Upadacitinib treatment in a real-world difficult-to-treat atopic dermatitis patient cohort.

BACKGROUND: Upadacitinib was the first JAK-1 selective inhibitor registered for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Although efficacy and safety have been shown in clinical trials, real-world data on the use of upadacitinib in patients that have been treated with other immunosuppressants and targeted therapies is limited. OBJECTIVES: To provide real-world evidence on the use of upadacitinib treatment in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. METHODS: In this prospective observational single-centre study, all AD patients treated with upadacitinib treatment in the context of standard care were included between August 2021 and September 2022. Clinical outcome measures and adverse events (AEs) were analysed. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were included. The majority (n = 39; 81%) had failed (ineffectiveness) on other targeted therapies, including other JAK inhibitors and biologics. Thirty-four (71%) patients were still using upadacitinib treatment at last follow up (median duration 46.5 weeks). Fourteen (29%) patients discontinued treatment due to ineffectiveness or AE. Upadacitinib treatment led to a significant decrease of disease severity during a median follow up of 37.5 weeks. Median IGA at baseline decreased from 3 (IQR 2-3) to 1.5 (IQR 1-2) at last review (p < 0.001). Median NRS itch decreased from 7 (IQR 5-8) at baseline to 2.25 (IQR 0.25-6.5) at last review (p < 0.001). Three patients discontinued treatment due to AE. Forty-eight AEs were reported, including acne-like eruptions (25%), nausea (13%) and respiratory tract infections (10%). CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world cohort, we confirmed that upadacitinib is an effective treatment in a subset of AD patients that have failed several previous systemic immunosuppressive and biologic treatments. Overall, AE were mostly well tolerated and not a reason to discontinue treatment for most patients.

Tralokinumab treatment for patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in daily practice.

BACKGROUND: Evidence about tralokinumab treatment for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in daily practice is limited. AIM: To report the first evidence, to our knowledge, from daily practice of treatment with tralokinumab in patients with AD. METHODS: In this observational prospective study, patients with AD who received tralokinumab treatment in the context of routine care at the Erasmus Medical Centre were included between November 2021 and February 2022. This included 28 patients who had previously been treated with dupilumab, and 14 patients who had been treated with a Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi). The Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA; 0-4) and the numeric rating scale peak pruritus during the past 7 days (NRS itch 7d: 0-10), adverse events and reasons for discontinuation were analysed. A good clinical response was defined as any decrease in IGA and NRS itch 7d and if a patient was satisfied with the treatment and wished to continue with therapy. RESULTS: In total, 37 patients were treated with tralokinumab. Twenty-two (59%) patients showed a good response to tralokinumab treatment. Fifteen (41%) patients discontinued treatment because of inadequate AD control or adverse events. Treatment-related adverse events were mild in most patients. Half of the patients where treatment with dupilumab had failed had a good clinical response to tralokinumab. CONCLUSIONS: Tralokinumab was found to be effective in most patients in this cohort with difficult-to-treat, severe AD from daily practice. Interestingly, tralokinumab was also found to be effective in 50% of patients who had previously experienced insufficient response or adverse events with dupilumab treatment.

Use of beta-blockers for rosacea-associated facial erythema and flushing: A systematic review and update on proposed mode of action.

BACKGROUND: Flushing and erythema are frequent skin symptoms in rosacea. Because their adequate treatment remains a clinical challenge, new treatment options are explored, such as oral ß-blockers. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of oral ß-blockers for rosacea-associated facial flushing and erythema. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched, including studies providing original data on the efficacy of oral ß-blockers in rosacea patients with facial flushing and/or persistent erythema. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, Newcastle-Ottawa scale, and Quality in Prognosis Studies tool. RESULTS: Nine studies evaluating the use of carvedilol, propranolol, nadolol, and ß-blockers in general were included. Articles studying carvedilol and propranolol showed a large reduction of erythema and flushing during treatment with a rapid onset of symptom control. Bradycardia and hypotension were the most commonly described adverse events. LIMITATIONS: Most studies had a retrospective design with a small sample size, and outcome measurement was often subjective. CONCLUSIONS: Oral ß-blockers could be an effective treatment option for patients with rosacea with facial erythema and flushing that does not respond to conventional therapy. Larger prospective trials with objective outcome assessment are needed to validate the promising results of these studies.

Anatomical site variation of water content in human skin measured by the Epsilon: A pilot study.

BACKGROUND: This pilot study aimed to investigate the anatomical site variation of water content of the stratum corneum (SC) on the body by measuring skin capacitance with the Epsilon, a new generation corneometer with multiple sensors. Secondly, values of the Epsilon were compared to values measured by conventional single sensor corneometers. METHODS: The hydration status of SC was measured in 15 healthy Caucasian volunteers with the Epsilon at five body sites (cheek, lower forearm, mid-calf, lower back and abdomen). Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) was measured with the Aquaflux to get more insight into the condition of the skin barrier. A literature search was performed to compare Epsilon values with conventional corneometers. RESULTS: The tested anatomical locations showed significant differences in water content (P < 0.001) with large interindividual variations; highest values were found in the cheek (11.64ε) and lowest values in the mid-calf (4.43ε). No correlation between water content and TEWL was found. In general, Epsilon values were lower compared to values of conventional corneometers, with a similar trend. CONCLUSION: This pilot study showed significant variations in water content at different skin locations measured by the Epsilon. Moreover, the Epsilon measured consistent lower values compared to single sensor corneometers. Further validation of the device is recommended.