K562/ADM. However, K562/ADM was 2.4-fold more sensitive to CDDP than its parental cell line, K562 (P less than 0.001). These results suggested that the mechanism of CDDP resistance is different from that of multidrug resistance.

Phase I clinical trial of irinotecan (CPT-11), 7-ethyl-10-[4-(1-piperidino)-1-piperidino]carbonyloxy-camptothecin, and cisplatin in combination with fixed dose of vindesine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11), a semisynthetic derivative of camptothecin, has been demonstrated to be active against solid tumors such as non-small cell lung cancer and colorectal cancer. Two combination phase I trials were undertaken to determine the maximum tolerated dose of CPT-11 in combination with cisplatin and vindesine in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. All 46 patients (age 32-73 years) entered into these trials had a good performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score, 0-1) and had received no prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy. In the first trial, 14 stage IV and 2 stage IIIb patients were studied; in the second trial 30 patients with stage IV disease were accrued. In the first trial, CPT-11 was given as a 90-min i.v. infusion on days 1 and 8 in combination with a fixed dose of cisplatin (100 mg/m2, i.v., on day 1) and vindesine (3 mg/m2, i.v., on days 1 and 8), every 4 weeks. The starting dose of CPT-11 was 25 mg/m2, and the dose was increased in increments of 25 mg/m2. In the second trial, the doses of either CPT-11 (days 1 and 8) or cisplatin (day 1) were escalated with a fixed dose of vindesine (same dose as the first study) given in a 4-week cycle. The starting doses of CPT-11 and cisplatin were 20 and 60 mg/m2, respectively, and the dose of either CPT-11 or cisplatin was increased in increments of 20 mg/m2. At least 3 patients were entered at each dose level in both trials. Use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor was not permitted in this trial. In the first trial, grade 4 granulocytopenia and grade > or = 3 diarrhea were dose limiting at 50 mg/m2 CPT-11, which represented the maximum tolerated dose. At the subsequent dose of CPT-11, 7 new patients were requited at the 50% reduced dose level of 37.5 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8. Nine patients were evaluated for response, and 4 of them achieved a partial response. In spite of a low dose of CPT-11 (25-37.5 mg/m2), the maximum concentration in plasma of CPT-11 (> 0.4 micrograms/ml) reached > 10-fold the in vitro concentration of CPT-11 required for 50% inhibition of growth. In the second trial, the dose-limiting toxicities were grade 4 granulocytopenia lasting for > or = 7 days and grade > or = 3 diarrhea.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Phase I study of CPT-11 and etoposide in patients with refractory solid tumors.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and acceptable dose level of a cytotoxic regimen of CPT-11, a new camptothecin derivative, in combination with etoposide (VP-16) and to describe the principal toxicities associated with it. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with refractory solid tumors received VP-16 and CPT-11 daily for 3 consecutive days (days 1 through 3) every 3 or 4 weeks. Groups entered the trial at escalating CPT-11/VP-16 dose levels of 40/60, 60/60, 60/80, and 80/60 mg/m2. Thirty-four patients entered this study, of whom 33 were assessable for toxicity and 22 for therapeutic efficacy. RESULTS: Granulocytopenia was so severe that this regimen required supportive therapy with recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). The majority of the patients experienced a 5% weight loss and diarrhea was the dose-limiting toxicity. The MTDs were 60/80 and 80/60 mg/m2 administered on days 1 through 3. Five of seven previously untreated patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) achieved partial responses (PRs) to this therapy, as did two with NSCLC who had received prior chemotherapy, two with head and neck cancer, and one with an adenocarcinoma (primary tumor unknown). CONCLUSION: The recommended dose of CPT-11/VP-16 for this regimen with G-CSF is 60/60 mg/m2 on days 1 through 3 every 3 to 4 weeks. We suggest that the combination of topoisomerase I and II inhibitors is likely to be an effective treatment strategy. The activity of this regimen against NSCLC is particularly encouraging and should be evaluated in a phase II trial.