RESUMO
Just-in-time training (JITT) is accepted in medical education as a training method for newer concepts or seldom-performed procedures. Providing JITT to a large nursing staff may be an effective method to teach quality improvement (QI) initiatives. We sought to determine if JITT could increase knowledge of a specific nutrition QI initiative. Members of the nutrition QI team interviewed staff using the Frontline Contextual Inquiry to assess knowledge regarding the specific QI project. The inquiry was completed pre- and post-JITT. A JITT educational cart was created, which allowed trainers to bring the educational information to the bedside for a short, small group educational session. The results demonstrated a marked improvement in the knowledge of the frontline staff regarding our Vermont Oxford Network involvement and the specifics of the nutrition QI project. Just-in-time training can be a valuable and effective method to disseminate QI principles to a large audience of staff members.
Assuntos
Capacitação em Serviço , Enfermagem Neonatal/educação , Humanos , Capacitação em Serviço/métodos , Capacitação em Serviço/organização & administração , Modelos Educacionais , Enfermagem Neonatal/normas , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Melhoria de QualidadeRESUMO
Importance: Racial and ethnic differences in skin cancer outcomes are understudied. Delineating these differences in Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is needed to better understand this rare disease. Objective: To determine how MCC presentation and outcomes differ across racial and ethnic groups. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study included patients diagnosed with MCC and followed up from 2000 through 2018 in the 18 population-based cancer registries of the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. Patients without follow-up data were excluded. Data analysis occurred from March 12 to November 30, 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: A Cox proportional hazards regression was conducted to determine associations between demographic variables (race and ethnicity, age, sex, and income) and clinical variables (stage at diagnosis, primary site, and diagnosis year) with MCC-specific survival. Results: Of the 9557 patients with MCC identified (6758 [70.7%] aged ≥70 years; 6008 [62.9%] male), 222 (2.3%) were Asian American or Pacific Islander, 146 (1.5%) Black, 541 (5.7%) Hispanic, and 8590 (89.9%) White. Hispanic patients had improved MCC-specific survival compared with White patients (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.67-0.99; P = .04). Black patients had the lowest MCC-specific survival, but it was not statistically different from White patients (hazard ratio, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.86-1.60; P = .28). Hispanic and Black patients were less likely to present with a primary site of the head and neck than White patients (183 of 541 [33.8%] Hispanic patients and 45 of 146 [30.8%] Black patients vs 3736 of 8590 [43.5%] White patients; P < .001 and P = .002, respectively). Black patients presented more often than White patients with advanced disease at diagnosis (59 of 146 [40.4%] vs 2510 of 8590 [29.2%]; P = .004). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, there were differences between racial and ethnic groups in observed MCC outcomes and disease characteristics. Further investigations are warranted into the findings that, compared with White patients, Hispanic patients with MCC had improved outcomes and Black patients did not have worse outcomes despite presenting with more advanced disease.