Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Drug Test Anal ; 14(8): 1519-1524, 2022 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35355431

RESUMO

The increasing global prevalence of gout and diabetes has led to a rise in the use of their respective medications, allopurinol and metformin. These are excreted via urine as oxypurinol and metformin and are discharged into wastewater and the environment. Current environmental monitoring of those two polar chemicals requires labour intensive and potentially inefficient sample pre-treatments, such as using solid-phase extraction or freeze-drying. This study validated a sensitive and simple method using direct-injection LC-MS/MS for the simultaneous measurement of oxypurinol and metformin in wastewater. The final method utilised a hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography together with simple filtration through 0.2 µm regenerated cellulose filter followed by dilution in acetonitrile with a dilution factor of 10. The developed method was validated with the limit of quantifications (LOQ) of 0.11 and 0.34 µg/L for metformin and oxypurinol, respectively. The new method was applied to 42 influent wastewater samples and 6 effluent samples collected from 6 Australian wastewater treatment plants. Both compounds were detected well above the LOQ at concentrations 29-214 µg/L in influent and 2-53 µg/L in effluent for metformin, and 24-248 µg/L in influent and 4-81 µg/L in effluent for oxypurinol, demonstrating its high applicability.


Assuntos
Metformina , Poluentes Químicos da Água , Austrália , Cromatografia Líquida/métodos , Interações Hidrofóbicas e Hidrofílicas , Oxipurinol/análise , Extração em Fase Sólida/métodos , Espectrometria de Massas em Tandem/métodos , Águas Residuárias/análise , Poluentes Químicos da Água/análise
2.
Sci Total Environ ; 743: 140551, 2020 Nov 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32653706

RESUMO

Wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE) has been used to estimate tobacco use in the population. However, the increased use of nicotine replacement therapies and e-cigarettes contributes to the load of nicotine metabolites in wastewater, causing over-estimation of tobacco use if nicotine metabolites were used in WBE back-estimation. This study aims to develop a rapid method for determining the tobacco-specific biomarkers, anabasine and anatabine, in wastewater and to evaluate their in-sewer stability for better estimation of tobacco use by WBE. An enhanced direct injection LC-MS/MS was developed to quantify anabasine and anatabine as well as nicotine biomarkers (nicotine, cotinine and hydroxycotinine). The method was optimal when wastewater was filtered through 0.2 µm RC syringe filters and a pre-conditioned SPE cartridge (Oasis HLB 1 cc, 30 mg) before 50 µL was injected into the LC-MS/MS system. Limits of quantification varied between 2.7 and 54.9 ng/L with recoveries from 76% to 103% for all five compounds. In sewer reactors, anabasine and anatabine were less stable than cotinine and hydroxycotinine. They were more stable in the gravity sewer reactor with <20% loss in 12 h than in the rising main sewer reactor with ~30% loss in the same period. We then applied the new method to 42 daily wastewater influent samples collected from an Australian wastewater treatment plant. The five biomarkers were detected in all samples with concentrations ranging from 9.2 to 7430 ng/L. All five compounds were positively correlated with one another. Our results suggested a high throughput analytical method for feasible application in anabasine and anatabine as biomarkers of tobacco use in routine wastewater monitoring.


Assuntos
Sistemas Eletrônicos de Liberação de Nicotina , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar , Alcaloides , Anabasina/análise , Austrália , Biomarcadores , Cromatografia Líquida , Cotinina/análise , Nicotina/análise , Piridinas , Espectrometria de Massas em Tandem , Dispositivos para o Abandono do Uso de Tabaco , Águas Residuárias/análise
3.
Environ Pollut ; 254(Pt A): 112973, 2019 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31401523

RESUMO

New Zealand uses more than a ton of pesticides each year; many of these are mobile, relatively persistent, and can make their way into waterways. While considerable effort goes into monitoring nutrients in agricultural streams and programs exist to monitor pesticides in groundwater, very little is known about pesticide detection frequencies, concentrations, or their potential impacts in New Zealand streams. We used the 'Polar Organic Chemical Integrative Sampler' (POCIS) approach and grab water sampling to survey pesticide concentrations in 36 agricultural streams in Waikato, Canterbury, Otago and Southland during a period of stable stream flows in Austral summer 2017/18. We employed a new approach for calculating site-specific POCIS sampling rates. We also tested two novel passive samplers designed to reduce the effects of hydrodynamic conditions on sampling rates: the 'Organic-Diffusive Gradients in Thin Films' (o-DGT) aquatic passive sampler and microporous polyethylene tubes (MPTs) filled with Strata-X sorbent. Multiple pesticides were found at most sites; two or more were detected at 78% of sites, three or more at 69% of sites, and four or more at 39% of sites. Chlorpyrifos concentrations were the highest, with a maximum concentration of 180 ng/L. Concentrations of the other pesticides were generally below 20 ng/L. Mean concentrations of individual pesticides were not correlated with in-stream nutrient concentrations. The majority of pesticides were detected most frequently in POCIS, presumably due to its higher sampling rate and the relatively low concentrations of these pesticides. In contrast, chlorpyrifos was most frequently detected in grab samples. Chlorpyrifos concentrations at two sites were above the 21-day chronic 'No Observable Effect Concentration' (NOEC) values for fish and another two sites had concentrations greater than 50% of the NOEC. Otherwise, concentrations were well-below NOEC values, but close to the New Zealand Environmental Exposure Limits in several cases.


Assuntos
Clorpirifos/análise , Monitoramento Ambiental/métodos , Água Subterrânea/química , Praguicidas/análise , Rios/química , Poluentes Químicos da Água/análise , Agricultura , Nova Zelândia , Estações do Ano
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA