Pregnancy- and lactation-induced osteoporosis: a social-media-based survey.

BACKGROUND: Pregnancy- and lactation-induced osteoporosis (PLO) presenting as spinal fractures is rare, and the spectrum of clinical presentation, risk factors and pathophysiology are incompletely understood. The aim of this study was to delineate clinical parameters, risk factors and osteoporosis-related quality of life (QOL) of women with PLO. METHODS: Participants of a social-media (WhatsApp) PLO group and mothers of a parents' WhatsApp group (control group) were offered to fill a questionnaire, including an osteoporosis-related QOL section. The groups were compared using the independent Students t test for numerical variables, and the Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. RESULTS: Twenty-seven women with PLO and 43 in the control group (aged 36.2 ± 4.7 and 38.8 ± 4.3 years, respectively, p = 0.04) participated. Among women with PLO, more than 5 vertebrae were involved in 13 (48%), 4 vertebrae in 6 (22%), and 3 or fewer vertebrae in 8 (30%). Among the 24 women with relevant data, 21 (88%) had nontraumatic fractures; 3 (13%) women had fractures during pregnancy, and the remaining during the early postpartum period. Diagnosis was delayed for over 16 weeks for 11 (41%) women; 16 (67%) received teriparatide. Significantly lower proportions of women in the PLO group engaged in physical activity over 2 hours/week, before and during pregnancy (37 vs. 67%, p < 0.015 and 11 vs. 44%, p < 0.003, respectively). A lower proportion of the PLO than the control group reported calcium supplementation during pregnancy (7% vs. 30%, p = 0.03) and a higher proportion reported treatment with low-molecular-weight-heparin during pregnancy (p = 0.03). Eighteen (67%) of the PLO group expressed fear of fractures and 15 (56%) fear of falls, compared to none and 2%, respectively, of the control group (p < 0.00001 for both). CONCLUSIONS: Most of the women with PLO who responded to our survey reported spinal fractures involving multiple vertebrae, delayed diagnosis, and treatment with teriparatide. Compared to a control group, they reported less physical activity and impaired QOL. For this uncommon yet severe condition, a multidisciplinary effort should be exerted for early identification and treatment, to alleviate back pain, prevent subsequent fractures and improve QOL.

Bone Mineral Density of the 1/3 Radius Refines Osteoporosis Diagnosis, Correlates With Prevalent Fractures, and Enhances Fracture Risk Estimates.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the added value of 1/3 radius (1/3R) for the diagnosis of osteoporosis by spine and hip sites and its correlation with prevalent fractures and predicted fracture risk. METHODS: Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) scores for hip and major osteoporotic fractures (MOF) with/without trabecular bone score were considered proxy for fracture risk. The contribution of 1/3R to risk prediction was depicted via linear regression models with FRAX score as the dependent variable-first only with central and then with radius T-score as an additional covariate. Significance of change in the explained variance was compared by F-test. RESULTS: The study included 1453 patients, 86% women, aged 66 ± 10 years. A total of 32% (n = 471) were osteoporotic by spine/hip and 8% (n = 115) by radius only, constituting a 24.4% increase in the number of subjects defined as osteoporotic (n = 586, 40%). Prior fracture prevalence was similar among patients with osteoporosis by spine/hip (17.4%) and radius only (19.1%) (P = .77). FRAX prediction by a regression model using spine/hip T-score yielded explained variance of 51.8% and 49.9% for MOF and 39.8% and 36.4% for hip (with/without trabecular bone score adjustment, respectively). The contribution of 1/3R was statistically significant (P < .001) and slightly increased the explained variance to 52.3% and 50.4% for MOF and 40.9% and 37.4% for hip, respectively. CONCLUSION: Reclassification of BMD results according to radius measurements results in higher diagnostic output. Prior fractures were equally prevalent among patients with radius-only and classic-site osteoporosis. FRAX tool performance slightly improved by incorporating radius BMD. Whether this approach may lead to a better fracture prediction warrants further prospective evaluation.

Structured, Protocol-Based Pulse-Oximetry Measurement Improves the Evaluation of Hypoxemic Patients at Hospital Admission.

BACKGROUND: Accurate pulse oximetry reading at hospital admission is of utmost importance, mainly for patients presenting with hypoxemia. Nevertheless, there is no accepted or evidence-based protocol for such structured measuring. OBJECTIVES: To devise and assess a structured protocol intended to increase the accuracy of pulse oximetry measurement at hospital admission. METHODS: The authors performed a prospective comparison of protocol-based pulse-oximetry measurement with non-protocol based readings in consecutive patients at hospital admission. They also calculated the relative percentage of improvement for each patient (before and after protocol implementation) as a fraction of the change in peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO2) from 100%. RESULTS: A total of 460 patients were recruited during a 6 month period. Implementation of a structured measurement protocol significantly changed saturation values. The SpO2 values of 24.7% of all study participants increased after protocol implementation (ranging from 1% to 21% increase in SpO2 values). Among hypoxemic patients (initial SpO2 < 90%), protocol implementation had a greater impact on final SpO2 measurements, increasing their median SpO2 readings by 4% (3-8% interquartile range; P < 0.05). Among this study population, 50% of the cohort improved by 17% of their overall potential and 25% improved by 50% of their overall improvement potential. As for patients presenting with hypoxemia, the median improvement was 31% of their overall SpO2 potential. CONCLUSIONS: Structured, protocol based pulse-oximetry may improve measurement accuracy and reliability. The authors suggest that implementation of such protocols may improve the management of hypoxemic patients.

Bone mineral density of the ultra-distal radius: are we ignoring valuable information?

The current study explored the possible utilization in dual-X-ray-absorptiometry scanning (DXA) of the ultra-distal radius (UDR). This region of interest is currently unused and mostly unstudied in this context. The study findings suggest UDR as potential useful region of interest in DXA scanning and warrant further study of the site. PURPOSE: Bone mineral density (BMD) measurement of a non-dominant arm is not routinely performed during dual-X-ray-absorptiometry (DXA) test, and the possible utility of ultra-distal (UDR) radius BMD is not well-studied. We evaluated in women, correlations of UDR BMD with fracture prevalence, fracture risk prediction by the fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX), and osteoporosis diagnosed by traditional sites. METHODS: Women who underwent a routine DXA (including their non-dominant forearm and including UDR BMD) in a tertiary medical center were included. Risk factors relevant to FRAX calculation were assessed via a self-administered questionnaire. Spearman correlations of UDR BMD to 10-year risks of major osteoporotic and hip fractures (assessed by FRAX) were explored. The possible added value of UDR BMD in explaining prevalent osteoporotic fractures was assessed using a multivariable regression model incorporating age and traditional osteoporosis diagnosis. RESULTS: The study included 1245 women with a median age of 66 years (interquartile range: 59-73), of whom 298 (24%) had UDR T-score ≤ - 2.5 and 154 (12%) reported prior fractures. UDR BMD was significantly negatively correlated with FRAX risk score for hip and major osteoporotic fractures (R = - 0.5 and R = - 0.41, respectively; P < 0.001). UDR T-score ≤ - 2.5 was associated with higher fracture prevalence (19% vs 10%; P < 0.001) and remained significant after adjusting for traditional BMD and age (OR 1.49, 1.01-2.19; P = 0.043). CONCLUSION: UDR BMD correlates both with prior fractures and with predicted fracture risks and might pose added value over traditional DXA sites.

Low risk for all-cause mortality among patients with lung neuroendocrine tumors co-diagnosed with pituitary adenomas.

PURPOSE: Lung neoplasms often co-occur with pituitary adenoma (PA). However, whether co-diagnosis of lung neuroendocrine tumors (LNETs) and PA constitute a unique entity and the impact of such co-diagnosis on patients' outcome is yet to be defined. The study objective was to compare patients' clinical characteristics with LNET to patients co-diagnosed with PA. METHODS: A Retrospective, case-control study based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry database between 2000 and 2016. A total of 2947 patients with LNET, including 2913 with LNET alone ("Sporadic") and 34 patients with both LNET and PA ("LNET-PA"). RESULTS: PA preceded LNET diagnosis in 85.3% of patients and had higher rates among LNET patients (34/2947) than with any cancer (p < 0.00001) and compared to patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (15/2378, p = 0.047). LNET-PA patients were younger at diagnosis compared with NSCLC patients and PA (p = 0.04). Among patients <60 years with LNET, co-diagnosis with PA was associated with lower all-cause mortality (ACM) risk (Log-rank test, p = 0.03). Adjusted ACM risk of patients with LNET-PA was lower than sporadic LNET (hazard ratio 0.553, 95% confidence interval 0.309-0.99, p = 0.046), especially among Caucasians, and lower overall-mortality risk in patients <60 years with borderline statistical significance (p = 0.071). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with both LNET and PA constitute a distinct morbidity and mortality profile than sporadic LNET, possibly suggesting an undefined MEN syndrome. Additional studies to further investigate patients' natural course and genetic profile with these neoplasms are needed.