Living Without a Pulse: The Vascular Implications of Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

Pulsatility seems to have a teleological role because evolutionary hierarchy favors higher ordered animals with more complex, multichamber circulatory systems that generate higher pulse pressure compared with lower ordered animals. Yet despite years of such natural selection, the modern generation of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs) that have been increasingly used for the last decade have created a unique physiology characterized by a nonpulsatile, nonlaminar blood flow profile with the absence of the usual large elastic artery Windkessel effect during diastole. Although outcomes and durability have improved with CF-LVADs, patients supported with CF-LVADs have a high rate of complications that were not as frequently observed with older pulsatile devices, including gastrointestinal bleeding from arteriovenous malformations, pump thrombosis, and stroke. Given the apparent fundamental biological role of the pulse, the purpose of this review is to describe the normal physiology of ventricular-arterial coupling from pulsatile flow, the effects of heart failure on this physiology and the vasculature, and to examine the effects of nonpulsatile blood flow on the vascular system and potential role in complications seen with CF-LVAD therapy. Understanding these concomitant vascular changes with CF-LVADs may be a key step in improving patient outcomes as modulation of pulsatility and flow characteristics may serve as a novel, yet simple, therapy for reducing complications.

Coronary Artery Remodeling and Fibrosis With Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Support.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery fluid dynamics may be altered because of the nonphysiological flow seen in continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs). Our aim was to study the structure and composition of coronary vessels after CF-LVAD. METHODS AND RESULTS: Coronary arteries were collected from patients with heart failure (HF) at the time of transplantation, of whom 15 were supported with a CF-LVAD before transplant (HF+LVAD group) and 9 were not (HF non-LVAD group). In addition, coronary samples were obtained from 5 nonfailing age-matched donors (nonfailing group). Histological analysis was performed to quantify coronary morphology, composition, vascular fibrosis, and vasa vasorum density. The age and sex mix of the 3 groups were similar, and the mean duration of LVAD support was 213 days. Compared with patients with HF and nonfailing donors, the arteries from patients with HF+LVAD had expansion of the adventitia, breakdown of the internal elastic lamina, and increased adventitial collagen deposition and density of vasa vasorum. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients supported with CF-LVADs, the coronary arteries develop marked remodeling with increased adventitial fibrosis. The physiological consequences of these structural changes are unknown, but it is possible that arterial contractility may be impaired, thus limiting coronary flow reserve and promoting myocardial ischemia. This may contribute to CF-LVAD complications, such as ventricular arrhythmias and right ventricular failure. As more patients receive CF-LVADs and new pump technology attempts to modulate flow profiles and pulsatility, further research is needed to understand the mechanisms and long-term sequela of these changes in coronary arteries and other vascular beds.