A Case of Response to Immunotherapy in a Patient With MSI Metastatic Colorectal Cancer and Autoimmune Disease Receiving Steroid Therapy.

Colorectal cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed tumors worldwide and a leading cause of cancer-related death. Although the majority of gastrointestinal cancers are generally considered poorly immunogenic, recent data from clinical trials have demonstrated that the subgroup of patients with DNA mismatch repair system is highly responsive to immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapy. We present the case of a 74-year-old man with pulmonary autoimmune intersitiopathy and microsatellite instability metastatic colorectal cancer who responded to nivolumab despite the concomitant steroid therapy. Furthermore, his autoimmune disease did not worsen during immunotherapy.

Cigarettes smoking habit may reduce benefit from cetuximab-based treatment in advanced colorectal cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: NF-kappaB is one of the nuclear effectors of EGFR activation. There are reports showing that NF-kappaB expression and activity is enhanced after nicotine treatment. Some data demonstrated that NF-kappaB activation plays a role in the induction of resistance to cetuximab and irinotecan in advanced colorectal tumors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of cigarette smoking on cetuximab efficacy in advanced colorectal cancer patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed the smoking habits of 200 patients treated with a variety of anticancer regimens containing cetuximab for advanced colorectal cancer. All patients were irinotecan-resistant and received an oxaliplatin-based first line treatment. We divided our patient population as follows: no previous smoking habit, previous smokers (any number of cigarettes), current smokers of less of 10 cigarettes/day, current smokers of more than 10 cigarettes/day. RESULTS: Out of 200 patients 58 declared a history of cigarette smoking, 108 patients never smoked and the remaining 44 patients were cigarette smokers during cetuximab-based anticancer therapy. Of the 44 smokers, 18 smoked more than 10 cigarettes per day. No statistically significant differences in terms of response rate (RR) and time to progression (TTP) were identified between previous smokers and never smokers. RR in actual smokers was 13.6% and was lower than RR reported for non-smokers (27.1%; p = 0.023). In addition, the median TTP was 5.5 months in the non-smokers versus 2.8 months in the current smokers (p < 0.0001). A difference in terms of overall survival (OS) was detected between the two groups (p = 0.03). Comparing smokers of more than 10 cigarettes per day and smokers of less than 10 cigarettes per day no differences were detected in RR, TTP or OS. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that cigarette smoking during anticancer treatment with a cetuximab-based regimen may be responsible for a decrease in RR and lead to a lower TTP.

The predictive value of 18F-FDG-PET early evaluation in patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma treated with chemotherapy plus cetuximab.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to evaluate whether the therapy-induced reduction of the (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET) maximum standardized uptake value in patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma treated with chemotherapy plus cetuximab could predict the objective response and outcome early during the treatment. METHODS: The study was performed as a part of a phase II trial evaluating cetuximab plus the leucovorin/5-fluorouracil/irinotecan (FOLFIRI) regimen. The objective response was evaluated according to the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) every 6 weeks. The early metabolic response evaluated by 18F-FDG-PET was assessed according to our own evaluated cutoff value (<35%) after receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: Twenty of 22 patients had positive baseline 18F-FDG-PET. The best RECIST response was: complete response (CR), 3; partial response (PR), 9; stable disease (SD), 8. Twelve patients (60%) were classified as metabolic responders and 8 (40%) as nonresponders. At the median follow-up time of 11 months, median time to disease progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) for early metabolic responders versus nonresponders were 11 versus 5 months (P = 0.0016) and 16 versus 6 months (P = 0.1493), respectively. CONCLUSION: The early metabolic response evaluated by 18F-FDG-PET predicted the clinical outcome in this series of patients with advanced gastric cancer treated with chemotherapy plus cetuximab.