Effect of a telephone and web-based problem-solving intervention for stroke caregivers on stroke patient activities of daily living: A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To test for effects of a problem-solving intervention for stroke caregivers on stroke survivor activities of daily living. DESIGN: Two-arm parallel randomized clinical trial with repeated measures at 11 weeks and 19 weeks. SETTING: Medical centers for US military Veterans. SUBJECTS: Caregivers of stroke survivors. INTERVENTION: A registered nurse guided caregivers in using problem-solving strategies emphasizing creative thinking, optimism, planning, and expert information to address challenges associated with caregiving. Caregivers in the intervention completed one telephone orientation session followed by eight online, asynchronous messaging center sessions. The messaging center sessions involved (a) education on the Resources and Education for Stroke Caregivers' Understanding and Empowerment website (https://www.stroke.cindrr.research.va.gov/en/), (b) supportive communication between the nurse and caregiver, (c) nurse and caregiver interactions to improve problem-solving, and (d) maintain adherence to discharge planning instructions. MAIN OUTCOME: The Barthel Index was used to measure activities of daily living. RESULTS: 174 participants (standard care n = 88, intervention n = 86) were enrolled at baseline. There were no significant differences between groups at baseline. Change scores in activities of daily living between baseline and 11 weeks were significantly higher in the intervention group than the standard care group (group difference = 6.43, 95% confidence interval: 1.28, 11.58). Group differences in change scores between baseline and 19 weeks were not statistically significant (group difference = 3.89, 95% confidence interval: -3.58, 11.36). CONCLUSIONS: This web-based caregiver intervention improved stroke survivor activities of daily living by 11 weeks, but intervention effects were undetectable after 19 weeks.

A randomized controlled trial to evaluate and assess the effect of comprehensive pre-end stage kidney disease education on home dialysis use in veterans, rationale and design.

BACKGROUND: Informed dialysis selection and greater home dialysis use are the two long-desired, underachieved targets of advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) care in the US healthcare system. Observational institutional studies have shown that comprehensive pre-kidney failure, conventionally referred to as end stage kidney disease education (CPE) can improve both these outcomes. However, lack of validated protocols, well-controlled studies, and systemic models have limited wide-spread adoption of CPE in the US. We hypothesized that a universal CPE and patient-centered initiation of kidney replacement therapy can improve multiple clinical, patient-centered and health service outcomes in advanced CKD and kidney failure requiring dialysis therapy. METHODS: Trial to Evaluate and Assess the effects of CPE on Home dialysis in Veterans (TEACH-VET) is a multi-method randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate the effects of a system-based approach for providing CPE to all Veterans with advanced CKD across a regional healthcare System. The study will randomize 544 Veterans with non-dialysis stage 4 and 5 CKD in a 1:1 allocation stratified by their annual family income and the stage of CKD to an intervention (CPE) arm or control arm. Intervention arm will receive a two-phase CPE in an intent-to-teach manner. Control arm will receive usual clinical care supplemented by resources for the freely-available kidney disease information. Participants will be followed after intervention/control for the duration of the study or until 90-days post-kidney failure, whichever occurs earlier. RESULTS: The primary outcome will assess the proportion of Veterans using home dialysis at 90-days post-kidney failure, and secondary outcomes will include post-intervention/control CKD knowledge, confidence in dialysis decision and home dialysis selection. Qualitative arm of the study will use semi-structured interviews to in-depth assess Veterans' satisfaction with the intervention, preference for delivery, and barriers and facilitators to home dialysis selection and use. Several post-kidney failure clinical, patient-centered and health services outcomes will be assessed 90-days post-kidney failure as additional secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: The results will provide evidence regarding the need and efficacy of a system-based, patient-centered approach towards universal CPE for all patients with advanced CKD. If successful, this may provide a blueprint for developing such programs across the similar healthcare infrastructures throughout the country. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04064086 .

Evaluating a new referral pathway from physical therapists to rheumatologists: A qualitative study.

Early referral to rheumatology of people with suspected inflammatory arthritis is associated with better outcomes. Typically, these individuals are seen by a family physician who would assess the need for rheumatology referral. However, some may first consult a physical therapist where no physician referral is required. New interprofessional referral pathways, such as direct referral from a physical therapist to a rheumatologist, could enhance early access to a rheumatologist. Our objective was to explore perceptions of clinicians and people with inflammatory arthritis regarding physical therapists referring directly to rheumatologists. We used purposive and snowball sampling to recruit participants for five focus groups: rheumatologists, family physicians, physical therapists, people with inflammatory arthritis, and a mixed group of physical therapists and people with inflammatory arthritis. Thematic analysis revealed four core themes: difficulties accessing care, reluctance of family physicians and rheumatologists toward the new pathway, interprofessional relationships (or lack thereof), and opportunities along the referral pathway. The conclusions are that care must be optimized by ensuring swift referral for those who require it; and that there is a need for knowledge translation to all actors on the advantages of this new pathway.

Feasibility and acceptability of a telephone and web-based stroke caregiver intervention: a pilot randomized controlled trial of the RESCUE intervention.

OBJECTIVE: Assess the feasibility and acceptability of an Internet and telephone support and problem-solving intervention for stroke caregivers. DESIGN: Randomized controlled pilot trial with four arms: four-week intervention (n = 13), eight-week intervention (n = 13), eight-week attention control (n = 13), and standard care (n = 14). SETTING: Southeastern U.S. Veterans Health System. PARTICIPANTS: Informal caregivers of Veterans who suffered a stroke in the preceding 2.5 years were enrolled over an 18-month period. INTERVENTIONS: Intervention participants received RESCUE, a support and problem-solving intervention delivered via telephone and Internet by registered nurses. Attention control participants received active listening with no advice delivered by nurses via telephone. MAIN MEASURES: Feasibility of a larger trial was assessed via recruitment and retention. Acceptability was assessed using an adapted enactment tool and qualitative interviews. Changes in caregiver depressive symptoms and burden were measured by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale and Zarit Burden Interview. The study was not powered for significance testing. RESULTS: Of 340 eligible caregivers, 53 (16%) agreed to participate. Among those enrolled, 51 (96%) completed the study. Caregiver mean age was 60.3 (10.1), 49 (93%) were female and 36 (68%) were white. At baseline, 21 (39%) caregivers had high risk of depression and 18 (33%) had significant burden. Acceptability and enactment tool findings indicated positive participant responses to the intervention. Most rated the amount of sessions the "right amount". Qualitative analysis revealed the intervention was valued by and acceptable to caregivers. CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate the RESCUE intervention is feasible and acceptable to caregivers and warrants further testing.

Pressure Injury Education in the Department of Veterans Affairs: Results of a National Wound Provider Cross-sectional Survey.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to describe experience, training, educational needs and preferences, and perceptions of pressure injury (PI) prevention education of wound care providers in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) as an indicator of effectiveness of the mandated VHA PI Prevention Program. SUBJECTS AND SETTING: A convenience sample of national VHA wound care providers practicing in VHA facilities was compiled from members of special interest groups and committees and by referrals from known wound care specialists and clinicians (N = 1726). The response rate was 24% (n = 410). DESIGN: Cross-sectional, descriptive study. METHODS: A 42-item online cross-sectional survey was administered via a blast-email of the survey link to the sample. The survey link was active for 1 month (March 3-31, 2014). The survey queried demographic data, PI experience and education, and their perceptions and preferences for PI education. Quantitative responses underwent descriptive analyses, and responses to open-ended questions were analyzed by content analysis. RESULTS: The majority of the 415 respondents completed most of the questionnaire (n = 310, 74%). Half were board-certified providers with a mean wound care experience of 14.2 years (standard deviation = 9.8 years). Preference for type of wound training ranged from 17% for online gaming to 82% for face-to-face training. Training provided by facilities was perceived to be inadequate for wound care by 60% (n = 175) and inadequate for PI care by 49% (n = 142). CONCLUSIONS: The 2 greatest areas of need in PI care identified by wound care providers were education and documentation. These same issues were identified as problematic by an audit of PI prevention and management at 47 VHA facilities that was conducted by the VA Office of Inspector General.

Informed Dialysis Modality Selection Among Veterans With Advanced CKD: A Community-Level Needs Assessment.

Rationale & Objective: The Advancing Americans Kidney Health Executive order has directed substantial increases in home dialysis use for incident kidney replacement therapy (KRT). Clinical guidelines recommend patients' self-selection of KRT modality through a shared decision-making process, which, at the minimum, requires predialysis nephrology care and KRT-directed comprehensive prekidney failure patient education (CoPE). The current state of these essential services among Americans with advanced (stages 4 and 5) chronic kidney disease (CKD) and their informed preferences for home dialysis are unknown. Study Design: We conducted a community-based, cross-sectional, observational cohort study across a large regional Veteran Healthcare System from October 1, 2020, to September 30, 2021. Setting & Participants: Of the 928 Veterans with advanced CKD, 287 (30.9%) were invited for needs assessment evaluations. Of the 218 (76% of invited cohort) responding, 178 (81.6%) were receiving nephrology care, with approximately half of those (43.6%) receiving such care from non-Veterans Affairs providers. Outcomes: The study was targeted to assess the prevalent state of ongoing nephrology care and KRT-directed pre-kidney failure education among Veterans with advanced CKD. The secondary outcome included evaluation of dialysis decision-making state among Veterans with advanced CKD. Analytical Approach: Veterans with advanced CKD with 2 sustained estimated glomerular filtration rates <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 were identified through an electronic database query, and a randomly selected cohort was invited for their current state of and outstanding needs for predialysis nephrology care and CoPE, essential for informed KRT selection. Results: Basic awareness of kidney disease was high (92.2%) among Veterans with advanced CKD, although only 38.5% were aware of the severity of their CKD. KRT-directed education during clinical care was reported by 46.8% of Veterans, of which 21.1% reported having received targeted CoPE classes. Three-quarters (74.3%) of Veterans expressed interest in receiving CoPE services. Overall, awareness of CKD and its severity and receipt of KRT-directed education were significantly higher among Veterans with nephrology care than among those without. Of the 61 Veterans providing their KRT preferences, overall decision making was poor, with three-quarters (73.8%) of the cohort unable to choose any KRT modality, irrespective of ongoing nephrology care. Only 8 (13%) felt confident choosing home KRT modalities. Limitations: The study results are primarily applicable to the Veterans with advanced CKD. Furthermore, a limited numbers of respondents provided data on their KRT decision-making state, prohibiting broad generalizations. Conclusions: In a first-of-its-kind community-based needs assessment evaluation among Veterans with advanced CKD, we found that awareness of kidney disease is positively associated with nephrology care; however, the informed KRT selection capabilities are universally poor, irrespective of nephrology care. Our results demonstrate a critical gap between the recommended and prevalent nephrology practices such as KRT-directed education and targeted CoPE classes required for informed patient-centered home dialysis selection in advanced CKD.

The Advancing American Kidney Health Executive Order recommended substantial, potentially unrealistic increases in societal home dialysis use. Unfortunately, we have not examined patient preferences for these targets to guide health care policies. Conducting a community-level needs assessment study among Veterans with advanced kidney disease, we found significant deficits in basic clinical care, namely the specialty nephrology care and dialysis-directed patient education services essential for informed patient-centered dialysis selection. This was expectedly associated with a suboptimal state of dialysis decision making, with about three-quarters of those surveyed being unable to select any dialysis modality. Our results show a critical need for provider and system-level efforts to ensure universal availability of specialty kidney care and targeted education for all patients with advanced chronic kidney disease.

On the Restorative Break: Understanding the Role of Break Room Design on Nurse Engagement and Satisfaction.

BACKGROUND: Healthcare organizations need to attract and retain qualified nurses, and break areas may influence nurse engagement with breaks, but this has not been studied in situ. The goal of this study was to understand nurse perception of breaks and ways building design and culture impact the frequency, duration, and location of nurse breaks. METHODS: This was Part 1 of a two-part study. Mixed-method approaches included on-site behavior mapping, focus groups, online survey, and break room usage rates analysis. FINDINGS: In this study, nurses did not take restorative breaks but focused on quick "bio" breaks in rooms nearest the central nurse station. When nurses left care floors, they preferred the cafeteria and outdoor eating spaces. CONCLUSION: Nurses' proclivity to minimize restorative breaks remains a major organizational concern. Future studies should investigate leadership activities impacting nurses' perception of shifts and break-taking behavior. APPLICATION TO PRACTICE: By optimizing the break setting and changing the cultural perspective of breaks, occupational health services and healthcare management can support nurses' engagement in restorative activities.

Electronic Phenotype for Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease in a Veteran Health Care System Clinical Database: Systems-Based Strategy for Model Development and Evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Identifying advanced (stages 4 and 5) chronic kidney disease (CKD) cohorts in clinical databases is complicated and often unreliable. Accurately identifying these patients can allow targeting this population for their specialized clinical and research needs. OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted as a system-based strategy to identify all prevalent Veterans with advanced CKD for subsequent enrollment in a clinical trial. We aimed to examine the prevalence and accuracy of conventionally used diagnosis codes and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)-based phenotypes for advanced CKD in an electronic health record (EHR) database. We sought to develop a pragmatic EHR phenotype capable of improving the real-time identification of advanced CKD cohorts in a regional Veterans health care system. METHODS: Using the Veterans Affairs Informatics and Computing Infrastructure services, we extracted the source cohort of Veterans with advanced CKD based on a combination of the latest eGFR value ≤30 ml·min-1·1.73 m-2 or existing International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 diagnosis codes for advanced CKD (N18.4 and N18.5) in the last 12 months. We estimated the prevalence of advanced CKD using various prior published EHR phenotypes (ie, advanced CKD diagnosis codes, using the latest single eGFR <30 ml·min-1·1.73 m-2, utilizing two eGFR values) and our operational EHR phenotypes of a high-, intermediate-, and low-risk advanced CKD cohort. We evaluated the accuracy of these phenotypes by examining the likelihood of a sustained reduction of eGFR <30 ml·min-1·1.73 m-2 over a 6-month follow-up period. RESULTS: Of the 133,756 active Veteran enrollees at North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System (NF/SG VHS), we identified a source cohort of 1759 Veterans with advanced nondialysis CKD. Among these, 1102 (62.9%) Veterans had diagnosis codes for advanced CKD; 1391(79.1%) had the index eGFR <30 ml·min-1·1.73 m-2; and 928 (52.7%), 480 (27.2%), and 315 (17.9%) Veterans had high-, intermediate-, and low-risk advanced CKD, respectively. The prevalence of advanced CKD among Veterans at NF/SG VHS varied between 1% and 1.5% depending on the EHR phenotype. At the 6-month follow-up, the probability of Veterans remaining in the advanced CKD stage was 65.3% in the group defined by the ICD-10 codes and 90% in the groups defined by eGFR values. Based on our phenotype, 94.2% of high-risk, 71% of intermediate-risk, and 16.1% of low-risk groups remained in the advanced CKD category. CONCLUSIONS: While the prevalence of advanced CKD has limited variation between different EHR phenotypes, the accuracy can be improved by utilizing two eGFR values in a stratified manner. We report the development of a pragmatic EHR-based model to identify advanced CKD within a regional Veterans health care system in real time with a tiered approach that allows targeting the needs of the groups at risk of progression to end-stage kidney disease.

Multisite Agricultural Veterans Affairs Farming and Recovery Mental Health Services (VA FARMS) Pilot Program: Protocol for a Responsive Mixed Methods Evaluation Study.

BACKGROUND: Veterans Affairs Farming and Recovery Mental Health Services (VA FARMS) is an innovative pilot program to provide supportive resources for veterans with interests in agricultural vocations. Implemented at 10 pilot sites, VA FARMS will provide mental health services and resources for veterans while supporting training in gardening and agriculture. As each pilot site project has unique goals, outreach strategies, and implementation efforts based on the local environment and veteran population, evaluating the pilot program provides a unique challenge for evaluators. This paper describes the protocol to evaluate VA FARMS, which was specifically designed to enable site variation by providing both site-specific and cross-site understanding of site implementation processes and outcomes. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this paper are to (1) describe the protocol used for evaluating VA FARMS, as an innovative Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) agriculturally based, mental health, and employment pilot program serving veterans at 10 pilot sites across the Veterans Health Administration enterprise; and (2) provide guidance to other evaluators assessing innovative programs. METHODS: This evaluation uses the context, inputs, process, product (CIPP) model, which evaluates a program's content and implementation to identify strengths and areas for improvement. Data collection will use a concurrent mixed methods approach. Quantitative data collection will involve quarterly program surveys, as well as three individual veteran participant surveys administered upon the veteran's entrance and exit of the pilot program and 3 months postexit. Quantitative data will include baseline descriptive statistics and follow-up statistics on veteran health care utilization, health care status, and agriculture employment status. Qualitative data collection will include participant observation at each pilot site, and interviews with participants, staff, and community stakeholders. Qualitative data will provide insights about pilot program implementation processes, veterans' experiences, and short-term participation outcomes. RESULTS: Evaluation efforts began in December 2018 and are ongoing. Between October 2018 and September 2020, 494 veterans had enrolled in VA FARMS and 1326 veterans were reached through program activities such as demonstrations, informational presentations, and town-hall discussions. A total of 1623 community members and 655 VA employees were similarly reached by VA FARMS programming during that time. Data were collected between October 2018 and September 2020 in the form of 336 veteran surveys, 30 veteran interviews, 27 staff interviews, and 11 community partner interviews. Data analysis is expected to be completed by October 2022. CONCLUSIONS: This evaluation protocol will provide guidance to other evaluators assessing innovative programs. In its application to the VA FARMS pilot, the evaluation aims to add to existing literature on nature-based therapies and the rehabilitation outcomes of agricultural training programs for veterans. Results will provide programmatic insights on the implementation of pilot programs, along with needed improvements and modifications for the future expansion of VA FARMS and other veteran-focused agricultural programs. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/40496.

Study protocol of a telephone problem-solving intervention for Spanish-speaking caregivers of veterans post-stroke: an 8-session investigator-blinded, two-arm parallel (intervention vs usual care), randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Stroke is one of the leading causes of death and the main cause of long-term disability in the United States. The significant risk factors of stroke among Hispanics are well-documented. The majority of stroke survivors return home following a stroke and are cared for by family caregivers. Due to the abrupt nature of strokes, caregivers experience unexpected changes and demands that oftentimes lead to caregiver burden and depression. Given the significant risk factors for stroke in Hispanics and the influence of culture in family norms and family management, we developed a telephone and online problem-solving intervention for Spanish-speaking stroke caregivers. This study tests the impact of a telephone and online problem-solving intervention for Spanish-speaking stroke caregivers on caregiver outcomes. METHODS: The design is a two-arm parallel randomized clinical trial with repeated measures. We will enroll 290 caregivers from 3 Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers. Participants randomized into the intervention arm receive a problem-solving intervention that uses telephone and online education and care management tools on the previously developed and nationally available RESCUE en Español Caregiver website. In the usual care group, participants receive the information and/or support caregivers of veterans with stroke normally receive through existing VA resources (e.g., stroke-related information and support). The primary outcome is change in caregiver's depressive symptoms at 1- and 12-weeks post-intervention. Secondary outcomes include changes in stroke caregivers' burden, self-efficacy, problem-solving, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and veterans' functional abilities. We will also determine the budgetary impact, the acceptability of the intervention and participation barriers and facilitators for Spanish-speaking stroke caregivers. DISCUSSION: This is an ongoing study. It is the first known randomized controlled trial testing the effect of a telephone and online problem-solving intervention in Spanish for caregivers of veterans post-stroke. If successful, findings will support an evidence-based model that can be transported into clinical practice to improve the quality of caregiving post-stroke. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03142841- Spanish Intervention for Caregivers of Veterans with Stroke (RESCUE Español). Registered on February 23, 2018. Protocol version 8. 08.11.2022.

Rural and Urban Home Modification Program Users: A Comparative Study.

OBJECTIVE: To understand the sociodemographic, geographical, and clinical characteristics of rural veterans utilizing home modification (HM) healthcare services under the Home Improvement Structural Alterations (HISA) program, to compare these characteristics between rural and urban veteran users, to estimate the costs of HMs performed, and to present distance that users traveled to HISA-prescribing medical facilities within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). BACKGROUND: Accessible housing is in short supply. HMs allow veterans with disabilities (VWDs) to remain living at home rather than enter institutional-type settings. HISA is associated with decreased inpatient hospitalization rates and increased use of preventative healthcare via outpatient clinic visits. Home accessibility provides psychological benefits improving social interactions and interaction with the physical environment. METHODS: This retrospective database study analyzes data from the National Prosthetics Patient Database and other medical datasets within the VHA. RESULTS: Results provide a profile of and comparison between rural and urban veteran users. HISA users are substantially older compared to younger VWDs. The frequency of bathroom, railing, and wooden ramp HMs differed significantly between rural and urban users (p values < .001). Rural users traveled more miles than urban users to reach a prescribing facility. CONCLUSIONS: Older adults and individuals with disabilities have unmet housing needs since accessible housing is in short supply. This HM healthcare service is helping to meet the housing accessibility needs of older veterans, VWDs, older adults, and people with disabilities, in general.

Development and validation of an end stage kidney disease awareness survey: Item difficulty and discrimination indices.

INTRODUCTION: Lack of awareness for chronic kidney disease (CKD), including end stage kidney disease (ESKD) and their management options is a major impediment to patients being able to select and use home dialysis therapies. While some instruments have been developed to measure CKD awareness, we lack validated instruments to evaluate patients' awareness of ESKD and dialysis modalities. This study is part of multipart project for developing and validating an ESKD-centric disease awareness questionnaire. METHODS: A team of specialty renal care experts developed a 45-items questionnaire encompassing the subdomains of General Kidney Knowledge, CKD Knowledge, and ESKD Knowledge. Item reduction analysis-specifically, calculation of item difficulty and item discrimination index scores-was used to items for further review and potential removal. RESULTS: Index scores were reviewed in conjunction with consideration of theoretical and substantive item content to reduce the number of items in the questionnaire, resulting in a 32-item questionnaire, retaining 5/10 items in the general kidney knowledge subdomain, 14/21 items in the CKD knowledge subdomain, and 13/14 items in the ESKD knowledge subdomain. Retained items ranged from 0.19 to 0.79 on the difficulty index, and from 0.31 to 0.81 on the discrimination index. Scores for percent correct on the reduced questionnaire spanned 0% to 87.5% correct on the full scale, 0% to 100% correct on the General Knowledge subdomain, 0% to 100% on the CKD Knowledge subdomain, and 0% to 92.3% on ESKD Knowledge subdomain. CONCLUSIONS: The questionnaire developed and refined in this study constitutes a patient disease awareness instrument that spans a range of difficulty, and yet shows strong ability to distinguish between patients with varying levels of disease awareness. This study is the first in part of a multistep project to addresses a gap in measuring ESKD specific knowledge. Accurate assessment of patients' disease awareness through a validated instrument can allow identification of knowledge domains leading to positive impacts on their healthcare decisions and improve targeted patient education efforts.

Provision of Kidney Disease Education Service Is Associated with Improved Vascular Access Outcomes among US Incident Hemodialysis Patients.

Background: Pre-ESKD Kidney Disease Education (KDE) has been shown to improve multiple CKD outcomes, but its effect on vascular access outcomes is not well studied. In 2010, Medicare launched KDE reimbursements policy for patients with advanced CKD. Methods: In this retrospective USRDS analysis, we identified all adult patients on incident hemodialysis with ≥6 months of pre-ESKD Medicare coverage during the first 5 years of CMS-KDE policy and divided them into CMS-KDE services recipients (KDE cohort) and nonrecipients (non-KDE cohort). The primary outcome was incident arteriovenous fistula (AVF) and the composite of incident AVF or arteriovenous graft (AVG) utilization. Secondary outcomes were central venous catheter (CVC) with maturing AVF/AVG and pure CVC utilizations. Step-wise multivariate analyses were performed in four progressive models (model 1, KDE alone; model 2, multivariate model encompassing model 1 with sociodemographics; model 3, model 2 with comorbidity and functional status; and model 4, model 3 with pre-ESKD nephrology care). Results: Of the 211,990 qualifying patients on incident hemodialysis during the study period, 2887 (1%) received KDE services before dialysis initiation. The rates of incident AVF and composite AVF/AVG were more than double (30% and 35%, respectively, compared with 14% and 17%), and pure catheter use about a third lower (40% compared with 65%) in the KDE cohort compared with the non-KDE cohort. The maximally adjusted odds ratios in model 4 for study outcomes were incident AVF use, 1.78, 99% confidence interval, 1.55 to 2.05; incident AVF/AVG use, 1.78, 99% confidence interval, 1.56 to 2.03; incident CVC with maturing AVF/AVG, 1.69, 99% confidence interval, 1.44 to 1.97; and pure CVC without any AVF/AVG, 0.51, 99% confidence interval, 0.45 to 0.58. The benefits of the KDE service were maintained even after accounting for the presence, duration, and facility of ESKD care. Conclusion: The occurrence of pre-ESRD KDE service is associated with significantly improved incident vascular access outcomes. Targeted studies are needed to examine the effect of KDE on patient engagement and self-efficacy as a cause for improvement in vascular access outcomes.

Do physical therapists follow evidence-based practices for treatment of inflammatory arthritis? Results from an online survey.

BACKGROUND: Physical therapists (PTs) should know how to best treat patients with inflammatory arthritis. OBJECTIVE: To document interventions chosen by PTs for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and whether choices follow evidence-based practice. METHODS: Licensed musculoskeletal PTs in Quebec, Canada responded to an online survey. Descriptive statistics illustrated proportions for each treatment choice and inferential statistics explored associations with demographic and practice-related factors. RESULTS: There were 298 PTs who responded to the survey. For both RA and AS respectively, most common interventions were mobility exercises (91.0%; 98.3%) and patient education (90.1%; 92.8%). For both cases, slightly >60% selected strengthening exercises. Passive forms of therapy were chosen by 36% of PTs for RA and 58% for AS. Aerobic exercise was rarely selected. PTs working in the public sector were less likely to use manual therapy for both RA (Odds Ratio (OR) 0.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.22,0.86) and AS (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.22,0.97). CONCLUSIONS: Most PTs chose mobility exercises and patient education, representing evidence-based approaches. Despite current recommendations, strengthening and especially aerobic exercises were not used as much. There is a need to increase awareness regarding the benefits of strengthening and aerobic exercise for these patients.

The RESCUE problem solving intervention for stroke caregivers: A mixed-methods pilot study.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: Stroke caregivers face many challenges after a family member experiences stroke. Because caregivers play such a crucial role in health care, there is a need for more interventions in web-based formats that focus on caregiver psycho-education and skills building. A pilot study was devised to determine the feasibility, acceptability, and value of an active, 4-week telephone and web-based intervention for stroke caregivers. METHOD/DESIGN: A one-group, pretest-posttest design with a mixed-methods approach was used. Qualitative data supplemented the quantitative findings. Community-dwelling caregivers of stroke patients were recruited from the Veterans Health Administration. Quantitative data were collected pre and postintervention. Semistructured interviews were completed with a subsample of caregivers to capture more detail about the acceptability and value of the intervention. RESULTS: Ninety-three caregivers were recruited; 72 caregivers completed the intervention and 21 withdrew (77% completion rate). From pre- to posttest, caregiver depression (p = .008) and caregiver burden (p = .013) decreased. Problem-solving abilities and health-related quality of life showed no change. Seventy-eight percent of caregivers rated the intervention sessions with the nurses as very helpful or extremely helpful, and 76% reported using the problem-solving strategies a moderate amount to extremely often. Interviews suggest that the intervention was valuable and led to new strategies to relieve stress and prioritize health. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: The intervention was feasible to implement and acceptable to caregivers. This intervention shows promise for fulfilling a need for more web-based interventions that focus on skills building and psycho-education, but more rigorous testing is needed to determine effectiveness. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Predictors of County-Level Home Modification Use Across the US.

Background: Geospatial analyses illustrating where the Home Improvements and Structural Alterations program (HISA) have been prescribed suggest that home modification (HM) services under US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is not prescribed and used uniformly across the US. Methods: The objective of this study was to identify county characteristics associated with HISA use rates, such as county-level measures of clinical care and quality of care, variables related to physical environment, and sociodemographic characteristics. Multiple regression analysis was used to predict county-level utilization rate from county-level variables. Results: County-level HISA use was highly skewed and ranged from 0.09 to 59.7%, with a mean of 6.6% and median of 5%. Percent uninsured adults and rate of preventable hospital stays emerged as significant predictors of county-level HISA utilization rate. Specifically, county percentage of uninsured adults was negatively related to county-level HISA utilization rate (b = -8.99, P = .005). The higher the proportion of uninsured adults the lower the HISA utilization rate. The county rate of preventable hospital stays was positively related to county-level HISA utilization rate (b = .0004, P = .009). County-level predictors of housing quality were not significantly associated with county-level HISA utilization rate. Conclusions: Our research fills a gap in the literature about the impact of county-level variables and the geographic distribution and use of HISA. More research is needed to understand and account for geographical variation in HISA use. This work serves as a first step at quantifying and predicting HISA utilization rate at a broad level, with the goal of increasing access to HMs for veterans with disabilities.

Making Decisions about Service Provision for Clients with Low Back Pain: Perspectives of Canadian Physiotherapy Professionals.

Purpose: This study identified the individuals responsible for making decisions about physiotherapy (PT) wait time, frequency of treatment, and treatment duration for persons with low back pain and determined which factors guided these decisions. Method: A cross-sectional survey was sent to Canadian PT professionals treating adult patients with musculoskeletal problems. It included a clinical vignette describing a patient with low back pain. Respondents were asked who made decisions about wait time, treatment frequency, and treatment duration as well as on which factors they based these decisions. Results: Clinicians were most often responsible for making decisions about treatment frequency and duration. Although clinicians and managers or coordinators were mainly responsible for making decisions about wait time, there was more variability depending on sector of care: in the private sector, administrative assistants played a much larger role. Clinical judgment, clinical guidelines, and patients' demands were the predominant factors influencing wait time and frequency decisions. Treatment duration was related to patients' goals, clinical progression, patients' motivation, and patients' return to work. Conclusions: Decisions about service provision for wait times are made by a range of stakeholders, and a wide variety of factors guide Canadian PT professionals' decision making. Identifying these factors is essential for informing a discussion of decisions about evidence-based and equitable service delivery so that the actors involved can reach a consensus.

Objectif : établir quelles sont les personnes responsables de prendre des décisions au sujet des temps d'attente et de la fréquence et de la durée des traitements en physiothérapie pour les personnes souffrant de douleurs lombaires, et déterminer quels facteurs orientent ces décisions. Méthodologie : les professionnels canadiens en physiothérapie qui traitaient des patients adultes atteints de problèmes musculosquelettiques ont reçu un sondage transversal, qui comprenait une mise en situation clinique décrivant un patient souffrant de douleurs lombaires. Les répondants devaient indiquer qui prenait les décisions au sujet des temps d'attente et de la durée et de la fréquence des traitements et sur quels facteurs reposaient ces décisions. Résultats : la plupart du temps, les cliniciens étaient responsables de prendre les décisions relatives à la fréquence et la durée des traitements. Même si la prise de décision sur les temps d'attente incombait surtout aux cliniciens et aux gestionnaires ou aux coordonnateurs, les responsabilités étaient plus variables en fonction du secteur de soins. En effet, dans le secteur privé, les adjoints administratifs jouaient un rôle beaucoup plus important à cet égard. Le jugement clinique, les directives cliniques et les demandes des patients étaient les principaux facteurs qui influaient sur les décisions en matière de temps d'attente et de fréquence. La durée des traitements dépendait des objectifs des patients, de leur progression clinique, de leur motivation et de leur retour au travail. Conclusions : de nombreux intervenants prennent les décisions sur le temps d'attente avant l'obtention des services, et toute une série de facteurs oriente les décisions des professionnels canadiens en physiothérapie. Il est essentiel de connaître ces facteurs pour éclairer les échanges sur les décisions relatives à une prestation de services équitable et fondée sur des données probantes, afin que toutes les personnes visées parviennent à un consensus.

Types of stroke-related deficits and their impact on family caregiver's depressive symptoms, burden, and quality of life.

BACKGROUND: Stroke caregiving has been associated with higher rates of caregiver burden, depression, and lower quality of life compared to non-caregivers. Little is known about relationships between stroke survivors' Cognitive/Emotional and Motor/Functional deficits and caregivers' outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between stroke survivors' Cognitive/Emotional deficits and Motor/Functional deficits and caregivers' depression, burden, and quality of life. METHOD: This is a retrospective secondary data analysis. The sample consisted of 109 caregivers of stroke survivors. Step-wise linear multiple regression analyses were conducted to determine if Cognitive/Emotional deficits and/or Motor/Functional deficits, were predictive of caregivers' depressive symptoms, burden, physical quality of life, and mental quality of life. RESULTS: The Cognitive/Emotional deficits category was a better predictor than the Motor/Functional deficit of caregivers' depressive symptoms, burden, and mental quality of life. The Cognitive/Emotional deficit score positively predicted both depression (ß = .49, p < .001) and burden (ß = 0.39, p < .001) and negatively predicted mental quality of life (ß = -0.42, p < .001), though it did not significantly predict physical quality of life (ß = -0.01, p = .90). The motor/functional deficits failed to significantly predict any of the caregiver outcomes (all p-values >.05). CONCLUSIONS: The Cognitive/Emotional deficits appear to impact caregiver well-being more than the Motor/Functional deficits. Understanding the impact of Cognitive/Emotional and Motor/Functional deficits on caregivers can help clinicians identify caregivers at the highest risk for negative outcomes.

Home Modifications for Rural Veterans With Disabilities.

BACKGROUND: Appropriate home modifications (HMs) can make the home environment accessible and relatively safe by reducing the risk of falls. Of special concern are individuals living alone, living in rural communities, and/or living in substandard housing. The Home Improvements and Structural Alterations (HISA) is a Veterans Health Administration (VHA) benefit program providing HMs for veterans with disabilities. METHODS: The objective of this study was to detail the profile of rural veteran (RV) HISA users and report on national HISA utilization patterns. We compare use at US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers of varying complexity levels, and in VA regions. An examination of the relationship between travel time/distance and HISA utilization is also provided. This retrospective database study uses GeoSpatial analyses and 3 VA sources: The National Prosthetics Patient Database, the VHA Medical Inpatient Dataset, and the VHA Outpatient Dataset. RESULTS: From 2015 through 2018, 10,810 RVs used HISA with a mean age of 70.9 years. A majority of participants were White (79.5%), married (74.3%), and male (96.5%) veterans. They traveled a mean of 79.8 miles for 94.5 minutes to reach a facility where they received a HISA prescription. Nearly 75% of HISA users were able to receive a HISA prescription from their nearest facility, while about one-quarter traveled to a facility farther away, of which 43% travelled between 100 and 200 miles to obtain the HISA benefit. The top categories of diagnoses were musculoskeletal (19.1%), neurologic (12.5%), and cardiovascular (5.4%). There were about 11,166 HM prescriptions afforded to rural HISA users during the period, including bathroom (82.4%), doorway (4.9%), and railing (3.6%) modifications. CONCLUSIONS: This study documents the national demographics and clinical characteristics of rural HISA users, data that may be useful to policy makers, HM service providers and advocate as well as HISA administrators in predicting future use and users.

Utilization of CMS pre-ESRD Kidney Disease Education services and its associations with the home dialysis therapies.

BACKGROUND: Kidney Disease Education (KDE) has been shown to improve informed dialysis selection and home dialysis use, two long-held but underachieved goals of US nephrology community. In 2010, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services launched a policy of KDE reimbursements for all Medicare beneficiaries with advanced chronic kidney disease. However, the incorporation of KDE service in real-world practice and its association with the home dialysis utilization has not been examined. METHODS: Using the 2016 US Renal Data System linked to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and pre-ESRD Medicare claim data, we identified all adult incident ESRD patients with active Medicare benefits at their first-ever dialysis during the study period (1 January 2010 to 31 December 2014). From these, we identified those who had at least one KDE service code before their dialysis initiation (KDE cohort) and compared them to a parsimoniously matched non-KDE control cohort in 1:4 proportions for age, gender, ESRD network, and the year of dialysis initiation. The primary outcome was home dialysis use at dialysis initiation, and secondary outcomes were home dialysis use at day 90 and anytime through the course of ESRD. RESULTS: Of the 369,968 qualifying incident ESRD Medicare beneficiaries with their first-ever dialysis during the study period, 3469 (0.9%) received KDE services before dialysis initiation. African American race, Hispanic ethnicity, and the presence of congestive heart failure and hypoalbuminemia were associated with significantly lower odds of receiving KDE services. Multivariate analyses showed that KDE recipients had twice the odds of initiating dialysis with home modalities (15.0% vs. 6.9%; adjusted odds ratio (aOR):95% confidence interval (CI) 2.0:1.7-2.4) and had significantly higher odds using home dialysis throughout the course of ESRD (home dialysis use at day 90 (17.6% vs. 9.9%, aOR:CI 1.7:1.4-1.9) and cumulatively (24.7% vs. 15.1%, aOR:CI 1.7:1.5-1.9)). CONCLUSIONS: Utilization of pre-ESRD KDE services is associated with significantly greater home dialysis utilization in the incident ESRD Medicare beneficiaries. The very low rates of utilization of these services suggest the need for focused systemic evaluations to identify and address the barriers and facilitators of this important patient-centered endeavor.