Triptan use among hospital workers affected by migraine.

Triptans represent the most specific and effective treatment for migraine attacks. Nevertheless, in clinical practice, they are often underused. Hospital workers, in particular physicians, are expected to be more aware of the correct use of specific drugs, especially for a very common disease such as migraine. Aim of this study was to evaluate whether different hospital workers affected by migraine are able to correctly manage the most suitable therapy for their migraine attacks. During a 1-year period, we submitted hospital employees to a structured interview with a questionnaire to investigate the presence of headache and its characteristics. In particular, in the subpopulation of subjects affected by migraine, we took information regarding their usual treatment for the control of attacks. The type of drug and the category of the working activity were synthesized as two different ordinal variables. Difference in the distribution of the different drug categories was evaluated with Chi squared test. Statistics was performed with SPSS 13.0 for Windows systems. We enrolled 1250 consecutive subjects: 20.3 % of the population (254 patients) was affected by migraine. Triptans use was significantly lower than that of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The distribution of the use of the drugs was significantly different (p < 0.0001) at Chi squared test. Among migraineur physicians, only 10.7 % used triptans. Even in this subgroup, we observed a significant difference (p < 0.0001) in the distribution of the use of the drugs at Chi squared test. Our findings show a reduced use of triptans among hospital workers. These data reflect the unsatisfactory dissemination of knowledge regarding the correct management of migraine attacks and the advantages of treatment with triptans. An incorrect therapeutic approach to migraine contributes to the risk of the most important complications, such as drugs abuse or illness chronicization. These findings suggest that an insufficient awareness of migraine-related therapeutic options also involves hospital workers, including physicians.

Prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome in a population of patients with transient global amnesia.

OBJECTIVE: The etiology of transient global amnesia (TGA) is largely undetermined. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS), a condition associated with subtle changes in brain structures involved in memory processes, increases in subjects who have previously experienced a TGA episode. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients who had had a TGA episode were included. A case-control model was used, matching cases with controls by sex, age, and body mass index category. Diagnosis of OSAS was based on the results of the Berlin Questionnaire, which was later confirmed by means of an all-night polysomnography recording. RESULTS: The prevalence of OSAS among TGA patients was significantly higher with respect to that in controls (44.8% vs 13.8%, p = 0.020, χ2 test). At logistic regression model, subjects with TGA had an odds ratio of 8.409 (95% confidence interval = 1.674-42.243; p = 0.010) of having OSAS when compared with controls. CONCLUSIONS: According to our findings, an accurate investigation of sleep disturbances could be considered for a complete assessment of patients with TGA. The subtle cerebral anatomo-functional damage induced by the repeated nocturnal apneic episodes may be a pathophysiologic link between OSAS and TGA.