[A case of autopsy-confirmed duodenal perforation due to calcium polystyrene sulfonate].

A 77-year-old male patient was referred to our hospital because of jaundice. He was diagnosed with alcoholic liver cirrhosis and was admitted to our hospital because of liver failure. After admission, we observed conservative liver disease, but the liver damage did not improve and gradually worsened. Renal function deteriorated during liver failure. Hyperkalemia presented due to renal dysfunction. Hence, calcium polystyrene sulfonate (CPS) was initiated. He died because of liver failure although hyperkalemia improved. An autopsy revealed ulcer perforation with CPS crystals in the duodenum. A basic substance considered a crystal of CPS was found by hematoxylin and eosin staining from the ulcer adjacent to the perforation and the exudate attached to the peritoneum. Furthermore, a large amount of CPS crystals were found in the ascites. A final diagnosis of gastrointestinal perforation peritonitis due to CPS was made. Gastrointestinal perforation due to CPS is presumed as a direct mucosal injury due to the drug, most of which is the sigmoid colon of elderly patients. Upper gastrointestinal tract perforation is extremely rare. We experienced a case of autopsy in which duodenal perforation due to CPS was pathologically confirmed. CPS is a widely used drug for renal disorders, but it has a risk of gastrointestinal injury. Therefore, a potential gastrointestinal mucosal injury should be considered when using CPS.

Magnifying Narrow-Band Imaging with Acetic Acid Spray for Superficial Non-Ampullary Duodenal Epithelial Tumors Based on the Mucin Phenotype.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to identify the characteristics of superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs) based on the mucin phenotype using magnifying narrow-band imaging with acetic acid spray (MA-NBI) and evaluate the efficacy of MA-NBI in differentiating gastric-type (G-type) from intestinal-type (I-type) lesions. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 59 resected SNADETs in 59 patients who underwent MA-NBI. We evaluated surface patterns using MA-NBI to differentiate G-type from I-type lesions. Surface structures were classified into three patterns: tubular, villous, or oval structures. Lesions displaying a single pattern among the three patterns were classified as monotype, whereas those displaying multiple surface patterns were classified as mixed type. In addition, lesions with disorganized and unclear structures with irregular margins were classified as irregular surface structures. RESULTS: In total, 32 (54%), 26 (44%), and 1 (2%) lesions were classified as Vienna category 3, 4, and 5 tumors, respectively, whereas 49 (83%) and 10 (17%) were classified as I- and G-type lesions, respectively. Oval structures were more frequently observed in G-type lesions (70%), whereas tubular structures were more frequently observed in I-type lesions (78%) (p < 0.001). Category 4 and 5 lesions had significantly higher mixed and irregular surface structure rates than category 3 lesions (41 vs. 6%, p = 0.003 and 81 vs. 3%, p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: MA-NBI can distinguish the mucin phenotypes of SNADETs and may facilitate histological grade diagnosis.