Anti-IL17 Secukinumab in hidradenitis suppurativa: A long-term drug survival analysis.

Real-world data on the long-term effectiveness of the anti-IL17 agent secukinumab in treating moderate-to-severe Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) are lacking. In this study, 24 patients with moderate-severe HS received five weekly subcutaneous injections followed by maintenance doses every 4 weeks. Primary outcomes included HiSCR, IHS4 reduction, and DLQI measures assessed at 12-week intervals. The median secukinumab drug survival was 16.0 months (range 3-51), with a 56.5% maximal response rate at 6 months and dropout exceeding 40% at 1 year. Baseline disease burden emerged as a key predictor of treatment response, overshadowing factors like sex or BMI. Prior systemic steroid use negatively impacts drug survival. The study underscores the critical 6-month window for assessing treatment efficacy, emphasizing the importance of initial induction dosing. Additionally, the newly developed scoring system, IHS4-55, showed analogies to the older HiSCR score in capturing treatment response. In this real-life scenario, challenges persist in HS management, necessitating innovative therapeutic approaches and predictive markers.

Paradoxical psoriasiform reactions during treatment with adalimumab for hidradenitis suppurativa: Real-life experience and therapeutic response to other biological drugs.

Adalimumab is the only biological drug approved to date for the treatment of moderate and/or severe hidradenitis suppurativa. Adverse events reported during therapy include paradoxical psoriasiform reactions. No guidelines are currently available for the management of this clinical condition. The aim of this paper is to describe the incidence and clinical features of paradoxical psoriasiform eruptions occurring during treatment with adalimumab in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa and to report real-life experience in management and the possible role of other biologic agents for the treatment of both conditions.

Switching from adalimumab originator to biosimilars in hidradenitis suppurativa: What's beyond cost-effectiveness?

In the last years, adalimumab biosimilars have represented a commonly used alternative to the originator agent in the treatment of moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa. As of today, studies investigating the switch from adalimumab originator to biosimilar, following pharmacoeconomic policies, are lacking. Herein we present a real-life setting retrospective study aimed at assessing the safety and efficacy of this switch in 37 patients, evaluated for 12 months in terms of IHS4 (International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System) and HiSCR (Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response). Overall, no significant differences emerge between adalimumab originator and biosimilar in terms of clinical response following non-medical switch. High discontinuation rates (43.2%) raise questions on patients' compliance to the new drug regimen, as severe pain at the injection site represents a substantial cause of biosimilar discontinuation (i.e., 31.5% of the cases). In selected cases, rechallenge with adalimumab originator may represent a valid option, as 66.6% (n = 8) of the patients who switched back to the former agent have benefited in terms of tolerability and efficacy. Carefully integrating pharmacoeconomic policies with a thorough assessment regarding the benefit-risk ratio of a nonmedical switch from originator to biosimilars remains essential to provide each HS patient with the best therapeutic option.