Age-dependent treatment effect of vocal fold steroid injection for benign vocal fold lesions.

Objective: Benign vocal fold lesions (BVFLs) cause voice disorders and impair social life. Recently, office-based vocal fold steroid injection (VFSI) has gained attention as a minimally invasive treatment for BVFLs. This study aimed to analyze the age-dependent treatment effect of VFSI and to clarify the indications for treatment. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, a total of 83 patients with BVFLs were treated with a similar regimen of VFSI. Three or four months after the injection, age-dependent phonological functions were evaluated. The differences between pre- and post-treatment findings were analyzed using the Wilcoxon matched-pair signed-rank test, and the correlation between patient age and improvement rates were determined by Pearson's correlation coefficient. Results: Improvement in voice handicap index (VHI), which was the primary endpoint, was observed. Subjective and objective voice quality measurements also showed significant improvements. Subgroup analyses revealed that there was no age-related difference in the improvement of voice quality and that there was no improvement in aerodynamic effect in patients over 45 years of age. Conclusion: This study clarified the age-dependent treatment effect of VFSI and provided the important suggestion of establishing indication criteria for BVFLs. The study results provided clarity on the indication criteria of VFSI and served as an important indicator for tailoring treatment to patients' needs. Level of Evidence: 4.

Assessment of Dysphonia Using the Japanese Version of the Voice Handicap Index and Determination of Cutoff Points for Screening.

INTRODUCTION: The Voice Handicap Index (VHI) is recognized as a useful subjective assessment method for dysphonia. The original VHI has been translated into numerous other languages, including Japanese (J-VHI). Although the reliability and validity of the J-VHI have already been established, the cutoff point has not been determined. The aims of this study were to investigate the relationship between the J-VHI and other voice laboratory measurements, and determine the cutoff point. METHOD: This study included 167 dysphonic patients and 55 healthy volunteers. All patients and volunteers completed the J-VHI at the initial visit, and the following outcomes were determined: VHI scores of patients with dysphonia and healthy volunteers, VHI scores according to disease, cutoff point, and correlations between VHI scores and other voice laboratory measurements. RESULTS: Both the total VHI (VHI-T) and individual domain (functional domain [VHI-F], emotional domain [VHI-E], physical domain [VHI-P]) scores were significantly higher in the dysphonia group compared to the healthy volunteer group. VHI-T, VHI-F, and VHI-E scores were significantly lower in the benign mucosal lesion subgroup, compared to the other disease subgroups. The G scale and B scale of the grade-roughness-breathiness-asthenia-strain scale showed a significant association with VHI-T, VHI-F, and VHI-P scores. Similarly, the A scale showed a significant association with VHI-T, VHI-F, and VHI-E scores. The cutoff point (12) for VHI-T was chosen from the receiver operating characteristic curve to maximize sensitivity and specificity. Similarly, the cutoff points for VHI-F (5), VHI-P (5), and VHI-E (3) were also obtained. Significant differences in maximum phonation time, pitch range, G scale, and B scale were observed between the VHI-T negative (VHI ≤ 12) and positive (VHI-T > 13) groups. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that self-evaluation using the VHI could serve as an independent assessment and screening tool for patients with dysphonia.

Validation of the Japanese Version of the Singing Voice Handicap Index.

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to translate the Singing Voice Handicap Index (SVHI) into Japanese and validate the Japanese version of the SVHI. METHODS: The SVHI was translated into Japanese from the validated original version, and the questionnaire was administered to 102 singers with voice problems and 88 healthy singers. Internal consistency and test-retest methods were implemented to evaluate the reliability of this index. The internal consistency method assessed validity via Cronbach's α, and test-retest reliability was analyzed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and limits of agreement (LoA) according to the Bland Altman method. Construct validity was verified by confirming correlations between SVHI scores and visual analog scale (VAS) scores for disability in singing using Spearman correlation. Discriminant validity was evaluated by comparing SVHI scores between singers with voice problems and healthy singers using t tests. Using the Tukey's honestly significant difference (HSD) test, we also compared the Voice Handicap Index (VHI) and SVHI scores among three groups: healthy singers, singers with voice problems solely during singing, and singers with voice problems during both speaking and singing. RESULTS: The Japanese version of the SVHI showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.981) and test-retest reliability (ICC: 0.93). The 95 percent LoA was calculated to be between -20.8 and 33.9. Construct validity was verified through correlated SVHI and VAS scores (r = 0.736, P < 0.001). Discriminant validity was verified as the SVHI scores of singers with voice problems were higher than those of healthy singers (77.8±37.5 vs. 30.0±26.5, P < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in VHI scores between singers with voice problems solely during singing and healthy singers; however, the SVHI scores of singers with voice problems solely during singing were significantly higher than those of healthy singers (63.4±36.8 vs. 30.0±26.5, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: We confirmed that the Japanese version of the SVHI is a valid and reliable self-rated questionnaire for measuring the patient-perceived impact of singing voice problems among Japanese singers.

Complaints and Complications of Microlaryngoscopic Surgery.

PURPOSE: To examine the postoperative complaints and complications of microlaryngoscopic surgery (MLS) performed at a facility specializing in voice disorders. METHODS: The subjects were 550 patients who underwent MLS over a period of 2 years and 6 months starting in 2014; they were investigated retrospectively based on surgical and medical records. RESULTS: Postoperatively, some complaints and complications were identified in 66.0% of the subjects; sore throat was reported by 40.0%, which was the highest rate of complaints among all subjects. Tongue-related complications (numbness of the tongue, taste disorder, tongue pain, and hypoglossal nerve palsy) were observed in 16.9% of all cases, which was a relatively high rate. A median duration of 4 days was required to recover from tongue numbness (1.0 and 11.0 days for the 25th and 75th percentiles, respectively), while recovery from a taste disorder involved 4 days (4.0 and 14.3 days); a relatively long period was required for healing. However, 25% of taste disorders and 21% of tongue numbness cases required more than 2 weeks to recover; all cases recovered eventually. Almost all complaints and complications were temporary. Moreover, only three cases (0.55%) of tooth damage were irreversible. No other serious complications were observed. CONCLUSION: In previous reports, we examined the complications of MLS conducted by phonosurgery specialists at our hospital, which is a facility that specializes in voice disorders. An unexpectedly large number of patients complained of some symptoms after the operation. Because tongue-related complications tended to have a long healing duration, we think that preoperative explanations are important. We believe that the results of this study provide new insights into the incidence of complications and complaints after MLS and the healing duration.

Therapeutic Efficacy of Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor in Patients With Vocal Fold Atrophy.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: In recent years, basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) injection has been used in the treatment of aging-related vocal fold atrophy. This injection not only improves closure by increasing the mass of the vocal fold but also improves its viscoelasticity. However, it has been reported that fibroblasts targeted by bFGF treatment decrease in number with age. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of local injection of bFGF on age-related vocal atrophy as well as the influence of age on phonological outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. METHODS: Fifty-three patients with age-related vocal fold atrophy underwent single injections of bFGF in their vocal folds. Phonological outcomes were evaluated 3 and 6 months after injection by acoustic and aerodynamic measurements. RESULTS: Voice Handicap Index (VHI), maximum phonation time (MPT), jitter, shimmer, and pitch range improved after injection, and the effects continued for 6 months. In those over 70 years of age, VHI and MPT showed improvement at 3 and 6 months after injection. In addition, the degree of improvement in VHI and MPT did not differ significantly between those older than 70 years and those younger than 70 years. CONCLUSIONS: Regenerative treatments dependent on bFGF single injection was safe and effective for both early and late elderly patients suffering of vocal fold atrophy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2c Laryngoscope, 2020.