The SUB-urothelial DUrvalumab InjEction-1 (SUBDUE-1) trial: first-in-human trial in patients with bladder cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety of sub-urothelial injection of durvalumab and examine the impact on tissue and circulating immune cell populations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The patients were chemotherapy and immunotherapy naïve (bacille Calmette-Guérin allowed) with non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer or non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer planned for radical cystectomy (RC). The study was a Phase Ib 3 + 3 dose-escalation design with sub-urothelial injection of durvalumab at three pre-determined doses (25, 75, 150 mg) diluted in 25 mL normal saline, injected at 25 locations (25 × 1 mL injections), at least 2 weeks before RC. RESULTS: A total of 11 patients were recruited (10 male, one female). No significant changes were reported on American Urological Association Symptom Score or O'Leary Interstitial Cystitis Scale. In all, 14 adverse events (AEs) were reported (10 Grade 1, three Grade 2, one Grade 3), none considered immune-related. No Grade 4 or 5 AEs were recorded. All the patients underwent RC. Tissue immune populations changed following durvalumab injection (P = 0.012), with a statistically significant increase in M2-macrophage (CD163) when comparing the 25-150 mg dose (P = 0.021). Basal/mixed cancers showed a larger CD163 increase than luminal cancers (P = 0.033). CONCLUSION: Sub-urothelial injection of durvalumab is feasible and safe without immune-related AEs and shows local immunological effects.

Malignant ureteral obstruction: comparison of metallic, 8 French and 6 French ureteric stents after failure of initial ureteric stent.

PURPOSE: Malignant ureteric obstruction is a significant management challenge. The failure of ureteric stents often leads to long-term nephrostomy tubes. This is delayed for as long as possible due to its' associated morbidity. Several types of ureteric stents are available, however there is little evidence demonstrating which stents are better for preventing progression to nephrostomy tubes. This study looked to determine whether a new 6 French (Fr) polymer stent, 8Fr polymer stent or metallic stent achieved a longer functional duration once the initial polymer ureteric stent failed. METHODS: A retrospective, longitudinal study was performed at a single tertiary institution. All patients who underwent ureteric stenting with a 6Fr polymer stent for malignancy between 2010 and 2020 were included. Patients were followed up until death with ureteric stent in situ or permanent nephrostomy tube insertion. RESULTS: A total of 46 patients (66 ureters) had ureteric stents inserted for malignancy. From initial ureteric stent failure, 10 stents were changed to a new 6Fr polymer stent, 42 were changed to an 8Fr polymer stent and 14 were changed to a Resonance® 6Fr metallic stent. The Resonance 6Fr metallic stent had the longest median functional duration of 14 months (p = 0.012). CONCLUSION: Resonance® 6Fr metallic stents appear to have a significantly longer functional duration than a new 6Fr polymer stent or 8Fr polymer stent, which may allow patients to enjoy a better quality of life and delay permanent nephrostomy tube insertion.

Comparing fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography in staging for nodal and distant metastasis in urothelial/bladder cancer.

Objectives: We aim to assess the clinical value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron (18F-FDG-PET) scan in detecting nodal and distant metastasis compared with computed tomography (CT) scan in patients with urothelial carcinoma or bladder cancer, aiming to improve staging accuracy and thereby better prognosticate and determine therapy. Methods: A retrospective review of 75 patients with invasive bladder cancer (≥T1) who were staged with both CT and 18F-FDG-PET within an 8-week interval was performed for the period between 2015 and 2020. Seventy-two per cent (54/75) had formal pelvic lymph node (LN) dissection or biopsy of lesions suspicious for metastases. FDG-PET definitions for positive sites were assessed depending on SUV Max (nodes with SUVmax >4 at any size, SUV > 2 for lymph nodes >8 mm, or any SUV if the lymph node was >10 mm on axial images). For CT scanning, enlarged LN by RECIST 1.1 criteria (>10 mm) as well as qualitative findings suggesting metastasis were considered positive. The analysis was based on the comparison of CT and 18F-FDG-PET findings to histopathology results from LN dissection or biopsies. Results: Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of CT versus FDG-PET for detecting metastasis, in patients who underwent pelvic LN dissection or biopsy of lesions suspicious of metastases, were 46.6% (95% CI: 21%-70%) versus 60% (95% CI: 32%-84%), 100% (95% CI: 91%-100%) versus 83.78% (95% CI: 69%-94%), 100% (95% CI: 63%-100%) versus 60% (95% CI: 32%-84%), and 82.2% (95% CI: 68%-92%) versus 83.78% (95% CI: 69%-94%), respectively. 7/75 (9.3%) patients avoided cystectomy due to 18F-FDG-PET features of metastases that were not detected by CT. Conclusion: FDG-PET may be more sensitive than CT for metastases in the staging of bladder cancer, which resulted in significant avoidance of aggressive local management in cases with occult metastasis.