Racial Differences in Stage IV Colorectal Cancer Molecular Profiling and Mutation Rates.

INTRODUCTION: Despite advances in colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment, racial disparities persist. The primary aims of the study were to: evaluate differences in molecular testing rates over time by race; and measure the incidence of tumor mutations by race in patients with metastatic CRC. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed of all adult patients with stage IV CRC (2008-2018) identified within the cancer registry of a large regional health system. Demographic/clinical characteristics were collected through primary data abstraction of the electronic health record. Molecular profiling results were obtained directly from Caris Molecular Intelligence and electronic health record. RESULTS: Three hundred eighty-three patients were included: 40.5% (n = 155) were Black and 59.5% (n = 228) were White. Significant increases were observed in microsatellite instability (MSI), KRAS, and BRAF testing rates during the study period (P < 0.0001). The odds of testing over time increased more significantly in Black compared to White patients for MSI testing (White: odds ratio [OR] 1.26 [95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12-1.41], Black: OR 1.69 [95% CI 1.41-2.02], P = 0.005) and BRAF testing (White: OR 1.42 [95% CI 1.26-1.62], Black: OR 1.89 [95% CI 1.51-2.36], P = 0.027). An increase in KRAS testing over time was observed for both cohorts and was independent of race (P = 0.58). Mutation rates did not differ by race: KRAS (Black 55.8% versus White 45.6%, P = 0.13) and BRAF (Black 4.8% versus White 10.0%, P = 0.33). CONCLUSIONS: Within a large regional health system, molecular testing rates in patients with metastatic CRC increased significantly following National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline changes for both Black and White patients. Black and White patients who underwent molecular testing had similar rates of MSI, KRAS, and BRAF mutations.

Association of Rural Residence and Receipt of Guideline-Concordant Care for Locoregional Colon Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Incidence and mortality rates of colon cancer (CC) are higher in rural populations. This study aimed to determine whether rural residence is associated with differences in guideline-concordant care for patients with locoregional CC. METHODS: Patients with stages I-III CC from 2006 to 2016 were identified in the National Cancer Database. Guideline-concordant care (GCC) was defined as resection with negative margins, adequate nodal harvest, and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with high-risk stage II or III disease. Multivariable logistic regression (MVR) was performed to evaluate the association between rural residence and the odds of receiving GCC. Effect modification was evaluated using a two-way interaction for rurality by insurance status. RESULTS: Of 320,719 identified patients, 6191 (2%) were rural. The rural patients had lower income and lower educational status than the urban patients and were more often Medicare-insured (p < 0.001). The rural patients traveled farther (44.5 vs. 7.5 miles; p < 0.001), although time to surgery was similar (8 vs. 9 days). The two cohorts had similar resection rates (98.8% vs. 98.0%), margin positivity (5.4% vs. 4.8%), adequate lymphadenectomy (80.9% vs. 83.0%), adjuvant chemotherapy (stage III: 69.2% vs. 68.7%), and receipt of GCC (66.5% vs. 68.3%). In the MVR, the odds of receiving GCC did not differ between the rural and urban patients (odds ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.94-1.05%). Insurance status did not differentially influence the receipt of GCC by the rural versus the urban patients (interaction: p = 0.83). CONCLUSIONS: Rural and urban patients with locoregional CC are equally likely to receive GCC, suggesting that differences in cancer care delivery may not explain rural-urban disparities.

A Mixed-Methods Study to Evaluate the Feasibility and Acceptability of Implementing an Electronic Health Record Social Determinants of Health Screening Instrument into Routine Clinical Oncology Practice.

BACKGROUND: Routine screening for social determinants of health (SDOH) in the outpatient oncology setting is uncommon. The primary goal of this study was to prospectively evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of implementing an electronic health record (EHR) SDOH screening instrument into routine, clinical, oncology practice. METHODS: Adult patients with newly diagnosed gastrointestinal cancer presenting to a regional cancer center (November 2020 to July 2021) were eligible. Based on the consolidated framework for implementation research, feasibility measures included screening completion, median clinic visit time, and acceptability by the inter-professional care team and patients as measured by semistructured, qualitative interviews and surveys. Secondary outcomes included SDOH needs identified. RESULTS: Of 137 eligible patients, 112 (81.8%) were screened for SDOH. Demographics of the cohort included: 41.1% black (n = 46), 48.2% rural (n = 54), 4.5% uninsured (n = 5), and 6.3% Medicaid-insured (n = 7) patients. Median visit time was 97 min (95% CI 70-107 min) before and 100 min after implementation (95% CI 75-119 min; p = 0.95). In total, 95.5% (n = 107) reported at least one SDOH need. Clinicians (7/10) reported that SDOH screening was not disruptive and were supportive of ongoing use. Patients (10/10) found the screening acceptable. Screening staff (5/5) reported workflow barriers. Patients and staff also recommended revision of specific instrument questions. CONCLUSIONS: Routine collection of SDOH in an outpatient oncology setting using an EHR instrument is feasible and does not result in increased visit time for patients or clinicians. However, staff perceptions of clinic workflow disruption were reported. Further investigation to determine whether standardized SDOH assessment can improve cancer care delivery and outcomes is ongoing.

Racial Disparity in Pathologic Response following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Resected Pancreatic Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Analysis from the Central Pancreatic Consortium.

BACKGROUND: Major pathologic response (MPR) following neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients undergoing resection is associated with improved survival. We sought to determine whether racial disparities exist in MPR rates following NAT in patients with PDAC undergoing resection. METHODS: Patients with potentially operable PDAC receiving at least 2 cycles of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel ± radiation followed by pancreatectomy (2010-2019) at 7 high-volume centers were reviewed. Self-reported race was dichotomized as Black and non-Black, and multivariable models evaluated the association between race and MPR (i.e., pathologic complete response [pCR] or near-pCR). Cox regression evaluated the association between race and disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Results of 486 patients who underwent resection following NAT (mFOLFIRINOX 56%, gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel 25%, radiation 29%), 67 (13.8%) patients were Black. Black patients had lower CA19-9 at diagnosis (median 67 vs. 204 U/mL; P = 0.003) and were more likely to undergo mild/moderate chemotherapy dose modification (40 vs. 20%; P = 0.005) versus non-Black patients. Black patients had significantly lower rates of MPR compared with non-Black patients (13.4 vs. 25.8%; P = 0.039). Black race was independently associated with worse MPR (OR 0.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.10-0.69) while controlling for NAT duration, CA19-9 dynamics, and chemotherapy modifications. There was no significant difference in DFS or OS between Black and non-Black cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Black patients undergoing pancreatectomy appear less likely to experience MPR following NAT. The contribution of biologic and nonbiologic factors to reduced chemosensitivity in Black patients warrants further investigation.

Accuracy of models to prognosticate survival after surgery for pancreatic cancer in the era of neoadjuvant therapy.

BACKGROUND: Outcomes for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remain difficult to prognosticate. Multiple models attempt to predict survival following the resection of PDAC, but their utility in the neoadjuvant population is unknown. We aimed to assess their accuracy among patients that received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). METHODS: We performed a multi-institutional retrospective analysis of patients who received NAC and underwent resection of PDAC. Two prognostic systems were evaluated: the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Nomogram (MSKCCPAN) and the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system. Discrimination between predicted and actual disease-specific survival was assessed using the Uno C-statistic and Kaplan-Meier method. Calibration of the MSKCCPAN was assessed using the Brier score. RESULTS: A total of 448 patients were included. There were 232 (51.8%) females, and the mean age was 64.1 years (±9.5). Most had AJCC Stage I or II disease (77.7%). For the MSKCCPAN, the Uno C-statistic at 12-, 24-, and 36-month time points was 0.62, 0.63, and 0.62, respectively. The AJCC system demonstrated similarly mediocre discrimination. The Brier score for the MSKCCPAN was 0.15 at 12 months, 0.26 at 24 months, and 0.30 at 36 months, demonstrating modest calibration. CONCLUSIONS: Current survival prediction models and staging systems for patients with PDAC undergoing resection after NAC have limited accuracy.

Molecular targeted and systemic therapy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multi-disciplinary approach.

Most patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) are diagnosed with advanced disease. For individuals with resectable tumors, R0 resection with lymphadenectomy is the best potentially curative-intent treatment. After resection, adjuvant therapy with capecitabine is the current standard of care. For patients with unresectable or distant metastatic disease, doublet chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin is the most utilized first-line regimen, but recent studies using triplet regimens and even the addition of immunotherapy have begun to shift the paradigm of systemic therapy. Molecular therapies have recently received US FDA approval for second-line treatment for patients harboring actionable genomic alterations. This review focuses on the multidisciplinary approach to the treatment of ICC with an emphasis on molecular targeted and systemic therapy.

Correction: Association of race and health insurance in treatment disparities of colon cancer: A retrospective analysis utilizing a national population database in the United States.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003842.].

Racial and ethnic differences in patient ratings of colorectal and non-small-cell lung cancer care: A SEER-CAHPS study.

PURPOSE: Although significant racial and ethnic disparities exist in colorectal and lung cancer treatment and survival, racial differences in patient-reported experience of care are not well understood. The purpose of this study was to examine differences in patient-reported ratings of colorectal and non-small-cell lung cancer care by race/ethnicity. METHODS: Medicare beneficiaries with AJCC stage I-IV colorectal and non-small-cell lung cancer (2003-2013) who completed a Medicare Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers (CAHPS) survey within 5 years of cancer diagnosis were identified in the linked SEER-CAHPS dataset. Scores were compared by race/ethnicity, defined as White, Black, or any other race/ethnicity. RESULTS: Of the 2,621 identified patients, 161 (6.1%) were Black, 2,279 (87.0%) White, and 181 (6.9%) any other race/ethnicity. Compared to White patients, Black patients were younger, had lower educational level, and had higher census tract poverty indicator (p < 0.001). Black patients rated their ability to get care quickly significantly lower than White patients (63.5 (SE 3.38) vs. 71.4 (SE 2.12), p < 0.01), as did patients of any other race/ethnicity (LS mean 66.2 (SE 2.89), p = 0.02). Patients of any other race/ethnicity reported their ability to get needed care significantly lower than White patients (LS mean 81.9 (SE 2.46) vs. 86.7 (SE 1.75), p = 0.02); however, there was no difference in ability to get needed care between Black and White patients. CONCLUSION: Patient ratings for getting care quickly were lower in non-White patients, indicating racial disparities in perceived timeliness of care.

Changes in the Proportion of Patients Presenting With Early Stage Colon Cancer Over Time Among Medicaid Expansion and Nonexpansion States: A Cross-sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: The 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act mandated preventive screening coverage and provided support to participating states for Medicaid coverage. The association of Medicaid expansion with colon cancer stage at diagnosis is unknown. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether the proportion of patients diagnosed with early stage colon cancer changed over time within states that expanded Medicaid compared with nonexpansion states. DESIGN: This is a cross-sectional cohort study. SETTING: This study evaluated multicenter registry data from the National Cancer Database (2006-2016). PATIENTS: There were 25,462 uninsured or Medicaid-insured patients with newly diagnosed colon cancer who resided in 2014 Medicaid expansion or nonexpansion states. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: This study assessed the annual proportion of patients with early stage (I-II) versus late stage (III-IV) colon cancer. RESULTS: A total of 10,289 patients were identified in expansion states and 15,173 patients in nonexpansion states. Cohorts were similar in age (median 55 years) and sex (46.7% female). A greater proportion of patients in nonexpansion states were Black (33.4% vs 24.0%) and resided in a zip code with median income <$38,000 (39.7% vs 28.2%) and lower educational status (37.4% vs 28.1%). In 2006, the proportions of patients with early stage colon cancer in expansion and nonexpansion cohorts were similar (33.2% vs 32.5%). The proportion of patients with early stage colon cancer within nonexpansion states declined by 0.8% per year after 2014, whereas the proportion within expansion states increased by 0.9% per year after 2014 ( p < 0.05). By 2016, the absolute difference in the propensity-adjusted proportion of early stage colon cancer was 8.8% (39.7% vs 30.9%, p < 0.001). LIMITATIONS: National Cancer Database data are obtained only from Commission on Cancer-accredited sites and are not population based. CONCLUSIONS: After Medicaid expansion in 2014, the proportion of patients diagnosed and treated at Commission on Cancer-accredited facilities with early stage colon cancer increased within expansion states and decreased in nonexpansion states. Increase in insurance coverage may have facilitated earlier diagnosis among patients in expansion states. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B804 . CAMBIOS EN LA PROPORCIN DE PACIENTES QUE PRESENTAN CNCER DE COLON EN ESTADIO TEMPRANA A LO LARGO DEL TIEMPO ENTRE LOS ESTADOS DE EXPANSIN Y NO EXPANSIN DE MEDICAID UN ESTUDIO TRANSVERSAL: ANTECEDENTES:La Ley del Cuidado de Salud a Bajo Precio del 2010 ordenó la cobertura de exámenes preventivos y brindó apoyo a los estados participantes para la cobertura de Medicaid. Se desconoce la asociación de la expansión de Medicaid con el estadio del cáncer de colon en el momento del diagnóstico.OBJETIVO:Determinar si la proporción de pacientes diagnosticados con cáncer de colon en estadio temprano cambió con el tiempo dentro de los estados que expandieron Medicaid en comparación con los estados sin expansión.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohorte transversal.ENTORNO CLINICO:Datos de registro multicéntrico de la Base de datos nacional de cáncer (2006-2016).PACIENTES:Había 25,462 pacientes sin seguro o asegurados por Medicaid con cáncer de colon recién diagnosticado. Exposición: Residencia en estados de expansión o no expansión de Medicaid en el 2014.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Proporción anual de pacientes con cáncer de colon en estadio temprano (I-II) versus tardío (III-IV).RESULTADOS:Se identificaron un total de 10.289 pacientes en estados de expansión y 15.173 pacientes en estados de no expansión. Las cohortes fueron similares en edad (mediana de 55 años) y sexo (46,7% mujeres). Una mayor proporción de pacientes en estados sin expansión eran de raza negra (33,4% vs 24,0%) y residían en un código postal con ingresos medios <$38 000 (39,7% vs 28,2%) y un nivel educativo más bajo (37,4% vs 28,1%). En el 2006, las proporciones de pacientes con cáncer de colon en estadio temprano en cohortes en expansión y sin expansión fueron similares (33,2% vs 32,5%). La proporción de pacientes con estadio temprano dentro de los estados sin expansión disminuyó en un 0,8% por año después del 2014, mientras que la proporción dentro de los estados de expansión aumentó en un 0,9% por año después del 2014 (p <0,05). Para el 2016, la diferencia absoluta en la proporción ajustada por propensión de cáncer de colon en estadio temprano fue de 8.8% (39.7% vs 30.9%, p <0.001).LIMITACIONES:Los datos de la Base de datos nacional de cáncer se obtienen únicamente de los sitios acreditados por la Comisión de cáncer y no se basan en la población.CONCLUSIONES:Después de la expansión de Medicaid en el 2014, la proporción de pacientes diagnosticados y tratados en instalaciones acreditadas por la Comisión de Cáncer en pacientes con cáncer de colon en estadio temprano aumentó dentro de los estados de expansión y disminuyó en los estados de no expansión. El aumento de la cobertura del seguro puede haber facilitado un diagnóstico más temprano entre los pacientes en estados de expansión. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B804 . (Traducción- Dr. Francisco M. Abarca-Rendon ).

Differential effects of the Affordable Care Act on the stage at presentation and receipt of treatment for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: For pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) which lacks a recommended screening modality, the benefit of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) may not be an earlier diagnosis, but rather improved rates of treatment. The objective of this study was to examine change in the stage of PDAC presentation and treatment disparities following the ACA. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients with primary PDAC identified in the 2004-2017 National Cancer Database was divided into pre- and post-ACA, for which the primary outcomes of a stage of presentation, receipt of surgical resection, and systemic therapy (termed multimodality) (Stage I-II), and receipt of systemic therapy (Stage III-IV) were compared by multivariable analysis. RESULTS: 228,015 patients were included. Odds of presenting with Stage I-II PDAC were significantly higher in 2011-2017 versus 2004-2010 (odds ratio 1.44, 95% confidence interval 1.40-1.47). Black patients with early-stage disease had a lower likelihood of multimodality therapy and those with advanced disease were less likely to receive systemic therapy, before and after the ACA. Uninsured patients were less likely to receive any therapy compared with insured patients; this disparity increased in the post-ACA period. CONCLUSIONS: An earlier presentation of PDAC increased following the ACA. However, racial, insurance, and socioeconomic treatment disparities persist.

Differences in receipt of multimodality therapy by race, insurance status, and socioeconomic disadvantage in patients with resected pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: Racial and socioeconomic disparities in receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy affect patients with pancreatic cancer. However, differences in receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy among patients undergoing resection are not well-understood. A retrospective cross-sectional cohort of patients with resected AJCC Stage I/II pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma was identified from the National Cancer Database (2014-2017). Outcomes included receipt of neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy, or receipt of either, defined as multimodality therapy and were assessed by univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Of 19 588 patients, 5098 (26%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 9624 (49.1%) received adjuvant chemotherapy only, and 4757 (24.3%) received no chemotherapy. On multivariable analysis, Black patients had lower odds of neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared to White patients (OR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.67-0.97) but no differences in receipt of multimodality therapy (OR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.77-1.03). Patients with Medicaid or no insurance, low educational attainment, or low median income had significantly lower odds of receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy or multimodality therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Racial and socioeconomic disparities persist in receipt of neoadjuvant and multimodality therapy in patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma. DISCUSSION: Policy and interventional implementations are needed to bridge the continued socioeconomic and racial disparity gap in pancreatic cancer care.

Association of race and health insurance in treatment disparities of colon cancer: A retrospective analysis utilizing a national population database in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Both health insurance status and race independently impact colon cancer (CC) care delivery and outcomes. The relative importance of these factors in explaining racial and insurance disparities is less clear, however. This study aimed to determine the association and interaction of race and insurance with CC treatment disparities. STUDY SETTING: Retrospective cohort review of a prospective hospital-based database. METHODS AND FINDINGS: In this cross-sectional study, patients diagnosed with stage I to III CC in the United States were identified from the National Cancer Database (NCDB; 2006 to 2016). Multivariable regression with generalized estimating equations (GEEs) were performed to evaluate the association of insurance and race/ethnicity with odds of receipt of surgery (stage I to III) and adjuvant chemotherapy (stage III), with an additional 2-way interaction term to evaluate for effect modification. Confounders included sex, age, median income, rurality, comorbidity, and nodes and margin status for the model for chemotherapy. Of 353,998 patients included, 73.8% (n = 261,349) were non-Hispanic White (NHW) and 11.7% (n = 41,511) were non-Hispanic Black (NHB). NHB patients were less likely to undergo resection [odds ratio (OR) 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61 to 0.72, p < 0.001] or to receive adjuvant chemotherapy [OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.87, p < 0.001] compared to NHW patients. NHB patients with private or Medicare insurance were less likely to undergo resection [OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.91, p = 0.004 (private insurance); OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.66, p < 0.001 (Medicare)] and to receive adjuvant chemotherapy [0.77, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.87, p < 0.001 (private insurance); OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.91, p < 0.001 (Medicare)] compared to similarly insured NHW patients. Although Hispanic patients with private and Medicare insurance were also less likely to undergo surgical resection, this was not the case with adjuvant chemotherapy. This study is mainly limited by the retrospective nature and by the variables provided in the dataset; granular details such as continuity or disruption of insurance coverage or specific chemotherapy agents or dosing cannot be assessed within NCDB. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that racial disparities in receipt of treatment for CC persist even among patients with similar health insurance coverage and that different disparities exist for different racial/ethnic groups. Changes in health policy must therefore recognize that provision of insurance alone may not eliminate cancer treatment racial disparities.

Racial and geographic disparities in stage-specific incidence and mortality in the colorectal cancer hotspot region of eastern North Carolina, 2008-2016.

BACKGROUND: Despite improvements in colorectal cancer (CRC) outcomes, geographic disparities persist. Spatial mapping identified distinct "hotspots" of increased CRC mortality, including 11 rural counties in eastern North Carolina (ENC). The primary aims of this study were to measure CRC incidence and mortality by stage and determine if racial disparities exist within ENC. METHODS: Data from 2008 to 2016 from the NC Central Cancer Registry were analyzed by stage, race, and region. Age-adjusted incidence and death rates (95% CI) were expressed per 100,000 persons within hotspot counties, all ENC counties, and Non-ENC counties. RESULTS: CRC incidence [43.7 (95% CI 39.2-48.8) vs. 38.4 (95% CI 37.6-39.2)] and mortality rates [16.1 (95% CI 16.6-19.7) vs. 13.9 (95% CI 13.7-14.2)] were higher in the hotspot than non-ENC, respectively. Overall, localized, and regional CRC incidence rates were highest among African Americans (AA) residing in the hotspot compared to Whites or Non-ENC residents. Incidence rates of distant disease were higher among AA but did not differ by region. CRC mortality rates were highest among AA in the hotspot (AA 22.0 vs. Whites 15.8) compared to Non-ENC (AA 19.3 vs. Whites 13.0), although significant stage-stratified mortality differences were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: Patients residing in the hotspot counties have higher age-adjusted incidence of overall, localized, regional, and distant CRC and mortality rates than patients in non-hotspot counties. Incidence and mortality rates remain highest among AA residing in the hotspot. IMPACT: Increased CRC incidence and mortality rates were observed among all patients in the hotspot and were highest among AA, suggestive of ongoing racial and geographic disparities.

Thirty-day complication rates do not differ by race among patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Black patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are less likely to receive multimodality treatment and have worse survival compared to White patients. However, little is known regarding racial differences in postoperative outcomes. The primary aim of this study was to determine if 30-day complication rates following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) differ by race. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent PD for PDAC from 2014 to 2016 within the ACS-NSQIP pancreatectomy-specific data set was performed. Primary outcomes were 30-day pancreas-specific and overall major complications. RESULTS: A total of 6936 patients were identified, including 91.4% (N = 6337) White and 8.6% (N = 599) Black. Pathologic stage and rates of neoadjuvant therapy were similar among Whites and Blacks. Rates of pancreas-specific (23.9% vs. 23.1%, p = .88) and major postoperative complications (39.2% vs. 39.9%, p = .55) were similar between Whites and Blacks. By multivariable regression analysis, there was no association between race and odds of pancreas-specific complications (odds ratio [OR] 1.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89-1.37) or overall major complications (OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.95-1.36). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing PD for PDAC, Black race is not associated with increased pancreas-specific or overall 30-day postoperative complications. Short-term postoperative outcomes do not appear to explain the increase in pancreatic cancer mortality among Black patients.

Delayed gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy: A study of the national surgical quality improvement program.

BACKGROUND: Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) remains common after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Risk factors for DGE have been difficult to identify due to a lack of a standard definition. The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with DGE using a standard definition across a national cohort of patients. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent PD from 2014 to 2016 within the ACS-NSQIP pancreatectomy-specific module was performed. Multivariable (MV) regression was used to determine perioperative risk factors for DGE. RESULTS: Of 10,249 patients undergoing PD, 16.6% developed DGE and were older (65.3 vs. 64.3 years), more often male (62.5% vs. 51.9%), overweight/obese (66.7% vs. 61.3%), and American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) class 3 (80.0% vs. 76.0%). Rates of pylorus preservation (41.4% vs. 38.7%) were higher, and median operative time (373 vs. 354 min) longer. On MV analysis, age≥65 years [OR 1.26 (95%CI 1.13-1.41)], male sex [OR 1.54 (95%CI 1.38-1.72), body mass index (BMI) > 30 [OR 1.22 (95%CI 1.06-1.40)], ASA class≥3 [OR 1.24 (95%CI 1.08-1.42)], pylorus preservation [OR 1.08 (95%CI 1.02-1.14)], and longer operative time [OR 1.26 (95%CI 1.13-1.40)] remained associated with DGE. Preoperative chemotherapy was associated with decreased risk of DGE [OR 0.77 (95%CI 0.64-0.93)]. CONCLUSION: In this national, multicenter cohort of patients undergoing PD, 16.6% of patients developed DGE based on a standardized definition. Perioperative factors including age, BMI, ASA class, pylorus preservation, and operative time were associated with increased risk of DGE. Further research is warranted to identify opportunities for prevention via preoperative rehabilitation strategies and treatment.

Stratifying Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms by Cyst Fluid Analysis: Present and Future.

A significant proportion of patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) undergo surgical resection in order to prevent or treat pancreatic cancer at the risk of significant perioperative morbidity. Efforts have been made to stratify the potential risk of malignancy based on the clinical and radiographic features of IPMN to delineate which cysts warrant resection versus observation. An analysis of the cyst fluid obtained by preoperative endoscopic examination appears to be correlative of cyst type and risk, whereas serum markers and radiographic findings have not yet reached a level of sensitivity or specificity that proves they are clinically meaningful. In this review, we investigate the current cyst fluid analysis studies and present those that have shown promise in effectively stratifying high-risk versus low-risk lesions. While new cyst fluid markers continue to be identified, additional efforts in testing panels and marker composites in conjunction with clinical algorithms have also shown promise in distinguishing dysplasia and the risk of malignancy. These should be tested prospectively in order to determine their role in guiding the surveillance of low-risk lesions and to evaluate the new markers detected by proteomics and genetic sequencing.

Sidedness of Colorectal Cancer Impacts Risk of Second Primary Gastrointestinal Malignancy.

INTRODUCTION: A history of colorectal cancer (CRC) increases the risk of subsequent gastrointestinal (GI) cancer. Cancers of the right colon, left colon, and rectum differ according to molecular profiles, responses to treatment, and outcomes. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine if CRC location is associated with differential risk for secondary primary GI malignancy. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of adults with CRC was compiled using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (1973-2015). Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) for second primary GI malignancies were compared based on location of the index CRC (right colon, left colon, or rectum). RESULTS: The cohort included 281,413 adults with CRC (30.3% right, 35.3% left, 34.3% rectum). With a median 4.9-year follow-up, 12,064 (4.3%) patients developed a second primary GI malignancy (64% CRC, 36% non-CRC). Those with CRC at any location had higher than expected incidences of small intestine, bile duct, and other CRCs, and lower incidences of liver and gallbladder cancer. The SIR for small intestinal cancer was higher after right colon cancer than after left colon or rectal cancer. The esophageal cancer SIR was higher after left colon cancer. Pancreas cancer was higher than expected for right colon cancer, but lower for left colon and rectal cancer. CONCLUSION: The location of CRC leads to differences in the incidence and location of second primary GI malignancies and may be related to similarities in the associated carcinogenesis and molecular pathways or response to treatment. CRC location not only impacts treatment response and outcomes, but should also be considered during subsequent surveillance.