RESUMO
PURPOSE: We examined whether patients' satisfaction improved when patients' preoperative consultations were conducted with perianesthesia nurses (PANs) in collaboration with anesthesiologists, as compared with preoperative consultations conducted by anesthesiologists only. DESIGN: We conducted a study using questionnaires regarding outpatient satisfaction among patients who visited the perioperative management department of Yokohama City University Medical Center between July and December 2018. METHODS: There were 1,595 outpatients during the survey period. After exclusion criteria were applied, we analyzed 590 valid responses. FINDINGS: Regarding the level of understanding, 96.9% of the patients in the nurse-and-anesthesiologist group and 95.6% of the patients in the anesthesiologist-only group answered, "easy to understand," indicating no significant difference. A reduction in concerns, worries, and anxiety was reported by 86.3% of the patients in the nurse-and-anesthesiologist group and 70.4% in the anesthesiologist-only group, indicating a significant difference. Furthermore, 94.1% of the patients in the nurse-and-anesthesiologist group and 87.9% in the anesthesiologist-only group indicated patients' satisfaction with the overall evaluation, indicating another significant difference. A multiple logistic regression analysis was conducted to analyze the anxiety reduction and overall evaluation. We uncovered significant differences in PANs' examinations regarding anxiety reduction and overall evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: Collaboration between anesthesiologists and PANs might be associated with satisfaction and reduced anxiety in preoperative patients without adversely affecting patients' comprehension of anesthesia. Further research is necessary to verify the impacts of PANs' involvement in anesthesia patient care on intra and postoperative patient outcomes and on the cost and efficiency of anesthetic care.