Phase 3 Trial of Nemolizumab in Patients with Prurigo Nodularis.

BACKGROUND: Prurigo nodularis is a chronic, debilitating, and severely pruritic neuroimmunologic skin disease. Nemolizumab, an interleukin-31 receptor alpha antagonist, down-regulates key pathways in the pathogenesis of prurigo nodularis. METHODS: In this phase 3, double-blind, multicenter, randomized trial, we assigned adults with moderate-to-severe prurigo nodularis to receive an initial 60-mg dose of nemolizumab followed by subcutaneous injections of 30 mg or 60 mg (depending on baseline weight) every 4 weeks for 16 weeks or matching placebo. The primary end points were an itch response (a reduction of ≥4 points on the Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale [PP-NRS; scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more severe itch]) and an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) response (a score of 0 [clear] or 1 [almost clear] on the IGA [scores range from 0 to 4] and a reduction from baseline to week 16 of ≥2 points). There were five key secondary end points. RESULTS: A total of 274 patients underwent randomization; 183 were assigned to the nemolizumab group, and 91 to the placebo group. Treatment efficacy was shown with respect to both primary end points at week 16; a greater percentage of patients in the nemolizumab group than in the placebo group had an itch response (56.3% vs. 20.9%; strata-adjusted difference, 37.4 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 26.3 to 48.5), and a greater percentage in the nemolizumab group had an IGA response (37.7% vs. 11.0%; strata-adjusted difference, 28.5 percentage points; 95% CI, 18.8 to 38.2) (P<0.001 for both comparisons). Benefits were observed for the five key secondary end points: itch response at week 4 (41.0% vs. 7.7%), PP-NRS score of less than 2 at week 4 (19.7% vs. 2.2%) and week 16 (35.0% vs. 7.7%), and an improvement of 4 or more points on the sleep disturbance numerical rating scale (range, 0 [no sleep loss] to 10 [unable to sleep at all]) at week 4 (37.2% vs. 9.9%) and week 16 (51.9% vs. 20.9%) (P<0.001 for all comparisons). The most common individual adverse events were headache (6.6% vs. 4.4%) and atopic dermatitis (5.5% vs. 0%). CONCLUSIONS: Nemolizumab monotherapy significantly reduced the signs and symptoms of prurigo nodularis. (Funded by Galderma; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04501679; EudraCT number, 2019-004789-17.).

Nemolizumab with concomitant topical therapy in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (ARCADIA 1 and ARCADIA 2): results from two replicate, double-blind, randomised controlled phase 3 trials.

BACKGROUND: Nemolizumab, an interleukin (IL)-31 receptor subunit α antagonist, inhibits the IL-31 pathway of itch and skin inflammation in atopic dermatitis. Two international phase 3 studies were done to assess the efficacy and safety of nemolizumab in atopic dermatitis. In this Article we report results for the 16-week initial treatment period of both trials. METHODS: ARCADIA 1 and ARCADIA 2 were identical 48-week randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trials in adult and adolescent participants (aged ≥12 years) with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis, associated pruritus, and inadequate response to topical steroids. Participants were enrolled from 281 clinics, hospitals, and academic centres in 22 countries across both trials, and were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive nemolizumab 30 mg subcutaneously (baseline loading dose 60 mg) or matching placebo once every 4 weeks with background topical corticosteroids (TCS) with or without topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCI; ie, TCS-TCI background treatment). Randomisation was done via interactive response technology and stratified by baseline disease and pruritus severity. Study staff and participants were masked throughout the study, with outcome assessors masked until database lock. Coprimary endpoints at week 16 post-baseline were Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) success (score of 0 [clear skin] or 1 [almost clear skin] with a ≥2-point improvement from baseline) and at least 75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index score from baseline (EASI-75 response). Outcome rates were compared between groups with the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusting for randomisation strata. The key secondary endpoints were the proportion of participants with Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS) score improvement of at least 4 points at weeks 1, 2, 4, and 16; PP-NRS score below 2 at weeks 4 and 16; Sleep Disturbance Numerical Rating Scale score improvement of at least 4 points at week 16; EASI-75 response plus PP-NRS score improvement of at least 4 points at week 16; and IGA success plus PP-NRS score improvement of at least 4 points at week 16. Efficacy analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis; safety analyses included all participants who received one dose of nemolizumab or placebo. Both studies are completed (ClinicalTrials.gov: ARCADIA 1, NCT03985943 and ARCADIA 2, NCT03989349). FINDINGS: Between Aug 9, 2019, and Nov 2, 2022, 1728 participants were enrolled across both trials: 1142 were allocated to nemolizumab plus TCS-TCI (620 in ARCADIA 1 and 522 in ARCADIA 2) and 586 to placebo plus TCS-TCI (321 in ARCADIA 1 and 265 in ARCADIA 2). ARCADIA 1 included 500 (53%) male participants and 441 (47%) female participants, and ARCADIA 2 included 381 (48%) male participants and 406 (52%) female participants. Mean age ranged from 33·3 (SD 15·6) years to 35·2 (17·0) years across the treatment groups. Both trials met the coprimary endpoints; at week 16, a greater proportion of participants receiving nemolizumab plus TCS-TCI versus placebo plus TCS-TCI had IGA success (ARCADIA 1: 221 [36%] of 620 vs 79 [25%] of 321, adjusted percentage difference 11·5% [97·5% CI 4·7-18·3], p=0·0003; ARCADIA 2: 197 [38%] of 522 vs 69 [26%] of 265, adjusted difference 12·2% [4·6-19·8], p=0·0006) and an EASI-75 response (ARCADIA 1: 270 [44%] vs 93 [29%], adjusted difference 14·9% [7·8-22·0], p<0·0001; ARCADIA 2: 220 [42%] vs 80 [30%], adjusted difference 12·5% [4·6-20·3], p=0·0006). Significant benefits were observed with nemolizumab for all key secondary endpoints including improvement in itch, as early as week 1, and sleep improvement by week 16. The safety profile was similar between nemolizumab plus TCS-TCI and placebo plus TCS-TCI. In the safety sets, 306 (50%) of 616 participants (ARCADIA 1) and 215 (41%) of 519 participants (ARCADIA 2) who received nemolizumab plus TCS-TCI had at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (serious treatment-emergent adverse events in six [1%] and 13 [3%], respectively); and 146 (45%) of 321 (ARCADIA 1) and 117 (44%) of 263 (ARCADIA 2) who received placebo plus TCS-TCI had at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (serious treatment-emergent adverse events in four [1%] and three [1%], respectively). Ten serious treatment-emergent adverse events possibly related to nemolizumab were reported in five (1%) participants in ARCADIA 2. No deaths occurred. INTERPRETATION: Nemolizumab plus TCS-TCI was efficacious and showed statistically and clinically significant improvements in inflammation and itch in adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Nemolizumab might offer a valuable extension of current therapies if approved. FUNDING: Galderma.

Single-cell profiling of prurigo nodularis demonstrates immune-stromal crosstalk driving profibrotic responses and reversal with nemolizumab.

BACKGROUND: Prurigo nodularis (PN) is a chronic neuroimmune skin disease characterized by bilaterally distributed pruritic hyperkeratotic nodules on extremities and trunk. Neuroimmune dysregulation and chronic scratching are believed to both induce and maintain the characteristic lesions. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to provide a comprehensive view of the molecular pathogenesis of PN at the single-cell level to identify and outline key pathologic processes and the cell types involved. Features that distinguish PN skin from the skin of patients with atopic dermatitis were of particular interest. We further aimed to determine the impact of the IL31RA antagonist, nemolizumab, and its specificity at the single-cell level. METHODS: Single-cell RNA-sequencing of skin from 15 healthy donors and nonlesional and lesional skin from 6 patients each with PN and atopic dermatitis, combined with spatial-sequencing using the 10x Visium platform. Integration with bulk RNA-sequencing data from patients treated with nemolizumab. RESULTS: This study demonstrates that PN is an inflammatory skin disease characterized by both keratinocyte proliferation and activation of profibrotic responses. This study also demonstrates that the COL11A1+ fibroblast subset is a major contributor to fibrosis and is predominantly found in the papillary dermis of PN skin. Activation of fibrotic responses is the main distinguishing feature between PN and atopic dermatitis skin. This study further shows the broad effect of nemolizumab on PN cell types, with a prominent effect driving COL11A1+ fibroblast and keratinocyte responses toward normal. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a high-resolution characterization of the cell types and cellular processes activated in PN skin, establishing PN as a chronic fibrotic inflammatory skin disease. It further demonstrates the broad effect of nemolizumab on pathological processes in PN skin.

Trial of Nemolizumab in Moderate-to-Severe Prurigo Nodularis.

BACKGROUND: Prurigo nodularis is a chronic pruritic skin disease with multiple nodular skin lesions. Nemolizumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting the interleukin-31 receptor, which is involved in the pathogenesis of prurigo nodularis. METHODS: We conducted a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, phase 2 trial of nemolizumab (at a dose of 0.5 mg per kilogram of body weight) administered subcutaneously at baseline, week 4, and week 8, as compared with placebo, in patients with moderate-to-severe prurigo nodularis and severe pruritus. Moderate-to-severe prurigo nodularis was defined as 20 or more nodules, and severe pruritus was defined as a mean score of at least 7 for the worst daily intensity of pruritus on the numerical rating scale (scores range from 0 [no itch] to 10 [worst itch imaginable]). The primary outcome was the percent change from baseline in the mean peak score for pruritus on the numerical rating scale at week 4. Secondary outcomes included additional measures of itching and disease severity. Safety assessments were performed through week 18. RESULTS: A total of 70 patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive nemolizumab (34 patients) or placebo (36). The initial pruritus score on the numerical rating scale was 8.4 in each group. At week 4, the peak pruritus score on the numerical rating scale was reduced from baseline by 4.5 points (change, -53.0%) in the nemolizumab group, as compared with a reduction of 1.7 points (change, -20.2%) in the placebo group (difference, -32.8 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, -46.8 to -18.8; P<0.001). Results for secondary outcomes were in the same direction as for the primary outcome. Nemolizumab was associated with gastrointestinal symptoms (abdominal pain and diarrhea) and musculoskeletal symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Nemolizumab resulted in a greater reduction in pruritus and severity of skin lesions than placebo in patients with prurigo nodularis but was associated with adverse events. Larger and longer trials are needed to determine the durability and safety of nemolizumab for the treatment of prurigo nodularis. (Funded by Galderma; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03181503.).

An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design to establish thresholds of within-individual meaningful change on a sleep disturbance numerical rating scale score in atopic dermatitis.

PURPOSE: Establishing a meaningful within-individual change (MWIC) threshold is a key aspect for interpreting scores used as endpoints for evaluating treatment benefit. A new patient-reported outcome (PRO), a sleep disturbance numerical rating scale (SD NRS), was developed in adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). This research aims to establish a MWIC threshold of the SD NRS score in the context of a drug development program. METHODS: An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design was used to address the research objective. This mixed-methods design used phase IIb data and a stand-alone qualitative study. Quantitative anchor-based and distribution-based approaches supported by qualitative-based approaches were conducted, and results were triangulated to determine preliminary MWIC thresholds of the SD NRS score. RESULTS: Triangulation of results from both quantitative and qualitative approaches suggested that a 2- to 6-point decrease in the SD NRS score change constitutes a preliminary range of MWIC threshold estimates. CONCLUSION: This research determined MWIC threshold estimates for the SD NRS score in both adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe AD using an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design. This mixed-methods design provides interesting insights for establishing MWIC thresholds of a PRO score in the context of a drug development program.

Selection of Nemolizumab Clinical Dosage for Atopic Dermatitis.

Nemolizumab is a monoclonal antibody directed against the interleukin-31 receptor A subunit, which is involved in the pathogenesis of pruritus and inflammation in atopic dermatitis (AD). Clinical trial results were combined with population PK (popPK) and pharmacokinetic/ pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) models to optimize nemolizumab dosing. Phase 1 and 2a clinical studies indicated that weight-based nemolizumab dosing reduced pruritus in patients with moderate-to-severe AD with good safety and tolerability even at the highest dose (3 mg/kg single dose and 2 mg/kg multiple doses). Nemolizumab PK profile was characterized by a slow absorption with peak serum concentrations reached 4.5-9.2 days post-dose, and a long terminal half-life ranging from 12.6 to 16.5 days. A change from weight-based dosing to flat dose was supported by an additional phase 2b study sponsored by Galderma. Flat dosing provides several practical advantages, including ease of preparation for self- or auto-injection and reduced chance of dosing errors. Doses of 10, 30, and 90 mg were selected based on popPK and PK/PD simulations to result in nemolizumab serum concentrations sufficient to achieve efficacy. Loading doses were administrated at the 2 lower doses in order to achieve target systemic concentrations from the first injection. The efficacy of Nemolizumab in improving cutaneous signs of inflammation and pruritus in AD and its safety profile, combined with popPK and PK/PD analyses, supported selection of the flat-dose regimen of 30 mg (with a 60 mg loading dose) given every 4 weeks subcutaneously for 16 weeks in the phase 3 ARCADIA studies sponsored by Galderma. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(10):1017-1020 doi:10.36849/JDD.7437R1.

Transcriptomic characterization of prurigo nodularis and the therapeutic response to nemolizumab.

BACKGROUND: Prurigo nodularis (PN) is a debilitating, difficult-to-treat, intensely pruritic, chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by hyperkeratotic skin nodules. The pathogenesis of PN is not well understood but is believed to involve cross talk between sensory nerve fibers, immune cells, and the epidermis. It is centered around the neuroimmune cytokine IL-31, driving an intractable itch-scratch cycle. OBJECTIVE: We sought to provide a comprehensive view of the transcriptomic changes in PN skin and characterize the mechanism of action of the anti-IL-31 receptor inhibitor nemolizumab. METHOD: RNA sequencing of biopsy samples obtained from a cohort of patients treated with the anti-IL-31 receptor inhibitor nemolizumab and taken at baseline and week 12. Generation and integration of patient data with RNA-Seq data generated from reconstructed human epidermis stimulated with IL-31 and other proinflammatory cytokines. RESULTS: Our results demonstrate that nemolizumab effectively decreases IL-31 responses in PN skin, leading to effective suppression of downstream inflammatory responses including TH2/IL-13 and TH17/IL-17 responses. This is accompanied by decreased keratinocyte proliferation and normalization of epidermal differentiation and function. Furthermore, our results demonstrate how transcriptomic changes associated with nemolizumab treatment correlate with improvement in lesions, pruritus, stabilization of extracellular matrix remodeling, and processes associated with cutaneous nerve function. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate a broad response to IL-31 receptor inhibition with nemolizumab and confirm the critical upstream role of IL-31 in PN pathogenesis.

Epidemiology of prurigo nodularis in England: a retrospective database analysis.

BACKGROUND: Prurigo nodularis is a debilitating skin condition that is classified as rare by the Genetic and Rare Diseases Information Center (GARD) and the National Organization for Rare Diseases (NORD). There are currently no estimates of the prevalence of prurigo nodularis in England. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to address this data gap by describing the epidemiology of prurigo nodularis in a representative dataset derived from the English National Health Service. METHODS: The study utilized data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked to Hospital Episode Statistics inpatient data. Patients with a diagnosis of prurigo nodularis were selected by clinical code in the primary care or inpatient datasets. Case definition was based on a minimum of two distinct diagnoses to maximize specificity. Point prevalence was calculated for the midpoint of 2018 and incidence rates from 2008 to 2018 were presented. For those classified as incident cases, demographic and clinical characteristics were reported. In sensitivity analyses the case definition was modified to relax the multiple diagnosis criteria and to restrict cases to those diagnosed within a maximum of 4 or 10 years of the midpoint prevalence date. RESULTS: Overall, 11 656 patients within the dataset had at least one prurigo nodularis diagnosis. Following application of the relevant inclusion criteria, 2743 patients formed the point prevalent cohort; the estimated prevalence was 3·27 patients per 10 000 population [95% confidence interval (CI) 3·15-3·40]. In sensitivity analyses the estimated prevalence ranged from 2·24 (95% CI 2·14-2·34) to 6·98 (95% CI 6·80-7·16). Incidence over the study period was 2·88 per 100 000 patient-years. Comorbidity was relatively high in this population, notably for atopic dermatitis (52·2%), depression (41·1%) and anxiety (35·4%). CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the NORD/GARD classification of prurigo nodularis as a rare disease with a prevalence of 3·27 patients per 10 000 population, which equates to 18 471 patients living with the disease in England in 2018. The relatively high prevalence of comorbidity observed for these patients may increase the complexity of management.

Phase 2B randomized study of nemolizumab in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis and severe pruritus.

BACKGROUND: Nemolizumab targets the IL-31 receptor α subunit involved in atopic dermatitis (AD) pathogenesis. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate a new dosing strategy of nemolizumab in patients with AD. METHODS: We performed a 24-week, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of nemolizumab (10, 30, and 90 mg) subcutaneous injections every 4 weeks versus placebo, with topical corticosteroids in adults with moderate-to-severe AD, severe pruritus, and inadequate control with topical treatment (n = 226). The Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), the peak pruritus (PP) numeric rating scale (NRS), and the Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) were assessed. Standard safety assessments were performed. RESULTS: Nemolizumab improved EASI, IGA, and/or NRS-itch scores, with the 30-mg dose being most effective. Nemolizumab (30 mg) reduced EASI scores versus placebo at week 24 (-68.8% vs -52.1%, P = .016); significant differences were observed by week 8 (P ≤ .01). With significant improvement (P = .028) as early as week 4, IGA 0/1 rates were higher for 30 mg of nemolizumab versus placebo at week 16 (33.3% vs 12.3%, P = .008) but not week 24 because of an increased placebo/topical corticosteroid effect (36.8% vs 21.1%, P = .06). PP-NRS scores were improved for 30 mg of nemolizumab versus placebo at week 16 (-68.6% vs -34.3%, P < .0001) and week 24 (-67.3% vs -35.8%, P < .0001), with a difference by week 1 (P < .001). NRS response rates (≥4-point decrease) were greater for 30 mg of nemolizumab versus placebo at week 16 (P ≤ .001) and week 24 (P ≤ .01). Nemolizumab was safe and well tolerated. The most common adverse events were nasopharyngitis and upper respiratory tract infection. CONCLUSIONS: Nemolizumab resulted in rapid and sustained improvements in cutaneous signs of inflammation and pruritus in patients with AD, with maximal efficacy observed at 30 mg. Nemolizumab had an acceptable safety profile.

Capturing patient-reported sleep disturbance in atopic dermatitis clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Patient-focused approaches to capturing day-to-day variability in sleep disturbance are needed to properly evaluate the sleep benefits of new treatments. Such approaches rely on patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures validated in the target patient population. METHODS: Using atopic dermatitis (AD) as an example of a disease in which sleep is commonly disturbed, we developed a strategy for measuring sleep disturbance in AD trials. In developing this strategy, we conducted a targeted literature review and held concept elicitation interviews with adolescents and adults with AD. We subsequently identified potentially suitable PRO measures and cognitively debriefed them. Finally, we evaluated their psychometric properties using data from phase 2b (NCT03100344) and phase 3 (NCT03985943 and NCT03989349) clinical trials. RESULTS: The literature review confirmed that sleep disturbance is a key impact of AD but failed to identify validated PRO measures for assessing fluctuations in sleep disturbance. Subsequent concept elicitation interviews confirmed the multidimensional nature of sleep disturbance in AD and supported use of a single-item measure to assess overall sleep disturbance severity, complemented by a diary to capture individual components of sleep disturbance. The single-item sleep disturbance numerical rating scale (SD NRS) and multi-item Subject Sleep Diary (SSD)-an AD-adapted version of the Consensus Sleep Diary-were identified as potentially suitable PRO measures. Cognitive debriefing of the SD NRS and SSD demonstrated their content validity and their understandability to patients. Psychometric analyses based on AD trial data showed that the SD NRS is a well-defined, reliable, and fit-for-purpose measure of sleep disturbance in adults with AD. Furthermore, the SD NRS correlated with many SSD sleep parameters, suggesting that most concepts from the SSD can be covered using the SD NRS. CONCLUSIONS: Using these findings, we developed an approach for measuring sleep disturbance in AD trials. Subject to further research, the same approach could also be applied to future trials of other skin diseases where itch causes sleep disturbance.

Assessing Response in Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review of the Psychometric Performance of Measures Used in HTAs and Clinical Trials.

INTRODUCTION: Assessing treatment response is key to determining treatment value in atopic dermatitis (AD). Currently, response is assessed using various clinician- or patient-reported measures and response criteria. This variation creates a mismatch of evidence across trials, hindering the ability of clinicians, regulators, and payers to compare the efficacy of treatments. This review identifies which measures and criteria are used to determine response in clinical trials and health technology assessments (HTAs). Moreover, it systematically reviews the psychometric performance of those measures and criteria to understand which perform best in capturing patient-relevant symptoms and treatment benefits. METHODS: A scoping review of clinical trials and HTAs in AD identified the following measures for inclusion: the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), the Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA), the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and the Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS). A systematic search was performed in MEDLINE and Embase to identify studies testing the psychometric performance of these measures in adults or adolescents with AD. RESULTS: A lack of consistency in the assessment of response was observed across clinical trials and HTAs. Important gaps in psychometric evidence were identified. No content validations of the EASI and IGA in AD were found, while some quantitative studies suggested that these measures fail to capture itch, a core symptom. The PP-NRS and DLQI performed well. No studies compared the performance of different response criteria. CONCLUSION: Content validation of the PP-NRS confirmed the importance of itch as a core symptom and treatment priority in AD; however, itch is not well covered in the EASI or IGA. Including the PP-NRS in clinical trials and HTAs will better capture patient-relevant benefit and response. Although various response criteria were used, no studies compared the performance of different criteria to inform which were most appropriate to compare treatments in clinical trials and HTAs.

The assessment of treatment response is important in determining treatment value in atopic dermatitis (AD). This study aimed to identify which outcome measures and criteria are used to determine treatment response in clinical trials and health technology assessments (HTAs). The psychometric performance of identified outcome measures and criteria was then systematically reviewed to understand which perform best in capturing patient-relevant symptoms and treatment benefits in AD. The review identified and included the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS) as response measures. Lack of consistency in how response is assessed across clinical trials and HTAs makes it difficult for clinicians and payers to compare the efficacies and cost-effectivenesses of different treatments and to make optimal treatment decisions. The review found that content validity (the extent to which a measure covers those symptoms and treatment benefits which are important to patients) was not assessed for EASI and IGA. EASI and IGA are often used to assess response in clinical trials and HTAs, but they miss key elements of the patient-relevant disease impact and treatment benefit, including itch. Treatments leading to improvements in missed symptoms (e.g. itch) will be undervalued using EASI and IGA, decreasing the chances of regulatory approval and reimbursement. Moreover, response criteria used in clinical trials and HTAs are sometimes adopted in prescriber settings. Here, if response assessment does not capture patient-relevant benefit, patients' access to tailored treatment may be restricted due to the perceived non-response.

Patient Perspectives on Living With Severe Prurigo Nodularis.

Importance: Because of a paucity of qualitative research on prurigo nodularis (PN), the symptoms and impacts of PN that are most important to patients are poorly understood. Objective: To explore patients' perspectives on their PN symptoms and to understand the impacts of the condition. Design, Setting, and Participants: One-on-one qualitative telephone interviews were held with English-speaking US adults aged 18 years or older with a confirmed diagnosis of PN, severe pruritus, and moderate to severe sleep disturbance. Participants were recruited via patient associations, patient panels, and social media posts. Interviews took place between September 10, 2020, and March 16, 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main symptoms of PN and their impacts on quality of life were identified by content analysis of deidentified interview transcripts. Results: A total of 21 adults with PN (mean [SD] age, 53.1 [11.8] years; 15 [71%] female; 2 African American or Black patients [10%], 1 Asian patient [5%], and 18 White patients [86%]; of these, 1 patient [ 5%] had Hispanic or Latino ethnicity) participated in the interviews. All participants reported itch, pain associated with PN, bleeding or scabbing, and dry skin. Other frequently reported symptoms included lumps or bumps (95%), having a crust on the skin (95%), burning (90%), stinging (90%), lesions or sores (86%), skin discoloration (86%), and raw skin (81%). Of the 17 participants who indicated what their worst symptoms were, 15 (88%) identified itching as the worst or 1 of the worst symptoms. The most frequently reported impacts of PN for quality of life were changes in sleep (100%), daily life (100%), feelings or mood (95%), relationships (95%), social life (81%), and work or school (71%). Overall, the worst impact of PN was its association with impaired feelings or mood. Conclusions and Relevance: This qualitative study suggests the importance of itching, sleep disturbance, and other symptoms and impacts of PN. This information can be used to guide end point selection in clinical trials and to inform patient-centric decision-making in clinical practice.

Incident Comorbidity, Resource Use, and All-Cause Mortality Associated with Prurigo Nodularis: A United Kingdom Retrospective Database Analysis.

We described comorbidity, resource utilization, and mortality for patients with prurigo nodularis (PN) using data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Patients with incident PN (2008-2018) were selected and matched to controls. Of 2,416 patients with PN, 2,409 (99.7%) were matched to controls. Prevalence of atopic dermatitis (relative risk [RR] = 2.571; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.356-2.806), depression (RR = 1.705; 95% CI = 1.566-1.856), anxiety (RR = 1.540; 95% CI = 1.407-1.686), coronary heart disease (RR = 1.575; 95% CI = 1.388-1.787), chronic kidney disease (RR = 1.529; 95% CI = 1.329-1.759), and type 2 diabetes mellitus (RR = 1.836; 95% CI = 1.597-2.111) was significantly higher for patients with PN. Subsequent risk of atopic dermatitis (hazard ratio = 6.58; 95% CI = 5.17- 8.37), depression (hazard ratio = 1.61; 95% CI = 1.30-1.99), and coronary heart disease (hazard ratio = 1.37; 95% CI = 1.09-1.74) were significantly increased. Resource utilization was increased in all settings: incidence rate ratio = 1.48 (95% CI = 1.47-1.49) for primary care, incident rate ratio = 1.80 (95% CI = 1.75-1.85) for inpatients, incident rate ratio = 2.15 (95% CI = 2.13-2.18) for outpatients, and incidence rate ratio = 1.32 (95% CI = 1.27-1.36) for accident and emergency. Respective cost ratios were 1.78 (95% CI = 1.67-1.90), 1.52 (95% CI = 1.20-1.94), 2.34 (95% CI = 2.13-2.58), and 1.55 (95% CI = 1.33-1.80). Total primary and secondary healthcare costs were £2,531 versus £1,333, a cost ratio of 1.62 (95% CI = 1.36-1.94). The adjusted hazard ratio for mortality was 1.37 (95% CI = 1.14-1.66). Patients with PN had significantly increased rates of comorbidity, healthcare resources utilization, and mortality compared with matched controls.

The Sleep Disturbance Numerical Rating Scale: Content Validity, Psychometric Validation, and Meaningful Within-Patient Change in Prurigo Nodularis.

INTRODUCTION: Sleep is often disturbed in patients with prurigo nodularis (PN). To address the lack of validated patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures for quantifying sleep disturbance in PN, we evaluated the Sleep Disturbance Numerical Rating Scale (SD NRS) as a single-item PRO measure for quantifying sleep disturbance in PN. METHODS: Adults with PN participated in qualitative interviews, which included concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing of the SD NRS. The SD NRS was evaluated psychometrically using data from a phase 2 randomized trial in adults with PN (NCT03181503). Other PRO assessments included the Average Pruritus (AP) NRS, AP Verbal Rating Scale (VRS), peak pruritus (PP) NRS, PP VRS, and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the SD NRS were evaluated, and meaningful within-patient change was estimated from qualitative interview responses and quantitative trial data. RESULTS: All interview participants (N = 21) experienced sleep disturbance and most (95%) understood the SD NRS as intended. The SD NRS demonstrated test-retest reliability based on intra-class correlation coefficients for itch-stable participants of 0.87 for the AP VRS and 0.76 for the PP VRS. At baseline, Spearman's rank-order correlation coefficients were moderate to strong (0.3-0.8) between the SD NRS and the AP NRS, AP VRS, PP NRS, PP VRS, and DLQI. Known-groups validity was demonstrated by higher (worse) SD NRS scores in participants with worse scores on the AP NRS, AP VRS, PP VRS, and DLQI. Improvements in SD NRS scores were greater in participants classified as "improved" versus "worsened/unchanged" on the anchor PROs. A 2- to 4-point decrease on the 11-point SD NRS scale was identified as a meaningful within-patient change. CONCLUSION: The SD NRS is a well-defined, reliable, and valid PRO measure that can be used in daily practice and clinical trials to capture sleep disturbance in adults with PN.

Patients with the skin disease prurigo nodularis often sleep badly because their skin is very itchy in the evening and at night. In assessing the effectiveness of new treatments for prurigo nodularis, it is useful to know whether patients sleep better when taking them. Here, we tested whether the "Sleep Disturbance Numerical Rating Scale" (SD NRS), a tool for measuring sleep, can be used by patients with prurigo nodularis. The SD NRS asks patients to score their sleep loss during the previous night on a scale of 0 ("no sleep loss") to 10 ("I did not sleep at all"). When we interviewed 21 patients with prurigo nodularis, 19 of them had problems falling asleep and 18 of them woke up every night. Most of the patients found the SD NRS easy to use. To further explore whether the SD NRS is suitable for patients with prurigo nodularis, we also analyzed data from a European clinical study in which patients with prurigo nodularis received nemolizumab, a new treatment being developed for the disease. Patients completed the SD NRS each morning during the clinical study. We found that the SD NRS has the necessary properties to be useful for assessing sleep on a daily basis. We also determined that a 2- to 4-point decrease on the SD NRS scale would represent a meaningful improvement in sleep for patients with prurigo nodularis. We conclude that the SD NRS is a useful tool for assessing sleep in prurigo nodularis patients participating in clinical studies.

Validation of the Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale as a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure in Prurigo Nodularis.

INTRODUCTION: Validated patient report tools for quantifying patient experiences of itch in prurigo nodularis (PN) are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the validity of the 11-point peak pruritus numerical rating scale (PP NRS) as a single-item patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure for assessing itch severity in PN. METHODS: Content validity of the PP NRS was evaluated through qualitative interviews with adults with PN. The PP NRS was then psychometrically evaluated using data from a placebo-controlled trial of nemolizumab in adults with PN, during which patients completed the PP NRS daily. Meaningful within-patient change was estimated from the qualitative interviews and by anchor- and distribution-based analyses of trial data. RESULTS: The interview participants (N = 21) all understood the PP NRS and reported itch as their worst symptom overall. The PP NRS showed good test-retest reliability and demonstrated convergent validity and known-groups validity. PP NRS scores improved more in patients classified as "improved" on other clinical outcome measures than in those classified as "worsened/unchanged". Triangulation of the different estimates identified a 2- to 5-point decrease in PP NRS score as a meaningful within-patient change threshold. CONCLUSION: The PP NRS is a content-valid and reliable PRO measure for quantifying itch severity in adults with PN in clinical trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03181503.

Prurigo nodularis is a skin disease where the skin becomes inflamed and very itchy. Itching and scratching can ruin the lives of people with prurigo nodularis. For doctors to know how well treatments for prurigo nodularis are working, they need to be able measure how bad their patients' itching is. Here we tested whether a tool called the peak pruritus numeric rating scale (PP NRS) can be used to reliably measure itching in patients with prurigo nodularis. The PP NRS asks patients to rate their itch "at the worst moment during the previous 24 h" on a scale from 0 ("no itch") to 10 ("worst itch imaginable"). We interviewed 21 patients with prurigo nodularis. Overall, itch was their worst symptom. They were able to use the PP NRS with few or no problems. To further explore whether the PP NRS can be used by patients with prurigo nodularis, we also obtained data from a clinical study. In this clinical study, patients with prurigo nodularis received a drug that might one day be used to treat their disease. They completed the PP NRS daily during the time they received the drug. When we analyzed the data from the clinical study, we found that the PP NRS has the properties a tool like this needs to be useful. We also concluded that a decrease of 2­5 points on the PP NRS scale would be a meaningful improvement in itching for patients with prurigo nodularis.

Modulation of Neuroimmune and Epithelial Dysregulation in Patients With Moderate to Severe Prurigo Nodularis Treated With Nemolizumab.

Importance: Prurigo nodularis (PN) is a debilitating skin disease characterized by intense pruritus and hyperkeratotic skin nodules. Nemolizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin 31 receptor α, is a promising novel therapy for the treatment of moderate to severe PN. The biological mechanisms by which nemolizumab promotes improvement of itch and skin lesions in PN are unknown. Objective: To characterize changes in plasma protein biomarkers associated with clinical response to nemolizumab in patients with PN. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter cohort study included patients recruited from Austria, France, Germany, Poland, and the US from a phase 2 clinical trial. Adults diagnosed with moderate to severe PN with severe pruritus for at least 6 months were included in the original trial. Patients in the nemolizumab group were included in the present study if they achieved at least a 4-point decrease in the Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS) from baseline to week 12 during nemolizumab treatment. Placebo controls did not experience a 4-point decrease in PP-NRS. Mass spectrometry with tandem mass tags to enrich skin-specific protein detection was used to characterize changes in plasma protein expression in nemolizumab and placebo groups. Data were collected from November 2, 2017, to September 26, 2018, and analyzed from December 6, 2019, to April 8, 2022. Intervention: As part of the clinical trial, patients were treated with 3 doses of nemolizumab or placebo at 0, 4, and 8 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: Changes in plasma and epidermal protein expression in nemolizumab-treated patients compared with the placebo group at 0, 4, and 12 weeks. Results: Among the 38 patients included in the analysis (22 women and 16 men; mean [SD] age, 55.8 [15.8] years), enrichment analysis of canonical pathways, biological functions, and upstream regulators showed downregulation of terms involving inflammation (IL-6, acute-phase response, signal transducer and activator of transcription 3, and interferon γ), neural processes (synaptogenesis signaling and neuritogenesis), tissue remodeling and fibrosis (transforming growth factor ß1 and endothelin-1), and epidermal differentiation (epithelial mesenchymal transition) in the plasma of nemolizumab group. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, differences between nemolizumab and placebo groups included modulation of inflammatory signaling, neural development, and epithelial differentiation, suggesting a promising potential approach for clinical management of PN.

Pharmacokinetics, Safety, Efficacy, and Biomarker Profiles During Nemolizumab Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis in Adolescents.

INTRODUCTION: Nemolizumab, a new monoclonal antibody that targets the receptor alpha of the neuroimmune cytokine interleukin-31 (IL-31), has shown efficacy in atopic dermatitis (AD) in adults. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of nemolizumab in adolescents with moderate to severe AD as well as the relationship between nemolizumab concentrations and clinical efficacy and the effect of nemolizumab on protein biomarkers. METHODS: Open-label, 16-week study of nemolizumab in patients aged 12-17 years with moderate to severe AD (baseline EASI ≥ 16, IGA ≥ 3, and BSA ≥ 10%) and associated pruritus with baseline average daily peak pruritus numeric rating scale (PP-NRS) intensity of at least 4. Nemolizumab was administered subcutaneously as a loading dose of 60 mg at baseline, followed by 30 mg every 4 weeks until week 12 with background topical corticosteroids (TCS) or calcineurin inhibitors (TCI). Subsequently patients were followed for 8 weeks more. Stratum corneum (SC) and plasma samples were collected for biomarker assessments. RESULTS: Twenty patients participated, with a mean age of 14.8 ± 1.6 years. The PK of nemolizumab was described by a one-compartment model with linear elimination, a first-order absorption, and a mean half-life of 16.7 ± 4.1 days. Mean trough concentrations ranged from 2935 ± 1029 ng/mL to 3292 ± 2018 ng/mL over the 16-week treatment period. There was a marked improvement in rash, itch, and sleep with a decrease from baseline to week 16 in EASI by 66.5 ± 32.5%, in PP-NRS by 43.2 ± 37%, and in sleep disturbance numeric rating scale by 53.5 ± 47.8%. The popPK and PK/PD analyses confirmed that model-predicted exposure and efficacy of nemolizumab were similar in adolescents compared to adults receiving the same dosing regimens. Age did not impact PK parameters, while the main source of PK variability was body weight. Analyses of SC samples identified a panel of AD-related pro-inflammatory biomarkers that were upregulated in lesional skin (compared to non-lesional skin) and correspondingly downregulated in clinical responders to nemolizumab (based on EASI75 and PP-NRS ≥ 4). Four biomarkers (CCL20, CCL22, CCL27, and VEGF) had changes that were 1.9-3.5-fold higher in EASI responders than in EASI non-responders (all p < 0.05). Analysis showed no significant correlation between plasma biomarkers and clinical scores. Adverse events were experienced by 33.3% of subjects (n = 6) and were primarily mild or moderate in severity. CONCLUSIONS: Nemolizumab PK and safety profiles in adolescents with moderate to severe AD are consistent with previous nemolizumab studies in adults. PK/PD models demonstrate similar exposure-response profiles in 12- to 17-year-old adolescents and adults for three clinical endpoints (EASI, IGA, and PP-NRS). Nemolizumab treatment reversed AD-related pro-inflammatory biomarkers in skin, indicating that the neuroimmune cytokine IL-31 is an important mediator of multiple pathways in AD. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03921411.

Dynamics of enfuvirtide resistance mutations in enfuvirtide-experienced patients remaining in virological failure under salvage therapy.

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of the dynamics of enfuvirtide (ENF) resistance mutations after ENF withdrawal in patients with virological failure under salvage therapy may be helpful to optimize the management of ENF in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients. METHODS: Seven patients with a failing ENF-containing regimen, initiated for at least 3 months (median 6.4 months, range 3-14), were included and followed up prospectively at the time of virological failure. Genotypic analysis of the gp41 region by bulk sequencing and clonal analysis was performed in plasma and/or peripheral blood mononuclear cells to detect ENF resistance mutations. RESULTS: Genotypic profiles of ENF-resistant variants at ENF discontinuation were as follows: V38A in 3 patients, V38A+N42T+N43D in 1 patient, N43D in 2 patients, and N43K in 1 patient. Clonal analysis showed that maintaining ENF treatment after virological failure has an impact on both (1) the number of resistance profiles detected, and (2) the time of persistence of ENF-resistant variants. ENF-resistant variants were archived in HIV DNA in 5/7 patients. At 1 month after ENF withdrawal, no significant increase in HIV-1 viral load was observed. CONCLUSION: The persistence of ENF-resistant variants was found to be correlated to exposure time to failing drug. ENF withdrawal should be considered in patients with virological failure to preserve the possible efficacy of ENF recycling or upcoming entry inhibitors.

A high HIV DNA level in PBMCs at antiretroviral treatment interruption predicts a shorter time to treatment resumption, independently of the CD4 nadir.

This study aimed to evaluate the safety of antiretroviral treatment interruption (TI) in HIV-infected patients who started treatment based on earlier guidelines, and to identify baseline factors predictive of the time to reach fixed criteria for treatment resumption. Prospective, open-label, multicenter trial. Patients were eligible if they had a CD4 cell count >350/mm(3) and plasma HIV RNA <50,000 copies/ml when they first started antiretroviral therapy (ART); and if they had a CD4 count >450/mm(3) and stable plasma HIV RNA <5,000 copies/ml for at least 6 months prior to enrollment. The criteria for ART resumption were a CD4 cell count <300/mm(3) and/or a CDC stage B or C event. 116 patients had received ART for a median of 5.3 years. The median CD4 cell count and plasma HIV RNA values at inclusion were 809/mm(3) and 2.6 log copies/ml, respectively. Median HIV DNA load at inclusion was 2.3 log copies/10(6) peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Thirty-six months after TI, 63.9% of the patients had not yet reached the criteria for ART resumption, and 55.9% of patients had not resumed ART. In Cox multivariable analysis, a high HIV DNA level at TI, a low CD4 nadir, and pre-existing AIDS status were the only significant risk factors for reaching the criteria for ART resumption (hazards ratio: 2.15 (1.02-4.53), 4.59 (1.22-17.24), and 5.74 (1.60-20.56), respectively). Patients who started ART with a CD4 cell count above 350/mm(3) were able to interrupt treatment for long periods without a high absolute risk of either AIDS or severe non-AIDS morbidity/mortality. A high PBMC HIV DNA level at TI was a strong predictor for more rapid treatment resumption.

Eczema phenotypes and risk of allergic and respiratory conditions in school age children.

BACKGROUND: Eczema phenotypes based on eczema onset and persistence might better identify groups prone to allergic and respiratory conditions than a binary definition of eczema. We examined the associations of childhood eczema phenotypes with allergic sensitization, allergy, asthma and lung function at school age. METHODS: This study among 4277 children was embedded in a multi-ethnic population-based prospective cohort study. Five eczema phenotypes (never, early transient, mid-transient, late transient, persistent) based on parental-reported physician-diagnosed eczema from age 6 months until 10 years were identified. At age 10 years, allergic sensitization was measured by skin prick tests, physician-diagnosed allergy and asthma by parent-reported questionnaires, and lung function by spirometry. Adjusted linear, logistic and multinomial regression models were applied. RESULTS: Compared with never eczema, all eczema phenotypes were associated with increased risks of asthma (odds ratios (OR) range (95% confidence interval): 2.68 (1.58, 4.57) to 11.53 (6.65, 20.01)), food and inhalant allergic sensitization (1.72 (1.25, 2.36) to 12.64 (7.20, 22.18)), and physician-diagnosed inhalant allergy (1.92 (1.34, 2.74) to 11.91 (7.52, 18.86)). Strongest effect estimates were observed of early and persistent eczema with the risk of physician-diagnosed food allergy (OR 6.95 (3.76, 12.84) and 35.05 (18.33, 70.00), respectively) and combined asthma and physician-diagnosed allergy (7.11 (4.33, 11.67) and 29.03 (15.27, 55.22), respectively). Eczema phenotypes were not associated with lung function measures. CONCLUSION: Eczema phenotypes were differentially associated with risks of respiratory and allergic conditions in school-aged children. Children with early transient and persistent eczema might benefit from more intense follow-up for early identification and treatment of asthma and allergies.