Arrhythmogenic or dilated or desmoplakin cardiomyopathy? A challenging case managed by our multidisciplinary cardiogenetic team.

Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM), characterized by fibro or fibrofatty infiltration of the myocardium with a predominant arrhythmic presentation, is a genetically mediated cause of sudden cardiac death in the young and athletic individuals. We report a case of a severe form of biventricular ACM in a middle-aged man with a family history of cardiomyopathy-related young death. The proband was identified to harbor two novel mutations in the DES and DOLK genes and was managed comprehensively with a multidisciplinary team approach. This report reinforces the need for a dedicated cardiovascular genetics program as well as a population-specific genetic database in developing countries.

Effect of Catheter Ablation Using Pulmonary Vein Isolation With vs Without Posterior Left Atrial Wall Isolation on Atrial Arrhythmia Recurrence in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: The CAPLA Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone is less effective in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) compared with paroxysmal AF. The left atrial posterior wall may contribute to maintenance of persistent AF, and posterior wall isolation (PWI) is a common PVI adjunct. However, PWI has not been subjected to randomized comparison. Objective: To compare PVI with PWI vs PVI alone in patients with persistent AF undergoing first-time catheter ablation. Design, Setting, and Participants: Investigator initiated, multicenter, randomized clinical trial involving 11 centers in 3 countries (Australia, Canada, UK). Symptomatic patients with persistent AF were randomized 1:1 to either PVI with PWI or PVI alone. Patients were enrolled July 2018-March 2021, with 1-year follow-up completed March 2022. Interventions: The PVI with PWI group (n = 170) underwent wide antral pulmonary vein isolation followed by posterior wall isolation involving linear ablation at the roof and floor to achieve electrical isolation. The PVI-alone group (n = 168) underwent wide antral pulmonary vein isolation alone. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary end point was freedom from any documented atrial arrhythmia of more than 30 seconds without antiarrhythmic medication at 12 months, after a single ablation procedure. The 23 secondary outcomes included freedom from atrial arrhythmia with/without antiarrhythmic medication after multiple procedures, freedom from symptomatic AF with/without antiarrhythmic medication after multiple procedures, AF burden between study groups at 12 months, procedural outcomes, and complications. Results: Among 338 patients randomized (median age, 65.6 [IQR, 13.1] years; 76.9% men), 330 (97.6%) completed the study. After 12 months, 89 patients (52.4%) assigned to PVI with PWI were free from recurrent atrial arrhythmia without antiarrhythmic medication after a single procedure, compared with 90 (53.6%) assigned to PVI alone (between-group difference, -1.2%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.99 [95% CI, 0.73-1.36]; P = .98). Of the secondary end points, 9 showed no significant difference, including freedom from atrial arrhythmia with/without antiarrhythmic medication after multiple procedures (58.2% for PVI with PWI vs 60.1% for PVI alone; HR, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.79-1.55]; P = .57), freedom from symptomatic AF with/without antiarrhythmic medication after multiple procedures (68.2% vs 72%; HR, 1.20 [95% CI, 0.80-1.78]; P = .36) or AF burden (0% [IQR, 0%-2.3%] vs 0% [IQR, 0%-2.8%], P = .47). Mean procedural times (142 [SD, 69] vs 121 [SD, 57] minutes, P < .001) and ablation times (34 [SD, 21] vs 28 [SD, 12] minutes, P < .001) were significantly shorter for PVI alone. There were 6 complications for PVI with PWI and 4 for PVI alone. Conclusions and Relevance: In patients undergoing first-time catheter ablation for persistent AF, the addition of PWI to PVI alone did not significantly improve freedom from atrial arrhythmia at 12 months compared with PVI alone. These findings do not support the empirical inclusion of PWI for ablation of persistent AF. Trial Registration: anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12616001436460.

Catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation: A multicenter randomized trial of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) versus PVI with posterior left atrial wall isolation (PWI) - The CAPLA study.

BACKGROUND: The success of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is reduced in persistent AF (PsAF) compared to paroxysmal AF. Adjunctive ablation strategies have failed to show consistent incremental benefit over PVI alone in randomized studies. The left atrial posterior wall is a potential source of non-PV triggers and atrial substrate which may promote the initiation and maintenance of PsAF. Adding posterior wall isolation (PWI) to PVI had shown conflicting outcomes, with earlier studies confounded by methodological limitations. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether combining PWI with PVI significantly improves freedom from AF recurrence, compared to PVI alone, in patients with PsAF. METHODS: This is a multi-center, prospective, international randomized clinical trial. 338 patients with symptomatic PsAF refractory to anti-arrhythmic therapy (AAD) will be randomized to either PVI alone or PVI with PWI in a 1:1 ratio. PVI involves wide antral circumferential pulmonary vein (PV) isolation, utilizing contact force sensing ablation catheters. PWI involves the creation of a floor line connecting the inferior aspect of the PVs, and a roof line connecting the superior aspect of the PVs. Follow up is for a minimum of 12 months with rhythm monitoring via implantable cardiac device and/or loop monitor, or frequent intermittent monitoring with an ECG device. The primary outcome is freedom from any documented atrial arrhythmia of > 30 seconds off AAD at 12 months, after a single ablation procedure. CONCLUSIONS: This randomized study aims to determine the success and safety of adjunctive PWI to PVI in patients with persistent AF.

Cardiac resynchronization with His-CRT-D in a patient with severe heart failure and Scimitar syndrome.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy with His-bundle pacing is evolving rapidly as a viable cardiac device strategy for the treatment of severe chronic heart failure. The success of this technique in patients with congenital heart disease is facilitated by advanced integrated imaging modalities. We report a case of cardiac resynchronization therapy with His-bundle pacing with defibrillator for the management of a patient with heart failure with severely reduced ejection fraction, left bundle branch block, and congenital heart disease characterized by Scimitar syndrome with cardiac dextroposition. We highlight the contribution of integrated imaging modalities to guide accurate lead positioning.

Atrial fibrillation: an update on management.

Atrial fibrillation carries a markedly increased risk of stroke and left ventricular dysfunction, and is associated with reduced quality of life In light of the potential for poor outcomes and the likely understated presence of silent atrial fibrillation, opportunistic screening should be carried out in general practice Modifying the risk factors for atrial fibrillation is the cornerstone of management with adjuvant drug therapy to help maintain sinus rhythm, control the ventricular rate and reduce the risk of cerebral thromboembolism The need for anticoagulant therapy can be assessed by using the revised CHA2DS2-VASc score. Direct oral anticoagulants are now preferred to warfarin in those who qualify for their use Catheter ablation is an effective option to improve survival in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. It also improves quality of life and reduces arrhythmia-related hospital admissions

Right atrial appendage tachycardia: A rare cause of tachycardia induced cardiomyopathy in a 4-year-old child.

We present a rare case of tachycardiomyopathy in a 4-year-old girl. The child had incessant atrial tachycardia (AT) and refractory heart failure. Right atrial appendage (RAA) was localised as the source of the ectopic tachycardia. The child underwent successful radiofrequency ablation (RFA) using 3-D electroanatomical mapping. Fluoroscopy was used sparingly only to rule out underlying anomalies. The left ventricular functions returned to normal by one month after the procedure. RAA AT is rare in very young children and usually necessitates surgical appendectomies. RFA is a challenge in such age groups and there are very few published literature on RAA AT in very young children.

Cardiac Biomarkers and Myocardial Dysfunction in Septicemia.

Objectives: Cardiac biomarkers have been studied in sepsis in the past and various mechanisms for their rise have been elucidated. However their association with severity of sepsis, mortality and myocardial dysfunction warrants further studies. We have studied three different cardiac biomarkers- troponin T (trop T), creatine phosphokinase MB isoform (CPK MB) and NT pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT Pro BNP) in patients with septicemia. We have attempted to observe the levels of these biomarkers in sepsis, their individual abilities to predict the severity of sepsis, mortality and association with myocardial dysfunction noted in echocardiography. Results: There were 54 patients each of septicaemia and controls. The means of the three biomarkers, namely Troponin T, CPK MB and NT Pro BNP, were significantly elevated in patients with sepsis- mean values of 0.23±0.8 ng/ml, 9.9±13.4 ng/ml and 5988.62±13.7 pg/ml respectively. Myocardial dysfunction was observed in 27 cases. There were 13 non-survivors. Troponin T and NT pro BNP were strongly associated with higher mortality. CPK MB had better correlation with myocardial dysfunction. Conclusion: We conclude that myocardial dysfunction using echocardiography is seen in around half of the patients with sepsis. Cardiac biomarkers can be routinely used in patients of septicemia to suggest the severity of sepsis,to detect myocardial injury and dysfunction and prognostication. CPK MB may be very useful to suspect myocardial dysfunction in such patients.

Heart Failure with Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction-A Phenotype Waiting to Be Explored.

Heart failure (HF) presents a significant global health challenge recognised by frequent hospitalisation and high mortality rates. The assessment of left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) plays a crucial role in diagnosing and predicting outcomes in HF, leading to its classification into preserved (HFpEF), reduced (HFrEF), and mildly reduced (HFmrEF) EF. HFmrEF shares features of both HFrEF and HFpEF but also exhibits distinct characteristics. Despite advancements, managing HFmrEF remains challenging due to its diverse presentation. Large-scale studies are needed to identify the predictors of clinical outcomes and treatment responses. Utilising biomarkers for phenotyping holds the potential for discovering new treatment targets. Given the uncertainty surrounding optimal management, individualised approaches are imperative for HFmrEF patients. This chapter examines HFmrEF, discusses the rationale for its re-classification, and elucidates HFmrEF's key attributes. Furthermore, it provides a comprehensive review of current treatment strategies for HFmrEF patients.

Clinical/electrophysiologic characteristics of infranodal Wenckebach in patients with indication for permanent ventricular pacing: A prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Infranodal Wenckebach is rare and not well characterized. OBJECTIVE: We prospectively studied clinical and electrophysiologic characteristics of patients with atrioventricular (AV) Wenckebach with an indication for permanent ventricular pacing. METHODS: During a 2-year period, all patients with an indication for permanent ventricular pacing underwent targeted preimplantation electrophysiologic study. Clinical and electrophysiologic characteristics at presentation and ventricular pacing percentage at 6-month follow-up were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 163 patients (median age, 68 [interquartile range, 60-74] years; male, 59%; median QRS duration, 110 [90-130] ms; complete AV block in 123 [75.5%]) were included. AV Wenckebach was noted in 22 (13.4%) patients (median age, 70 [63-76.5] years; male, 54%; median QRS duration, 120 [110-140] ms) and classified as infranodal (12/163 [7.3%]) vs AV nodal (10/163 [6.1%]). Patients with infranodal Wenckebach (infrahisian in all), compared with AV nodal Wenckebach, demonstrated higher frequency with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% (41.7% vs 0%; P = .04), longer median HV interval (90 vs 49 ms; P = .005), lower frequency of isolated first-degree AV block (8.3% vs 60%; P = .02), higher frequency of right bundle branch block with left anterior fascicular block (75% vs 10%; P = .003), lesser PR increment at onset of AV Wenckebach (20.5 vs 80 ms; P = .002), and onset of 2:1 AV block at longer cycle lengths (91.7% vs 20%; P = .002). CONCLUSION: Of patients referred for pacemaker implantation, infranodal Wenckebach was present in 27.5% (11/40) without complete AV block. It was as frequent as AV nodal Wenckebach and associated with characteristic electrophysiologic findings.

Characteristics of the phenotype of mixed cardiomyopathy in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.

BACKGROUND OR PURPOSE: The prognosis of m ixed cardiomyopathy (CMP) in patients with implanted cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) has not been investigated. We aim to study the demographic, clinical, device therapies and survival characteristics of mixed CMP in a cohort of patients implanted with a defibrillator. METHODS: The term mixed CMP was used to categorise patients with impaired left ventricular ejection fraction attributed to documented non-ischemic triggers with concomitant moderate coronary artery disease. This is a single center observational cohort of 526 patients with a mean follow-up of 8.7 ± 3.5 years. RESULTS: There were 42.5% patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM), 26.9% with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) and 30.6% with mixed CMP. Mixed CMP, compared to NICM, was associated with higher mean age (69.1 ± 9.6 years), atrial fibrillation (55.3%) and greater incidence of comorbidities. The proportion of patients with mixed CMP receiving device shocks was 23.6%, compared to 18.4% in NICM and 27% in ICM. The VT cycle length recorded in mixed CMP (281.6 ± 43.1 ms) was comparable with ICM (282.5 ± 44 ms; p = 0.9) and lesser than NICM (297.7 ± 48.7 ms; p = 0.1). All-cause mortality in mixed CMP (21.1%) was similar to ICM (20.1%; p = 0.8) and higher than NICM (15.6%; p = 0.2). The Kaplan-Meier curves revealed hazards of 1.57 (95% CI: 0.91, 2.68) for mixed CMP compared to NICM. CONCLUSION: In a cohort of patients with ICD, the group with mixed CMP represents a phenotype predominantly comprised of the elderly with a higher incidence of comorbidities. Mixed CMP resembles ICM in terms of number of device shocks and VT cycle length. Trends of long-term prognosis of patients with mixed CMP are worse than NICM and similar to ICM.

Correlation of extent of left ventricular endocardial unipolar low-voltage zones with ventricular tachycardia in nonischemic cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Endocardial electrogram (EGM) characteristics in nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) have not been explored adequately for prognostication. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to study correlation of bipolar and unipolar EGM characteristics with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and ventricular tachycardia (VT) in NICM. METHODS: Electroanatomic mapping of the left ventricle was performed. EGM characteristics were correlated with LVEF. Differences between groups with and without VT and predictors of VT were studied. RESULTS: In 43 patients, unipolar EGM variables had better correlation with baseline LVEF than bipolar EGM variables: unipolar voltage (r = +0.36), peak negative unipolar voltage (r = -0.42), peak positive unipolar voltage (r = +0.38), and percentage area of unipolar low-voltage zone (LVZ; r = -0.41). Global mean unipolar voltage (hazard ratio [HR], 0.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2-0.8), extent of unipolar LVZ (HR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1-2.3), and percentage area of unipolar LVZ (HR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1-2.3) were significant predictors of VT. For classification of patients with VT, extent of unipolar LVZ had an area under the curve of 0.82 (95% CI, 0.69-0.95; P < .001), and percentage area of unipolar LVZ had an area under the curve of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.71-0.96; P = .01). Cutoff of >3 segments for extent of unipolar LVZ had the best diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, 90%; specificity, 67%) and cutoff of 33% for percentage area of unipolar LVZ had the best diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, 95%; specificity, 60%) for VT. CONCLUSION: In NICM, extent and percentage area of unipolar LVZs are significant predictors of VT. Cutoffs of >3 segments of unipolar LVZ and >33% area of unipolar LVZ have good diagnostic accuracies for association with VT.

Electrocardiographic predictors of clinical outcomes in nonischemic cardiomyopathy patients with left bundle branch area pacing cardiac resynchronization therapy.

BACKGROUND: Paced QRS morphology may vary during left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) per the pacing location. It remains unclear whether electrocardiographic changes observed during LBBAP can predict clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess correlation between characteristics of paced QRS on the electrocardiogram and clinical outcomes in heart failure patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy. METHODS: Of 79 consecutive heart failure patients receiving LBBAP, 59 patients were included in this prospective study after exclusions. LBBAP was performed using Medtronic 3830 lead. Patients were assigned to various groups on the basis of paced QRS morphology in lead V1 (qR and Qr), QRS axis (normal, left, or right), and V6 R-wave peak time (RWPT, ≤80 ms or >80 ms) to compare echocardiographic outcomes. RESULTS: RWPT was significantly shorter (75.7 ± 17.5 ms vs 85.3 ± 11.3 ms; P = .014), transition during threshold testing was more commonly observed (81.5% vs 53%; P = .02), and improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was significantly greater in the qR group (21.4% ± 6.4% vs 16.4% ± 8.3%; P = .013) compared with the Qr group. RWPT or LVEF did not differ in patients with different paced QRS axis (P > .05). Whereas qR morphology and presence of transition during threshold testing independently predicted LVEF improvement, RWPT lacked predictive value. Nonresponders had greater incidence of loss of R' (P = .009) and prolonged RWPT (P = .003) on follow-up compared with average responders and superresponders. CONCLUSION: Paced qR morphology and transition during threshold testing predicted greater improvement in LVEF, whereas RWPT lacked predictive value. Loss of terminal R in lead V1 and prolongation of RWPT on follow-up prognosticated nonresponse to LBBAP.

Results of comprehensive genetic testing in patients presenting to a multidisciplinary inherited heart disease clinic in India.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to analyze the results of comprehensive genetic testing in patients presenting to a dedicated multidisciplinary inherited heart disease clinic in India. METHODS: All patients presenting to our clinic from August 2017 to October 2023 with a suspected inherited heart disease and consenting for genetic testing were included. The probands were grouped into familial cardiomyopathies namely hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) and peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM), channelopathies namely congenital long QT syndrome (LQTS) and Brugada syndrome (BrS), and heritable connective tissue disorder namely Marfan Syndrome (MFS). Next generation sequencing (NGS) was used, and pre-test and post-test counseling were provided to probands and cascade screening offered to relatives. RESULTS: Mean age of the subjects (n = 77; 48 probands, 29 relatives) was 43 ± 18 years, 68 % male and 44 % symptomatic, with 36 HCM, 3 DCM, 3 ACM, 1 PPCM, 3 LQTS, 1 BrS and 1 MFS probands. The diagnostic yield of NGS-based genetic testing was 31 %; variants of uncertain significance (VUS) were identified in 54 %; and 15 % were genotype-negative. Twenty-nine relatives from 18 families with HCM (n = 12), DCM (n = 3), ACM (n = 2) and MFS (n = 1) underwent genetic testing. The genotype positive probands/relatives and VUS carriers with strong disease phenotype and/or high risk variant were advised periodic follow-up; the remaining probands/relatives were discharged from further clinical surveillance. CONCLUSIONS: Genetic testing guides treatment and follow-up of patients with inherited heart diseases and should be carried out in dedicated multidisciplinary clinics with expertise for counseling and cascade screening of family members.