Early arterial pressure monitoring and term-equivalent age MRI findings in very preterm infants.

INTRODUCTION: Variability of arterial blood pressure (ABP) has been associated with intraventricular hemorrhage in very preterm neonates (VPT) and may predict other brain lesions assessed at term-equivalent of age (TEA). METHODS: This was a prospective single-center study including VPT with early invasive continuous ABP monitoring and assessed at TEA using brain magnetic resonance imaging (TEA-MRI). The association between early mean ABP (MABP) and TEA-MRI findings was modeled by multivariate logistic regression analysis using covariates selected by the LASSO method. RESULTS: Among 99 VPT, the LASSO procedure selected consecutive periods of lowest MABP of 30 min on day 1 (d1) and 10 min on day 2 (d2) as the most relevant durations to predict TEA-MRI findings (OR [95% CI], 1.11 [1.02-1.23], p = 0.03 and 1.13 [1.01-1.27], p = 0.03, respectively). ROC curve analysis showed optimal thresholds at 30.25 mmHg on d1 and 33.25 mmHg on d2. This significant association persisted after adjustment with covariates including birthweight, gestational age, sex, and inotrope exposure. Final models selected by LASSO included the decile of the birthweight and lowest MABP for 30 min on d1 and 10 min on d2, for which the areas under the ROC curve were 74% and 75%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Early continuous ABP monitoring may predict brain TEA-MRI findings in VPT. IMPACT: Early arterial blood pressure monitoring may contribute to predicting brain damage upon MRI at term-equivalent of age for infants born very preterm. Careful blood pressure continuous monitoring in very preterm infants may identify infants at risk of long-term brain damage. Umbilical artery catheterization provides the best option for continuously monitoring arterial blood pressure in very preterm infants.

["Illustrated guide for the observation of the sensory-motor behavior of the preterm newborn"]. / Guide illustré pour l'observation du comportement sensori-moteur du nouveau-né prématuré.

Developmental care is defined by a personalized approach to the premature child. Observation of sensory-motor behavior is a key part of this approach and requires specific training and the use of observation tools. This study analyzes the use of an illustrated guide during the observation and evaluation of the sensory-motor behavior of the premature baby; this didactic contribution constitutes a real added value for the professionals, allowing the elaboration of a care project.

Outcomes for Infants Born in Perinatal Centers Performing Fewer Surgical Ligations for Patent Ductus Arteriosus: A Swiss Population-Based Study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess patent ductus arteriosus treatment variation between Swiss perinatal centers and to determine its effect on outcome in a population-based setting. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of infants born less than 28 weeks of gestation between 2012 and 2017. Outcomes between surgically ligated and pharmacologically treated infants as well as infants born in centers performing ≤10% ligation ("low" group) and >10% ("high" group) were compared using logistic regression and 1:1 propensity score matching. Matching was based on case-mix and preligation confounders: intraventricular hemorrhages grades 3-4, necrotizing enterocolitis, sepsis, and ≥28 days' oxygen supply. RESULTS: Of 1389 infants, 722 (52%) had pharmacologic treatment and 156 (11.2%) received surgical ligation. Compared with infants who received pharmacologic treatment, ligated infants had greater odds for major morbidities (OR 2.09, 95% CI 1.44-3.04) and 2-year neurodevelopmental impairment (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.15-2.84). Mortality was comparable after restricting the cohort to infants surviving at least until day 10 to avoid survival bias. In the "low" group, 34 (4.9%) of 696 infants were ligated compared with 122 (17.6%) of 693 infants in the "high" group. Infants in the "high" group had greater odds for major morbidities (OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.11-2.0). CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis identified a burden on infants receiving surgical ligation vs pharmacologic treatment in a population-based setting where there was no agreed-on common procedure. These results may guide a revision of patent ductus arteriosus treatment practice in Switzerland.

Successful conservative treatment of intestinal perforation in VLBW and ELBW neonates: a single centre case series and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: The current standard treatment of neonates with intestinal perforation is surgery. However, the mortality rate after surgical treatment for intestinal perforation is very high for very low birth weight (VLBW) and extremely low birth weight (ELBW) neonates. In this review, conservative treatment of pneumoperitoneum among VLBW and ELBW neonates is investigated. METHODS: Between January 2015 and December 2017, data from all of the VLBW and ELBW neonates with pneumoperitoneum who survived without surgical treatment were collected from Shenzhen Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital in Guangdong, China. Twenty-two neonates with birth weight less than 1500 g were diagnosed with pneumoperitoneum. Following careful evaluation and discussion, eleven were treated conservatively and this was successful in eight. Details of the eight neonates including birth weight, gestational age, gender, risk factors, time of the perforation, treatment and prognosis were retrospectively recorded. A literature review was performed of previously reported cases that had used conservative treatment. RESULTS: The median gestational age and birth weight of the eight neonates were 27+ 1 weeks (range 24w+ 3 to 31w+ 6) and 855 g (range 650 g to 1440 g), respectively. Pneumoperitoneum was confirmed by X-ray in all at a median of 8 days of life. They received full parenteral support for a median of 22 days. All eight neonates received a combination of piperacillin-tazobactam and meropenem as first-choice antibiotics, two of them also received fluconazole as anti-fungal medication. Median duration of hospitalisation was 80 days. CONCLUSIONS: Conservative treatment with careful surveillance may be a practical choice for the VLBW and ELBW neonates with intestinal perforation. Further studies are needed for confirmation.

Prediction of ROP Treatment and Evaluation of Screening Criteria in VLBW Infants-a Population Based Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) and ROP screening criteria differ between countries. We assessed whether ROP screening could be reduced based on the local ROP incidence. METHODS: Observational cohort study of infants born in Switzerland between 2006 and 2015 <32 0/7 weeks. Chronological and postmenstrual ages at ROP treatment were analyzed. A model to identify ROP treatment on patients born between 2006 and 2012 (training set) was developed and tested on patients born between 2013 and 2015 (validation set). RESULTS: Of 7817 live-born infants, 1098 died within the first 5 weeks of life. The remaining 6719 infants were included into analysis. All patients requiring ROP treatment would have been identified if screening had been performed before reaching 60 days of life or 37 3/7 weeks postmenstrual age, whichever came first. The training and validation sets included 4522 and 2197 preterm infants encompassing 56 and 20 patients receiving ROP treatment, respectively. All patients would have required screening to reach 100% sensitivity. To reach a sensitivity of 95.0% and a specificity of 87.6%, we predicted a reduction in 13.2% of patients requiring screening (c-statistic = 0.916). CONCLUSIONS: A substantial reduction of infants requiring screening seems possible, but necessitates prospective testing of new screening criteria.

Avoiding late preterm deliveries to reduce neonatal complications: an 11-year cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Late preterm (LPT) newborns, defined as those born between 34 0/7 and 36 6/7 gestational weeks, have higher short- and long-term morbidity and mortality than term infants (≥37 weeks). A categorization to justify a non-spontaneous LPT delivery has been proposed to distinguish evidence-based from non-evidence-based criteria. This study aims to describe rates and temporal trends of non-spontaneous LPT neonates delivered according to evidence-based or non-evidence-based criteria and to evaluate the number of avoidable LPT deliveries, including severe neonatal morbidity rates and associated risk factors. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study including all LPT neonates born at a Swiss university maternity unit between January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2012. Trends of LPT neonates and neonatal complications were assessed across time using Poisson regression and risk factors for neonatal complications by logistic regression. RESULTS: Among 40,609 singleton live births, 4223 (10.5%) were preterm and 2017 (4.9%) LPT. In the latter group, 26.2% were non-spontaneous (evidence-based: 12.0%; non-evidence-based: 14.2%). The most frequent indications for evidence-based non-spontaneous LPT delivery were severe preeclampsia (51.8%) and abnormal fetal tracing (24.7%). Indications for non-evidence-based non-spontaneous LPT deliveries were hemorrhage (36.2%) and mild preeclampsia (15.7%). LPT birth rates remained stable over time. The rate of neonatal complications after non-evidence-based LPT birth remained high over time (43.8% vs. 43.5% in 2002 and 2012, respectively; P = 0.645), whereas the annual proportion of neonatal complications overall showed a decreasing trend (from 38.0% in 2002 to 33.5% in 2012; P = 0.051). CONCLUSIONS: LPT birth rates were stable over time, but neonatal complications remained high, particularly after non-evidence-indicated LPT birth. A total of 287 LPT births could have been potentially avoided if an evidence-based protocol for delivery indications had been used. Efforts should be made to avoid non-spontaneous LPT births in order to reduce neonatal complications.

[Obstetrics]. / Obstétrique.

During the past year, we have renewed interest in old well-known problems. New studies and guidelines have been issued about lung maturation in cases of preterm delivery after 37 weeks of gestation. Short term benefits have been proven but the number of cases needed to treat to prevent one case of respiratory complications is high and with possible neurological long-term effects. Also, several studies have shown the benefits of including the ultrasound measurement of the inferior segment of the uterus in order to attempt vaginal delivery after caesarean section with the lowest risk for uterine rupture, while others studies have shown the best procedure to close the uterus during cesarean section. And finally, we will discuss about an old friend: aspirin to reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia.

Au cours de l'année écoulée, l'intérêt pour de vieux problèmes bien connus de notre spécialité médicale a été renouvelé. De nouvelles études et lignes directrices ont été publiées concernant la maturation pulmonaire en cas d'accouchement prématuré après 37 semaines de gestation. Bien qu'un bénéfice à court terme ait été prouvé, le nombre de cas à traiter pour prévenir une complication respiratoire néonatale est élevé, avec des effets neurologiques potentiels à long terme. Afin de promouvoir la tentative d'accouchement vaginal après césarienne sans augmenter le risque de rupture utérine, différents travaux indiquent qu'il faut intégrer la mesure du segment inférieur de l'utérus dans la discussion de la voie d'accouchement. D'autres ont montré la meilleure procédure pour fermer l'utérus pendant la césarienne. Enfin, nous allons parler d'une vieille amie : l'aspirine pour réduire le risque de prééclampsie.

Moderate and extended neonatal resuscitations occur in one in 10 births and require specialist cover 24 hours a day.

AIM: Neonatal resuscitation requires minimal equipment, but the immediate availability of expert staff accounts for the largest proportion of the costs. Despite this, staff requirements and timetables are currently planned without comprehensive epidemiologic data. The aim of this study was to evaluate the staffing required for neonatal resuscitations in the delivery room. METHODS: We measured attendance for each specific role in a tertiary university-affiliated hospital and for four possible intervention levels: preparation time, basic paediatric care, moderate resuscitation and extended resuscitation. RESULTS: Between 2005 and 2012, resuscitation staff attended 11 561 of the 32 799 births: 27.2% for preparation time, 17.7% for basic paediatric care, 6.4% for moderate resuscitation and 3.5% for extended resuscitation. Moderate and extended resuscitations occurred in roughly 10% of births and evenly during 24-h periods. Basic paediatric care levels were higher during weekday mornings, and extended resuscitations were uniformly distributed. However, there was a drop in all types of interventions around 7 a.m. to 8 a.m., when staff were changing shifts. CONCLUSION: Moderate and extended resuscitations occurred evenly over 24 h in roughly 10% of births, stressing the importance of having a highly competent neonatal team constantly available. All activities associated with resuscitation were lower during morning shift changes.

Impact of clinical decision support guidelines on therapeutic drug monitoring of gentamicin in newborns.

BACKGROUND: Our institution's gentamicin dosing and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) practices for newborns were suspected to be very heterogeneous. Once-daily dosing (ODD) or extended-interval dosing (EID) and trough concentration measurement were recommended. Clinical decision support guidelines were developed and implemented as clinical decision support in the computerized prescriber order entry system. Impact on dosing, TDM practices, and blood sampling were evaluated. METHODS: A 1-year retrospective historically controlled study before (April 2008-March 2009) and after the implementation of guidelines (January 2010-December 2010) for newborns (<30 days of life) receiving gentamicin. Blood concentrations (% of peak concentrations sampled, % of patients with zero or one concentration sampled, % of trough concentrations ≤1 mg/L) and dose regimen (ODD/EID) were compared between groups. Factors potentially associated with gentamicin concentration were analyzed (multivariate analysis). RESULTS: One hundred thirty-two (postguidelines) versus 102 (preguidelines) patients were included (median gestational age: 34.3 versus 35.8 weeks, P > 0.05). After implementation of the guidelines, an ODD/EID regimen was almost exclusively used (97.7% versus 61.6%, P < 0.001), the percentage of peak concentrations (0.9% versus 17.2%, P < 0.001) and the number of blood samples per patient (87.1% having 0 or 1 concentration measured versus 48.0, P < 0.001) sharply reduced. A significantly higher percentage of trough concentrations were ≤1 mg/L (68.5% versus 33.0%, P < 0.001). The probability of a trough concentration ≤1 mg/L increased with an ODD/EID regimen (odds ratio, 7.23; 95% confidence interval: 3.48-15.0, P < 0.001) and in the postguidelines group (odds ratio, 2.02; 95% confidence interval: 1.01-4.02, P = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: Guideline implementation generated a sharp reduction in blood sampling. Clinical benefits of better gentamicin dosing and TDM practices were evident. Cost-effectiveness and clinical benefit of reduced blood sampling should be evaluated.

Challenges and opportunities in neonatal sepsis management: insights from a survey among clinicians in 25 Sub-Saharan African countries.

BACKGROUND: Neonatal sepsis (NS) is a global health issue, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa, where it accounts for a substantial portion of neonatal morbimortality. This multicountry survey aimed to elucidate current practices, challenges and case definitions in managing NS among clinicians in Sub-Saharan Africa. METHODS: The survey targeted physicians and medical practitioners working in neonatal care who participated in a Self-Administered Web Questionnaire. The main objective was to understand NS and infection case definitions and management from the clinician's point of view and to identify challenges and opportunities in sepsis management. Participants were queried on demographics, definitions and diagnostic criteria, treatment approaches, and infection prevention and control (IPC) measures. A total of 136 participants from 93 healthcare structures responded, providing valuable insights into NS management practices. RESULTS: From May to July 2022 across 21 Sub-Saharan African countries, 136 neonatal clinicians with an average from 93 structures with on average 10-year experience took the survey. NS ranked highest among prevalent neonatal conditions. Diagnostic case definitions between sepsis and infection were attributed to clinical signs, anamnesis, C reactive protein, white blood cll count and blood cultures with no statistically significant differences. Early-onset sepsis was defined within 72 hours by 48%, while late-onset varied. Antibiotics were likely on admission (86.4%) and during the stay (82.2%). Treatment abandonment was reported unlikely. The preferred antibiotic regimen for early-onset sepsis was intravenous amoxicillin (or ampicillin), gentamycin and cefotaxime. Blood culture availability and IPC protocols were reported as limited, particularly concerning patient environment, pharmacy protocols and clean-dirty circuits. CONCLUSIONS: This NS survey emphasises clinicians' challenges due to limited access to diagnostic tools and raises concerns about antimicrobial overexposure. IPC also seem limited, according to participants. Addressing these challenges can enhance diagnostic practices, antibiotic stewardship and infection control in the region.

Hydration for treatment of preterm labour.

BACKGROUND: Hydration has been proposed as a treatment for women with preterm labour. Theoretically, hydration may reduce uterine contractility by increasing uterine blood flow and by decreasing pituitary secretion of antidiuretic hormone and oxytocin. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of intravenous or oral hydration to avoid preterm birth and its consequences in women with preterm labour. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (30 September 2013) and bibliographies of relevant papers. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials, including women with a viable pregnancy less than 37 completed weeks' gestation and presenting with preterm labour, comparing intravenous or oral hydration with no treatment. The intervention might or might not be associated with bed rest. Studies comparing tocolytic drugs with intravenous fluids used in the control group as a placebo were not included in this review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed the reports, to determine if the study met the inclusion criteria and to evaluate the methodological quality. Data were extracted independently by two of the review authors. The results were expressed as risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes. MAIN RESULTS: Two studies, including a total of 228 women with preterm labour and intact membranes, compared intravenous hydration with bed rest alone. Risk of preterm delivery, before 37 weeks (RR) 1.09; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71 to 1.68), before 34 weeks (RR 0.72; 95% CI 0.20 to 2.56) or before 32 weeks (RR 0.76; 95% CI 0.29 to 1.97), was similar between groups. Admission to neonatal intensive care unit occurred with similar frequency in both groups (RR 0.99; 95% CI 0.46 to 2.16). Cost of treatment was slightly higher (US$39) in the hydration group. This difference was not statistically significant and only includes hospital costs during a visit of less than 24 hours. No studies evaluated oral hydration. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The data are too few to support the use of hydration as a specific treatment for women presenting with preterm labour. The two small studies available do not show any advantage of hydration compared with bed rest alone. Intravenous hydration does not seem to be beneficial, even during the period of evaluation soon after admission, in women with preterm labour. Women with evidence of dehydration may, however, benefit from the intervention.

Early detection of cold stress to prevent hypothermia: A narrative review.

Temperature monitoring is essential for assessing neonates and providing appropriate neonatal thermal care. Thermoneutrality is defined as the environmental temperature range within which the oxygen and metabolic consumptions are minimum to maintain normal body temperature. When neonates are in an environment below thermoneutral temperature, they respond by vasoconstriction to minimise heat losses, followed by a rise in metabolic rate to increase heat production. This condition, physiologically termed cold stress, usually occurs before hypothermia. In addition to standard axillary or rectal temperature monitoring by a thermometer, cold stress can be detected by monitoring peripheral hand or foot temperature, even by hand-touch. However, this simple method remains undervalued and generally recommended only as a second and lesser choice in clinical practice. This review presents the concepts of thermoneutrality and cold stress and highlights the importance of early detection of cold stress before hypothermia occurs. The authors suggest systematic clinical determination of hand and foot temperatures by hand-touch for early detection of physiological cold stress, in addition to monitoring core temperature for detection of established hypothermia, particularly in low-resource settings.

Neonatal warming devices: What can be recommended for low-resource settings when skin-to-skin care is not feasible?

Hypothermia occurs frequently among clinically unstable neonates who are not suitable to place in skin-to-skin care. This study aims to explore the existing evidence on the effectiveness, usability, and affordability of neonatal warming devices when skin-to-skin care is not feasible in low-resource settings. To explore existing data, we searched for (1) systematic reviews as well as randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing the effectiveness of radiant warmers, conductive warmers, or incubators among neonates, (2) neonatal thermal care guidelines for the use of warming devices in low-resource settings and (3) technical specification and resource requirement of warming devices which are available in the market and certified medical device by the US Food and Drug Administration or with a CE marking. Seven studies met the inclusion criteria, two were systematic reviews comparing radiant warmers vs. incubators and heated water-filled mattresses vs. incubators, and five were randomised controlled trials comparing conductive thermal mattresses with phase-change materials vs. radiant warmers and low-cost cardboard incubator vs. standard incubator. There was no significant difference in effectiveness between devices except radiant warmers caused a statistically significant increase in insensible water loss. Seven guidelines covering the use of neonatal warming devices show no consensus about the choice of warming methods for clinically unstable neonates. The main warming devices currently available and intended for low-resource settings are radiant warmers, incubators, and conductive warmers with advantages and limitations in terms of characteristics and resource requirements. Some devices require consumables which need to be considered when making a purchase decision. As effectiveness is comparable between devices, specific requirements according to patients' characteristics, technical specification, and context suitability must play a primary role in the selection and purchasing decision of warming devices. In the delivery room, a radiant warmer allows fast access during a short period and will benefit numerous neonates. In the neonatal unit, warming mattresses are low-cost, effective, and low-electricity consumption devices. Finally, incubators are required for very premature infants to control insensible water losses, mainly during the first one to two weeks of life, mostly in referral centres.

Exploring health care professionals' experiences and knowledge of woman-centred care in a university hospital.

Inspired by the six quality-of-care goals developed by the Institute of Medicine, woman-centred care (WCC) as model of care is used in maternity services as it gives an emphasis on the woman as an individual and not her status as a patient. Bringing stronger attention to women's needs and values, is proven to have clear benefits for perinatal outcomes, but fails to be known or recognised by healthcare professionals' (HCPs) and implemented. Using a mixed-methods approach, this study aimed to explore HCPs definitions of WCC and identify the degree of agreement and knowledge regarding perinatal indicators when a WCC model of care is implemented. The quantitative part was carried using a self-administered questionnaire with perinatal indicators identified from the literature. Semi-structured interviews were realized using a purposive sample of 15 HCPs and an interview grid inspired by Leap's WCC model. The study was conducted in the maternity of a university hospital in French-speaking part of Switzerland. Out of 318 HCPs working with mothers and their newborns, 51% had already heard of WCC without being familiar with Leap's model. The HCPs were aware of the positive perinatal care outcomes when WCC was implemented: women's satisfaction (99.2%), health promotion (97.6%), HCP's job satisfaction (93.2%) and positive feelings about their work (85.6%), which were strongly emphasised in the interviews. The respondents reported institutional difficulties in implementing the model such as administrative overload and lack of time. The positive outcomes of WCC on spontaneous deliveries and improved neonatal adaptation were known by most HCPs (63.4% and 59.9%, respectively). However, fewer than half of the HCPs highlighted the model's positive effects on analgesia and episiotomies or its financial benefits. Knowledge of quality-of-care outcomes (i.e women's satisfaction, positive impact on practice…) was prevalent among most of HCPs. Without adhering to a common definition and without a specific model for consensus, most providers have integrated some aspects of WCC into their practice. However, specific perinatal indicators remain largely unknown, which may hinder the implementation of WCC.

Less is more: Antibiotics at the beginning of life.

Antibiotic exposure at the beginning of life can lead to increased antimicrobial resistance and perturbations of the developing microbiome. Early-life microbiome disruption increases the risks of developing chronic diseases later in life. Fear of missing evolving neonatal sepsis is the key driver for antibiotic overtreatment early in life. Bias (a systemic deviation towards overtreatment) and noise (a random scatter) affect the decision-making process. In this perspective, we advocate for a factual approach quantifying the burden of treatment in relation to the burden of disease balancing antimicrobial stewardship and effective sepsis management.

Clinical detection of 'cold stress' is overlooked: an online survey of healthcare workers to explore the gap in neonatal thermal care in low-resource settings.

BACKGROUND: Neonatal hypothermia has been widely regarded as a major contributory factor to neonatal mortality and morbidity in low-resource settings. The high prevalence of potentially preventable hypothermia today urges an investigation into why neonates still become hypothermic despite awareness of the problem and established thermal care guidelines. This study aimed to explore the gaps in knowledge and practices of neonatal thermal care among healthcare workers in low-resource settings. METHODS: A cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey was performed online among healthcare workers in low-resource settings. We applied a purposive and snowballing sampling method to recruit participants through a two-round international online survey. Questionnaires were developed using themes of neonatal thermal care extracted from existing neonatal care guidelines. RESULTS: 55 neonatal care professionals participated in the first-round survey and 33 in the second. Almost all participants (n=44-54/55) acknowledged the importance of the WHO's warm chain to keep a neonate warm. However, fewer participants (n=34-46/55) responded to practice them. When asked about cold stress, defined as a condition in which neonates are below optimum environmental temperature and using more oxygen and energy while maintaining normal body temperature, 15 out of 55 participants answered that checking extremity temperatures by hand touch was useless. Some participants reported concern about the extremity temperature's inaccuracy compared with core temperature. Opinions and preferences for rewarming methods differed among participants, and so did the availability of warming equipment at their institutions. CONCLUSION: An inadequate understanding of cold stress underestimates the potential benefits of extremity temperatures and leads to missed opportunities for the timely prevention of hypothermia. The current thermal care guidelines fail to highlight the importance of monitoring cold stress and intervening before hypothermia occurs. Therefore, we urge introducing the concept of cold stress in any neonatal thermal care guidelines.

Ending Neonatal Deaths From Hypothermia in Sub-Saharan Africa: Call for Essential Technologies Tailored to the Context.

Neonatal death represents a major burden in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), where the main conditions triggering mortality, such as prematurity, labor complications, infections, and respiratory distress syndrome, are frequently worsened by hypothermia, which dramatically scales up the risk of death. In SSA, the lack of awareness on the procedures to prevent hypothermia and the shortage of essential infant devices to treat it are hampering the reduction of neonatal deaths associated to hypothermia. Here, we offer a snapshot on the current available medical solutions to prevent and treat hypothermia in SSA, with a focus on Kenya. We aim to provide a picture that underlines the essential need for infant incubators in SSA. Specifically, given the inappropriateness of the incubators currently on the market, we point out the need for reinterpretation of research in the field, calling for technology-based solutions tailored to the SSA context, the need, and the end-user.

2.5 Million Annual Deaths-Are Neonates in Low- and Middle-Income Countries Too Small to Be Seen? A Bottom-Up Overview on Neonatal Morbi-Mortality.

(1) Background: Every year, 2.5 million neonates die, mostly in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), in total disregard of their fundamental human rights. Many of these deaths are preventable. For decades, the leading causes of neonatal mortality (prematurity, perinatal hypoxia, and infection) have been known, so why does neonatal mortality fail to diminish effectively? A bottom-up understanding of neonatal morbi-mortality and neonatal rights is essential to achieve adequate progress, and so is increased visibility. (2) Methods: We performed an overview on the leading causes of neonatal morbi-mortality and analyzed the key interventions to reduce it with a bottom-up approach: from the clinician in the field to the policy maker. (3) Results and Conclusions: Overall, more than half of neonatal deaths in LMIC are avoidable through established and well-known cost-effective interventions, good quality antenatal and intrapartum care, neonatal resuscitation, thermal care, nasal CPAP, infection control and prevention, and antibiotic stewardship. Implementing these requires education and training, particularly at the bottom of the healthcare pyramid, and advocacy at the highest levels of government for health policies supporting better newborn care. Moreover, to plan and follow interventions, better-quality data are paramount. For healthcare developments and improvement, neonates must be acknowledged as humans entitled to rights and freedoms, as stipulated by international law. Most importantly, they deserve more respectful care.

Impact of SARS-CoV-2 on incidence, treatment and outcome of very preterm born infants in Switzerland: a retrospective, population-based cohort study.

AIMS OF THE STUDY: To assess whether the COVID-19 pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 had an impact on incidence, treatment or major adverse short-term outcome of preterm-born infants in Switzerland. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of preterm infants born in 2020 based on two independent data sources from the Swiss Federal Statistics Office (FSO) and SwissNeoNet. Based on FSO data, we calculated the odds ratios for extremely preterm (22-27 weeks gestation), very preterm (28-31 weeks gestation), and late preterm (32-36 weeks gestation) births during the pandemic. Based on SwissNeoNet data of infants born between 22 and 31 weeks gestation, we compared infants born during the Swiss lockdown period in 2020 with infants born during the same period between 2015 and 2019, all infants of 2020 with all infants between 2015 and 2019 and infants born to mothers tested SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative. Possible associations with the pandemic were tested using logistic regression adjusted for case-mix. As a control, we compared births of 2019 with those of 2015-2018. RESULTS: The FSO data revealed equivalent odds for extremely preterm births in 2020 (odds ratio [OR] 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89-1.14), as well as somewhat lower odds ratios for very preterm (OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.82-1.00) and late preterm (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.88-0.93) births in 2020. A comparison between 2019 and 2015-2018, however, revealed matching odds ratios rendering an association to the pandemic unlikely. In the SwissNeoNet data, 137 infants were born during lockdown in 2020 compared with 134 births per year during 2015-2019. When including all infants, 744 infants were compared to 845 births, respectively. The only difference observed in treatments and short term outcomes between 2020 and the reference years were a higher odds for respiratory distress syndrome (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.08-2.37) and provision of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.05-1.84). CONCLUSIONS: Our Swiss population-based analysis did not identify the elsewhere reported association between the COVID-19 pandemic and a reduced preterm birth rate. However, we can confirm a possible link between the COVID-19 pandemic and higher odds of respiratory distress syndrome, possibly coupled with CPAP requirements. Further observation of potential effects of the pandemic on health and health care provision to newborns may however be indicated based on the literature available so far and that our data only covers the first 9 months of the current pandemic.

Analysis of Antibiotic Exposure and Early-Onset Neonatal Sepsis in Europe, North America, and Australia.

Importance: Appropriate use of antibiotics is life-saving in neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS), but overuse of antibiotics is associated with antimicrobial resistance and long-term adverse outcomes. Large international studies quantifying early-life antibiotic exposure along with EOS incidence are needed to provide a basis for future interventions aimed at safely reducing neonatal antibiotic exposure. Objective: To compare early postnatal exposure to antibiotics, incidence of EOS, and mortality among different networks in high-income countries. Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a retrospective, cross-sectional study of late-preterm and full-term neonates born between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2018, in 13 hospital-based or population-based networks from 11 countries in Europe and North America and Australia. The study included all infants born alive at a gestational age greater than or equal to 34 weeks in the participating networks. Data were analyzed from October 2021 to March 2022. Exposures: Exposure to antibiotics started in the first postnatal week. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were the proportion of late-preterm and full-term neonates receiving intravenous antibiotics, the duration of antibiotic treatment, the incidence of culture-proven EOS, and all-cause and EOS-associated mortality. Results: A total of 757 979 late-preterm and full-term neonates were born in the participating networks during the study period; 21 703 neonates (2.86%; 95% CI, 2.83%-2.90%), including 12 886 boys (59.4%) with a median (IQR) gestational age of 39 (36-40) weeks and median (IQR) birth weight of 3250 (2750-3750) g, received intravenous antibiotics during the first postnatal week. The proportion of neonates started on antibiotics ranged from 1.18% to 12.45% among networks. The median (IQR) duration of treatment was 9 (7-14) days for neonates with EOS and 4 (3-6) days for those without EOS. This led to an antibiotic exposure of 135 days per 1000 live births (range across networks, 54-491 days per 1000 live births). The incidence of EOS was 0.49 cases per 1000 live births (range, 0.18-1.45 cases per 1000 live births). EOS-associated mortality was 3.20% (12 of 375 neonates; range, 0.00%-12.00%). For each case of EOS, 58 neonates were started on antibiotics and 273 antibiotic days were administered. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this study suggest that antibiotic exposure during the first postnatal week is disproportionate compared with the burden of EOS and that there are wide (up to 9-fold) variations internationally. This study defined a set of indicators reporting on both dimensions to facilitate benchmarking and future interventions aimed at safely reducing antibiotic exposure in early life.