Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Pulm Med ; 22(1): 169, 2022 Apr 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35488330

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Frequent and highly prevalent as comorbidities in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients, both depression and anxiety seem to have an impact on COPD prognosis. However, they are underdiagnosed and rarely treated properly. AIM: To establish the prevalence of depression and anxiety in patients admitted for Acute Exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) and determine their influence on COPD prognosis. METHODS: Prospective observational study conducted from October 1, 2016 to October 1, 2018 at the following centers in Galicia, Spain: Salnés County Hospital, Arquitecto Marcide, and Clinic Hospital Complex of Santiago de Compostela. Patients admitted for AECOPD who agreed to participate and completed the anxiety and depression scale (HADS) were included in the study. RESULTS: 288 patients (46.8%) were included, mean age was 73.7 years (SD 10.9), 84.7% were male. 67.7% patients were diagnosed with probable depression, and depression was established in 41.7%; anxiety was probable in 68.2% and established in 35.4%. 60.4% of all patients showed symptoms of both anxiety and depression. Multivariate analysis relates established depression with a higher risk of late readmission (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.28; 3.31) and a lower risk of mortality at 18 months (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.37; 0.90). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of anxiety and depression in COPD patients is high. Depression seems to be an independent factor for AECOPD, so early detection and a multidisciplinary approach could improve the prognosis of both entities. The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Galicia (code 2016/460).


Assuntos
Depressão , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica , Idoso , Ansiedade/epidemiologia , Comorbidade , Depressão/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Prognóstico , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/complicações , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/epidemiologia
3.
Arch Bronconeumol ; 60(1): 23-32, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38042707

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of biologic therapy response is vital to monitor its effectiveness. Authors have proposed various response criteria including good responder, super-responder, non-responder, and clinical remission. OBJECTIVES: To ascertain the prevalence of response and clinical remission after long-term treatment (>6 months) of anti-IgE and anti-IL-5/IL-5Rα biologics, compare these results with existing criteria, and identify predictors for non-responders and clinical remission. METHODS: A multicenter, real-life study involving severe asthma patients in Spain. Various outcomes were assessed to gauge response and clinical remission against established criteria. RESULTS: The study included 429 patients, 209 (48.7%) omalizumab, 112 (26.1%) mepolizumab, 19 (4.4%) reslizumab and 89 (20.7%) benralizumab, with a mean treatment duration of 55.3±38.8 months. In the final year of treatment, 218 (50.8%) were super-responders, 173 (40.3%) responders, 38 (8.9%) non-responders, and clinical remission in 116 (27%), without differences among biologics. The short-term non-responders (<6 months) were 25/545 (4.6%). Substantial variations in response and clinical remission were observed when applying different published criteria. Predictors of non-response included higher BMI (OR:1.14; 95% CI:1.06-1.23; p<0.001), admissions at ICU (2.69; 1.30-5.56; p=0.01), high count of SAE (1.21; 1.03-1.42; p=0.02) before biologic treatment. High FEV1% (0.96; 0.95-0.98; p<0.001), a high ACT score (0.93; 0.88-0.99; p=0.01) before biologic treatment or NSAID-ERD (0.52; 0.29-0.91; p=0.02) showed strong associations with achieving clinical remission. CONCLUSION: A substantial proportion of severe asthma patients treated long-term with omalizumab or anti-IL5/IL-5Rα achieved a good response. Differences in response criteria highlight the need for harmonization in defining response and clinical remission in biologic therapy to enable meaningful cross-study comparisons.


Assuntos
Antiasmáticos , Asma , Produtos Biológicos , Humanos , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Omalizumab/uso terapêutico
4.
Open Respir Arch ; 5(4): 100271, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37818452

RESUMO

Introduction: COPD causes high morbidity and mortality and high health costs. Thus, identifying and analyzing the distinctive and treatable traits seems useful to optimize the management of AEPOC patients. While various biomarkers have been researched, no solid data for systematic use have been made available. Aim: Assessing the short-term prognostic usefulness of clinical and analytical parameters available in routine clinical practice in COPD exacerbations. Material and methods: Multicenter prospective observational study conducted between 2016 and 2018. Patients admitted for COPD exacerbation who agreed to participate and signed an informed consent form were included. Prolonged stay, in-hospital mortality or early readmission was considered an unfavorable progression. 30-Day mortality was also analyzed. Results: 615 patients were included. Mean age was 73.9 years (SD 10.6); 86.2% were male. Progression of 357 patients (58%) was considered unfavorable. Mortality at 1 month from discharge was 6.7%. The multivariate analysis shows a relationship between the CRP/Albumin ratio and unfavorable progression (OR 1.008, 95% CI 1.00; 1.01), as well as increased risk of death at 1 month from discharge with elevated urea (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.005; 1.02) and troponin T (OR 2.21, 95% CI 1.06; 4.62). Conclusion: Elevated CRP/Albumin, urea and TnT are prognostic indicators of poor short-term outcome in patients admitted for COPD exacerbation. Cardiovascular comorbidity and systemic inflammation could explain these findings.


Introducción: : La EPOC provoca una elevada morbimortalidad y elevados costes sanitarios. Identificar y analizar los rasgos distintivos y tratables parece útil para optimizar el tratamiento de los pacientes con AEPOC. Se han investigado varios biomarcadores sin que de momento se disponga de datos sólidos para su uso sistemático. Objetivo: Evaluar la utilidad pronóstica a corto plazo de los parámetros clínicos y analíticos disponibles en la práctica clínica habitual en las exacerbaciones de la EPOC. Material y métodos: Estudio observacional prospectivo multicéntrico realizado entre 2016 y 2018. Se incluyeron pacientes ingresados por exacerbación de EPOC que aceptaron participar y que firmaron consentimiento informado. Se consideró evolución desfavorable la estancia prolongada, la mortalidad hospitalaria o el reingreso precoz. También se analizó la mortalidad a 30 días. Resultados: Se incluyeron 615 pacientes. La edad media fue 73,9 años (DE 10,6); El 86,2% eran varones. Se consideró desfavorable la evolución de 357 pacientes (58%). La mortalidad al mes del alta fue del 6,7%. El análisis multivariante muestra una relación entre el ratio PCR/Albúmina y la progresión desfavorable (OR 1,008, IC 95% 1,00; 1,01), así como un mayor riesgo de muerte al mes del alta con urea elevada (OR 1,01, IC 95% 1,005; 1,02) y troponina T (OR 2,21; IC del 95%: 1,06; 4,62). Conclusión: La elevación de PCR/albúmina, la urea y la TnT son indicadores de mal pronóstico a corto plazo en pacientes ingresados por exacerbación de la EPOC. La comorbilidad cardiovascular y la inflamación sistémica podrían explicar estos hallazgos.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA