Anatomic risk factors for the occurrence of medial talar osteochondral lesions: a case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the anatomical risk factors that may play a role in the etiology of medial-sided osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT) using morphological parameters in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty-four patients with medial-sided OLT and age- and sex-matched 124 controls were included in this retrospective study. Two examiners conducted independent OLT classification and measurements of five MRI parameters: tibial axis-medial malleolus angle (TMM), the anterior opening angle of the talus (AOT), talus position (TalPos), the ratio of the distal tibial articular surface to the length of the trochlea tali arc (TAS/TAL), depth of the incisura fibularis (IncDep). Statistical analysis included intraclass correlation coefficients, independent t-tests, receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, area under the curve (AUC) calculation, and logistic regression analysis. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: TTM, AOT, TalPos, and TAL values were significantly higher and the TAS/TAL ratio was significantly lower in the case group than in the control group (p < 0.001). Cut-off and AUC values for TMM were 15.15° (AUC 0.763), AOT 13.05° (AUC 0.826), TalPos 0.75 mm (AUC 0.887), TAL 35.45 mm (AUC 0.642), and TAS/TAL ratio 0.82 (AUC 0.784), p < 0.001. Multivariate logistic regression analysis results were odds ratio (OR) = 6.1 for TMM ≥ 15.15°, OR = 8.9 for AOT ≥ 13.05°, OR = 36.1 for TalPos ≥ 0.75 mm, and OR = 6.7 for TAS/TAL ratio ≤ 0.82. CONCLUSION: Ankle morphology might have an influence on OLT development. The talus position (TalPos) and anterior opening angle of the talus (AOT) seemed to be the strongest predisposing factors.

An accuracy evaluation of clinical, arthrometric, and stress-sonographic acute ankle instability examinations.

BACKGROUND: Ankle sprain injuries, often due to lateral ligamentous injury, are the most common sports traumatology conditions. Correct diagnoses require an understanding of the assessment tools with a high degree of diagnostic accuracy. Obviously, there are still no clear consensuses or standard methods to differentiate between a ligament tear and an ankle sprain. In addition to clinical assessments, stress sonography, arthrometer and other methods are often performed simultaneously. These methods are often costly, however, and their accuracy is controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate three different measurement tools that can be used after a lateral ligament lesion of the ankle with injury of the anterior talofibular ligament to determine their diagnostic accuracy. METHODS: Thirty patients were recruited for this study. The mean patient age was 35±14 years. There were 15 patients with a ligamentous rupture and 15 patients with an ankle sprain. We quantified two devices and one clinical assessment by which we calculated the sensitivity and specifity: Stress sonography according to Hoffmann, an arthrometer to investigate the 100N talar drawer and maximum manual testing and the clinical assessment of the anterior drawer test. A high resolution sonography was used as the gold standard. RESULTS: The ultrasound-assisted gadgetry according to Hoffmann, with a 3mm cut-off value, displayed a sensitivity of 0.27 and a specificity of 0.87. Using a 3.95mm cut-off value, the arthrometer displayed a sensitivity of 0.8 and a specificity of 0.4. The clinical investigation sensitivities and specificities were 0.93 and 0.67, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Different assessment methods for ankle rupture diagnoses are suggested in the literature; however, these methods lack reliable data to set investigation standards. Clinical examination under adequate analgesia seems to remains the most reliable tool to investigate ligamentous ankle lesions. Further clinical studies with higher case numbers are necessary, however, to evaluate these findings and to measure the reliability.

[Biological reconstruction of large bone defects : Masquelet technique and new procedures]. / Biologische Rekonstruktion von großen Knochendefekten : Masquelet-Technik und neue Verfahren.

Extensive diaphyseal and metaphyseal bone defects continue to pose a major challenge for orthopedic trauma surgeons. Various treatment options have been described for the biological reconstruction of these defects. The most frequently used methods are bone segment transport, the Masquelet technique and 3D printed scaffolds. As far as the Masquelet technique is concerned, in the first stage spacers, such as polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), calcium sulfate or polypropylene are inserted into the bone defects to induce a foreign body membrane. In the second stage the bone defect surrounded by the induced membrane is filled with autologous cancellous bone. The time interval between the first and second interventions is usually 4-8 weeks whereby the induced membranes do not lose their bioactivity even with a latency period longer than 8 weeks. Three-dimensional printed scaffolds are increasingly used but large clinical studies are lacking in order to show the exact role of this procedure in the reconstruction of bone defects.

Profit Analysis of Minimal-invasive Approaches for Surgical Treatment of A3 Spinal Burst Fractures.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Regarding the surgical treatment of incomplete burst fractures of the spine, no optimal standard procedure has been established. While previous studies have focused on radiological and surgical outcome parameters, the literature has not elucidated economic aspects of various surgical treatment options in detail yet. This study aimed to investigate whether open and minimal-invasive approaches differ in their economic profit gain. Furthermore, we examined whether a single-stage or two-stage approach of anterior-posterior fusion was more profitable. PATIENTS AND METHODS: By analyzing retrospectively data of 129 patients who underwent surgical procedure due to isolated incomplete burst fractures, we examined the economic profit and radiological parameter of open pedicle screw insertion, minimal-invasive techniques (percutaneous screws, percutaneous screws combined with SpineJack®, kyphoplasty or SpineJack®), and anterior-posterior fusion. RESULTS: Percutaneous screws in combination with SpineJack® gained significantly higher profit and higher profit per day of hospital length of stay. Profit was similar after single-stage and two-stage approach of vertebral body replacement. No significant difference in radiological outcome after 24 months was detected between the various surgical techniques. CONCLUSION: From a financial aspect, our finding suggests that application of percutaneous screws in combination with SpineJack® may generate the highest economic profit gain regarding treatment of incomplete burst fracture.

Reduction of Patella-baja and Pseudo-patella-baja Does Not Improve Range of Motion in Patients After Mega-TKA.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Patella baja (PB) and pseudo-patella baja (PPB) have been shown to negatively influence outcomes after total knee arthroplasty. We hypothesized that there is a high incidence of PB and PPB after megaprosthetic total knee arthroplasty (M-TKA), and that this is associated with reduced range of motion. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed all patients in our Orthopaedic Trauma Department after distal femur or proximal tibia replacement. Preoperative and one-year postoperative follow-up included measurement of range of motion and detection of PB and PPB using radiological indices. RESULTS: We included 44 patients (age: 73±19 years). Preoperative PB detected by ISI could be reduced from 13 (36%) to 11 (25%) (p<0.01). Preoperative vs. postoperative ISI was 0.88±0.23 vs. 1.06±0.45 (p=0.03). PPB was observed preoperatively in 23 (63%) patients vs. 24 (54%) postoperatively. Preoperative vs. postoperative CDI was 0.70±0.24 vs. 0.95±0.43 (p=0.002). Preoperative flexion was 91°±30° vs. 85°±24° postoperatively (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Both PB and PPB are frequently observed after M-TKA. A reduction in PB and PPB alone does not improve postoperative range of motion.