Extreme hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for elderly prostate cancer patients: side effects preliminary analysis of a phase II trial.

PURPOSE: Aim of this study is to evaluate safety and efficacy of SBRT in elderly patients affected by localized prostate cancer (PC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Men aged 70 years or older were enrolled and analyzed. The SBRT schedule was 35 Gy in 5 fractions administered in 1-2 weeks. According to risk group, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was prescribed. Urinary symptoms were evaluated at baseline using the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). Genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities were assessed at the end of treatment, 2 weeks after SBRT and during follow-up using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). PSA values were recorded before treatment and during follow-up as biochemical response criteria. RESULTS: Between 07/2019 and 09/2021, 111 patients were enrolled. Median age was 77 years. At the end of treatment, no acute GU/GI toxicities ≥ G2 were observed. At 2-3 weeks after treatment, 3 patients reported G2 GU toxicity, while 14 patients referred G2 GI toxicity. During the last follow up, 26 and 2 patients reported, respectively, G1 and G2 GU toxicity, while 22 and 1 cases described, respectively, G1 and G2 GI toxicity. No late toxicities ≥ G3 were recorded. GU toxicity is related to absence of urethra sparing, increasing PTV volume, Dmax PTV and IPSS; GI toxicity is related to RT schedule (each other day is better than consecutive day), Dmax rectum and IPSS, At a median follow-up of 24 months, excellent biochemical disease control was achieved in all cases with median PSA of 0.5 ng/ml. CONCLUSION: SBRT in elderly patients affected by PC is feasible and well tolerated with excellent biochemical disease control. Longer follow-up is needed to assess late toxicity profile and long-term clinical outcome.

Robotic pyelolithotomy for the treatment of large renal stones: a single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have reported robotic pyelolithotomy (RPL) series; furthermore, the most of all have reported small and single-center series. Herein we report our experience from 70 cases of complex kidney stones treated with RPL at our surgical center; this study reports the largest series of RPL in a minimal invasive experienced center. METHODS: Between February 2016 and March 2018, 70 patients with complex renal stones (Guy's Stone Score: 4) underwent RPL and included in a prospectively maintained institutional database. Baseline characteristics, clinical data, perioperative data, postoperative data and stone free status were assessed by descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Of 70 patients, 72.85% presented renal pelvis stones. The mean maximum stone diameter was 33.1±14.5 mm (median 30 mm; interquartile range 22-40 mm). Mean total operative duration was 122.5±34.4 min (median 120 min; interquartile range 105-135 min). In two patients (2.8%), a grade III complications were noted; no major complications (grade IV-V) were noted. The complete SFR, after a single robotic procedure, was 92.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that RPL is a safe, reproducible and minimally invasive approach as treatment of large renal stones when endoscopic treatment failed or was not available. RPL permits to achieve an excellent stone free status, in a single definitive procedure.

Extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a high-volume surgical center experience.

BACKGROUND: Herein we report our high-volume single center experience with extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (eRARP) in patients with prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS: A retrospective chart review of our prospectively maintained institutional PCa database was performed to analyze eRARP cases done between April 2009 and March 2016. Nerve-sparing technique was applied in accordance with Tewari. Baseline characteristics, surgical outcomes, continence and erectile function were assessed by descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Of 1354 patients, 61% had intermediate-risk disease. Mean total operative duration was 146±44 min (median 140 minutes; interquartile range 120-160 minutes). In 91.7% of case no complication was recorded. Gleason Score on final pathology was mostly 6 (43.3%) or 7 (3+4) (32.3%). The pathological T stage was mostly pT2c (53.8%). Patients who had a bilateral nerve sparing procedure showed the best functional results, with 81.2% continence rate at 1 month, and 65% reported recovery of erectile function at 3 months postoperation. CONCLUSIONS: eRARP is a safe, reproducible, and effective procedure for the surgical treatment of prostate cancer. Superior functional outcome can be achieved when a bilateral intrafascial nerve-sparing approach can be performed.

Retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma with infrahepatic vena caval thrombus.

PURPOSE: The retroperitoneal laparoscopic approach is utilized to treat a right renal tumor with vena caval thrombus reaching infrahepatic veins. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The patient is an 87-year-old woman with a tumor measuring 8 x 9 cm and a vena caval thrombus (7 cm), stretching as far as the subhepatic vein. The retroperitoneal laparoscopic approach is used with the patient in the lateral position and the usual 4 laparoscopy trocars. A wide incision is made through Gerota's fascia, the renal artery clipped and severed, and the vena cava is dissected to the level of the infrahepatic veins; a vessel loop is encircled twice upstream of the thrombus. Vessel loop is similarly tied below the thrombus. An 8 cm abdominal wall incision is made joining two trocars on the medial and anterior axillary side. After retrieving the vessel loops and closing the vena cava by pulling gently on the loops, thrombus is extracted through a cavotomy under direct vision, with removal of the surgical specimen, positioning of the Satinsky haemostatic forceps, and closure of the vena cava using uninterrupted Prolene 2/0 sutures. RESULTS: Blood loss was 300 cc. The patient was discharged on day 6, and a CT-scan 4 months later disclosed no signs of recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: This is an original solution that opens the way to further indications for using retroperitoneal laparoscopy to treat tumors extending into the inferior vena cava.

Bicalutamide monotherapy versus flutamide plus goserelin in prostate cancer: updated results of a multicentric trial.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of bicalutamide monotherapy to maximal androgen blockade in advanced prostatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Previously untreated patients with histologically proven stage C or D (American Urological Association Staging System) disease were randomly allocated to either bicalutamide (B) or goserelin plus flutamide (G+F). After disease progression, patients treated with B were assigned to castration. The primary endpoint for this trial was overall survival. Prostate cancer-specific survival and progression were included among secondary endpoints. RESULTS: In total 108 patients received B and 112 received G+F. At a median follow-up time of 54 months (range 1-89), 151 patients progressed and 113 died. There was no significant difference in the duration of either progression-free or overall survival. Hazards of progression, death and cancer-specific death, corrected by disease stage, tumor grade and baseline PSA level, showed that patients initially assigned to B had a higher risk of progression but a comparable risk of death and cancer-specific death with the exception of patients with G3 tumors who had an increased risk of death). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with well or moderately well differentiated tumors, B monotherapy followed by castration may offer the same survival chance as maximal androgen deprivation. In those patients it thus represents a reasonable choice that can avoid the side effects of androgen deprivation for considerable periods of time.