Gene signature of circulating platelet-bound neutrophils is associated with poor prognosis in cancer patients.

Beyond their critical role in hemostasis, platelets physically interact with neutrophils to form neutrophil-platelet aggregates (NPAs), enhancing neutrophil effector functions during inflammation. NPAs may also promote disease worsening in various inflammatory diseases. However, characterization of NPAs in cancer remains totally unexplored. Using ImageStreamX (ISX) imaging flow cytometer, we were not only allowed able to detect CD15+ CD14- CD36+ ITGA2B+ NPAs in both healthy donors' (HDs) and cancer patients' bloods, but we also showed that NPAs result from the binding of platelets preferentially to low-density neutrophils (LDNs) as opposed to normal-density neutrophils (NDNs). By reanalyzing two independent public scRNAseq data of whole blood leukocytes from cancer patients and HDs, we could identify a subset of neutrophils with high platelet gene expression that may correspond to NPAs. Moreover, we showed that cancer patients' derived NPAs possessed a distinct molecular signature compared to the other neutrophil subsets, independently of platelet genes. Gene ontology (GO) term enrichment analysis of this NPAs-associated neutrophil transcriptomic signature revealed a significant enrichment of neutrophil degranulation, chemotaxis and trans-endothelial migration GO terms. Lastly, using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), we could show by multivariate Cox analysis that the NPAs-associated neutrophil transcriptomic signature was associated with a worse patient prognosis in several cancer types. These results suggest that neutrophils from NPAs are systemically primed by platelets empowering them with cancer progression capacities once at tumor site. NPAs may therefore hold clinical utility as novel noninvasive blood prognostic biomarker in cancer patients with solid tumors.

Breast cancer remotely imposes a myeloid bias on haematopoietic stem cells by reprogramming the bone marrow niche.

Myeloid cell infiltration of solid tumours generally associates with poor patient prognosis and disease severity1-13. Therefore, understanding the regulation of myeloid cell differentiation during cancer is crucial to counteract their pro-tumourigenic role. Bone marrow (BM) haematopoiesis is a tightly regulated process for the production of all immune cells in accordance to tissue needs14. Myeloid cells differentiate during haematopoiesis from multipotent haematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs)15-17. HSPCs can sense inflammatory signals from the periphery during infections18-21 or inflammatory disorders22-27. In these settings, HSPC expansion is associated with increased myeloid differentiation28,29. During carcinogenesis, the elevation of haematopoietic growth factors supports the expansion and differentiation of committed myeloid progenitors5,30. However, it is unclear whether cancer-related inflammation also triggers demand-adapted haematopoiesis at the level of multipotent HSPCs. In the BM, HSPCs reside within the haematopoietic niche which delivers HSC maintenance and differentiation cues31-35. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are a major cellular component of the BM niche and contribute to HSC homeostasis36-41. Modifications of MSCs in systemic disorders have been associated with HSC differentiation towards myeloid cells22,42. It is unknown if MSCs are regulated in the context of solid tumours and if their myeloid supportive activity is impacted by cancer-induced systemic changes. Here, using unbiased transcriptomic analysis and in situ imaging of HSCs and the BM niche during breast cancer, we show that both HSCs and MSCs are transcriptionally and spatially modified. We demonstrate that breast tumour can distantly remodel the cellular cross-talks in the BM niche leading to increased myelopoiesis.

Neutrophil Heterogeneity in Cancer: From Biology to Therapies.

Neutrophils have been extensively described in the pathophysiology of autoimmune and infectious diseases. Accumulating evidence also suggests the important role of neutrophils in cancer progression through their interaction with cancer and immune cells in blood and in the tumor microenvironment (TME). Most studies have described neutrophils as key drivers of cancer progression, due to their involvement in various tumor promoting functions including proliferation, aggressiveness, and dissemination, as well as in immune suppression. However, such studies were focusing on late-stages of tumorigenesis, in which chronic inflammation had already developed. The role of tumor-associated neutrophils (TANs) at early stages of tumor development remains poorly described, though recent findings indicate that early-stage TANs may display anti-tumor properties. Beyond their role at tumor site, evidence supported by NLR retrospective studies and functional analyses suggest that blood neutrophils could also actively contribute to tumorigenesis. Hence, it appears that the phenotype and functions of neutrophils vary greatly during tumor progression, highlighting their heterogeneity. The origin of pro- or anti-tumor neutrophils is generally believed to arise following a change in cell state, from resting to activated. Moreover, the fate of neutrophils may also involve distinct differentiation programs yielding various subsets of pro or anti-tumor neutrophils. In this review, we will discuss the current knowledge on neutrophils heterogeneity across different tissues and their impact on tumorigenesis, as well as neutrophil-based therapeutic strategies that have shown promising results in pre-clinical studies, paving the way for the design of neutrophil-based next generation immunotherapy.