Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Thorax ; 77(1): 58-64, 2022 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33927023

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) provides benefits to patients undergoing flexible bronchoscopy (FOB). We compared the effects of HFNC versus standard therapy (ST) on gas exchange, lung volume and diaphragm function in patients undergoing FOB for bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). METHODS: 36 outpatients were randomised to ST or HFNC. Arterial blood gases, episodes of severe desaturation, changes of end-expiratory lung impedance (ΔEELI), diaphragm ultrasound were recorded. Measurements were done at baseline (T0), after bronchoscope insertion (T1), at the end of the procedure (T2) and 10 min afterwards (T3). RESULTS: Arterial partial oxygen pressure (PaO2) was not different between T0 (10.8 (95% CI 8.7 to 12.0) kPa and T2 (11.1 (95% CI 10.4 to 12.0) kPa) with HFNC, while decreased from 11.1 (95% CI 10.5 to 12.1) to 9.1 (95% CI 8.4 to 9.8) kPa with ST. At T2, PaO2 was significantly higher with HFNC than with ST (p<0.001). Also, with HFNC, compared with ST, fewer desaturations occurred (11% vs 56%; p<0.01). ΔEELI was no different at the different time points with HFNC, while with ST there was a significant decrease at T1 (-170 (95% CI -382 to -32) mL, p=0.003), T2 (-211 (95% CI -425 to -148) mL, p<0.001) and T3 (-213 (95% CI -398 to -81) mL, p<0.001), as opposed to T0. EELI was lower with ST than HFNC at T1 (p=0.006), T2 (p=0.001) and T3 (p=0.002). Diaphragm displacement was no different between groups (p=0.748), while the thickening fraction significantly increased at T1 and T2 with ST only (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: During FOB for BAL, HFNC improves gas exchange, avoiding loss of end-expiratory lung volume and preventing increase of diaphragm activation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04016480.


Assuntos
Cânula , Insuficiência Respiratória , Broncoscopia , Humanos , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Oxigênio , Oxigenoterapia , Estudos Prospectivos , Insuficiência Respiratória/terapia
2.
Ther Adv Respir Dis ; 14: 1753466620963016, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33070706

RESUMO

The worldwide spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the new severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO) in March 2020. According to clinical studies carried out in China and Italy, most patients experience mild or moderate symptoms; about a fifth of subjects develop a severe and critical disease, and may suffer from interstitial pneumonia, possibly associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and death.In patients who develop respiratory failure, timely conventional oxygen therapy through nasal catheter plays a crucial role, but it can be used only in mild forms. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) support or non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) are uncomfortable, and require significant man-machine cooperation. Herein we describe our experience of five patients with COVID-19, who were treated with high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) after failure of CPAP or NIV, and discuss the role of HFNC in COVID-19 patients. Our findings suggest that HFNC can be used successfully in selected patients with COVID-19-related ARDS.The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.


Assuntos
Betacoronavirus , Cânula , Infecções por Coronavirus/complicações , Infecções por Coronavirus/terapia , Oxigenoterapia/instrumentação , Pneumonia Viral/complicações , Pneumonia Viral/terapia , Insuficiência Respiratória/terapia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , COVID-19 , Estudos de Coortes , Pressão Positiva Contínua nas Vias Aéreas , Infecções por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Itália , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ventilação não Invasiva , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Respiratória/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Respiratória/virologia , SARS-CoV-2 , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Sci Rep ; 10(1): 20834, 2020 11 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33257703

RESUMO

Since December 2019, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has spread from China all over the world and many COVID-19 outbreaks have been reported in long-term care facilities (LCTF). However, data on clinical characteristics and prognostic factors in such settings are scarce. We conducted a retrospective, observational cohort study to assess clinical characteristics and baseline predictors of mortality of COVID-19 patients hospitalized after an outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 infection in a LTCF. A total of 50 patients were included. Mean age was 80 years (SD, 12 years), and 24/50 (57.1%) patients were males. The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 32%. At Cox regression analysis, significant predictors of in-hospital mortality were: hypernatremia (HR 9.12), lymphocyte count < 1000 cells/µL (HR 7.45), cardiovascular diseases other than hypertension (HR 6.41), and higher levels of serum interleukin-6 (IL-6, pg/mL) (HR 1.005). Our study shows a high in-hospital mortality rate in a cohort of elderly patients with COVID-19 and hypernatremia, lymphopenia, CVD other than hypertension, and higher IL-6 serum levels were identified as independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. Given the small population size as major limitation of our study, further investigations are necessary to better understand and confirm our findings in elderly patients.


Assuntos
COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/mortalidade , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Assistência de Longa Duração/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Doenças Cardiovasculares/complicações , China/epidemiologia , Síndrome da Liberação de Citocina/patologia , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Hipernatremia/complicações , Interleucina-6/sangue , Linfopenia/complicações , Masculino , Casas de Saúde , Fatores de Risco , SARS-CoV-2
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA