RESUMO
1: ESGE recommends cold snare polypectomy (CSP), to include a clear margin of normal tissue (1-2âmm) surrounding the polyp, for the removal of diminutive polyps (≤â5âmm).Strong recommendation, high quality of evidence. 2: ESGE recommends against the use of cold biopsy forceps excision because of its high rate of incomplete resection.Strong recommendation, moderate quality of evidence. 3: ESGE recommends CSP, to include a clear margin of normal tissue (1-2âmm) surrounding the polyp, for the removal of small polyps (6-9âmm).Strong recommendation, high quality of evidence. 4: ESGE recommends hot snare polypectomy for the removal of nonpedunculated adenomatous polyps of 10-19âmm in size.Strong recommendation, high quality of evidence. 5: ESGE recommends conventional (diathermy-based) endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for large (≥â20âmm) nonpedunculated adenomatous polyps (LNPCPs).Strong recommendation, high quality of evidence. 6: ESGE suggests that underwater EMR can be considered an alternative to conventional hot EMR for the treatment of adenomatous LNPCPs.Weak recommendation, moderate quality of evidence. 7: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) may also be suggested as an alternative for removal of LNPCPs of ≥â20âmm in selected cases and in high-volume centers.Weak recommendation, low quality evidence. 8: ESGE recommends that, after piecemeal EMR of LNPCPs by hot snare, the resection margins should be treated by thermal ablation using snare-tip soft coagulation to prevent adenoma recurrence.Strong recommendation, high quality of evidence. 9: ESGE recommends (piecemeal) cold snare polypectomy or cold EMR for SSLs of all sizes without suspected dysplasia.Strong recommendation, moderate quality of evidence. 10: ESGE recommends prophylactic endoscopic clip closure of the mucosal defect after EMR of LNPCPs in the right colon to reduce to reduce the risk of delayed bleeding.Strong recommendation, high quality of evidence. 11: ESGE recommends that en bloc resection techniques, such as en bloc EMR, ESD, endoscopic intermuscular dissection, endoscopic full-thickness resection, or surgery should be the techniques of choice in cases with suspected superficial invasive carcinoma, which otherwise cannot be removed en bloc by standard polypectomy or EMR.Strong recommendation, moderate quality of evidence.
Assuntos
Pólipos do Colo , Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa , Humanos , Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa/métodos , Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa/normas , Pólipos do Colo/cirurgia , Colonoscopia/normas , Colonoscopia/métodos , Colonoscopia/instrumentação , Neoplasias Colorretais/cirurgia , Margens de Excisão , Pólipos Adenomatosos/cirurgia , Pólipos Adenomatosos/patologia , Europa (Continente) , Sociedades Médicas/normasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Prolonged biliary stenting may be considered in high-risk patients with irretrievable bile duct stones (IBDS). Distal stent migration (DSM) is a known complication, although data beyond the recommended interval of temporary stenting (3-6 months) are lacking. We compared the long-term incidence of DSM between straight and double-pigtail stents in patients with IBDS. METHODS: Consecutive patients with IBDS undergoing plastic biliary stenting (1/2009-12/2019) were retrospectively reviewed. DSM was confirmed on follow-up examination when the stent was no longer present at the papillary orifice nor fluoroscopically visible in the bile duct. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to determine estimates and predictors of DSM. RESULTS: Overall, 618 biliary stenting procedures (410 patients) were included: 289 with a straight stent (group A) and 329 with a double-pigtail (group B). By Kaplan-Meier analysis, the DSM rates were 8.4 and 14.6% at 6 months, 21.4 and 27.7% at 12 months, 27 and 43.5% at 18 months, and 37.2 and 60.4% at 24 months, for groups A and B, respectively (p = 0.004). Double-pigtail stents were at higher risk for DSM (HR = 7.38, p = 0.04), whereas an inverse correlation was noted with age (HR = 0.97, p = 0.0001). Considering only temporary stenting procedures (≤ 6 months; n = 297), the probability of DSM was not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: In a setting of prolonged stenting for IBDS, the probability of DSM appears to be higher when a double-pigtail stent is used and in younger patients. A relative anti-migratory advantage of double-pigtail over straight stents appears negligible in this study.
Assuntos
Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica , Cálculos Biliares , Ductos Biliares , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Stents/efeitos adversos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
1: ESGE recommends that each center implements a written policy regarding the management of iatrogenic perforations, including the definition of procedures that carry a higher risk of this complication. This policy should be shared with the radiologists and surgeons at each center. 2 : ESGE recommends that in the case of an endoscopically identified perforation, the endoscopist reports its size and location, with an image, and statement of the endoscopic treatment that has been applied. 3: ESGE recommends that symptoms or signs suggestive of iatrogenic perforation after an endoscopic procedure should be rapidly and carefully evaluated and documented with a computed tomography (CT) scan. 4 : ESGE recommends that endoscopic closure should be considered depending on the type of the iatrogenic perforation, its size, and the endoscopist expertise available at the center. Switch to carbon dioxide (CO2) endoscopic insufflation, diversion of digestive luminal content, and decompression of tension pneumoperitoneum or pneumothorax should also be performed. 5 : ESGE recommends that after endoscopic closure of an iatrogenic perforation, further management should be based on the estimated success of the endoscopic closure and on the general clinical condition of the patient. In the case of no or failed endoscopic closure of an iatrogenic perforation, and in patients whose clinical condition is deteriorating, hospitalization and surgical consultation are recommended.
Assuntos
Insuflação , Perfuração Intestinal , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal , Humanos , Doença Iatrogênica , Perfuração Intestinal/diagnóstico , Perfuração Intestinal/etiologia , Perfuração Intestinal/cirurgiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Cold snare polypectomy is an established method for the resection of small colorectal polyps; however, significant incomplete resection rates still leave room for improvement. We aimed to assess the efficacy of cold snare endoscopic mucosal resection (CS-EMR), compared with hot snare endoscopic mucosal resection (HS-EMR), for nonpedunculated polyps sized 6â-â10âmm. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study was a dual-center, randomized, noninferiority trial. Consecutive adult patients with at least one nonpedunculated polyp sized 6â-â10âmm were enrolled. Eligible polyps were randomized (1:1) to be treated with either CS-EMR or HS-EMR. Both methods involved submucosal injection of a methylene blue-tinted normal saline solution. The primary noninferiority end point was histological eradication evaluated by postpolypectomy biopsies (noninferiority marginâ-â10â%). Secondary outcomes included occurrence of intraprocedural bleeding, clinically significant postprocedural bleeding, and perforation. RESULTS: Among 689 patients screened, 155 patients with 164 eligible polyps were included (CS-EMR nâ=â83, HS-EMR nâ=â81). The overall rate of histological complete resection was 92.8â% in the CS-EMR group and 96.3â% in the HS-EMR group (difference 3.5â%; 95â% confidence interval [CI]â-â4.15 to 11.56), showing noninferiority of CS-EMR compared with HS-EMR. CS-EMR was shown to be noninferior both for polyps measuring 6â-â7âmm (CS-EMR 93.3â%; HS-EMR 100â%; 95â%CIâ-â7.95 to 21.3) and those of 8â-â10âmm (92.5â% vs. 94.7â%, respectively; 95â%CIâ-â7.91 to 13.16). Rates of intraprocedural bleeding were similar between the two groups (CS-EMR 3.6â%, HS-EMR 1.2â%; P â=â0.30). No clinically significant postprocedural bleeding or perforation occurred in either group. CONCLUSIONS: CS-EMR appears to be a valuable modification of the standard cold snare technique, obviating the need to use diathermy for nonpedunculated colorectal polyps sized 6â-â10âmm.
Assuntos
Pólipos do Colo/patologia , Pólipos do Colo/cirurgia , Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa/métodos , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiologia , Perfuração Intestinal/etiologia , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Idoso , Temperatura Baixa , Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Temperatura Alta , Humanos , Complicações Intraoperatórias/etiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation with biliary sphincterotomy (EPLBD + EBS) is safe and effective in patients with large common bile duct (CBD) stones. However, data on long-term outcomes after EPLBD + EBS remain limited. We sought to prospectively evaluate the long-term recurrence of CBD stones after EPLBD + EBS and to identify the associated factors. METHODS: We conducted an extended follow-up of a previous randomized trial (2009-2011) comparing the outcomes of 30- versus 60-s large balloon dilation. A total of 106 trial participants undergoing successful CBD stone clearance by EPLBD + EBS were prospectively followed up for up to 4 years (range 19-48 months). Various risk factors were analysed to assess predictors of long-term recurrence of stones. RESULTS: Recurrent CBD stones appeared in 8/106 (7.5 %) patients during a mean follow-up of 30.5 ± 5.5 months. The mean diameter of CBD was significantly higher in the recurrence versus non-recurrence group (2.0 ± 4.9 vs 1.6 ± 0.9 cm, p = 0.008). Multivariate analysis revealed that CBD diameter was the only predictor significantly associated with the long-term recurrence of stones (odds ratio 1.2, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: EPLBD + EBS is associated with a low rate of long-term CBD stone recurrence. However, the risk is significantly higher in patients with a more dilated CBD.
Assuntos
Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/métodos , Coledocolitíase/cirurgia , Ducto Colédoco/patologia , Dilatação/métodos , Esfinterotomia Endoscópica/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Tamanho do Órgão , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Recidiva , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
This Position Paper is an official statement of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). It addresses the diagnosis and management of iatrogenic perforation occurring during diagnostic or therapeutic digestive endoscopic procedures. Main recommendations 1 ESGE recommends that each center implements a written policy regarding the management of iatrogenic perforation, including the definition of procedures that carry a high risk of this complication. This policy should be shared with the radiologists and surgeons at each center. 2 In the case of an endoscopically identified perforation, ESGE recommends that the endoscopist reports: its size and location with a picture; endoscopic treatment that might have been possible; whether carbon dioxide or air was used for insufflation; and the standard report information. 3 ESGE recommends that symptoms or signs suggestive of iatrogenic perforation after an endoscopic procedure should be carefully evaluated and documented, possibly with a computed tomography (CT) scan, in order to prevent any diagnostic delay. 4 ESGE recommends that endoscopic closure should be considered depending on the type of perforation, its size, and the endoscopist expertise available at the center. A switch to carbon dioxide insufflation, the diversion of luminal content, and decompression of tension pneumoperitoneum or tension pneumothorax should also be done. 5 After closure of an iatrogenic perforation using an endoscopic method, ESGE recommends that further management should be based on the estimated success of the endoscopic closure and on the general clinical condition of the patient. In the case of no or failed endoscopic closure of the iatrogenic perforation, and in patients whose clinical condition is deteriorating, hospitalization and surgical consultation are recommended.
Assuntos
Doenças do Sistema Digestório , Endoscopia do Sistema Digestório/efeitos adversos , Esôfago/lesões , Doença Iatrogênica , Perfuração Intestinal , Intestinos/lesões , Estômago/lesões , Algoritmos , Ductos Biliares/lesões , Doenças do Sistema Digestório/diagnóstico , Doenças do Sistema Digestório/etiologia , Doenças do Sistema Digestório/terapia , Humanos , Insuflação , Perfuração Intestinal/diagnóstico , Perfuração Intestinal/etiologia , Perfuração Intestinal/terapia , Ductos Pancreáticos/lesõesRESUMO
Immunoglobulin G4-related sclerosing cholangitis (IgG4-SC) is a distinct type of cholangitis, currently recognized as a biliary manifestation of IgG4-related disease. We present a case of type 3 IgG4-SC in a patient with normal IgG4 serum levels, surgically treated for suspicion of cholangiocarcinoma. This case highlights that differentiating between isolated IgG4-SC and cholangiocarcinoma can present a challenging diagnostic dilemma.
RESUMO
Background and study aims Through advanced endoscopic clipping techniques, endoscopic treatment of both diagnostic and therapeutic acute iatrogenic colonic perforations has been shown effective. The main purpose of this study was to compare the management of acute iatrogenic perforations (AIPs) of the colon before and after the introduction of advanced clipping techniques. Methods We conducted a retrospective study from July 1996 to February 2020. The period was divided into two sub periods, Period 1: from July 1996 to December 2012 and Period 2: from January 2013 to March 2020. All AIPs occurring during a colonoscopy and detected during or immediately (<â4 hours) after the procedure, were included in the study. Results The total number of colonoscopies performed at our hospital was 33055 and 36831 during Periods 1 and 2 respectively. Fifteen perforations were observed in Period 1 and 11 in Period 2.âThe rate of surgery was 93.3â% % (14/15) in Period 1 and 27.2â% (3â/11) in Period 2 ( P â<â0.01). The mean hospital stay in Period 1 was 6.9 days and 4 in Period 2 ( P â<â0.01). Conclusions Data from this historical cohort have clearly shown a decrease in the surgery rate and the length of hospitalization of AIPs in Period 2 compared to Period 1.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Prolonged propofol-induced deep sedation increases the risk for sedation-related complications. Cerebral oximetry enables prompt assessment of tissue oxygenation by demonstrating the regional hemoglobin oxygen saturation (rSO2) of the cerebral cortex. This study aimed to: evaluate cerebral oxygenation under deep sedation during an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedure; determine the cerebral desaturation event (CDE) rate; and assess the predictive capacity of CDEs for sedation-related complications. METHODS: All consecutive patients who underwent ERCP between September and December 2019 were included prospectively. Propofol monotherapy was used and sedation level was assessed using the bispectral index (BIS). The target level of sedation was deep sedation, defined by BIS values 40-60. Participants were monitored with arterial blood gas analysis and INVOS 5100C cerebral oximeter. RSO2 values were registered prior to sedation (baseline value), every 5 min during the sedation period and at recovery of consciousness. BIS values were recorded simultaneously. CDE was defined as a drop >10% from individual baseline rSO2. RESULTS: Sixty patients were enrolled. Mean baseline rSO2 was 65.1% and BIS values ranged from 18-85. No significant correlation was observed between mean rSO2 measurements and mean BIS values throughout the recordings (P = 0.193). Data from patients aged ≥65 years were analyzed separately and the results were similar. The CDE rate was 2.7%, but no CDE was associated with clinical manifestations. Twelve sedation-related complications occurred without the presence of cerebral desaturation. CONCLUSION: Cerebral oxygenation remained independent of changes in sedation depth and cerebral oximetry monitoring did not detect complications earlier than standard monitors.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Recently, the introduction of the novel digital SpyGlass™ DS Direct Visualization system (Boston Scientific Corp., Natick, MA, USA) has signaled the transition into the era of digital single-operator cholangioscopy (D-SOC). We sought to compare the clinical utility between fiberoptic single-operator cholangioscopy (F-SOC) and D-SOC in a tertiary-care referral center in Greece. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of a prospective database of single-operator cholangioscopy (SOC) procedures performed over an 8-year period (2009-2017) at a single tertiary-care referral center. The study population consisted of consecutive adults referred for cholangioscopy for a variety of clinical indications, including biliary strictures, difficult biliary stones and migrated or occluded pancreatic or biliary stents. RESULTS: A total of 2763 endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedures were performed during the study period. Overall, SOC was performed in 68 (2.46%) procedures (F-SOC=39, D-SOC=29), showing a significant increase in the utilization of cholangioscopy during the D-SOC (29/599; 4.84%) compared with the F-SOC (39/2124; 1.83%) period (P=0.0001). The overall technical success of diagnostic SOC was 69.1% (38/55), being marginally higher for D-SOC (83.3%) than for F-SOC (58.1%), although not reaching statistical significance (P=0.07). CONCLUSIONS: D-SOC was utilized more frequently in our tertiary-care non-academic referral center, demonstrating a favorable safety profile and a trend towards a marginally higher technical success rate for the diagnosis of biliary strictures compared with F-SOC.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) using the full-thickness resection device (FTRD®) is an invasive treatment for colorectal lesions not resectable by conventional endoscopic techniques. This study presents the first Greek experience of the FTRD® procedure, assessing the efficacy and safety of EFTR. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 17 consecutive patients treated with the FTRD® at 2 referral centers from October 2015 through December 2018. The indications included difficult adenomas (non-lifting and/or at difficult locations), early adenocarcinomas and subepithelial tumors. Primary endpoints were technical success and R0 resection. RESULTS: Technical success and R0 resection were achieved in 82.3% procedures (14/17) and in 87.5% of those with difficult adenomas (8 patients). In the subgroup with carcinomas (n=3), the rate of technical success and R0 resection was 66.6%, while in the subgroup with subepithelial tumors (n=6) the rate was 83.3%. Technical success and R0 resection were significantly lower for lesions >20 mm vs. ≤20 mm (P=0.0429). In the 17 patients a total of 3 adverse events occurred (17.6%) and one of the patients underwent laparoscopic appendectomy because of EFTR around the appendix. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed favorable results concerning EFTR feasibility, efficacy and safety, especially for lesions ≤20 mm, non-lifting adenomas, and subepithelial tumors. Technical success, R0 resection, and adverse events rates were comparable with previously published data. Larger randomized studies are needed to better define the clinical benefit and long-term outcomes of EFTR in selected patients.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: There is evidence that circulating microparticles (MPs) and annexin (+) platelet-derived MPs (PDMPs) are increased in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The aim of our study was to characterize the abundance, origin, and annexin V binding of MPs in patients with IBD and correlate them with the disease characteristics. METHODS: Case-control study of 46 IBD patients (23 Crohn's disease, 23 ulcerative colitis) and 40 matched healthy controls (HC). MPs were divided according to annexin V binding, their origin was estimated based on specific cell membrane markers in plasma samples and their number was calculated via flow cytometry. Clinical and laboratory activity indices were also analyzed. RESULTS: Annexin (-) PDMPs (P=0.0004), total (P=0.04) and annexin (+) monocyte-derived MPs (P=0.02) were increased and annexin (-) total MPs (P=0.0007) were decreased in IBD patients compared to HC. The annexin (+)/(-) ratio of all MP types were significantly elevated in IBD patients compared to HC (P<0.003). IBD patients with active disease displayed elevated total and annexin (+) total MPs, total, annexin (+) and (-) PDMPs compared with those in remission (P<0.05). Annexin (-) PDMPs were considerably increased in IBD patients with active compared to those with inactive disease (P=0.0013). Total and annexin (-) PDMPs were significantly correlated with most of the disease activity indices (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: The majority of circulating MPs, their counterparts and particularly annexin (-) PDMPs are increased in active IBD patients. Annexin (+)/(-) ratio proved to be the most reliable distinctive MP index between HC and IBD patients.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Most colonoscopic complications are polypectomy-related and occur more frequently during the removal of numerous small polyps. Therefore, it is important to have the best polypectomy approach of small polyps. The aim of the present animal study was to investigate the effectiveness and safety of cold snare polypectomy (CSP) technique combined with light pull of the snare in order to peel the mucosal and upper submucosal layer, namely pull CSP (PCSP), for the removal of polyps sized up to 12 mm in porcine models. METHODS: We performed a series of polypectomies in the pig colon with a double-channel experimental gastroscope using PCSP technique. RESULTS: Thirty cases of "polyps" larger than 7 mm and up to 12 mm were treated using PCSP technique. No sign of perforation or bleeding was observed in all cases performed with PCSP. CONCLUSIONS: According to our preliminary results in this animal model, PCSP could be a safe and effective technique for flat colonic polyp removal up to 12 mm in size consistent with the basic polypectomy principles.