Early elastic and viscoelastic corneal biomechanical changes after photorefractive keratectomy and small incision lenticule extraction.

PURPOSE: To compare early changes in the corneal biomechanical parameters after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and their correlations with corneal shape parameters. METHODS: One hundred twenty four eyes received myopic PRK and SMILE for similar amounts of myopia. Corneal tomography with Pentacam HR, biomechanical parameters using Corvis ST, and Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) were evaluated before and 2 weeks after surgery. The change in each parameter was compared between groups, while the difference in central corneal thickness and cornea-compensated intraocular pressure measured before and after surgery were considered as covariates. RESULTS: A significant reduction was seen in the corneal stiffness parameter at first applanation, and an increase in deformation amplitude ratio (DAR), and integrated inverse radius (IIR) in both groups after surgery (p < 0.001) Changes in DAR, and IIR were significantly greater in the SMILE than in the PRK group (p < 0.001) Corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) decreased in both SMILE and PRK groups after surgery, (p < 0.001) with no statistically significant difference between groups (p > 0.05) Among new Corvis ST parameters, DAR showed a significant correlation with changes in Ambrosio relational thickness in both groups (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both techniques caused significant changes in corneal biomechanics in the early postoperative period, with greater elastic changes in the SMILE group compared to the PRK group, likely due to lower tension in the SMILE cap and thinner residual stromal bed in SMILE. There were no differences in viscoelastic changes between them, so the lower CH may reflect the volume of tissue removed.

Comparison of corneal biomechanical parameters in healthy corneas with symmetric and asymmetric bow-tie topographic pattern with inferior and superior steepening.

PURPOSE: To compare the corneal biomechanical parameters in healthy corneas with symmetric and asymmetric bow-tie topographic patterns. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 144 eyes were divided based on inferior-superior asymmetry value (I-S) into symmetric (zero I-S: - 0.50 to + 0.50 D) and asymmetric bow-tie topographic patterns with inferior (positive I-S: + 0.51 to + 1.4 D) or superior (negative I-S: - 2.5 to - 0.51 D) steepening. The biomechanical assessment was performed using Corvis ST and ocular response analyzer (ORA). A general linear model univariate analysis was used to compare the parameters, while the central corneal thickness, intraocular pressure, and age were considered covariates. RESULTS: Only the peak distance (PD) at the highest concavity phase (P = 0.007) and tomographic biomechanical index (TBI, P = 0.001) showed statistically significant differences between the three groups. For TBI, this difference was statistically significant between the positive I-S group separately with the zero I-S group (P < 0.001), and with the negative I-S group (P = 0.022). For PD, the significant difference was between the negative I-S group separately with zero I-S (P = 0.019), and positive I-S groups (P = 0.018). There was a statistically significant correlation between the I-S value with PD (r = 0.281, P = 0.001) and TBI (r = 0.170, P = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: Most corneal biomechanical parameters are not statistically significant compared to the zero I-S group. However, superior steepening is associated with a stiffer response based solely on the shorter PD values seen in this group, and the group with the inferior steepening shows the highest or more suspicious values based on TBI.

Intereye Differences in the Clinical Assessment of Intraocular Pressure and Ocular Biomechanics.

SIGNIFICANCE: Clinicians and researchers will have evidence whether intereye differences confound clinical measurements of intraocular pressure or of ocular biomechanical parameters. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether intraocular pressure and biomechanical parameters, as measured by the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) and by Cornea Visualization with Scheimpflug Technology (CorVis ST), are different between the first and second eye measured. METHODS: Intraocular pressure and biomechanical parameters were collected from both eyes of healthy participants (N = 139). The ORA measured corneal-compensated intraocular pressure, Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure, and corneal hysteresis. The CorVis ST measured biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure, stiffness parameter at first applanation, and stiffness parameter at highest concavity. For each measurement, a paired t test compared the value of the first eye measured against that of the second eye measured. RESULTS: For the ORA, Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure was significantly higher ( P = .001) in the first eye (14.8 [3.45] mmHg) than in the second eye (14.3 [3.63] mmHg). For the CorVis ST, biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure was significantly higher ( P < .001) in the second eye (14.7 [2.14] mmHg) than in the first eye (14.3 [2.11] mmHg). Stiffness parameter at first applanation (intereye difference, 6.85 [9.54] mmHg/mm) was significantly ( P < .001) higher in the first eye than in the second eye. Stiffness parameter at highest concavity was significantly higher ( P = .01) in the second eye (14.3 [3.18] mmHg/mm) than in the first eye (14.0 [3.13] mmHg/mm). CONCLUSIONS: Although there were statistically significant intereye differences in intraocular pressure and in biomechanical parameters for both devices, the variations were small and thus unlikely to affect clinical outcomes.

Novel High-Resolution Imaging Using ANTERION Optical Coherence Tomography to Assess Fluid Reservoir Change in Scleral Lens Periphery.

OBJECTIVES: To assess scleral lens fluid reservoir (FR) change simultaneously in four quadrants with single acquisition using novel ANTERION anterior segment swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT). METHODS: A prospective, observational, clinical study of 18 subjects (30 eyes) was performed on adults fitted with a scleral lens for ocular surface disease (n=8), irregular cornea/scar (n=7), and corneal ectasia (n=15). ANTERION anterior segment SS-OCT imaging was obtained at the initial visit and at the follow-up to determine pre and post scleral lens settling, measured in microns, centrally and peripherally. Peripheral measurements were grouped into four quadrants. Repeated-measures ANOVA was performed comparing vault post minus pre differences by quadrant, and TTests comparing difference in FR by lens design were performed with a significant threshold at P <0.05. RESULTS: The mean central scleral lens settling was significant at -48.3±41.7 µm. The change in FR by quadrant was superior (S): -47.8±67.3 µm, inferior (I): -68.0±102.2 µm, nasal (N) -46.3±63.4 µm, and temporal (T): -56.7±49.3 µm. There were no significant differences in lens settling between the quadrants. Within the three categories, the irregular cornea group experienced significantly greater lens settling. There was no significant difference in central FR when comparing lens design or lens diameter. CONCLUSIONS: The ANTERION SS-OCT allows for high-resolution central and peripheral assessment of FR in scleral lens wear. With increased technology available for scleral lens customization, this imaging modality can assist in more detailed assessment in quadrant-specific scleral lens designs.

Effect of penetration enhancer with novel corneal cross-linking using recombinant human decoron in porcine eyes.

The aim of the study was to investigate the effectiveness of exogenous recombinant human decoron and an accompanying penetration-enhancing solution in stiffening ex-vivo porcine corneas both transepithelially and after de-epithelialization. Eight porcine paired eyes were treated transepithelially: one eye with a pre-treatment solution (Pre-Tx), penetration enhancing solution (PE), and decoron while the fellow eye was treated by the same protocol but without decoron. A second group included 4 de-epithelialized pairs treated identically. The final group included 4 de-epithelialized pairs with one eye treated with Pre-Tx, PE, and decoron while the fellow eye was treated without PE. Uniaxial tensile testing was used to compare the corneal stiffness between the different treatment conditions. Residual tissue underwent immunohistochemistry analysis to evaluate the depth of penetration of decoron into the corneal stroma. There was no stiffening effect exhibited among corneas treated transepithelially with decoron compared to control (P > 0.05) and poor stromal penetration was exhibited on tissue analysis. Among de-epithelialized corneas, there was a significant stiffening effect seen in those treated with decoron at 3%, 4%, 5%, & 6% strain (P < 0.05) compared to control. Among de-epithelialized corneas there was also a significant stiffening effect seen in those treated with the PE and decoron at 4%, 5%, & 6% strain (P < 0.05) with improved stromal penetration confirmed by immunohistochemistry, versus without PE. De-epithelialization is necessary for effective stromal penetration of decoron. Depth of penetration and subsequent corneal stiffening may be improved with a penetration enhancing solution. Compared to riboflavin, decoron requires shorter treatment time and spares UV light exposure.

Biomechanical contribution of the sclera to dynamic corneal response in air-puff induced deformation in human donor eyes.

This study was conducted to evaluate the impact of varying scleral material properties on the biomechanical response of the cornea under air-puff induced deformation. Twenty pairs of human donor eyes were obtained for this study. One eye from each pair had its sclera stiffened using 4% glutaraldehyde, while the fellow eye served as control for uniaxial strip testing. The whole globes were mounted in a rigid holder and intraocular pressure (IOP) was set using a saline column. Dynamic corneal response parameters were measured before and after scleral stiffening using the CorVis ST, a dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer. IOP was set to 10, 20, 30, and 40 mmHg, with at least 3 examinations performed at each pressure step. Uniaxial tensile testing data were fit to a neo-Hookean model to estimate the Young's modulus of treated and untreated sclera. Scleral Young's modulus was found to be significantly correlated with several response parameters, including Highest Concavity Deformation Amplitude, Peak Distance, Highest Concavity Radius, and Stiffness Parameter-Highest Concavity (SP-HC). There were significant increases in SP-HC after scleral stiffening at multiple levels of IOP, while no significant difference was observed in the corneal Stiffness Parameter - Applanation 1 (SP-A1) at any level of IOP. Scleral mechanical properties significantly influenced the corneal deformation response to an air-puff. The stiffer the sclera, the greater the constraining effect on corneal deformation resulting in lower displaced amplitude. This may have important clinical implications and suggests that both corneal and scleral material properties contribute to the observed corneal response in air-puff induced deformation.

Fundus-simulating phantom for calibration of retinal vessel oximetry devices.

Retinal vessel oxygen supply is important for retinal tissue metabolism. Commonly used retinal vessel oximetry devices are based on dual-wavelength spectral measurement of oxyhemoglobin and deoxyhemoglobin. However, there is no traceable standard for reliable calibration of these devices. In this study, we developed a fundus-simulating phantom that closely mimicked the optical properties of human fundus tissues. Microchannels of precisely controlled topological structures were produced by soft lithography to simulate the retinal vasculature. Optical properties of the phantom were adjusted by adding scattering and absorption agents to simulate different concentrations of fundus pigments. The developed phantom was used to calibrate the linear correlation between oxygen saturation (SO2) level and optical density ratio in a dual-wavelength oximetry device. The obtained calibration factors were used to calculate the retinal vessel SO2 in both eyes of five volunteers aged between 24 and 27 years old. The test results showed that the mean arterial and venous SO2 levels after phantom calibration were coincident with those after empirical value calibration, indicating the potential clinical utility of the produced phantom as a calibration standard.

Ex-vivo experimental validation of biomechanically-corrected intraocular pressure measurements on human eyes using the CorVis ST.

The purpose of this study was to assess the validity of the Corvis ST (Oculus; Wetzlar, Germany) biomechanical correction algorithm (bIOP) in determining intraocular pressure (IOP) using experiments on ex-vivo human eyes. Five ex-vivo human ocular globes (age 69 ±â€¯3 years) were obtained and tested within 3-5 days post mortem. Using a custom-built inflation rig, the internal pressure of the eyes was controlled mechanically and measured using the CorVis ST (CVS-IOP). The CVS-IOP measurements were then corrected to produce bIOP, which was developed for being less affected by variations in corneal biomechanical parameters, including tissue thickness and material properties. True IOP (IOPt) was defined as the pressure inside of the globe as monitored using a fixed pressure transducer. Statistical analyses were performed to assess the accuracy of both CVS-IOP and bIOP, and their correlation with corneal thickness. While no significant differences were found between bIOP and IOPt (0.3 ±â€¯1.6 mmHg, P = 0.989) using ANOVA and Bonferroni Post-Hoc test, the differences between CVS-IOP and IOPt were significant (7.5 ±â€¯3.2 mmHg, P < 0.001). Similarly, bIOP exhibited no significant correlation with central corneal thickness (p = 0.756), whereas CVS-IOP was significantly correlated with the thickness (p < 0.001). The bIOP correction has been successful in providing close estimates of true IOP in ex-vivo tests conducted on human donor eye globes, and in reducing association with the cornea's thickness.

Importance of accurately assessing biomechanics of the cornea.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article summarizes the state-of-the-art in clinical corneal biomechanics, including procedures in which biomechanics play a role, and the clinical consequences in terms of error in estimating intraocular pressure (IOP). RECENT FINDINGS: Corneal biomechanical response to refractive surgery can be categorized into either stable alteration of surface shape and thus visual outcome, or unstable biomechanical decompensation. The stable response is characterized by central flattening and peripheral steepening that is potentiated in a stiffer cornea. Two clinical devices for assessing corneal biomechanics do not yet measure classic biomechanical properties, but rather provide assessment of corneal deformation response. Biomechanical parameters are a function of IOP, and both the cornea and sclera become stiffer as IOP increases. Any assessment of biomechanical parameters must include IOP, and one value of stiffness does not adequately characterize a cornea. SUMMARY: Corneal biomechanics plays a role in the outcomes of any procedure in which lamellae are transected. Once the corneal structure has been altered in a manner that includes central thinning, IOP measurements with applanation tonometry are likely not valid, and other technologies should be used.

Biomechanical Modeling of Femtosecond Laser Keyhole endokeratophakia Surgery.

PURPOSE: To apply a finite element model to endokeratophakia and evaluate anterior and posterior corneal surface changes. METHODS: Spatial elevation data (Pentacam HR; Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany) were obtained for the front and back corneal surfaces of an eye prior to undergoing an endokeratophakia procedure. These were used to warp a spherical template finite element model of the cornea to create a patient-specific finite element mesh and the initial stress distribution was computed with an iterative approach. The finite element model (Optimeyes; Integrated Scientific Services, Biel, Switzerland) included non-linear elastic characteristics of the stroma. The endokeratophakia procedure was recreated in the model: a donor lenticule (-10.50 diopters [D], 5.75-mm zone, 127-µm thick) was inserted into a lamellar pocket (180-µm deep, 6.25-mm diameter) and two 2-mm small incisions were made at 150° and 330°. Anterior and posterior surfaces, computed by the finite element model, were compared to clinical data to assess accuracy and reliability of finite element modeling. RESULTS: The postoperative axial curvature produced by the model closely resembled the patient data; average curvature was 48.01 D clinically and 48.23 D in the simulation, and corneal astigmatism was 3.01 D clinically and 2.88 D in the simulation. The posterior best-fit sphere elevation map also matched the patient data, replicating inward bulging of the posterior surface by approximately 40 µm. Stress distribution modeling predicted a stress increase by 159.94% ± 73% in the cap and a stress decrease by 32.41% ± 21% in the stromal bed. CONCLUSIONS: Finite element modeling of the cornea reproduced the clinically observed anterior and posterior corneal surface changes following an endokeratophakia procedure. This case sets the stage for further study to refine and yield predictive finite element modeling for the evaluation of corneal refractive surgical procedures.

Corneal curvature gradient map: a new corneal topography map to predict the corneal healing process.

PURPOSE: To evaluate a new curvature gradient topography map to predict postoperative corneal remodeling. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 32 eyes of 16 patients with myopia underwent excimer ablation surgery with a postoperative high curvature gradient. The new curvature gradient map (acquired immediately postoperatively) shows the difference between the curvatures of two points over the distance between them; it was compared to the tangential curvature difference map between 1 and 12 months postoperatively to determine their relationship. Corneas were divided into 12 regions for analysis: four 90°-wide sectors centered on 0°, 90°, 180°, and 270°. There were three subdivisions in each sector: central (radius: 0 to 2.75 mm), paracentral (radius: 2.75 to 3.25 mm), and peripheral (radius: 3.25 to 4.5 mm). Linear regression analysis was performed by region. RESULTS: The following regions had significant relationships between the initial curvature gradient and curvature difference between 1 and 12 months postoperatively: the paracentral zone of the 90° sector (P = .0145; R(2) = 0.1832) and both the central (P = .0034; R(2) = 0.2522) and paracentral (P = .0452; R(2) = 0.1271) zones of the 270° sector. The greatest average initial tangential curvature was in the 270° sector. CONCLUSIONS: The initial curvature gradient after surgery predicted change in tangential curvature over the subsequent 12 months in areas where initial tangential curvature was greatest. When the curvature gradient was high, the surface curvature modification remained in progress months after surgery.

Air puff induced corneal vibrations: theoretical simulations and clinical observations.

PURPOSE: To investigate air puff induced corneal vibrations and their relationship to the intraocular pressure (IOP), viscoelasticity, mass, and elasticity of the cornea based on theoretical simulations and preliminary clinical observations. METHODS: To simulate the corneal movement during air puff deformation, a kinematic viscoelastic corneal model was developed involving the factors of corneal mass, damping coefficient, elasticity, and IOP. Different parameter values were taken to investigate how factors would affect the corneal movements. Two clinical ocular instruments, CorVis ST (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) and the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA; Reichert, Inc., Buffalo, NY), were employed to observe the corneal dynamical behaviors. RESULTS: Numerical results showed that during the air puff deformation, there would be vibrations along with the corneal deformation, and the damping viscoelastic response of the cornea had the potential to reduce the vibration amplitude. With consistent IOP, the overall vibration amplitude and inward motion depths were smaller with a stiffer cornea. CONCLUSIONS: A kinematic viscoelastic model of the cornea is presented to illustrate how the vibrations are associated with factors such as corneal mass, viscoelasticity, and IOP. Also, the predicted corneal vibrations during air puff deformation were confirmed by clinical observation.

Ocular biomechanical metrics by CorVis ST in healthy Brazilian patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate ocular biomechanical metrics given by the CorVis ST (Oculus, Inc., Berlin, Germany) in a population of healthy Brazilian patients. METHODS: An observational and cross-sectional study involving 1 eye randomly selected from 90 healthy patients. Studied parameters (including deformation amplitude, first applanation time, highest concavity time, second applanation time, first applanation length, second applanation length, curvature radius highest concavity, curvature radius normal, velocity in, and velocity out) derived from the CorVis ST were correlated to central corneal thickness from the Pentacam (Oculus, Inc.). Differences between data on the basis of gender were evaluated. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 35.80 ± 12.83 years (range: 21.07 to 78.84 years). Mean central corneal thickness was 547.50 ± 32.00 µm (range: 490 to 647 µm) and mean spherical equivalent refraction was -3.29 ± 3.69 diopters (range: -9.50 to +10.37 diopters). Mean deformation amplitude was 1.05 ± 0.08 mm (range: 0.91 to 1.26 mm). Highest concavity time was 18.38 ± 0.93 ms (range: 16.95 to 21.07 ms). Intraocular pressure was 16.43 ± 2.15 mm Hg (range: 11.50 to 21.0 mm Hg). First applanation time was 8.32 ± 0.33 ms (range: 7.53 to 9.12 ms) and second applanation time was 23.80 ± 0.44 ms (range: 22.76 to 24.95 ms). First applanation length (max) was 2.07 ± 0.38 mm (range: 1.20 to 3.10 mm) and second applanation length (max) was 2.37 ± 0.47 mm (range: 1.33 to 4.12 mm). Curvature radius highest concavity was 11.09 ± 2.06 mm (range: 7.58 to 15.98 mm) and curvature radius normal was 7.59 ± 0.67 mm (range: 6.82 to 11.02 mm). Velocity in was 0.21 ± 0.05 m/s (range: 0.16 to 0.72 m/s) and velocity out was -0.33 ± 0.07 m/s (range: -0.72 to -0.20 m/s). Studied parameters were not associated with gender. CONCLUSIONS: Eight of 11 ocular biomechanical metrics given by the CorVis ST were associated with central corneal thickness, but the influence of central corneal thickness on these measurements was low.

A New Biomechanical Deformation Response Parameter: Change in Central Corneal Thickness During Air Puff Induced Corneal Deformation.

PURPOSE: To investigate the percent change in central corneal thickness (%ΔCCT) during air-puff-induced deformation as an indicator of corneal biomechanical response. METHODS: Forty ex vivo human eyes from forty donors were imaged using the CorVis ST at experimentally controlled intraocular pressure (IOP) of 10, 20, 30, and 40 mmHg, followed by uniaxial strip testing to calculate tensile modulus. The CorVis ST research software tracked the anterior and posterior cornea edges and determined the dynamic corneal response (DCR) parameters. Eyes were excluded if image quality or posterior tracking issues were present. Custom algorithms were used to calculate CCT during deformation using a ray-tracing method to correct for Scheimpflug and optical distortion within each image. Correlation and stepwise regression analyses between the shape-related DCR parameters and %ΔCCT were conducted. A mixed model analysis was performed to test the effect of IOP and the strongest significant predictors of the stepwise regression on %ΔCCT. The significance threshold was set to p < 0.05. RESULTS: Thirty eyes were ultimately analyzed and CCT increased significantly from the pre-deformation state to the highest concavity state at each IOP level (p < 0.001). IOP and multiple shape DCRs were found to be significantly related to %ΔCCT (p < 0.0001). The strongest predictor of %ΔCCT was integrated inverse radius (IIR) (p < 0.0001; partial R2 = 0.4772) with no other parameter having a partial R2 value greater than 0.04. The mixed model analysis showed that IIR was the sole predictor (p = 0.0098) and IOP was no longer significant as a single predictor. However, the interaction of IIR with IOP (p = 0.0023) had a significant effect on %ΔCCT. CONCLUSION: Percent change in CCT is influenced by corneal stiffness as indicated by the significant relationship with IIR. The %ΔCCT may be a potential biomarker for determining differences in corneal deformation response with corneal diseases.

Keratoconus cone location influences ocular biomechanical parameters measured by the Ocular Response Analyzer.

BACKGROUND: Keratoconus is characterized by asymmetry in the biomechanical properties of the cornea, with focal weakness in the area of cone formation. We tested the hypothesis that centrally-measured biomechanical parameters differ between corneas with peripheral cones and corneas with central cones. METHODS: Fifty participants with keratoconus were prospectively recruited. The mean ± standard deviation age was 38 ± 13 years. Axial and tangential corneal topography were analyzed in both eyes, if eligible. Cones in the central 3 mm of the cornea were considered central, and cones outside the central 3 mm were considered peripheral. Each eye was then measured with the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) tonometer. T-tests compared differences in ORA-generated waveform parameters between cohorts. RESULTS: Seventy-eight eyes were analyzed. According to the axial topography maps, 37 eyes had central cones and 41 eyes had peripheral cones. According to the tangential topography maps, 53 eyes had central cones, and 25 eyes had peripheral cones. For the axial-topography algorithm, wave score (WS) was significantly higher in peripheral cones than central cones (inter-cohort difference = 1.27 ± 1.87). Peripheral cones had a significantly higher area of first peak, p1area (1047 ± 1346), area of second peak, p2area (1130 ± 1478), height of first peak, h1 (102 ± 147), and height of second peak, h2 (102 ± 127), than central cones. Corneal hysteresis (CH), width of the first peak, w1, and width of the second peak, w2, did not significantly differ between cohorts. There were similar results for the tangential-topography algorithm, with a significant difference between the cohorts for p1area (855 ± 1389), p2area (860 ± 1531), h1 (81.7 ± 151), and h2 (92.1 ± 131). CONCLUSIONS: Cone location affects the biomechanical response parameters measured under central loading of the cornea. The ORA delivers its air puff to the central cornea, so the fact that h1 and h2 and that p1area and p2area were smaller in the central cone cohort than in the peripheral cone cohort suggests that corneas with central cones are softer or more compliant centrally than corneas with peripheral cones, which is consistent with the location of the pathology. This result is evidence that corneal weakening in keratoconus is focal in nature and is consistent with localized disruption of lamellar orientation.

Biomechanical and Vascular Metrics Between Eyes of Patients With Asymmetric Glaucoma and Symmetric Glaucoma.

PRCIS: Corneal hysteresis (CH) and pulsatile ocular blood volume (POBV) were significantly lower in the eye with greater damage in asymmetric glaucoma, without a difference in intraocular pressure (IOP) or central corneal thickness (CCT), and no difference in elastic parameters. OBJECTIVE: To compare biomechanical and vascular metrics between the eyes of patients with asymmetric glaucoma (ASYMM) and those with symmetric glaucoma (SYMM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-five patients were prospectively recruited and divided into ASYMM, defined as cup-to-disc (C/D) ratio difference >0.1 between eyes and SYMM, with C/D difference ≤0.1. For ASYMM, the smaller C/D was defined as the best eye ("best") and the fellow eye was defined as the worst eye ("worse"). All metrics were subtracted as "worse" minus "best," including the viscoelastic parameter CH, and elastic parameters from the Corvis ST, including stiffness parameter at first applanation, stiffness parameter at highest concavity, integrated inverse radius, deformation amplitude ratio, IOP, CCT, mean deviation (MD), ganglion cell complex (GCC), and POBV were included. Paired t tests were performed between eyes in both groups. Statistical analyses were performed with SAS using a significance threshold of P <0.05. RESULTS: For ASYMM (16 patients), "worse" showed significantly lower CH (-0.76 ± 1.22), POBV (-0.38 ± 0.305), MD (-3.66 ± 6.55), and GCC (-7.9 ± 12.2) compared with "best." No other parameters were significantly different. For SYMM (29 patients), there were no significantly different metrics between eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Lower CH, POBV, GCC, and worse MD were associated with greater glaucomatous damage in asymmetric glaucoma without a difference in IOP or CCT. Lower CH and GCC are consistent with previous studies. POBV, a new clinical parameter that may indicate reduced blood flow, is also associated with greater damage.

Corneal Stress Distribution Evolves from Thickness-Driven in Normal Corneas to Curvature-Driven with Progression in Keratoconus.

Purpose: To introduce the novel parameter of Corneal Contribution to Stress (CCS) and compare stress distribution patterns between keratoconus (KCN) and normal corneas. Design: Prospective, observational, cross-sectional study. Participants: The study included 66 eyes of 40 subjects diagnosed with KCN and 155 left eyes from 155 normal control (NRL) subjects. Methods: Tomography was obtained to calculate the newly proposed CCS, defined according to the hoop stress formula without intraocular pressure, R/2t, where R is the radius of curvature and t is the thickness. CCS maps were calculated from pachymetry and tangential curvature maps. Custom software identified the 2-mm-diameter zones of greatest curvature (Cspot-max), thinnest pachymetry (Pach-min), greatest stress (CCSmax), and lowest stress (CCSmin). Stress difference (CCSdiff) was calculated as CCSmax - CCSmin. Distances between Cspot-max vs. Pach-min, vs. CCSmax, and vs. CCSmin, as well as between Pach-min vs. CCSmax and vs. CCSmin, were calculated. t tests were performed between cohorts, and paired t tests were performed within cohorts. Univariate linear regression analyses were performed between parameters and distances. The significance threshold was P < 0.05. Main Outcome Measures: Corneal stress parameters, corneal features of maximum curvature, minimum thickness, and distances between corneal stress parameters and corneal features. Results: CCSmax was significantly closer to Pach-min (0.79 ± 0.92) and Cspot-max (2.04 ± 0.85) than CCSmin (3.17 ± 0.38, 2.73 ± 1.53, respectively) in NRL, P < 0.0001, whereas CCSmin was significantly closer to Cspot-max (1.35 ± 1.43) than CCSmax (2.52 ± 0.72) in KCN, P < 0.0001. Cspot-max (severity) was significantly related to CCSdiff in KCN (P < 0.0001; R2 = 0.5882) with a weak relationship in NRL (P < 0.0080, R2 = 0.0451). Cspot-max was significantly related to the distance from Pach-min to CCSmax (P < 0.0001; R2 = 0.3737) without significance in NRL (P = 0.8011). Conclusions: Corneal stress is driven by thickness in NRL, with greatest stress at thinnest pachymetry and greatest curvature. However, maximum stress moves away from thinnest pachymetry with progression in KCN, and minimum stress is associated with maximum curvature. Severity in KCN is significantly related to greater difference between maximum and minimum stress, consistent with the biomechanical cycle of decompensation. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Effect of corneal cross-linking on biomechanical changes following transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK.

Purpose: To evaluate the change in corneal biomechanics in patients with postoperative ectasia risk when combining two common laser vision correction procedures (tPRK and FS-LASIK) with cross-linking (in tPRK Xtra and FS-LASIK Xtra). Methods: The study included 143 eyes of 143 myopic, astigmatic patients that were divided into non-cross-linked refractive surgery groups (non-Xtra groups, tPRK and FS-LASIK) and cross-linked groups (Xtra groups, tPRK Xtra and FS-LASIK Xtra) according to an ectasia risk scoring system. The eyes were subjected to measurements including the stress-strain index (SSI), the stiffness parameter at first applanation (SP-A1), the integrated inverse radius (IIR), the deformation amplitude at apex (DA), and the ratio of deformation amplitude between apex and 2 mm from apex (DARatio2mm). The measurements were taken preoperatively and at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively (pos1m, pos3m, and pos6m). Posterior demarcation line depth from the endothelium (PDLD) and from the ablation surface (DLA) were recorded at pos1m. Results: SP-A1 significantly decreased, while IIR, deformation amplitude, and DARatio2mm increased significantly postoperatively in all four groups (p < 0.01)-all denoting stiffness decreases. In the FS-LASIK group, the changes in IIR, DA, and DARatio2mm were 32.7 ± 15.1%, 12.9 ± 7.1%, and 27.2 ± 12.0% respectively, which were significantly higher (p < 0.05) compared to 20.1 ± 12.8%, 6.4 ± 8.2%, and 19.7 ± 10.4% in the FS-LASIK Xtra group. In the tPRK group, the change in IIR was 27.3 ± 15.5%, significantly larger than 16.9 ± 13.4% in the tPRK Xtra group. The changes of SSI were minimal in the tPRK (-1.5 ± 21.7%, p = 1.000), tPRK Xtra (8.4 ± 17.9%, p = 0.053), and FS-LASIK Xtra (5.6 ± 12.7%, p = 0.634) groups, but was significant in the FS-LASIK group (-12.1 ± 7.9%, p < 0.01). After correcting for baseline biomechanical metrics, preoperative bIOP and the change in central corneal thickness (△CCT) from pre to pos6m, the changes in the IIR in both FS-LASIK and tPRK groups, as well as DA, DARatio2mm and SSI in the FS-LASIK group remained statistically greater than their corresponding Xtra groups (all p < 0.05). Most importantly, after correcting for these covariates, the changes in DARatio2mm in the FS-LASIK Xtra became statistically smaller than in the tPRK Xtra (p = 0.017). Conclusion: The statistical analysis results indicate that tPRK Xtra and FS-LASIK Xtra effectively reduced the biomechanical losses caused by refractive surgery (tPRK and FS-LASIK). The decrease in corneal overall stiffness was greater in FS-LASIK than in tPRK, and the biomechanical enhancement of CXL was also higher following LASIK than after tPRK.

Scheimpflug-based tomography and biomechanical assessment in pressure-induced stromal keratopathy.

PURPOSE: To report the tomographic and biomechanical findings before and after treatment of a case of pressure-induced stromal keratopathy (PISK), which was misdiagnosed as diffuse lamellar keratitis (DLK). METHODS: A case report of a referred patient with supposed diagnosis of DLK after LASIK in the right eye. Scheimpflug-based corneal tomography and biomechanical assessment were provided by the Pentacam HR and CorVis ST (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany). RESULTS: A layer of corneal opacity beneath the flap with a presumably fluid-filled interface area was observed on slit-lamp biomicroscopy. Scheimpflug image from Pentacam revealed a hyperreflective area underneath the flap interface. Goldmann applanation tonometry was 12 mm Hg, whereas CorVis intraocular pressure was 53.5 mm Hg with deformation amplitude of 0.42 mm. Two days after starting oral and topical ocular hypotensive therapy, CorVis intraocular pressure was 14 mm Hg and deformation amplitude was 1.02 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Ocular hypertension in PISK was associated with lower deformation response, along with steepening and thickening of the cornea.

Comparison of keratometric changes after myopic ablation: ray tracing versus simulated keratometry.

PURPOSE: To compare the changes in corneal power (ΔK) induced by myopic ablations estimated by Placido-disk and total corneal power (TCP) ray tracing methods to the refractive change (ΔSE). METHODS: Manifest refraction, simulated keratometry from a Placido-disk based system, and TCP from a dual-Scheimpflug analyzer were obtained from 35 patients (58 eyes) before and 3 months after a myopic ablation. The change in the manifest refraction that occurred after surgery was then vertex distance corrected and compared to the changes observed in corneal power with the various systems analyzed. RESULTS: The Placido-based simulated keratometry overestimated the corneal power after the procedure by 0.50 ± 0.53 diopters (D) when compared to refractive change in the corneal plane induced by the laser surgery (ΔSE-ΔK). The ray tracing method showed the opposite trend, with the TCP simulated keratometry showing an underestimation of the corneal power of -0.25 ± 0.48 D. The Placido system showed a direct correlation between the overestimation of the corneal power and the level of myopia, whereas the ray tracing method showed an underestimation, which was more pronounced in higher levels of myopia. CONCLUSIONS: Ray tracing methods underestimate corneal power as opposed to the overestimation in corneal power after refractive surgery, directly related to the level of myopia, observed in Placido-based systems. They have the potential to overcome the errors in calculations based on anterior curvature alone. However, ray tracing methods need to be validated and optimized before it can be used routinely in IOL calculation.