Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Gynecol Oncol ; 158(2): 331-338, 2020 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32553589

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Estimate the association between non-surgical management (NSM) (e.g. hormonal or radiation therapy) and overall survival among women with stage I endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC) and identify patient and facility characteristics associated with receipt of NSM. METHODS: Women >45 years of age with clinical stage I EEC were identified in the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2016. Women treated with NSM were compared with women treated initially with hysterectomy. Patient and facility characteristics associated with NSM were evaluated using logistic regression models. Association with overall survival was examined using log-rank tests, Kaplan-Meier curves, and Cox proportional hazards regression models with and without propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS: A total of 112,469 women underwent treatment for stage I EEC between 2004 and 2016. 2776 (3%) received NSM, of whom 1987 (71%) received radiation therapy, 688 (25%) received hormonal therapy, and 101 (4%) received both. Older age, black race, higher Charlson-Deyo scores, Medicaid insurance, and low annual facility hysterectomy volume were associated with receiving NSM. The 5-year survival rate was 40% (95%CI: 37%-42%) for women with NSM compared to 89% (95%CI: 88%-89%) for hysterectomy. Women treated with NSM died at a faster rate than those who underwent primary hysterectomy (HR 7.6, 95%CI: 7.2-8.0; p < 0.001). This statistically significant difference in survival persisted in adjusted Cox proportional hazards models and after PSM. CONCLUSIONS: Women treated with NSM had a significantly higher risk of death compared to those undergoing hysterectomy for stage I EEC. Caution should be used when selecting patients for NSM given its worse outcomes.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Hormonais/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma Endometrioide/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma Endometrioide/radioterapia , Neoplasias do Endométrio/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias do Endométrio/radioterapia , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma Endometrioide/mortalidade , Quimiorradioterapia , Estudos de Coortes , Bases de Dados Factuais , Neoplasias do Endométrio/mortalidade , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
2.
Gynecol Oncol ; 159(1): 195-200, 2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32771277

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Determine the incidence and identify factors associated with potentially avoidable hospital readmissions due to uncontrolled symptoms or minor complications after surgery for gynecologic cancers. METHODS: Women who underwent major abdominal or pelvic surgery for a gynecologic malignancy between 2015 and 2017 were identified from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program targeted hysterectomy dataset. Hospital readmissions within 30 days of surgery were categorized as indicated readmissions or potentially avoidable readmissions by three independent reviewers. Demographic, clinical, and operative covariates were evaluated to determine their association with type of readmission using bivariable tests and adjusted multinomial logistic regression models. RESULTS: A total of 20,986 women were identified. 19,814 (94.4%) were not readmitted, 894 (4.3%) were indicated readmissions, and 278 (1.3%) were potentially avoidable readmissions. Among those readmitted, 24% were potentially avoidable readmissions. Presence of ascites, increasing length of stay, and discharge to facility were associated with an increased risk of indicated and potentially avoidable readmissions. Age < 60 years old (RR 1.4, 95%CI 1.1-1.8), BMI ≥ 30 (RR 1.7, 95%CI 1.3-2.3), history of abdominal/pelvic surgery (RR 1.6, 95%CI 1.2-2.1), cervical cancer (RR 2.1, 95%CI 1.4-3.1), and open surgery (RR 2.1, 95%CI 1.4-3.2) were associated with an increased risk of a potentially avoidable readmission but not with increased risk of an indicated readmission. Median time to readmission did not differ between the two readmission groups (indicated = 8 days; avoidable = 7 days; p = .72). CONCLUSIONS: Among women with gynecologic cancer, 24% of all unplanned readmissions were attributed to uncontrolled symptoms or minor complications that were potentially avoidable. Age <60 years old, history of previous abdominal/pelvic surgery, obesity, cervical cancer, and open surgery were associated with an increase in risk of a potentially avoidable readmission.


Assuntos
Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/efeitos adversos , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Fatores Etários , Índice de Massa Corporal , Comorbidade , Conjuntos de Dados como Assunto , Feminino , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/diagnóstico , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/epidemiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/métodos , Humanos , Incidência , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Duração da Cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA