Raf Kinase Inhibitor Protein Expression and Prognostic Value in Soft Tissue Sarcomas.

OBJECTIVE: Soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) are heterogeneous tumors displaying multiple and complex molecular abnormalities with no specific pattern. Despite current therapeutic advances, the patients with STS still have a poor outcome, which makes it necessary to find out new prognostic markers. The Raf kinase inhibitory protein (RKIP) has been associated with prognosis in several human neoplasms; however, its role in STS is unknown. METHODS: In the present study RKIP expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry in a series of 87 STSs, and its expression profile was associated with the patients' pathological parameters. RESULTS: We found that RKIP is expressed in the cytoplasm of the great majority of cases, and absent in only approximately 18% of cases (16/87). Importantly, we observed that loss of RKIP expression was associated with poor outcome, constituting an independent prognostic marker. CONCLUSION: This is the first study assessing RKIP expression levels in STS. We showed that loss of RKIP expression is present in a small subset of cases; however, its absence was associated with poor survival and may be a potential marker for STS prognosis.

Characterization of monocarboxylate transporters (MCTs) expression in soft tissue sarcomas: distinct prognostic impact of MCT1 sub-cellular localization.

BACKGROUND: Soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) are a group of neoplasms, which, despite current therapeutic advances, still confer a poor outcome to half of the patients. As other solid tumors, STSs exhibit high glucose consumption rates, associated with worse prognosis and therapeutic response. As highly glycolytic tumors, we hypothesized that sarcomas should present an increased expression of lactate transporters (MCTs). METHODS: Immunohistochemical expression of MCT1, MCT2, MCT4 and CD147 was assessed in a series of 86 STSs and the expression profiles were associated with patients' clinical-pathological parameters. RESULTS: MCT1, MCT4 and CD147 were mainly observed in the plasma membrane of cancer cells (around 60% for MCTs and 40% for CD147), while MCT2 was conspicuously found in the cytoplasm (94.2%). Importantly, we observed MCT1 nuclear expression (32.6%). MCT1 and MCT4, alone or co-expressed with CD147 in the plasma membrane, were associated with poor prognostic variables including high tumor grade, disease progression and shorter overall survival. Conversely, we found MCT1 nuclear expression to be associated with low grade tumors and longer overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: The present work represents the first report of MCTs characterization in STSs. We showed the original finding of MCT1 expression in the nucleus. Importantly, opposite biological roles should be behind the dual sub-cellular localization of MCT1, as plasma membrane expression of MCT1 is associated with worse patients' prognosis, while nuclear expression is associated with better prognosis.