RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Providers must balance effective empiric therapy against toxicity risks and collateral damage when selecting antibiotic therapy for patients receiving hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). Antimicrobial stewardship interventions during HCT are often challenging due to concern for undertreating potential infections. METHODS: In an effort to decrease unnecessary carbapenem exposure for patients undergoing HCT at our pediatric center, we implemented individualized antibiotic plans (IAPs) to provide recommendations for preengraftment neutropenia prophylaxis, empiric treatment of febrile neutropenia, and empiric treatment for hemodynamic instability. We compared monthly antibiotic days of therapy (DOT) adjusted per 1000 patient-days for carbapenems, antipseudomonal cephalosporins, and all antibiotics during two 3-year periods immediately before and after the implementation of IAPs to measure the impact of IAP on prescribing behavior. Bloodstream infection (BSIs) and Clostridioides difficile (CD) positivity test rates were also compared between cohorts. Last, providers were surveyed to assess their experience of using IAPs in antibiotic decision making. RESULTS: Overall antibiotic use decreased after the implementation of IAPs (monthly reduction of 19.6 DOT/1000 patient-days; P = .004), with carbapenems showing a continuing decline after IAP implementation. BSI and CD positivity rates were unchanged. More than 90% of providers found IAPs to be either extremely or very valuable for their practice. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of IAPs in this high-risk HCT population led to reduction in overall antibiotic use without increase in rate of BSI or CD test positivity. The program was well received by providers.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Criança , Humanos , Carbapenêmicos/uso terapêutico , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Hospitais Pediátricos , Melhoria de QualidadeRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether a two-phase intervention was associated with improvements in antibiotic prescribing among nonhospitalized children with community-acquired pneumonia. STUDY DESIGN: In a large health care organization, a first intervention phase was implemented in September 2020 directed at antibiotic choice and duration for children 2 months through 17 years of age with pneumonia. Activities included clinician education and implementation of a pneumonia-specific order set in the electronic health record. In October 2021, a second phase comprised additional education and order set revisions. A narrow spectrum antibiotic (eg, amoxicillin) was recommended in most circumstances. Electronic health record data were used to identify pneumonia cases and antibiotics ordered. Using interrupted time series analyses, antibiotic choice and duration after phase one (September 2020-September 2021) and after phase two (October 2021-October 2022) were compared with a preintervention prepandemic period (January 2016-early March 2020). RESULTS: Overall, 3570 cases of community-acquired pneumonia were identified: 3246 cases preintervention, 98 post-phase one, and 226 post-phase two. The proportion receiving narrow spectrum monotherapy increased from 40.6% preintervention to 68.4% post-phase one to 69.0% post-phase two (P < .001). For children with an initial narrow spectrum antibiotic, duration decreased from preintervention (mean duration 9.9 days, SD 0.5 days) to post-phase one (mean 8.2, SD 1.9) to post-phase two (mean 6.8, SD 2.3) periods (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: A two-phase intervention with educational sessions combined with clinical decision support was associated with sustained improvements in antibiotic choice and duration among children with community-acquired pneumonia.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas , Pneumonia , Padrões de Prática Médica , Humanos , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/tratamento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Lactente , Adolescente , Feminino , Masculino , Pneumonia/tratamento farmacológico , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Ambulatorial , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Análise de Séries Temporais Interrompida , Gestão de Antimicrobianos/métodos , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Melhoria de QualidadeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Children with influenza-like-illness (ILI) often require clinician clearance or antibiotics to return to child care or school. Study objectives were to examine the association between antibiotic receipt during an Emergency Department (ED) visit for ILI and the outcomes of class absenteeism and illness duration. METHODS: A secondary analysis of 251 children aged 2 months to 12 years with uncomplicated ILI discharged from the ED from December 1, 2018 to November 30, 2019 was conducted. The primary exposure was receipt of antibiotics over the course of illness (assessed by chart review and family follow-up survey). RESULTS: Patients prescribed antibiotics (n = 65) experienced a median of 3 (interquartile range [IQR]: 1,5) days of class missed and 5 (IQR: 3,7) days of illness compared to 2 (IQR: 1,4) days of class missed and 4 (IQR: 3,7) days of illness for those not prescribed antibiotics (n = 186, p = 0.08 and p = 0.13, respectively). There was no statistically significant association with missed class days (incidence rate ratio [IRR]: 1.14 [0.86-1.50], p = 0.37) or days of illness (IRR: 1.06 [0.88-1.27], p = 0.55) for patients prescribed antibiotics compared to patients not prescribed antibiotics for ILI. CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic use for ILI was not associated with reduced class absenteeism or illness duration. IMPACT STATEMENT: Child care centers and schools sometimes exclude children with influenza-like-illness (ILI) from class until cleared to return by a clinician and/or prescribed antibiotics. This study addresses these social drivers of overprescribing. Antibiotics were prescribed in 26% of children with ILI discharged from a large Emergency Department in the US. Antibiotic use was not significantly associated with class absenteeism or illness duration. This study can serve as a discussion point for clinicians when navigating parental or social pressures to prescribe antibiotics for uncomplicated acute respiratory tract infections, particularly when these pressures are influenced by concerns about returning to class.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Children with urinary tract infection (UTI) are often diagnosed in emergency and urgent care settings and increasingly are unnecessarily treated with broad-spectrum antibiotics. This study evaluated the effect of a quality improvement intervention on empiric antibiotic prescribing for the treatment of uncomplicated UTI in children. METHODS: A local clinical pathway for uncomplicated UTI, introduced in June 2010, recommended empiric treatment with cephalexin, a narrow-spectrum (first-generation) cephalosporin antibiotic. A retrospective quasi-experimental study of pediatric patients older than 1 month presenting to emergency and urgent care settings from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2014, with uncomplicated UTI was conducted. Hospitalized patients and those with chronic conditions or urogenital abnormalities were excluded. Control charts and interrupted time-series analysis were used to analyze the primary outcome of narrow-spectrum antibiotic prescribing rates and the balancing measures of 72-hour revisits, resistant bacterial isolates, and subsequent inpatient admissions for UTI. RESULTS: A total of 2134 patients were included. There was an immediate and sustained significant increase in cephalexin prescribing before (19.2%) versus after (79.6%) pathway implementation and a concurrent significant decline in oral third-generation cephalosporin (cefixime) prescribing from 50.3% to 4.0%. There was no significant increase in 72-hour revisits, resistant bacterial isolates, or inpatient admissions for UTI. CONCLUSIONS: A clinical pathway produced a significant and sustained increase in narrow-spectrum empiric antibiotic prescribing for pediatric UTI. Increased empiric cephalexin prescribing did not result in increased treatment failures or adverse patient outcomes. Future studies on implementing clinical pathways for children outside a pediatric hospital network are needed.
Assuntos
Assistência Ambulatorial , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Cefalosporinas/uso terapêutico , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções Urinárias/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Procedimentos Clínicos , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Melhoria de Qualidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecções Urinárias/microbiologiaRESUMO
Acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs) account for most antibiotic prescriptions in pediatrics. Although US guidelines continue to recommend ≥10 days antibiotics for common ARTIs, evidence suggests that 5-day courses can be safe and effective. Academic imprinting seems to play a major role in the continued use of prolonged antibiotic durations. In this report, we discuss the evidence supporting short antibiotic courses for group A streptococcal pharyngitis, acute otitis media, and acute bacterial rhinosinusitis. We discuss the basis for prolonged antibiotic course recommendations and recent literature investigating shorter courses. Prescribers in the United States should overcome academic imprinting and follow international trends to reduce antibiotic durations for common ARTIs, where 5 days is a safe and efficacious course when antibiotics are prescribed.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Faringite , Infecções Respiratórias , Sinusite , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Infecções Respiratórias/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Respiratórias/microbiologia , Doença Aguda , Sinusite/tratamento farmacológico , Sinusite/microbiologia , Faringite/tratamento farmacológico , Faringite/microbiologia , Otite Média/tratamento farmacológico , Otite Média/microbiologia , Criança , Esquema de Medicação , Infecções Estreptocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Rinite/tratamento farmacológico , Rinite/microbiologia , Estados Unidos , Streptococcus pyogenes/efeitos dos fármacosRESUMO
We quantified antibiotic prescribing for ambulatory pediatric acute respiratory illness at 22 institutions in "pre-shortage" (Jan 2019-Sep 2022) and "shortage" (Oct 2022-Mar 2023) periods for amoxicillin. While acute respiratory illness prescribing increased across settings, the proportion of amoxicillin prescriptions decreased. Variation was seen within and between institutions.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Most antibiotic use occurs in ambulatory settings. No benchmarks exist for pediatric institutions to assess their outpatient antibiotic use and compare prescribing rates to peers. We aimed to share pediatric outpatient antibiotic use reports and benchmarking metrics nationally. METHODS: We invited institutions from the Sharing Antimicrobial Reports for Pediatric Stewardship OutPatient (SHARPS-OP) Collaborative to contribute quarterly aggregate reports on antibiotic use from January 2019 to June 2022. Outpatient settings included emergency departments (ED), urgent care centers (UCC), primary care clinics (PCC) and telehealth encounters. Benchmarking metrics included the percentage of: (1) all acute encounters resulting in antibiotic prescriptions; (2) acute respiratory infection (ARI) encounters resulting in antibiotic prescriptions; and among ARI encounters receiving antibiotics, (3) the percentage receiving amoxicillin ("Amoxicillin index"); and (4) the percentage receiving azithromycin ("Azithromycin index"). We collected rates of antibiotic prescriptions with durations ≤7 days and >10 days from institutions able to provide validated duration data. RESULTS: Twenty-one institutions submitted aggregate reports. Percent ARI encounters receiving antibiotics were highest in the UCC (40.2%), and lowest in telehealth (19.1%). Amoxicillin index was highest for the ED (76.2%), and lowest for telehealth (55.8%), while the azithromycin index was similar for ED, UCC, and PCC (3.8%, 3.7%, and 5.0% respectively). Antibiotic duration of ≤7 days varied substantially (46.4% for ED, 27.8% UCC, 23.7% telehealth, and 16.4% PCC). CONCLUSIONS: We developed a benchmarking platform for key pediatric outpatient antibiotic use metrics drawing data from multiple pediatric institutions nationally. These data may serve as a baseline measurement for future improvement work.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Infecções Respiratórias , Humanos , Criança , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Azitromicina/uso terapêutico , Benchmarking , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Padrões de Prática Médica , Amoxicilina/uso terapêutico , Infecções Respiratórias/tratamento farmacológico , Prescrição InadequadaRESUMO
Antibiotics are overprescribed for children in outpatient settings, primarily for the diagnosis of acute respiratory tract infections. The overuse of antibiotics leads to antibiotic-resistant infections, avoidable adverse drug events, and chronic inflammatory conditions in children. Decreasing unnecessary antibiotic use is therefore a public health priority. In this article, the authors describe the burden of antibiotic prescribing to children in outpatient settings, identify targets for improvement, and use national recommendations as a guide to describe pragmatic methods to measure and improve antibiotic prescribing for children in outpatient settings.
Assuntos
Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Infecções Respiratórias , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Criança , Humanos , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Saúde Pública , Infecções Respiratórias/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
Metrics to track and compare outpatient pediatric antibiotic prescribing are needed to improve antibiotic use and prevent unwanted consequences of antibiotic overuse. We have considered the impact and feasibility of available metrics and propose select high-priority measures for electronic reporting of pediatric outpatient antibiotic use. Streamlined use of antibiotic prescribing metrics will allow for national benchmarking, monitoring and identification of targets and goals for improvement.
Assuntos
Benchmarking , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Criança , Humanos , Prescrição Inadequada , Padrões de Prática MédicaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: National guidelines published in 2011 recommend amoxicillin as first-line treatment for non-hospitalized children with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). We aimed to understand visit rates, antibiotic selection, and factors associated with amoxicillin prescribing for children with CAP since guideline publication. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional retrospective study of patients aged 90 days-18 years with an outpatient clinic or emergency department (ED) visit from 2008 to 2015 using the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey ED data files, respectively. We estimated the incidence rates of ambulatory CAP visits, examined time trends in antibiotics prescribed at CAP visits, and determined factors independently associated with first-line guideline-recommended antibiotic prescribing using multivariable logistic regression, including patient age, setting, and US census region. RESULTS: From 2008 to 2015, there were an estimated 1.5 million [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3-1.7 million] pediatric CAP visits annually. Amoxicillin was prescribed in 23% (95% CI 18-30%), azithromycin was prescribed in 47% (95% CI 41-54%), and cephalosporins were prescribed in 26% (95% CI 21-31%) of antibiotic visits for CAP. There were no significant differences in annual CAP visits or prescribing by antibiotic class since guideline publication. Amoxicillin prescribing was significantly less likely in visits by older children, aged 5-18 years, [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.22, 95% CI 0.10-0.49] compared to visits by younger children aged 90 days-4 years with CAP. Compared with the Northeast, amoxicillin prescribing was significantly lower in the Midwest (aOR 0.35, 95% CI 0.13-0.98) and South (aOR 0.23, 95% CI 0.08-0.63). Azithromycin prescribing was significantly more likely in visits to EDs (aOR 1.46, 95% CI 1.07-1.98) compared to physician offices. CONCLUSION: Despite national guideline recommendations, amoxicillin prescribing for CAP in outpatient settings is low and azithromycin remains the predominant antibiotic prescribed, highlighting the need for dedicated antibiotic stewardship efforts in ambulatory settings.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Acute otitis media (AOM) is a common pediatric condition known to contribute to excessive antibiotic use in the outpatient setting. Treatment of AOM in the inpatient setting has not been described. The objective was to describe the clinical features and inpatient management of AOM to harness this entity to teach learners about judicious antibiotic prescribing in all settings. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective cohort study of inpatients treated for AOM from January 2015 to December 2018. Patients were included if they had an antibiotic ordered and either a provider-selected order indication of otitis media or an International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision billing code of AOM. A chart review was performed to identify primary diagnoses, examination features, and treatment, including excess days of therapy. RESULTS: We included 840 hospitalized patients treated for AOM in this study. At least 71% of patients had a concurrent viral respiratory illness. Examinations were frequently discordant (34%), and 47% lacked documentation of a physical examination finding of a bulging tympanic membrane, contributing to 3417 potential excess days of therapy. Of the total patients treated for AOM, 40% were given excess duration of therapy. The vast majority (97%) of patients who qualified for a wait-and-watch approach were treated. CONCLUSIONS: AOM is not being rigorously diagnosed or treated in a guideline-adherent manner in the inpatient setting. This is a lost opportunity for teaching antibiotic stewardship. Interventions, such as promoting the wait-and-watch approach and deferring treatment decisions to inpatient providers, could help promote the judicious use of antibiotics.
Assuntos
Gestão de Antimicrobianos , Otite Média , Doença Aguda , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Criança , Hospitais Pediátricos , Humanos , Lactente , Pacientes Internados , Otite Média/diagnóstico , Otite Média/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
: media-1vid110.1542/5972296744001PEDS-VA_2018-1056Video Abstract OBJECTIVES: To characterize and compare ambulatory antibiotic prescribing for children in US pediatric and nonpediatric emergency departments (EDs). METHODS: A cross-sectional retrospective study of patients aged 0 to 17 years discharged from EDs in the United States was conducted by using the 2009-2014 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey ED data. We estimated the proportion of ED visits resulting in antibiotic prescriptions, stratified by antibiotic spectrum, class, diagnosis, and ED type ("pediatric" defined as >75% of visits by patients aged 0-17 years, versus "nonpediatric"). Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine factors independently associated with first-line, guideline-concordant prescribing for acute otitis media, pharyngitis, and sinusitis. RESULTS: In 2009-2014, of the 29 million mean annual ED visits by children, 14% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 10%-20%) occurred at pediatric EDs. Antibiotics overall were prescribed more frequently in nonpediatric than pediatric ED visits (24% vs 20%, P < .01). Antibiotic prescribing frequencies were stable over time. Of all antibiotics prescribed, 44% (95% CI: 42%-45%) were broad spectrum, and 32% (95% CI: 30%-34%, 2.1 million per year) were generally not indicated. Compared with pediatric EDs, nonpediatric EDs had a higher frequency of prescribing macrolides (18% vs 8%, P < .0001) and a lower frequency of first-line, guideline-concordant prescribing for the respiratory conditions studied (77% vs 87%, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Children are prescribed almost 7 million antibiotic prescriptions in EDs annually, primarily in nonpediatric EDs. Pediatric antibiotic stewardship efforts should expand to nonpediatric EDs nationwide, particularly regarding avoidance of antibiotic prescribing for conditions for which antibiotics are not indicated, reducing macrolide prescriptions, and increasing first-line, guideline-concordant prescribing.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Gestão de Antimicrobianos/tendências , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/tendências , Prescrição Inadequada/tendências , Adolescente , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Gestão de Antimicrobianos/métodos , Gestão de Antimicrobianos/normas , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/normas , Feminino , Humanos , Prescrição Inadequada/prevenção & controle , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Children in outpatient clinics are prescribed over 15 million courses of unnecessary antibiotics annually. Clinicians have identified parent pressure for antibiotics, parent satisfaction, and time constraints as the primary drivers of unnecessary antibiotic prescribing. Over the past decade, parents have become more aware that antibiotics only treat bacterial infections, yet continue to report an expectation for antibiotics in 50-65% of acute care visits. Parental expectations for antibiotics stem from parental concerns about symptom severity and a desire to alleviate symptoms. Clinicians can address parental concerns when they assess the severity of illness through a physical exam, provide a clear explanation for the symptoms, recommend ways to alleviate the symptoms, and provide council on when to be concerned. When clinicians fail to address parental concerns, parents are more likely to challenge the diagnosis or treatment recommendations, clinicians are more likely to perceive that parent as expecting an antibiotic, and antibiotics are significantly more likely to be prescribed. Parents that expect antibiotics are more likely to communicate using a 'candidate diagnosis' (e.g., "Johnny has strep throat.") and resist the diagnosis or treatment given. Clinicians can recognize these parental communication patterns and use specific communication practices shown to decrease unnecessary antibiotic prescribing. When parents expect antibiotics, clinicians should (1) review physical exam findings using 'no problem' commentary (e.g., "This ear is just a little red."), (2) deliver a specific diagnosis (e.g., avoid 'a virus'), (3) use a two-part negative/positive treatment recommendation (e.g., "On the one hand, antibiotics will not help. On the other hand, ibuprofen can help with pain."), and (4) provide a contingency plan. Clinicians should feel comfortable discussing the risks and benefits of antibiotics. Effective communication between parents and clinicians in outpatient clinics leads to more judicious antibiotic prescribing, higher parent satisfaction scores, and more efficient clinic visits.