Comparing volumetric and biochemical assessment of intravasation caused by hysteroscopic surgery.

BACKGROUND: During hysteroscopic surgery intravasation of irrigation fluid occurs, leading to potentially dangerous intravascular fluid overload. Currently, intravasation is usually measured volumetrically as fluid deficit. Intravasation could also be calculated using the decrease in hemoglobin or increase in chloride ion concentration, both phenomena known to result from intravasation. We compared the values of intravasation measured volumetrically as fluid deficit versus calculated from the biochemical change in hemoglobin and chloride. We expected that these values would show strong correlation and agreement. METHODS: In a retrospective data analysis of 51 patients who underwent hysteroscopic resection of myomas or endometrium a pre and post procedure concentration of haemoglobin and chloride was available. The fluid deficit was plotted against the two versions of calculated intravasation. Furthermore, we put the data into Bland-Altman plots to scrutinize their relationship. RESULTS: The volumetric assessed fluid deficit and both versions of biochemically assessed intravasation, either using the change in hemoglobin or chloride ion concentration, turned out to be three totally different entities with weak correlation. Bland-Altman plots show too wide limits of agreement, and a striking difference between the two methods of calculated intravasation. CONCLUSION: Our study shows significant differences and poor agreement between volumetric and biochemically assessed intravasation. Based on this study, routinely assessing intravasation by biochemical methods does not have additional benefit compared to the volumetric fluid deficit. It remains unclear which method resembles true intravasation.

The HYSTER study: the effect of intracervically administered terlipressin versus placebo on the number of gaseous emboli and fluid intravasation during hysteroscopic surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Transcervical resection of myoma or endometrium is a safe, hysteroscopic, minimally invasive procedure. However, intravasation of distension fluid is a common phenomenon during these procedures. In a previous study we observed venous gas emboli in almost every patient. The severity of hysteroscopic-derived embolization has been shown to be correlated to the amount of intravasation. In addition, paradoxical gas embolism, which is potentially dangerous, was observed in several patients. Studies have shown a reduction of intravasation by using intracervically administered vasopressin during hysteroscopy. We think that its analog, terlipressin, should have the same effect. In our previous research we observed more gaseous emboli as intravasation increased. Whether or not the insertion of intracervically administered terlipressin leads to a lower incidence and severity of gas embolism is unknown. We hypothesize that intracervically administered terlipressin leads to a reduction of intravasation with a lower incidence and severity of gas embolism. Terlipressin may be of benefit during hysteroscopic surgery. METHODS/DESIGN: Forty-eight patients (ASA 1 or 2) scheduled for transcervical resection of large, types 1-2 myoma or extensive endometrium resection will be included. In a double-blind fashion patients will be randomized 1:1 according to surgical treatment using either intracervically administered terlipressin or placebo. Transesophageal echocardiography will be used to observe and record embolic events. A pre- and post-procedure venous blood sample will be taken to calculate intravasation based on hemodilution. Our primary endpoint will be how terlipressin influences the severity of embolic events. Secondary endpoints include the effect of terlipressin on the amount of intravasation and on hemodynamic parameters. DISCUSSION: If terlipressin does indeed reduce the number of gaseous emboli and intravasation occurring during hysteroscopic surgery, it would be a simple method to minimize potential adverse events. It also allows for prolonged operating time before the threshold of intravasation is reached, thereby reducing the need for a second operation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Nederlands Trial Register (Dutch Trial Register), ID: NTR5577 . Registered retrospectively on 18 December 2015.

A multidisciplinary evidence-based guideline for minimally invasive surgery.: Part 1: entry techniques and the pneumoperitoneum.

The Dutch Society for Endoscopic Surgery together with the Dutch Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology initiated a multidisciplinary working group to develop a guideline on minimally invasive surgery to formulate multidisciplinary agreements for minimally invasive surgery aiming towards better patient care and safety. The guideline development group consisted of general surgeons, gynecologists, an anesthesiologist, and urologist authorized by their scientific professional association. Two advisors in evidence-based guideline development supported the group. The guideline was developed using the "Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation" instrument. Clinically important aspects were identified and discussed. The best available evidence on these aspects was gathered by systematic review. Recommendations for clinical practice were formulated based on the evidence and a consensus of expert opinion. The guideline was externally reviewed by members of the participating scientific associations and their feedback was integrated. Identified important topics were: laparoscopic entry techniques, intra-abdominal pressure, trocar use, electrosurgical techniques, prevention of trocar site herniation, patient positioning, anesthesiology, perioperative care, patient information, multidisciplinary user consultation, and complication registration. The text of each topic contains an introduction with an explanation of the problem and a summary of the current literature. Each topic was discussed, considerations were evaluated and recommendations were formulated. The development of a guideline on a multidisciplinary level facilitated a broad and rich discussion, which resulted in a very complete and implementable guideline.

Embolism of air and gas in hysteroscopic procedures: pathophysiology and implication for daily practice.

Hysteroscopic surgery has gained in popularity and has become the method of choice for diagnostic and therapeutic interventions of intrauterine pathology. Advantages consist of short operating time, rapid postoperative recovery, and low morbidity. However, there are concerns about the potential serious complications that can occur, such as venous air and gas embolism. These are rare but hazardous complications, which can occur in all surgical procedures. In hysteroscopic surgery, large uterine veins may be exposed and are, therefore, a point of entry for gas or air. A number of fatal and nonfatal cases have been described as case reports. Although awareness for air and gas embolism is raised this way, proper guidelines as to how to reduce the risk of venous gas or air embolism are lacking. The pathophysiologic difference between gas and air embolism is described herein because composition of the gases differs as does their physiologic effects. A gas embolism is likely to be derived from electrosurgical vapors whereas air embolism seems to arise from improper purging of lines or reinsertion of hysteroscopic instruments. Treatment regimens must, therefore, be designed to address the specific gases involved. Signs and symptoms of these different embolisms are described, as early detection and intervention are crucial for survival. Furthermore, we provide guidelines for operating department personnel, surgeons, and anesthesiologists to reduce the risk of venous gas or air embolism during hysteroscopic procedures. Potential complications of these procedures may be prevented this way.