Evaluating a unique enhanced recovery protocol in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: A single center experience.

INTRODUCTION: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been associated with a reduction in opioid consumption and a hastening in recovery in abdominal surgery. However, their impact on laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) has not been fully elucidated. The aim of this study is to evaluate opioid consumption and other relevant outcome measures before and after implementation of a unique LDN ERAS protocol. METHODS: 244 LDN patients were included in this retrospective cohort study. Forty-six underwent LDN prior to implementation of ERAS, whereas 198 patients received ERAS perioperative care. The primary outcome was daily oral morphine equivalent (OME) consumption averaged over the entire postoperative stay. Due to removal of preoperative oral morphine from the protocol partway through the study period, the ERAS group was further subdivided into morphine recipients and non-recipients for subgroup analysis. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), length of stay, pain scores, and other relevant measures. RESULTS: ERAS donors consumed significantly fewer average daily OMEs than Pre-ERAS donors (21.5 vs. 37.6, respectively; p < .0001). There were no statistically significant differences in OME consumption between morphine recipients and non-recipients. The ERAS group experienced less PONV (44.4% requiring one or more rescue antiemetic postoperatively, vs. 60.9% of Pre-ERAS donors; p = .008). CONCLUSIONS: A protocol pairing lidocaine and ketamine with a comprehensive approach to preoperative PO intake, premedication, intraoperative fluid management and postoperative pain control is associated with reduced opioid consumption in LDN.

Does multimodal perioperative pain management enhance immediate and short-term outcomes after living donor partial hepatectomy? A systematic review of the literature and expert panel recommendations.

BACKGROUND: The optimal analgesic strategy for patients undergoing donor hepatectomy is not known and the potential short- and long-term physical and psychological consequences of complications are significant. OBJECTIVES: To identify whether a multimodal approach to pain of the donor intraoperatively enhances immediate and short-term outcomes after living liver donation, and to provide international expert panel recommendations. DATA SOURCES: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Central. METHODS: Systematic review following PRISMA guidelines and recommendations using the GRADE approach derived from an international expert panel. PROSPERO 2021 CRD42021260699. RESULTS: Nine studies assessing multi-modal analgesia strategies were included in a qualitative assessment. Interventions included local, regional, and neuro-axial anesthetic techniques, pharmacological intervention (NSAIDs, COX-2 inhibitors, ketamine, dexmedetomidine, and lidocaine), and acupuncture. Overall, there was a significant (40%) reduction in opioid requirement on day 1 and a significant reduction in pain scores in the intervention vs control groups. Significant reductions in either length of stay or post-operative complications were demonstrated in four of nine studies. CONCLUSIONS: Opioid use for patients undergoing donor hepatectomy is likely to impact both their short- and long-term outcomes. To reduce post-operative pain scores, shorten length of hospital stay, and promote earlier post-operative return of bowel function, we recommend that multi-modal analgesia be offered to patients undergoing living donor hepatectomy. Further research is required to confirm which multi-modal techniques are most associated with enhanced recovery in living liver donors.

An evaluation of the safety and preliminary efficacy of peri- and post-operative treprostinil in preventing ischemia and reperfusion injury in adult orthotopic liver transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is the only treatment option for various end-stage liver diseases. Ischemia and reperfusion (I/R) injury is one of the unavoidable complications/conditions in OLT. In 2019, a total of 8896 livers were transplanted of which >94% organs were procured from deceased donors. An increase in the use of extended criteria donor (ECD) livers for transplantation further unraveled the role of hepatic I/R injury on short-term and long-term graft outcomes. Despite promising outcomes with the use of antioxidants, free radical scavengers, and vasodilators; I/R-mediated liver injury persists and significantly influences the overall clinical outcomes. Treprostinil, a synthetic prostacyclin I2  (PGI2 ) analog, due to its vasodilatory property, antiplatelet activity, and its ability to downregulate pro-inflammatory cytokines can potentially minimize I/R injury. AIM: We investigated the safety and preliminary efficacy of continuous intravenous infusion of treprostinil in liver transplant recipients in a prospective, single-center, non-randomized, interventional study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a dose escalation (3 + 3 design) phase 1/2 study. Deceased donor liver transplant recipients received 5 ng/kg/min for two days, or 2.5, 5, and 7.5 ng/min/kg for 5 days as a continuous infusion. Multiple blood samples were collected for biochemical parameter assessment and for measuring treprostinil levels. Indocyanine green plasma disappearance rate was used as a measure of hepatic functional capacity. RESULTS: Subjects tolerated continuous infusion of treprostinil up to 5 ng/kg/min for 120 h with no occurrence of primary graft non-function (PNF), minimized need for ventilation support, reduced hospitalization time, 100% graft and patient survival, and improved hepatobiliary excretory function comparable to normal healthy adults. DISCUSSION: Treprostinil can be administered to liver transplant patients safely during the perioperative period. CONCLUSION: Based on this phase 1/2 study, further efficacy studies of treprostinil in preventing I/R injury of liver should be conducted to potentially increase the number of livers available for transplantation.

Blood product utilization in human upper-extremity transplantation: challenges, complications, considerations, and transfusion protocol conception.

BACKGROUND: Upper-extremity transplantation (UET) is a reality. Immunologic, functional, and graft survival outcomes have been encouraging. However, these complex reconstructions have unique considerations that pose distinct challenges. Transplant programs have reported morbidity and mortality due to significant intraoperative blood losses, but similar data are scant during other phases of recovery. We report experience from two centers on complete blood component demands and utilization with UET. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Inpatient medical records of UET recipients from intraoperative (time from initiation of transplant surgery to exit from the operative suite) and postoperative (exit from the operative suite to discharge from the hospital) phases were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Six patients received various UETs and mean (±SD) postoperative hospital stay was 46 (±14.4) days. Mean (±SD) intraoperative blood unit utilization was 14.8 (±10.2) red blood cells (RBCs), 10.5 (±11.8) plasma, 0.8 (±1.2) platelets (PLTs), and 0.3 (±0.8) cryoprecipitate units. Mean postoperative blood unit utilization was 9.3 (±10.4) RBCs, 5.3 (±6.7) plasma, 1.2 (±2.0) PLTs, and 0.7 (±1.6) cryoprecipitate units. Both intraoperative and postoperative blood utilization for unilateral versus bilateral transplant were different, but not significantly so. However, total inpatient blood use in bilateral transplants was significantly greater than in unilateral transplants. CONCLUSION: Substantial blood loss may occur in UET and require transfusion of many blood components, primarily RBCs and plasma. We propose an UET transfusion protocol and suggest that centers preparing to perform these transplants should actively engage the transfusion medicine service to ensure availability and access to appropriate blood components for the entire hospitalizations of these unique patients.

Reduced Requirement for Prothrombin Complex Concentrate for the Restoration of Thrombin Generation in Plasma From Liver Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: Plasma transfusion remains the mainstay hemostatic therapy during liver transplantation (LT) in most countries. However, a large volume is required for plasma to achieve clinically relevant factor increases. Prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) is a low-volume alternative to plasma in warfarin reversal, but its efficacy has not been well studied in LT. METHODS: Blood samples were collected from 28 LT patients at baseline (T0) and 30 minutes after graft reperfusion (T1). Factor X and antithrombin levels were measured. Ex vivo effects of PCC (0.2 and 0.4 IU/mL) and 10% volume replacement with normal plasma were compared in LT and warfarin plasma by measuring lag time, thrombin peak, and endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) using thrombin generation (TG) assay. RESULTS: Coagulation status was worsened at T1 as international normalized ratio increased from 1.7 to 3.0, and factor X was decreased from 49% to 28%. TG measurements showed normal lag time and ETP at T0 and T1, but low-normal peak at T0, and below-normal peak at T1. Both doses of PCC increased peak and ETP, while 10% volume plasma had minimal effects on TG. Thrombin inhibition appears to be very slow after adding 0.4 IU/mL of PCC in LT plasma due to low antithrombin. The same doses of PCC and plasma were insufficient for warfarin reversal. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced TG in LT can be more effectively restored by using PCC rather than plasma. The required doses of PCC for LT patients seem to be lower than warfarin reversal due to slow thrombin inhibition.

Ex vivo evaluation of 4 different viscoelastic assays for detecting moderate to severe coagulopathy during liver transplantation.

Prolonged prothrombin time (PT) and its ratio are routinely used for the assessment of candidates for liver transplantation (LT), but intraoperative coagulation management of transfusion is hindered by its long turnaround time. Abnormal reaction time (R time) on thromboelastography (TEG) or clotting time (CT) of rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) are presumably an alternative, but there is a paucity of clinical data on abnormal R time/CT values compared to PT during LT. After receiving institutional review board approval and informed consent, we obtained blood samples from 36 LT patients for international normalized ratio (INR), factor (F) X level, and viscoelastic tests (EXTEM/INTEM and kaolin/rapid TEG) at baseline and 30 minutes after graft reperfusion. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated for INR > 1.5 and viscoelastic R time/CT thresholds to assess the ability to diagnose FX deficiency at the moderate (<50%) or severe (<35%) level. The FX deficiency data were calculated using cutoff values of INR (>1.5) and abnormal R time/CT for TEG and ROTEM. Tissue factor (TF)-activated INR and EXTEM-CT performed well in diagnosing FX below 50%, but rapid TEG with combined TF and kaolin activators failed. Improved performance of INTEM-CT in diagnosing FX below 35% underlies multifactorial deficiency involving both intrinsic and common pathways. In conclusion, the differences among different viscoelastic tests and clinical situations should be carefully considered when they are used to guide transfusion during LT.

Clinical applicability of rapid thrombelastography and functional fibrinogen thrombelastography to adult liver transplantation.

Unlike kaolin thrombelastography (k-TEG), the clinical utility of rapid thrombelastography (r-TEG) and functional fibrinogen thrombelastography (FF-TEG) has not been tested in liver transplantation (LT). These thrombelastography techniques were simultaneously performed at the time of the skin incision (the baseline) and 30 minutes after graft reperfusion (III + 30) for 27 consecutive adult LT patients. k-TEG and r-TEG parameters [alpha angle (α) and maximum amplitude of the clot (MA)] were compared in addition to the assay time. Estimated FF-TEG fibrinogen levels were compared with plasma fibrinogen measurements. At the baseline, the values of Spearman's correlation coefficient (r) between k-TEG and r-TEG were moderate for α (r = 0.40, P = 0.06) and strong for MA (r = 0.90, P < 0.01). At III + 30, r was 0.46 (P < 0.05) for α and 0.80 (P < 0.01) for MA. The average time required to measure MA via r-TEG was decreased in comparison with k-TEG [from 29.7 to 21.6 minutes at the baseline (a 22% reduction) and from 29.6 to 22.9 minutes at III + 30 (a 23% reduction)]. FF-TEG correlated strongly with the plasma fibrinogen level at the baseline (r = 0.90, P < 0.01); however, FF-TEG overestimated the fibrinogen level at III + 30 (r = 0.58, P = 0.01). In conclusion, in adult LT, r-TEG correlates with k-TEG strongly for MA but only moderately for α. FF-TEG estimates the plasma fibrinogen level well at the baseline; however, it must be interpreted with caution because of its overestimation after graft reperfusion when the plasma fibrinogen level often decreases to less than 100 mg/dL.

Upper-extremity transplantation using a cell-based protocol to minimize immunosuppression.

OBJECTIVE: To minimize maintenance immunosuppression in upper-extremity transplantation to favor the risk-benefit balance of this procedure. BACKGROUND: Despite favorable outcomes, broad clinical application of reconstructive transplantation is limited by the risks and side effects of multidrug immunosuppression. We present our experience with upper-extremity transplantation under a novel, donor bone marrow (BM) cell-based treatment protocol ("Pittsburgh protocol"). METHODS: Between March 2009 and September 2010, 5 patients received a bilateral hand (n = 2), a bilateral hand/forearm (n = 1), or a unilateral (n = 2) hand transplant. Patients were treated with alemtuzumab and methylprednisolone for induction, followed by tacrolimus monotherapy. On day 14, patients received an infusion of donor BM cells isolated from 9 vertebral bodies. Comprehensive follow-up included functional evaluation, imaging, and immunomonitoring. RESULTS: All patients are maintained on tacrolimus monotherapy with trough levels ranging between 4 and 12 ng/mL. Skin rejections were infrequent and reversible. Patients demonstrated sustained improvements in motor function and sensory return correlating with time after transplantation and level of amputation. Side effects included transient increase in serum creatinine, hyperglycemia managed with oral hypoglycemics, minor wound infection, and hyperuricemia but no infections. Immunomonitoring revealed transient moderate levels of donor-specific antibodies, adequate immunocompetence, and no peripheral blood chimerism. Imaging demonstrated patent vessels with only mild luminal narrowing/occlusion in 1 case. Protocol skin biopsies showed absent or minimal perivascular cellular infiltrates. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that this BM cell-based treatment protocol is safe, is well tolerated, and allows upper-extremity transplantation using low-dose tacrolimus monotherapy.

Cardiac arrest during adult liver transplantation: a single institution's experience with 1238 deceased donor transplants.

Liver transplantation (LT) is one of the highest risk noncardiac surgeries. We reviewed the incidence, etiologies, and outcomes of intraoperative cardiac arrest (ICA) during LT. Adult cadaveric LT recipients from January 1, 2001 through December 31, 2009 were reviewed. ICA was defined as an event requiring either closed chest compression or open cardiac massage. Cardiac arrest patients who recovered with only pharmacological interventions were excluded. Data included etiologies and outcomes of ICA, intraoperative deaths (IDs) and hospital deaths (HDs), and potential ICA risk factors. ICA occurred in 68 of 1238 LT recipients (5.5%). It occurred most frequently during the neohepatic phase (60 cases or 90%), and 39 of these cases (65.0%) experienced ICA within 5 minutes after graft reperfusion. The causes of ICA included postreperfusion syndrome (PRS; 26 cases or 38.2%) and pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE; 24 cases or 35.3%). A higher Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score was found to be the most significant risk factor for ICA. The ID rate after ICA was 29.4% (20 cases), and the HD rate was 50.0% (34 cases). The 30-day patient survival rate after ICA was 55.9%, and the 1-year survival rate was 45.6%: these rates were significantly lower (P < 0.001) than those for non-ICA patients (97.4% and 85.1%, respectively). In conclusion, the incidence of ICA in adult cadaveric LT was 5.5% with an intraoperative mortality rate of 29.4%. ICA most frequently occurred within 5 minutes after reperfusion and resulted mainly from PRS and PTE. A higher MELD score was identified as a risk factor.

Complications related to invasive hemodynamic monitors during adult liver transplantation.

The rate of complications directly related to invasive monitors during liver transplantation (LT) was reviewed in 1206 consecutive adult LTs performed over 8.6 yr (1/1/2004-7/31/2012). The designated anesthesiologists placed intra-operative monitors, including two arterial catheters (via the radial and the right femoral arteries), central venous catheters (a 9 Fr. catheter and an 18 Fr. veno-venous bypass [VVB] return cannula in an internal jugular vein), a pulmonary artery catheter, and a transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) probe. A 17 Fr. VVB drainage cannula was placed via the left femoral vein. No Clavien-Dindo Grade V (death) or Grade IV (organ dysfunction) complication was identified. Nine Grade III complications (requiring surgical intervention) and 15 Grade II complications (conservative treatment) were noted. Seven (0.58% in 1206 cases) were related to a femoral arterial line with Grade III of four; seven (0.58%) were due to VVB return cannula in the femoral vein with Grade III of one; four (0.33%) were related to central venous catheters with Grade III of two; four (0.33%) were due to a TEE probe with Grade III of two; and two minor complications (0.17%) that were related to a radial arterial line. No complication was observed with a pulmonary arterial catheter. Current invasive monitors placed during LT have an acceptable risk.

Simulation: a teaching tool for liver transplantation anesthesiology.

Anesthesia for liver transplantation (ALT) requires extensive preparation and rapid recognition of changing clinical conditions. Owing to the proliferation of transplant centers, greater number of anesthesia providers need training in specific skills required to treat these patients. These cases are no longer limited to few transplant centers; therefore, reduction of cases in individual centers has created a need for simulation training to prepare and supplement clinical experience. We have developed an ALT simulation course for senior anesthesia residents which combines didactic sessions with live-patient-based and mannequin-based simulation. Outcomes have been measured using pre- and post-simulation course quizzes as well as a survey given at the end of the month-long ALT rotation. Twenty-four senior anesthesiology residents (n = 24) have completed the ALT simulation course. Residents had an average score of 75% ± 10% on the pre-simulation quiz, which increased to 92% ± 6.5% on the post-simulation quiz (p < 0.001). Furthermore, survey scores indicated that residents noted that the course provided an improvement in their preparedness, confidence, anticipation, and understanding of the importance of communication skills in the care of this patient population. The ALT simulation course provided a standardized in-depth exposure to clinical issues involved in the perioperative care of liver transplant patients.

Anesthetic management in upper extremity transplantation: the Pittsburgh experience.

BACKGROUND: Hand/forearm/arm transplants are vascularized composite allografts, which, unlike solid organs, are composed of multiple tissues including skin, muscle, tendons, vessels, nerves, lymph nodes, bone, and bone marrow. Over the past decade, 26 upper extremity transplantations were performed in the United States. The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center has the largest single center experience with 8 hand/forearm transplantations performed in 5 recipients between January 2008 and September 2010. Anesthetic management in the emerging field of upper extremity transplants must address protocol and procedure-specific considerations related to the role of regional blocks, effects of immunosuppressive drugs during transplant surgery, fluid and hemodynamic management in the microsurgical setting, and rigorous intraoperative monitoring during these often protracted procedures. METHODS: For the first time, we outline salient aspects of upper extremity transplant anesthesia based on our experience with 5 patients. We highlight the importance of minimizing intraoperative vasopressors and improving fluid management and blood product use. RESULTS: Our approach reduced the incidence of perioperative bleeding requiring re-exploration or hemostasis and shortened in-hospital and intensive care unit stay. Functional, immunologic and graft survival outcomes have been highly encouraging in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Further experience is required for validation or standardization of specific anesthetic protocols. Meanwhile, our recommendations are intended as pertinent guidelines for centers performing these novel procedures.

Auricular field nerve stimulation using the NSS-2 BRIDGE® device as an alternative to opioids following kidney donor surgery.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the role that the NSS-2 BRIDGE® device, an auricular field nerve stimulator, may play in reducing opioid requirement and pain in kidney donor surgery. It was not a randomized study. Electrophysiologic studies have demonstrated that the stimulation of the cranial nerves produced by the NSS-2 BRIDGE® device modulates the ascending/descending spinal pain pathways, especially at the level of the limbic system. METHODS: The design compared the effects of the NSS-2 BRIDGE® device (NSS 2-BRIDGE® device group; n=10) to a control group (n=10). In both groups, the surgery was performed using the same standard enhanced recovery after surgery protocol based on the use of a multimodal analgesic approach. For the active treatment group, the NSS-2 BRIDGE® device was placed in the post anesthesia care unit. The primary endpoint was opioid requirement (oral morphine equivalent, OME in mg) at 24 h post-surgery. Secondary endpoints included pain (0-10), at 24 and 48 h, time to discharge from the recovery room, incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting at 24 h, time to oral intake, time to ambulation, and time to discharge from the hospital. Data was analyzed using unpaired t-test and presented as mean ± standard deviation. RESULTS: Compared to control, the use of the NSS-2 BRIDGE® was associated with a 75.4% reduction in OME (33.6 vs. 8.3 mg; p=0.03) and 41.5% reduction in pain (5 vs. 3.28; p=0.06) at 24 h and a 73.3% difference in pain at 48 h (1.6 ± 1.6 vs. 6.0 ± 2.8; p=0.0004). There was no difference in non-opioid analgesics administration between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The tolerability of NSS-2 BRIDGE® device was reported by most to be excellent. This study suggests that the NSS-2 BRIDGE® device may represent a complementary approach for controlling postoperative opioid consumption and pain in patients undergoing kidney donation.

Recommendations From the Society for the Advancement of Transplant Anesthesiology Fellowship Committee: Core Competencies and Milestones for the Kidney/Pancreas Component of Abdominal Organ Transplant Anesthesia Fellowship.

The Society for the Advancement of Transplant Anesthesia (SATA) is dedicated to improving patient care in all facets of transplant anesthesia. The anesthesia fellowship training recommendations for thoracic transplantation (heart and lungs) and part of the abdominal organ transplantation (liver) have been presented in previous publications. The SATA Fellowship Committee has completed the remaining component of abdominal transplant anesthesia (kidney/pancreas) and has assembled core competencies and milestones derived from expert consensus to guide the education and overall preparation of trainees providing care for kidney/pancreas transplant recipients. These recommendations provide a comprehensive approach to pre-operative evaluation, vascular access procedures, advanced hemodynamic monitoring, assessment of coagulation and metabolic abnormalities, operative techniques, and post-operative pain control. As such, this document supplements the current liver/hepatic transplant anesthesia fellowship training programs to include all aspects of "Abdominal Organ Transplant Anesthesia" recommended knowledge.

Portopulmonary hypertension as an indication for combined heart, lung, and liver or lung and liver transplantation: literature review and case presentation.

End-stage liver disease with severe portopulmonary hypertension (PPHTN), which is refractory to vasodilator therapies, is a contraindication for isolated liver transplantation (LT) because of the high mortality rate. Combined heart, lung, and liver transplantation (CHLLT) and combined lung and liver transplantation (CLLT) can be lifesaving options for these patients; however, these procedures have rarely been performed. A 52-year-old man had end-stage liver disease due to hepatitis C and PPHTN; the latter showed a suboptimal response to pulmonary vasodilator therapy with continuous intravenous treprostinil sodium and oral sildenafil citrate and was considered a contraindication to isolated LT. His preoperative left ventricular function was normal, and he had mild to moderate right ventricular dysfunction. He underwent CLLT, which consisted of sequential double-lung transplantation under cardiopulmonary bypass followed by standard LT under venovenous bypass. Re-exploration of the chest cavity was necessary because of bleeding, and respiratory failure developed; however, the patient recovered, was discharged home on day 26, and remained well 1 year after CLLT with the standard immunosuppressants (similar to those used for heart and lung transplantation). For PPHTN, combined thoracic organ and liver transplantation has been reported in only 10 patients. Six of these patients, including our case, underwent CLLT, whereas 4 patients underwent CHLLT. Notably, 2 of the 6 CLLT patients expired within 24 hours of transplantation because of acute right heart failure. CHLLT should be considered for patients with refractory PPHTN. The assessment of preoperative cardiac function is a vital part of the decision to include heart transplantation in CLLT.

Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava-When a Left-Sided Central Line Does Not Make the Turn: A Case Report.

A 59-year-old male presenting for a living nonrelated kidney transplant has an intraoperative left internal jugular central venous catheter placed for operative access and monitoring. Post-anesthesia care unit postoperative chest X-ray shows possible aortic placement as read by radiology. The catheter is confirmed venous on insertion, with monitoring during the operation, and with repeat transduction and venous blood gas results postoperatively. A follow-up computed tomography scan shows findings consistent with persistent left superior vena cava. This can be associated with other cardiac abnormalities and an increased risk of complications, both mechanical and physiological. Care should be taken in patients identified with persistent left superior vena cava to prevent complications in future procedures.

Fluid Management During Kidney Transplantation: A Consensus Statement of the Committee on Transplant Anesthesia of the American Society of Anesthesiologists.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative fluid management may affect the outcome after kidney transplantation. However, the amount and type of fluid administered, and monitoring techniques vary greatly between institutions and there are limited prospective randomized trials and meta-analyses to guide fluid management in kidney transplant recipients. METHODS: Members of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) committee on transplantation reviewed the current literature on the amount and type of fluids (albumin, starches, 0.9% saline, and balanced crystalloid solutions) administered and the different monitors used to assess fluid status, resulting in this consensus statement with recommendations based on the best available evidence. RESULTS: Review of the current literature suggests that starch solutions are associated with increased risk of renal injury in randomized trials and should be avoided in kidney donors and recipients. There is no evidence supporting the routine use of albumin solutions in kidney transplants. Balanced crystalloid solutions such as Lactated Ringer are associated with less acidosis and may lead to less hyperkalemia than 0.9% saline solutions. Central venous pressure is only weakly supported as a tool to assess fluid status. CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations may be useful to anesthesiologists making fluid management decisions during kidney transplantation and facilitate future research on this topic.

N-acetylcysteine does not prevent hepatorenal ischaemia-reperfusion injury in patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Glutathione (GSH) acts as a free radical scavenger that may be helpful in preventing reperfusion injury. N-acetylcysteine (NAC) replenishes GSH stores. The aims of this study were to evaluate the efficacy of NAC in improving liver graft performance and reducing the incidence of post-operative acute kidney injury (AKI). METHODS: Our study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 100 patients; 50 received placebo and 50 received a loading dose of 140 mg/kg of intravenous (IV) NAC over 1 h followed by 70 mg/kg IV repeated every 4 h for a total of 12 doses. Both groups were followed up for 1 year post-orthotopic liver transplant (OLT). We recorded liver function tests, renal function tests, graft survival, patient survival, plasma GSH and duration of hospital and ICU stay. In addition to serum creatinine (SCr) levels, we analysed cystatin C and beta-trace as independent measures of glomerular filtration. All clinical data were recorded daily for the first week after the surgery, then on Days 14, 21, 30, 90 and 180 and at the end of the first year. RESULTS: IV NAC did not affect survival, graft function or risk of AKI. However, GSH levels were highly variable with only 50% of patients receiving NAC exhibiting increased levels and fewer patients developed AKI when GSH levels were increased. Additional risk factors for AKI in the post-transplant period were female gender (P = 0.05), increased baseline serum bilirubin (P = 0.004) and increased baseline SCr levels (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: IV NAC was not effective in reducing renal or hepatic injury in the setting of liver transplantation. The dose and duration of NAC used, though higher than most renal protection studies, may have been ineffective for raising GSH levels in some patients.

Insertion and management of percutaneous veno-venous bypass cannula for liver transplantation: a reference for transplant anesthesiologists.

Surgical advances using the retrohepatic caval preservation technique in liver transplantation (LT) has significantly decreased the need for veno-venous bypass (VVB). However, VVB still remains a viable adjunct of LT. The venous return cannula has traditionally been inserted using a cut-down technique via the axillary vein, but this technique carries significant risks for lymphorrhea, infection, or nerve damage. Since 2001, our institution has routinely used VVB in adult LT surgery. Percutaneous insertion of an internal jugular venous return cannula is performed by the attending anesthesiologist. The aim of this report is to describe the method of insertion and management of a percutaneous veno-venous return cannula in the internal jugular vein during LT. In-depth detail as well as video clips will provide a reference for LT centers wishing to apply this method in their practice.