RESUMO
PURPOSE: Rural communities have limited knowledge about genetics and genomics and are also underrepresented in genomic education initiatives. The purpose of this project was to assess genomic and epigenetic knowledge and beliefs in rural West Virginia. SAMPLE: A total of 93 participants from three communities participated in focus groups and 68 participants completed a demographic survey. The age of the respondents ranged from 21 to 81 years. Most respondents had a household income of less than $40,000, were female and most were married, completed at least a HS/GED or some college education working either part-time or full-time. METHOD: A Community Based Participatory Research process with focus groups and demographic questionnaires was used. FINDINGS: Most participants had a basic understanding of genetics and epigenetics, but not genomics. Participants reported not knowing much of their family history and that their elders did not discuss such information. If the conversations occurred, it was only during times of crisis or an illness event. Mental health and substance abuse are topics that are not discussed with family in this rural population. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the efforts surrounding genetic/genomic understanding have focused on urban populations. This project is the first of its kind in West Virginia and has begun to lay the much needed infrastructure for developing educational initiatives and extending genomic research projects into our rural Appalachian communities. By empowering the public with education, regarding the influential role genetics, genomics, and epigenetics have on their health, we can begin to tackle the complex task of initiating behavior changes that will promote the health and well-being of individuals, families and communities.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Recent evidence suggests physical activity may be protective against smoking initiation and increased smoking among youth. The present study explored the effects of a teen smoking cessation intervention supplemented with a physical activity module on participants' physical activity outcomes. A secondary aim examined the relationship between participants' physical activity outcomes and postprogram smoking intensity. DESIGN: The study reports primary data from a 3-arm randomized group trial consistent with CONSORT guidelines (Registry # NCT01242657). SETTING: Public high schools (N = 19) in West Virginia. PARTICIPANTS: Teens aged 14-19 years (N = 233) who reported current smoking, ≥1 cigarette in the past 30 days. INTERVENTION: High schools were randomly selected, then randomly assigned to Brief Intervention (standard of care), Not-On-Tobacco (N-O-T, teen cessation program), or N-O-T plus a physical activity module (N-O-T+FIT). OUTCOME MEASURES: Standardized instruments at baseline and end of treatment/3-months postbaseline measured physical activity outcomes. The study assessed smoking intensity using cigarettes smoked per day. We conducted ANCOVA controlling for school-level variance to measure physical activity changes. Multiple linear and logistic regression analyses explored favorable change influence of physical activity on smoking cessation outcomes, controlling for potential clustering. RESULTS: Teens who increased the number of days on which they received at least 20 minutes of exercise were significantly more likely to reduce their daily cigarette use, with those in the N-O-T+FIT condition having the highest likelihood of reducing smoking. Teens in the N-O-T+FIT condition who increased the number of days on which they received at least 30 minutes of exercise were significantly more likely than those in other groups to quit smoking. CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that it is possible to alter simultaneously more than one health behavior among teens-favorable changes in physical activity and smoking cessation may be particularly compatible targets for dual behavior change.