Chronic graft-versus-host disease: Unresolved complication or ancient history?

Chronic graft-vs.-host disease (GVHD) is associated with morbidity, mortality, impaired quality of life, prolonged immunosuppressive (IS) therapy, and infection risk after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Major strides have occurred in the understanding of chronic GVHD biology, NIH Consensus meetings have refined rigorous approaches to diagnosis, staging and response criteria, major interventional trials have established standard benchmarks for treatment outcome, and three agents to date have been FDA-approved for treating steroid-refractory chronic GVHD. Promising results from several recent trials have led some but not others to conclude that the risk of developing chronic GVHD is sufficiently low to by-and-large be considered a major post-HCT complication of the past. We propose that it is time to critically examine the results of contemporary GVHD prophylaxis regimens and discuss the state-of-the-science and associated controversies in spectrum of conclusions reached as to the risk of chronic GVHD. With these data, the current chronic GVHD incidence can be most precisely determined, and the present and future burden of chronic GVHD-affected patients be accurately modeled. Through review of existing evidence, we highlight unresolved needs and opportunities to refine best GVHD prophylaxis or preemptive therapy approaches, optimize established chronic GVHD therapy, and make the argument that support of preclinical and clinical research is critical in improving patient outcomes.

JAK2/mTOR Inhibition Fails to Prevent Acute GVHD Despite Reduced Th1/Th17 cells: Final Phase II Trial Results.

Our phase I graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prevention trial of JAK2 inhibitor, pacritinib, (recommended phase II dose: 100mg po BID day 0 to +70) plus sirolimus and tacrolimus (PAC/SIR/TAC) demonstrated the regimen was safe and free of pan-JAK myelosuppression after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). PAC inhibits IL-6 receptor activity and pathogenic Th1/Th17 differentiation in preclinical models and the phase I trial. Herein we report on our completed phase II trial of PAC/SIR/TAC after 8/8-HLA matched alloHCT. This single-arm phase II trial (NCT02891603) was powered to determine if PAC/SIR/TAC suppressed %pSTAT3+ CD4+ T cells at day +21 (primary endpoint: %pSTAT3+ CD4+ T cells ≤ 35%) and estimated grade II-IV acute GVHD by day +100. The impact of PAC/SIR/TAC on T cell subsets, CD28 (pS6 and pH3ser10), and IL-2 receptor (pSTAT5) signal transduction was also evaluated. Eligible patients (n=28) received alloHCT for hematologic malignancies or myeloproliferative neoplasms. Reduced or myeloablative intensity conditioning was permitted. PAC/SIR/TAC met the primary endpoint, reducing %pSTAT3+ CD4+ T cells to 9.62% at day +21. Th1/Th17 cells were decreased at day +21, increasing the ratio of Tregs to Th1 and Th17 cells with PAC/SIR/TAC at RP2D PAC compared to dose level 1 PAC. The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD by day +100 with PAC/SIR/TAC was similar to historic SIR/TAC values (46 v 43%). While PAC/SIR/TAC suppressed pSTAT3 and Th1/Th17 cells, the regimen did not improve acute GVHD prevention.

Clinical impact of clonal hematopoiesis in hematopoietic cell transplantation: a review, metaanalysis, and call to action.

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is the only potentially curative treatment option for many patients with hematologic malignancies. While HCT outcomes have improved drastically over the years, patients and clinicians continue to face numerous survivorship challenges, such as relapse, graft-versushost disease, and secondary malignancies. Recent literature suggests that clonal hematopoiesis (CH), the presence of a recurrent somatic mutation in hematopoietic cells, in HCT patients or donors may be associated with outcomes in autologous and allogeneic HCT. Herein, we perform a review of the literature and summarize reported associations between CH and clinical outcomes in HCT. For commonly reported outcomes, we used meta-analysis methods to provide estimates of effect sizes when combining results. A total of 32 articles with relevant and independent contributions were included, covering both autologous (n = 19) and allogeneic (n = 13) HCT. The articles report variable risk for developing outcomes according to CH characteristics, patient disease status, and method of HCT. Using meta-analysis of available results, HCT outcomes with statistically significant effects by CH status include therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (OR 3.65, 95%CI 2.18-6.10) and overall survival (HR 1.38, 95%CI 1.20-1.58) in autologous HCT and relapse (HR 0.80, 95%CI 0.68-0.94) in allogeneic HCT. However, heterogeneity, biases, and limitations in the literature provide challenges for informing the translation of CH to clinical decision-making. We conclude with a call to action and discussion of next steps to build upon the current literature and provide granularity to the true clinical impact of CH in the setting of HCT.

Comparison of treatment response measures in cutaneous sclerosis after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Cutaneous sclerosis, a highly morbid subtype of chronic graft vs. host disease (cGVHD), demonstrates limited treatment response under current NIH Response Measures. We explored novel sclerosis-specific response measures using Chronic GVHD Consortium data. A training cohort included patients with cutaneous sclerosis from a randomized trial of imatinib vs. rituximab, and a Consortium observational study. The validation cohort was a different Consortium observational study. Clinician-reported measures (baseline, and baseline to 6-month change) were examined for association with 6-month clinician-reported response. Patient-reported measures (baseline and baseline to 6-month change) were studied for association with 6-month patient-reported response. A total of 347 subjects were included (training 183, validation 164). While multiple skin and joint measures were associated with clinician-reported response on univariate analysis, PROM total score, PROM total score change, and NIH 0-3 skin change were retained in the final multivariate model (AUC 0.83 training, 0.75 validation). Similarly, many patient-reported measures were associated, but final multivariate analysis retained the HAP AAS, SF36 vitality change, LSS skin, and LSS skin change in the model (AUC 0.86 training, 0.75 validation). We identified which sclerosis measures have greatest association with 6-month clinician- and patient-reported treatment response, a previously unstudied area. However, given the observed performance in the validation cohorts, we conclude that further work is needed. Novel response measures may be needed to optimally assess treatment response in cutaneous sclerosis.

Cost-Effectiveness of Reduced-Intensity Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Older Patients With High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome: Analysis of BMT CTN 1102.

PURPOSE: BMT CTN 1102 was a phase III trial comparing reduced-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (RIC alloHCT) to standard of care for persons with intermediate- or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). We report results of a cost-effectiveness analysis conducted alongside the clinical trial. METHODS: Three hundred eighty-four patients received HCT (n = 260) or standard of care (n = 124) according to availability of a human leukocyte antigen-matched donor. Cost-effectiveness was calculated from US commercial and Medicare perspectives over a 20-year time horizon. Health care utilization and costs were estimated using propensity score-matched cohorts of HCT recipients in the OptumLabs Data Warehouse (age 50-64 years) and Medicare (age 65 years and older). EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) surveys of trial participants were used to derive health state utilities. RESULTS: Extrapolated 20-year overall survival for those age 50-64 years was 29% for HCT (n = 105) versus 13% for usual care (n = 44) and 31% for HCT (n = 155) versus 12% for non-HCT (n = 80) for those age 65 years and older. HCT was more effective (+2.36 quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs] for age 50-64 years and +2.92 QALYs for age 65 years and older) and more costly (+$452,242 in US dollars (USD) for age 50-64 years and +$233,214 USD for age 65 years and older) than usual care, with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of $191,487 (USD)/QALY and $79,834 (USD)/QALY, respectively. For persons age 50-64 years, there was a 29% chance that HCT was cost-effective using a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $150K (USD)/QALY and 51% at a $200K (USD)/QALY. For persons age 65 years and older, the probability was 100% at a WTP >$150K (USD)/QALY. CONCLUSION: Among patients age 65 years and older with high-risk MDS, RIC HCT is a high-value strategy. For those age 50-64 years, HCT is a lower-value strategy but has similar cost-effectiveness to other therapies commonly used in oncology.