High fragmentation in platelet concentrates impacts the activation, procoagulant, and aggregatory capacity of platelets.

Platelets are transfused to patients to prevent bleeding. Since both preparation and storage can impact the hemostatic functions of platelets, we studied platelet concentrates (PCs) with different initial composition in regard to platelet fragmentation and its impact on storage-induced changes in activation potential. Ten whole blood derived PCs were assessed over 7 storage days. Using flow cytometry, platelet (CD41+) subpopulations were characterized for activation potential using activation markers (PAC-1, P-selectin, and LAMP-1), phosphatidylserine (Annexin V), and mitochondrial integrity (DiIC1(5)). Aggregation response, coagulation, and soluble activation markers (cytokines and sGPVI) were also measured. Of the CD41+ events, the PCs contained a median of 82% normal-sized platelets, 10% small platelets, and 8% fragments. The small platelets exhibited procoagulant hallmarks (increased P-selectin and Annexin V and reduced DiIC1(5)). Normal-sized platelets responded to activation, whereas activation potential was decreased for small and abolished for fragments. Five PCs contained a high proportion of small platelets and fragments (median of 28% of CD41+ events), which was significantly higher than the other five PCs (median of 9%). A high proportion of small platelets and fragments was associated with procoagulant hallmarks and decreased activation potential, but, although diminished, they still retained some activation potential throughout 7 days storage.

What is the context?● Platelets are necessary to prevent and stop bleeding.● Conditions associated with a low platelet count in the circulation, such as during chemotherapy treatment for hematologic cancer, can result in life-threatening bleeding. To prevent this, platelets from blood donors are transfused to these patients.● The collection and preparation of platelet concentrates and subsequent storage before transfusion can affect the ability of the platelets to prevent bleeding.● In this study, we investigated platelet concentrates prepared from whole blood and how their activation capacity was affected by the preparation and storage period.What is new?● We found that the platelet concentrates contained mainly low activated platelets of normal size, but also smaller platelets and platelet fragments.● Unlike normal-sized platelets, small platelets and fragments exhibited hallmarks that are characteristic of pre-activation.● Some platelet concentrates contained a relatively high proportion of small platelets and fragments already directly following preparation.● Investigating several platelet activation markers, we found that platelet concentrates containing a high proportion of small platelets and platelet fragments showed lower activation capacity throughout the storage period.What is the impact?● We show that some platelet concentrates show lower activation capacity and might contain a substantial fraction of platelets with characteristics that might potentially trigger spontaneous blood coagulation. The variation between different concentrations is high, even though the preparation procedure is the same.● If these differences will affect the efficacy of platelet transfusion is an important area for future studies.

Platelet Function is Preserved After Moderate Cardiopulmonary Bypass Times But Transiently Impaired After Protamine.

OBJECTIVES: Previous studies have described impaired platelet function after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Whether this is still valid in contemporary cardiac surgery is unclear. This study aimed to quantify changes in function and number of platelets during CPB in a present-day cardiac surgery cohort. DESIGN: Prospective, controlled clinical study. SETTING: A single-center university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-nine patients scheduled for coronary artery bypass graft surgery with CPB. INTERVENTIONS: Platelet function and numbers were measured at 6 timepoints in 39 patients during and after coronary artery bypass graft surgery; at baseline before anesthesia, at the end of CPB, after protamine administration, at intensive care unit (ICU) arrival, 3 hours after ICU arrival, and on the morning after surgery. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Platelet function was assessed with impedance aggregometry and flow cytometry. Platelet numbers are expressed as actual concentration and as numbers corrected for dilution using hemoglobin as a reference marker. There was no consistent impairment of platelet function during CPB with either impedance aggregometry or flow cytometry. After protamine administration, a decrease in platelet function was seen with impedance aggregometry and for some markers of activation with flow cytometry. Platelet function was restored 3 hours after arrival in the ICU. During CPB (85.0 ± 21 min), the number of circulating platelets corrected for dilution increased from 1.73 ± 0.42 × 109/g to 1.91 ± 0.51 × 109/g (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: During cardiac surgery with moderate CPB times, platelet function was not impaired, and no consumption of circulating platelets could be detected. Administration of protamine transiently affected platelet function.

Platelet function testing: Current practice among clinical centres in Northern Europe.

INTRODUCTION: Platelet function tests are used to screen and diagnose patients with possible inherited platelet function defects (IPFD). Some acquired platelet dysfunction may be caused by certain drugs or comorbidities, which need to be excluded before testing. AIMS: To identify current practice among centres performing platelet function tests in Northern Europe. METHODS: A total of 14 clinical centres from Sweden (six), Finland (two), Denmark (two), Norway (one), Estonia (two) and Iceland (one) completed the survey questionnaire, the population capture area of about 29.5 million. RESULTS: Six of the 14 (42.8%) centres providing platelet function assessment represent comprehensive treatment centres (EUHANET status). A Bleeding score (BS) or ISTH bleeding assessment tool (ISTH BAT score) is evaluated in 11/14 (78.6%) centres and family history in all. Five/14 centres (35.7%) use structured preanalytical patient instructions, and 10/14 (71.4%) recorded questionnaire on the preassessment of avoidance of any drugs or natural products affecting platelet functions. Preliminary investigations of screening tests of coagulation are performed in 10/14 (71.4%), while in 4/14 (28.6%), the diagnostic work-up of IPFD and von Willebrand disease (VWD) is performed simultaneously. The work-up of IPFD includes peripheral blood smear in 10/14 (71.4%), platelet aggregometry in all, flow cytometry in 10/14 (71.4%) and Platelet Function Analysis (PFA) in 3/11 (28.6%). Molecular genetic diagnosis is available in 7/14 (50%) centres. CONCLUSIONS: The considerable variability in the current practice illustrates the need for harmonization between the Northern European centres according to the international registers (i.e. EUHASS) and IPFD guidelines (ISTH, EHA).

Variation in activation marker expression within the platelet population - a new parameter for evaluation of platelet flow cytometry data.

In flow cytometry, individual cells are investigated. Platelet activation is normally reported in form of percentage of platelets expressing the marker (positive platelets) and/or mean/median fluorescence intensity (MFI) for the entire analyzed population. None of these take into account the variance of the marker expression between individual platelets. This can be obtained as data on coefficient of variation (CV). This study explores if CV provides additional information regarding platelet function. Samples from platelet concentrates (PCs) prepared by apheresis- (n = 13) and interim platelet unit (IPU) technique (n = 26) and stored for 6-7 days were included and compared. Spontaneous- and agonist-induced expression of activation markers (fibrinogen binding and exposure of P-selectin, LAMP-1, and CD63) was investigated as percentage positive platelets, MFI and CV. Spontaneous expression of P-selectin as percentage positive platelets and MFI was higher for IPU PCs than apheresis PCs, which in contrast had higher agonist-induced activation. CV for spontaneous fibrinogen binding and P-selectin exposure was larger for apheresis PCs, while IPU PCs generally had larger CV for P-selectin, LAMP-1, and CD63 after agonist stimulation. Our findings show that CV adds additional information when assessing platelet activation by providing data on the variation in activation responses within the platelet population.

Quantification of platelet function - a comparative study of venous and arterial blood using a novel flow cytometry protocol.

Studies of platelet function in surgical patients often involve both arterial and venous sampling. Possible effects of different sampling sites could be important, but have not been thoroughly investigated. We aimed to compare platelet function in arterial and venous blood samples using a novel flow cytometry protocol and impedance aggregometry. Arterial and venous blood was collected before anesthesia in 10 patients undergoing cardiac surgery of which nine was treated with acetylsalicylic acid until the day before surgery. Flow cytometry included simultaneous analysis of phosphatidylserine exposure, active conformation of the fibrinogen receptor (PAC-1 binding), α-granule and lysosomal release (P-selectin and LAMP-1 exposure) and mitochondrial membrane integrity. Platelets were activated with ADP or peptides activating thrombin receptors (PAR1-AP/PAR4-AP) or collagen receptor GPVI (CRP-XL). Leukocyte-platelet conjugates and P-selectin exposure were evaluated immediately in fixated samples. For impedance aggregometry (Multiplate®), ADP, arachidonic acid, collagen and PAR1-AP (TRAP) were used as activators. Using impedance aggregometry and in 27 out of 37 parameters studied with flow cytometry there was no significant difference between venous and arterial blood sampling. Arterial blood showed more PAC-1 positive platelets when activated with PAR1-AP or PAR4-AP and venous blood showed more monocyte-platelet and neutrophil-platelet conjugates and higher phosphatidylserine exposure with CRP-XL alone and combined with PAR1-AP or PAR4-AP. We found no differences using impedance aggregometry. In conclusion, testing of platelet function by flow cytometry and impedance aggregometry gave comparable results for most of the studied parameters in venous and arterial samples. Flow cytometry identified differences in PAC-1 binding when activated with PAR1-AP, exposure of phosphatidyl serine and monocyte/neutrophil-platelet conjugates, which might reflect differences in blood sampling technique or in flow conditions in this patient cohort with coronary artery disease. These differences might be considered when comparing data from different sample sites, but caution should be exercised if a different protocol is used or another patient group is studied.

Platelet proteome and function in X-linked thrombocytopenia with thalassemia and in silico comparisons with gray platelet syndrome.

In X-linked thrombocytopenia with thalassemia (XLTT; OMIM 314050), caused by the mutation p.R216Q in exon 4 of the GATA1 gene, male hemizygous patients display macrothrombocytopenia, bleeding diathesis and a ß-thalassemia trait. Herein, we describe findings in two unrelated Swedish XLTT families with a bleeding tendency exceeding what is expected from the thrombocytopenia. Blood tests revealed low P-PAI-1 and P-factor 5, and elevated S-thrombopoietin levels. Transmission electron microscopy showed diminished numbers of platelet α- and dense granules. The proteomes of isolated blood platelets from 5 male XLTT patients, compared to 5 gender- and age matched controls, were explored. Quantitative mass spectrometry showed alterations of 83 proteins (fold change ≥±1.2, q< .05). Of 46 downregulated proteins, 39 were previously reported to be associated with platelet granules. Reduced protein levels of PTGS1 and SLC35D3 were validated in megakaryocytes of XLTT bone marrow biopsies by immunohistochemistry. Platelet function testing by flow cytometry revealed low dense- and α-granule release and fibrinogen binding in response to ligation of receptors for ADP, the thrombin receptor PAR4 and the collagen receptor GPVI. Significant reductions of a number of α-granule proteins overlapped with a previous platelet proteomics investigation in the inherited macrothrombocytopenia gray platelet syndrome (GPS). In contrast, Ca2+ transporter proteins that facilitate dense granule release were downregulated in XLTT but upregulated in GPS. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis showed altered Coagulation System and Protein Ubiquitination pathways in the XLTT platelets. Collectively, the results revealed protein and functional alterations affecting platelet α- and dense granules in XLTT, probably contributing to bleeding.

Protamine stimulates platelet aggregation in vitro with activation of the fibrinogen receptor and alpha-granule release, but impairs secondary activation via ADP and thrombin receptors.

Heparin and protamine are fundamental in the management of anticoagulation during cardiac surgery. Excess protamine has been associated with increased bleeding. Interaction between protamine and platelet function has been demonstrated but the mechanism remains unclear. We examined the effect of protamine on platelet function in vitro using impedance aggregometry, flow cytometry, and thrombin generation. Platelets were exposed to protamine at final concentrations of 0, 20, 40, and 80 µg/mL, alone or together with adenosine diphosphate (ADP) or thrombin PAR1 receptor-activating peptide (TRAP). We found that in the absence of other activators, protamine (80 µg/mL) increased the proportion of platelets with active fibrinogen receptor (binding of PAC-1) from 3.6% to 97.0% (p < .001) measured with flow cytometry. Impedance aggregometry also increased slightly after exposure to protamine alone. When activated with ADP or TRAP protamine at 80 µg/mL reduced aggregation, from 73.8 ± 29.4 U to 46.9 ± 21.1 U (p < .001) with ADP and from 126.4 ± 16.1 U to 94.9 ± 23.7 U (p < .01) with TRAP. P-selectin exposure (a marker of alpha-granule release) measured by median fluorescence intensity (MFI) increased dose dependently with protamine alone, from 0.76 ± 0.20 (0 µg/mL) to 10.2 ± 3.1 (80 µg/mL), p < .001. Protamine 80 µg/mL by itself resulted in higher MFI (10.16 ± 3.09) than activation with ADP (2.2 ± 0.7, p < .001) or TRAP (5.7 ± 2.6, p < .01) without protamine. When protamine was combined with ADP or TRAP, there was a concentration-dependent increase in the alpha-granule release. In conclusion, protamine interacts with platelets in vitro having both a direct activating effect and impairment of secondary activation of aggregation by other agonists.

Gradient-dependent inhibition of stimulatory signaling from platelet G protein-coupled receptors.

As platelet activation is an irreversible and potentially harmful event, platelet stimulatory signaling must be tightly regulated to ensure the filtering-out of inconsequential fluctuations of agonist concentrations in the vascular milieu. Herein, we show that platelet activation via G protein-coupled receptors is gradient-dependent, i.e., determined not only by agonist concentrations per se but also by how rapidly concentrations change over time. We demonstrate that gradient-dependent inhibition is a common feature of all major platelet stimulatory G protein-coupled receptors, while platelet activation via the non-G protein-coupled receptor glycoprotein VI is strictly concentration-dependent. By systematically characterizing the effects of variations in temporal agonist concentration gradients on different aspects of platelet activation, we demonstrate that gradient-dependent inhibition of protease-activated receptors exhibits different kinetics, with platelet activation occurring at lower agonist gradients for protease-activated receptor 4 than for protease-activated receptor 1, but shares a characteristic bimodal effect distribution, as gradient-dependent inhibition increases over a narrow range of gradients, below which aggregation and granule secretion is effectively shut off. In contrast, the effects of gradient-dependent inhibition on platelet activation via adenosine diphosphate and thromboxane receptors increase incrementally over a large range of gradients. Furthermore, depending on the affected activation pathway, gradient-dependent inhibition results in different degrees of refractoriness to subsequent autologous agonist stimulation. Mechanistically, our study identifies an important role for the cyclic adenosine monophosphate-dependent pathway in gradient-dependent inhibition. Together, our findings suggest that gradient-dependent inhibition may represent a new general mechanism for hemostatic regulation in platelets.

Arachidonic acid causes lysis of blood cells and ADP-dependent platelet activation responses in platelet function tests.

The use of arachidonic acid (AA) to stimulate platelets is considered as a specific approach to study aspirin treatment efficacy. However, very high concentrations of AA are used, and it has been previously reported that AA can induce cell lysis in other settings. Several clinical studies have reported decreased responses to AA in whole blood tests in the presence of clopidogrel. Our aim was to investigate whether unspecific effects contribute to AA-induced aggregation and platelet activation in light transmission aggregometry (LTA) in platelet-rich plasma (PRP), and in assays using whole blood, multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA, Multiplate®), and flow cytometry. We report that cell lysis, especially of red blood cells, does occur at concentrations of AA used in the clinical tests and that ADP is very important for the AA-induced platelet activation responses. In flow cytometry, very limited platelet activation was detected before reaching AA concentrations in the millimolar range, where cell lysis also occurred, making it problematic to develop a reliable flow cytometry assay using AA as reagent. We conclude that cell lysis and ADP release contribute to AA-induced platelet responses, most markedly in whole blood assays. This finding could potentially explain some differences between studies comparing methods using whole blood and PRP and also how clopidogrel treatment could influence AA-induced aggregation results in previously published studies. Our findings highlight some issues with AA as reagent for platelet activation, which also have an impact on how platelet activation assays using AA should be interpreted.

Flow cytometry-based platelet function testing is predictive of symptom burden in a cohort of bleeders.

Platelet function disorders (PFDs) are common in patients with mild bleeding disorders (MBDs), yet the significance of laboratory findings suggestive of a PFD remain unclear due to the lack of evidence for a clinical correlation between the test results and the patient phenotype. Herein, we present the results from a study evaluating the potential utility of platelet function testing using whole-blood flow cytometry in a cohort of 105 patients undergoing investigation for MBD. Subjects were evaluated with a test panel comprising two different activation markers (fibrinogen binding and P-selectin exposure) and four physiologically relevant platelet agonists (ADP, PAR1-AP, PAR4-AP, and CRP-XL). Abnormal test results were identified by comparison with reference ranges constructed from 24 healthy controls or with the fifth percentile of the entire patient cohort. We found that the abnormal test results are predictive of bleeding symptom severity, and that the greatest predictive strength was achieved using a subset of the panel, comparing measurements of fibrinogen binding after activation with all four agonists with the fifth percentile of the patient cohort (p = 0.00008, hazard ratio 8.7; 95% CI 2.5-40). Our results suggest that whole-blood flow cytometry-based platelet function testing could become a feasible alternative for the investigation of MBDs. We also show that platelet function testing using whole-blood flow cytometry could provide a clinically relevant quantitative assessment of platelet-related hemostasis.

Better platelet function, less fibrinolysis and less hemolysis in re-transfused residual pump blood with the Ringer's chase technique - a randomized pilot study.

INTRODUCTION: Residual pump blood from the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuit is often collected into an infusion bag (IB) and re-transfused. An alternative is to chase the residual blood into the circulation through the arterial cannula with Ringer's acetate. Our aim was to assess possible differences in hemostatic blood quality between these two techniques. METHODS: Forty adult patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery with CPB were randomized to receive the residual pump blood by either an IB or through the Ringer's chase (RC) technique. Platelet activation and function (impedance aggregometry), coagulation and hemolysis variables were assessed in the re-transfused blood and in the patients before, during and after surgery. Results are presented as median (25-75 quartiles). RESULTS: Total hemoglobin and platelet levels in the re-transfused blood were comparable with the two methods, as were soluble platelet activation markers P-selectin and soluble glycoprotein VI (GPVI). Platelet aggregation (U) in the IB blood was significantly lower compared to the RC blood, with the agonists adenosine diphosphate (ADP) 24 (10-32) vs 46 (33-65), p<0.01, thrombin receptor activating peptide (TRAP) 50 (29-73) vs 69 (51-92), p=0.04 and collagen 24 (17-28) vs 34 (26-59), p<0.01. The IB blood had higher amounts of free hemoglobin (mg/L) (1086 (891-1717) vs 591(517-646), p<0.01) and D-dimer 0.60 (0.33-0.98) vs 0.3 (0.3-0.48), p<0.01. Other coagulation variables showed no difference between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The handling of blood after CPB increases hemolysis, impairs platelet function and activates coagulation and fibrinolysis. The RC technique preserved the blood better than the commonly used IB technique.

Caveats in studies of the physiological role of polyphosphates in coagulation.

Platelet-derived polyphosphates (polyP), stored in dense granule and released upon platelet activation, have been claimed to enhance thrombin activation of coagulation factor XI (FXI) and to activate FXII directly. The latter claim is controversial and principal results leading to these conclusions are probably influenced by methodological problems. It is important to consider that low-grade contact activation is initiated by all surfaces and is greatly amplified by the presence of phospholipids simulating the procoagulant membranes of activated platelets. Thus, proper use of inhibitors of the contact pathway and a careful choice of materials for plates and tubes is important to avoid artefacts. The use of phosphatases used to degrade polyP has an important drawback as it also degrades the secondary activators ADP and ATP, which are released from activated platelets. In addition, the use of positively charged inhibitors, such as polymyxin B, to inhibit polyP in platelet-rich plasma and blood is problematic, as polymyxin B also slows coagulation in the absence of polyP. In conclusion we hope awareness of the above caveats may improve research on the physiological roles of polyP in coagulation.

Platelet Function Determined by Flow Cytometry: New Perspectives?

Flow cytometry enables studies of several different aspects of platelet function in response to a variety of platelet agonists. This can be done using only a small volume of whole blood, and also in blood with low platelet counts. These properties, together with the increasing number of flow cytometers available in hospitals worldwide, make flow cytometry an interesting option for laboratories interested in studies of platelet function in different clinical settings. This review focuses on practical issues regarding the use of flow cytometry for platelet function testing. It provides an overview of available activation markers, platelet agonists, and experimental setup issues. The review summarizes previous experience and factors important to consider to perform high-quality platelet function testing by flow cytometry. It also discusses its current use and possibilities and challenges for future use of flow cytometry in clinical settings.

Thrombin-induced lysosomal exocytosis in human platelets is dependent on secondary activation by ADP and regulated by endothelial-derived substances.

Exocytosis of lysosomal contents from platelets has been speculated to participate in clearance of thrombi and vessel wall remodelling. The mechanisms that regulate lysosomal exocytosis in platelets are, however, still unclear. The aim of this study was to identify the pathways underlying platelet lysosomal secretion and elucidate how this process is controlled by platelet inhibitors. We found that high concentrations of thrombin induced partial lysosomal exocytosis as assessed by analysis of the activity of released N-acetyl-ß-glucosaminidase (NAG) and by identifying the fraction of platelets exposing the lysosomal-associated membrane protein (LAMP)-1 on the cell surface by flow cytometry. Stimulation of thrombin receptors PAR1 or PAR4 with specific peptides was equally effective in inducing LAMP-1 surface expression. Notably, lysosomal exocytosis in response to thrombin was significantly reduced if the secondary activation by ADP was inhibited by the P2Y12 antagonist cangrelor, while inhibition of thromboxane A2 formation by treatment with acetylsalicylic acid was of minor importance in this regard. Moreover, the NO-releasing drug S-nitroso-N-acetyl penicillamine (SNAP) or the cyclic AMP-elevating eicosanoid prostaglandin I2 (PGI2) significantly suppressed lysosomal exocytosis. We conclude that platelet inhibitors that mimic functional endothelium such as PGI2 or NO efficiently counteract lysosomal exocytosis. Furthermore, we suggest that secondary release of ADP and concomitant signaling via PAR1/4- and P2Y12 receptors is important for efficient platelet lysosomal exocytosis by thrombin.

Increased Thrombopoiesis and Platelet Activation in Hantavirus-Infected Patients.

BACKGROUND: Thrombocytopenia is a common finding during viral hemorrhagic fever, which includes hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS). The 2 main causes for thrombocytopenia are impaired thrombopoiesis and/or increased peripheral destruction of platelets. In addition, there is an increased intravascular coagulation risk during HFRS, which could be due to platelet activation. METHODS: Thrombopoiesis was determined by quantification of platelet counts, thrombopoietin, immature platelet fraction, and mean platelet volume during HFRS. The in vivo platelet activation was determined by quantification of soluble P-selectin (sP-selectin) and glycoprotein VI (sGPVI). The function of circulating platelets was determined by ex vivo stimulation followed by flow cytometry analysis of platelet surface-bound fibrinogen and P-selectin exposure. Intravascular coagulation during disease was determined by scoring for disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) and recording thromboembolic complications. RESULTS: The levels of thrombopoietin, immature platelet fraction, and mean platelet volume all indicate increased thrombopoiesis during HFRS. Circulating platelets had reduced ex vivo function during disease compared to follow-up. Most interestingly, we observed significantly increased in vivo platelet activation in HFRS patients with intravascular coagulation (DIC and thromboembolic complications) as shown by sP-selectin and sGPVI levels. CONCLUSIONS: HFRS patients have increased thrombopoiesis and platelet activation, which contributes to intravascular coagulation.

Putting polyphosphates to the test: evidence against platelet-induced activation of factor XII.

The recent claim that stimulated platelets activate the intrinsic pathway of coagulation by the release of polyphosphates has been considered a breakthrough in hemostasis research. In little more than 3 years, the original publication by Müller et al has been cited >100 times. However, none of the citing articles has sought to independently validate this potentially paradigm-shifting concept. To this end, we performed extensive experimentation in vitro and in vivo in an attempt to verify the claim that factor XII (FXII) is primarily activated by stimulated platelets. In contrast to the original assertion, platelet-derived polyphosphates were found to be weak activators of FXII, with a FXIIa-generating activity of <10% compared with equivalent concentrations of kaolin. Using different coagulation assays, it was shown that platelet contribution to whole blood coagulation was unrelated to the generation of activated FXII in vitro. Additionally, key results used to verify the hypothesis in the original study in vivo were found to be irreproducible. We conclude that platelet-derived polyphosphates are not physiologically relevant activators of FXII.

Assays of different aspects of haemostasis - what do they measure?

Haemostasis is a complex process affected by many factors including both cellular and plasma components. It is a multistep process starting with platelet adhesion to damaged endothelium and ending in clot fibrinolysis. There are several methods available to study different aspects of haemostasis including adhesion, aggregation, coagulation and fibrinolysis. This review describes the different methods, what aspects of haemostasis they measure and their limitations. Methods discussed include methods to study adhesion (e.g. PFA-100, cone and platelet(let) analyzer and perfusion chambers) and aggregation (e.g. Multiplate, VerifyNow and Plateletworks). Furthermore the principles behind viscoelastic haemostatic assays are presented as well as methods that can analyse aspects of haemostasis in plasma or platelet-rich-plasma samples (thrombin generation, overall haemostasis potential and Thrombodynamics Analyzer).

Platelet adhesion changes during storage studied with a novel method using flow cytometry and protein-coated beads.

The aim of the present study was to set up and evaluate a novel method for studies of platelet adhesion and activation in blood and platelet suspensions such as platelet concentrate (PC) samples using protein-coated polystyrene beads and flow cytometry. To demonstrate its usefulness, we studied PCs during storage. PCs were prepared by aphaeresis technique (n = 7). Metabolic variables and platelet function was measured on day 1, 5, 7 and 12 of storage. Spontaneous and TRAP-6-induced adhesion to fibrinogen- and collagen-coated beads was analyzed by flow cytometry. P-selectin and phosphatidyl serine (PS) expression was assessed on platelets bound to beads as well as on non-adherent platelets. Platelet adhesion to fibrinogen beads had increased by day 12 and adhesion to collagen beads at day 7 of storage (p < 0.05). TRAP-6 stimulation significantly increased the platelet adhesion to fibrinogen beads (p < 0.05) as well as the P-selectin and PS exposure on platelets bound to beads (p < 0.01) during the first 7 days of storage, but by day 12, significant changes were no longer induced by TRAP-6 stimulation. We demonstrate that our adhesion assay using protein-coated polystyrene beads can be used to assess the adhesion properties of platelets during storage without the addition of red blood cells. Therefore it may offer a useful tool for future studies of platelet adhesive capacity in transfusion medicine and other settings.

Individual platelet adhesion assay: measuring platelet function and antiplatelet therapies in whole blood via digital quantification of cell adhesion.

Widespread monitoring of platelet function and the effect of antiplatelet drugs will improve outcomes in cardiovascular patients, but platelet function testing is not routine in clinical practice. We report a rapid, accurate methodology to quantify platelet-protein interactions: a microarray of contact-printed 6-µm fibrinogen dots on a transparent substrate binds platelets from whole blood, one platelet per dot. The fractional occupancy of an array of fibrinogen dots after a predefined incubation time quantitatively assays platelet adhesion to the protein matrix. We demonstrate this technique by measurement of platelet adhesion to fibrinogen as a means to quantify the effect of the P2Y12 and αIIbß3 receptor inhibitors cangrelor and abciximab, respectively, both in vitro--by incubating the drug with a freshly drawn blood sample--and in blood from patients treated with antiplatelet agents. The effects of single- and dual-antiplatelet therapy are also assessed. Results from this platelet-binding assay are well correlated with standard techniques including flow cytometry and light transmission aggregometry. This assay technology, readily integrated with microfluidic platforms, is generally applicable to the assay of cell-protein interactions and promises more effective, rapid assay of drug effects in cardiovascular disease patients.

Consensus report on markers to distinguish procoagulant platelets from apoptotic platelets: communication from the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the ISTH.

BACKGROUND: Procoagulant platelets are a subpopulation of highly activated platelets that promote coagulation through surface-exposed, negatively charged phospholipids, especially phosphatidylserine. Procoagulant platelets are important for clot stabilization during hemostasis, and an increased number of these platelets is associated with thrombotic risk. There is a need for harmonization in this area since many of the markers and methods used to assess procoagulant platelets are not specific when used in isolation but are also associated with platelet apoptosis. OBJECTIVES: We initiated this project to identify a minimum set of markers and/or methods that can detect and distinguish procoagulant platelets from apoptotic platelets. METHODS: The study design involved a primary panel with 27 international experts who participated in an online survey and moderated virtual focus group meetings. Primary and secondary panel members were then invited to provide input on themes and statements generated from the focus groups. RESULTS: This led to a recommendation to use flow cytometry and a combination of the following 3 surface markers to differentiate procoagulant platelets from apoptotic platelets: P-selectin (CD62P), phosphatidylserine (recognized by annexin V), and the platelet-specific receptor GPIX (CD42a) or αIIb integrin (CD41, GPIIb). CONCLUSION: Procoagulant platelets are expected to be positive for all 3 markers, while apoptotic platelets are positive for annexin V and the platelet-specific surface receptor(s) but negative for P-selectin.