RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of squash cytology in rapid on-site adequacy checking (ROSAC) of image-guided gun biopsy and to determine its diagnostic accuracy at a tertiary cancer center. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective study on 183 patients undergoing image-guided biopsy. Squash smears were prepared from biopsy cores and checked for adequacy by cytotechnologists. When adequate, more cores were sampled from the same area for histopathology. If inadequate, the procedure was repeated at the same sitting on a different area. The squash smears were reported by cytopathologists within 4 h after staining with conventional Papanicoloau stain. The results were compared with the final histopathology report. RESULTS: The sampling was representative in 95.6% cases with concordance for adequacy in 97.3% cases. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of squash cytology for diagnosis of the lesion were 99.4, 92.7, 97.7 and 97.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Squash cytology is an ideal and cost-effective technique for ROSAC of image-guided biopsies, which ensures adequacy, avoids repeat procedures and prevents delay in diagnosis. It can be effectively performed by trained cytotechnologists in radiology clinics. Squash cytology is also a cost-effective tool offering rapid diagnosis which expedites planning of treatment.
Assuntos
Citodiagnóstico/métodos , Neoplasias/patologia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Biópsia Guiada por Imagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Teste de Papanicolaou , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Manejo de EspécimesRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To standardize the technique of immunocytochemical (ICC) assessment of estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status in breast cancer by scrape cytology and to compare the results with immunohistochemistry on paraffin blocks. STUDY DESIGN: ICC assessment for ER and PR was done on scrape smears from tissue samples in 200 cases of primary breast cancer. The results were compared to those obtained from immunohistochemical (IHC) evaluation of formalin-fixed paraffin same tissue samples. RESULTS: ER/PR positivity rates as well as staining scores were compared between the scrape smears and tissue sections. The concordance between cytology and histology was 84% for ER and 90% for PR. Both the positivity rates and the staining intensity scores were higher for cytochemistry than for histochemistry. CONCLUSION: The ICC method on scrape smears is a simple test with rapid turnaround time. The sample required is small, and antigen loss due to fixation and processing is minimal. This new method gives a higher yield of hormone receptor positivity and, when used in conjunction with the IHC method, may improve the pickup rate of ER-positive cases, thereby playing an important role in risk stratification and therapeutic decision making in patients with breast cancer.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/patologia , Imuno-Histoquímica/métodos , Receptores de Estrogênio/análise , Receptores de Progesterona/análise , Neoplasias da Mama/metabolismo , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/metabolismo , Reações Falso-Negativas , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Receptores de Estrogênio/metabolismo , Receptores de Progesterona/metabolismo , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Fixação de TecidosRESUMO
Papanicolaou (Pap) staining procedure has achieved worldwide acceptance in cytology practice due to its crisp cytological details. There are many centres or private laboratories in our country which cannot fulfill the economic requirement of Pap staining and hence employ comparatively cheaper haematoxylin and eosin (H & E) stain. Although routine H & E cannot replace Pap, this study is an attempt to modify H & E staining that would offer comparable diagnostic results. The present study is restricted to FNAC material from palpable lesions i.e.breast and lymph nodes. For this purpose 50 lymph nodes ( LN) and 18 breasts were aspirated. Out of two fixed smears, 1 was stained by Pap technique for routine reporting and other by modified H & E method which was examined and reported by other pathologist, Dr. Sangeeta B. Desai ( SBD) The diagnosis of both the techniques were compared. Emphasis was also given on cytomorphological characteristics. Out of fifty lymph node aspirates from various sites, no diagnostic discrepancy was observed in 46 cases. Three out of 4 had sampling errors whereas, poor nuclear staining was noticed in a single case. Out of eighteen breast aspirates concordant diagnosis was achieved in 16 cases. Out of two discrepant diagnosis 1 was due to sampling error, and the other was an interpretative error. All the cases were confirmed histologically. In conclusion, modified H & E staining is useful for common sites of aspirations of superficial lesions.