RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Patients with encephalitis following a viral infection are often thought to have a para infectious, inflammatory, or autoimmune cause for their presentation. These diagnoses usually result in treatments with immunosuppressant therapies which can have side effects. However, there is an increasing body of evidence demonstrating that patients can have a direct genetic cause mediating viral infection triggered encephalitis, where inflammation is a secondary response. These patients may benefit not from immunosuppressive therapies, but from protection from infection through dedicated immunisation programs and early antiviral therapies at times of infection. METHODS: A small case series of paediatric neurology patients (n = 2) from a single institution with infection induced encephalitis and an underlying genetic cause, is presented. Patients with a confirmed genetic cause of infection induced encephalitis were identified and consented by their treating neurologist for inclusion in this case series. Ethics approval was gained for this case series and review of the surrounding literature. CONCLUSION: A case of both DBR1 and NUP214 genetic changes resulting in infection induced encephalitis is presented. This case series raises awareness of this rare group of disorders and provides clues to their identification. Features to prompt clinician consideration of such genetic conditions are also highlighted. Although rare, identification of these patients is important due to implications on treatment, prognosis, and family planning.
Assuntos
Complexo de Proteínas Formadoras de Poros Nucleares , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Complexo de Proteínas Formadoras de Poros Nucleares/genética , Criança , Encefalite Infecciosa/genética , Encefalite Infecciosa/etiologia , Pré-Escolar , Encefalite/genética , Encefalite/etiologia , LactenteRESUMO
BACKGROUND: To determine maternal and neonatal risk factors for, and incidence of, neonatal early-onset group B streptococcus (EOGBS) and late-onset (LOGBS) infection in South Australia (SA) and the Northern Territory (NT). METHODS: A case-control study with 2:1 matched controls to cases. The study included tertiary hospitals in South Australia and the Northern Territory, Australia. Retrospective data were collected from a 16-year epoch (2000-2015). RESULTS: Of a total of 188 clinically suspected or confirmed cases, 139 were confirmed, of which 56.1% (n = 78) were EOGBS and 43.9% (n = 61) were LOGBS. The incidence of clinically suspected and confirmed cases of EOGBS was 0.26/1000 live births in SA and 0.73/1000 live births in the NT, and the incidence of confirmed cases was 0.19/1000 for SA and 0.36/1000 for the NT. The incidence of clinically suspected or confirmed LOGBS was 0.18/1000 live births in SA and 0.16/1000 for the NT. The majority of infants with GBS presented with sepsis, pneumonia, or meningitis. Developmental delay was the most commonly recorded long-term complication at 1 year old. Risk factors for EOGBS included maternal GBS carriage, previous fetal death, identifying as Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander, and maternal fever in labor/chorioamnionitis. CONCLUSIONS: GBS remains a leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. Adding previous fetal death to GBS screening guidelines would improve GBS prevention. The introduction of maternal GBS vaccination programs should be guided by country-specific disease epidemiology.