Oral manifestations in women using hormonal contraceptive methods: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the oral manifestations in women of reproductive age using hormonal contraceptive methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This review is based on the PRISMA statement. A literature search incorporated observational studies from the last 21 years. An investigative question was formulated using the PICO model, studies were selected, and a quality analysis was performed using the modified STROBE guidelines. A bibliometric analysis was performed, and the data were examined. RESULTS: Thirteen articles were included, with the majority evaluating periodontal status. Others analyzed factors such as the presence of alveolar osteitis, oral candidiasis, and salivary microbiome dysbiosis. Ten articles were deemed to have a low risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: Hormonal contraceptives may increase the risk of alveolar osteitis following tooth extraction and increase the presence of the Candida species in the oral cavity. They also affect the periodontium, such as the frequent development of gingivitis, but do not lead to changes in the salivary microbiome. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The increasing number of women using hormonal contraceptives and the knowledge that these contraceptives can produce oral cavity alterations underscore the need to evaluate the oral manifestations found in these women.

Game-changing perspectives: A dataset on student perceptions of sustainable mobility pre- and post escape room intervention.

The dataset aims to examine the prior and acquired knowledge in an Escape Room (ER) experience on sustainable mobility. In addition, the data could also be used to identify possible correspondences between some mobility behaviors and the predisposition to learn sustainable mobility concepts to foster attitude change. To meet these objectives, an ER on sustainable mobility was conducted and a questionnaire was given before and after the activity to 173 students from various schools between 5th grade of primary school and 1st year of compulsory secondary school (10-13 years old). The questionnaire was divided into two parts. The first part included social demographics questions (gender, family members, place of residence) and mobility habits (number of cars in the family, bus use, cycling). The second part included questions related to sustainable mobility topics with 14 items. Data was collected between December 2022 and February 2023.

Weight bias internalization among adolescents in Spain: psychological correlates across gender diversity and weight status / La internalización de los prejuicios de peso entre los y las adolescentes en España: correlatos psicológicos en función del género y el estatus de peso

Weight bias internalization refers to the negative weight-related attributions applied to oneself, but it does not just occur in the highest weight statuses, but rather exists across the entire weight spectrum. There is a negative impact associated to increase psychological problems in adults, however, it has been less studied among the adolescent Spanish population. In this study, we assess the relationship between the internalization of weight bias, social attitudes towards appearance, body appreciation and self-esteem, and potential differences regarding gender and weight status. A community sample of 1258 Spanish adolescents between 12 and 18 years old (46.3% male gender; Mage = 15.58; SD = 1.59; 49.5% female gender; Mage = 15.59; SD = 1.67; and 4.1% non-binary gender; Mage = 14.86; SD = 2.86) participated in the study. The Modified Weight Bias Internalization Scale (WBIS-M), the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES), and the Sociocultural Attitudes Towards Appearance Questionnaire (SATAQ-4) were used. ANOVA’s test and bivariate correlations were performed. The results suggest that females (t = -.55; p ≤ .001) and non-binary adolescents (t = .64; p ≤ .01) have higher levels of WBI-M compared to males. Regarding weight status, the group with obesity (t = 1.39; p ≤ .001) and the group with overweight (t = -.81; p ≤ .001) have higher levels of WBI-M compared to the normal weight group. Significant correlations between WBI-M and the assessed psychological variables were found in the total sample, and across all-gender and weight categories, except for the underweight group. These results are a first approximation to the internalization of weight bias in a Spanish adolescent sample and highlight the need to introduce this concept in prevention and psychological interventions in school context. (AU)

La internalización de los prejuicios de peso hace referencia a las atribuciones negativas relacionadas con el peso aplicadas a uno mismo/a, lo cual no ocurre únicamente en las personas con un estatus de peso elevado, sino en todo el rango de pesos. En adultos, existe evidencia de su impacto negativoasociados a incrementar problemas psicológicos; aunque se ha estudiado en menor medida en la población adolescente. El objetivo de este estudio fue examinar la relación entre la internalización de prejuicios de peso, las actitudes socioculturales hacia la apariencia, la apreciación corporal y el nivel de autoestima, y analizar las posibles diferencias en función del género y del estatus de peso. Participaron 1.258 adolescentes españoles de una muestra comunitaria entre 12 y 18 años (46.3% género masculino; Medad = 15.58; DT = 1.59; 49,5% género femenino; Medad = 15.59; DT = 1.67; y 4.1% género no binario; Medad = 14.86; DT = 2.86). Se utilizaron la escala de internalización de prejuicios de peso modificado (WBIS-M), la escala de autoestima de Rosenberg (RSES) y el cuestionario de actitudes socioculturales hacia la apariencia (SATAQ-4). Se realizó la prueba ANOVA y correlaciones bivariadas. Los resultados sugieren que el grupo identificado con el género femenino (t = -.55; p ≤ .001) y con el no binario (t = .64; p ≤ .01) muestran niveles más altos de internalización del sesgo de peso en comparación con el género masculino. En cuanto al estado ponderal, el grupo con obesidad (t = 1.39; p ≤ .001) y el grupo con sobrepeso (t = -.81; p ≤ .001) presentan niveles más altos de internalización de prejuicios de peso en comparación con el grupo con normopeso. Se encontraron correlaciones significativas entre las puntuaciones del WBIS-M y las variables psicológicas evaluadas en la muestra total yen todas las categorías de género y peso, con la excepción del grupo de bajo peso. (AU)

Desarrollo y validación española de la escala de sucesos vitales estresantes (SVE-I) en escolares (8-12 años) / Development and validation of the stressful life events questionnaire (SVE-I) for Spanish children (8-12 years old)

La acumulación de Sucesos Vitales Estresantes (SVE) supone un factor de riesgo para la salud mental en la infancia, sin embargo, no contamos con un cuestionario en español validado en la segunda infancia. Este estudio presenta el desarrollo y la validación de una nueva escala (SVE-I) de autoinforme para evaluar la acumulación de SVE en menores de 8 a 12 años españoles. Un panel de expertas participó en la evaluación de la adecuación de la escala. Se realizaron comprobaciones en un grupo focal para asegurar la aceptabilidad y comprensión de los ítems. 504 menores de cuatro centros escolares de Madrid (Medad = 10.1; DTedad = 1.28; 56.5 % chicos) participaron en el estudio, completando la batería de cuestionarios. El análisis factorial confirmatorio mostró una estructura de tres factores (estrés familiar, estrés socio-escolar y salud), con una consistencia interna de la escala global adecuada (αordinal = .83). Para la evidencia de validez concurrente, se encontró una asociación positiva entre la acumulación de SVE y la sintomatología ansiosa de los menores. Los resultados indican que la SVE-I es un instrumento válido y fiable. Esta escala pretende ser una herramienta sencilla y útil para el cribado de casos en riesgo desde la escuela y Atención Primaria. (AU)

The accumulation of Stressful Life Events (SVE) is a risk factor for mental health in childhood, however, there is no adequate questionnaire validated in Spanish for its use during childhood. This study presents the development and validation of a new scale (SVE-I), a self-report questionnaire for assessing the accumulation of SVE in Spanish children aged 8 to 12 years. A panel of experts evaluated the adequacy of the scale. The acceptability and understanding of the items were ensured by a small focus group. 504 children from four schools in Madrid (Mage = 10.1; SDage = 1.28; 56.5 % boys) participated in the study, completing a battery of questionnaires. Confirmatory factor analysis showed a structure of three factors: (family stress, socio-school stress, and health), with an adequate internal consistency of the global scale (α = .83). For concurrent validity, a positive association was found between the accumulation of EVS and the anxious symptomatology of the children. The results indicate that the SVE-I is a valid and reliable instrument. This scale aims to be a useful tool in the school context and clinical practice. (AU)

Ambiente familiar, actividad física y sedentarismo en preadolescentes con obesidad infantil: estudio ANOBAS de casos-controles / Family environment, physical activity and sedentarism in preadolescents with childhood obesity: ANOBAS case-control study

OBJETIVO: Comparar los niveles de actividad física y sedentarismo en niños con obesidad y normopeso, y analizar el nivel de actividad física del cuidador principal junto con el ambiente familiar. DISEÑO: Estudio caso-control. Emplazamiento: Un centro de salud y colegios de la Comunidad de Madrid. PARTICIPANTES: Un total de 50 niños con obesidad entre 8 y 12 años (GO; P > 97) y sus madres, fueron emparejados por edad, sexo y estatus socioeconómico de sus padres (1:1) con 50 niños con normopeso (GN; P < 85). MEDICIONES PRINCIPALES: Los niveles de actividad física se midieron por acelerometría (ActiGraph GT3X), la actividad física del cuidador principal con el cuestionario de actividad física (IPAQ) y el ambiente con el cuestionario de ambiente familiar (HES-S). RESULTADOS: El grupo GO presentó menos actividad física de tipo vigoroso al compararse con el grupo GN. La actividad física vigorosa en el GO se asoció al modelado y las políticas parentales respecto a la actividad física. Un análisis de regresión múltiple muestra que el 21% de la varianza del estatus de peso de los niños se explicaba por la actividad física vigorosa y el índice de masa corporal materno. CONCLUSIONES: Los niveles de actividad física vigorosa y el ambiente familiar difieren entre los niños con obesidad y normopeso. Por lo tanto, es importante seguir trabajando la conciencia de enfermedad y la promoción de hábitos saludables desde Atención Primaria y el contexto escolar e institucional

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to compare the levels of physical activity and sedentary behaviours in children with obesity and normal weight through accelerometer measures, and analyze the family environment related to physical activity. DESIGN: Case-control study. LOCATION: A health center and colleges of the Community of Madrid. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 50 obese children between 8 and 12 years of age (P > 97) and their mothers were matched by age, sex and socioeconomic status of their parents (1: 1) with 50 children with normopeso (GN; P < 85). MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Physical activity levels were measured by accelerometer (ActiGraph GT3X), levels of physical activity of the primary caregiver were measured through physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ) and the environment in relation to the physical activity was measured by the Home Environment Scale (HES-S). RESULTS: The group GO showed less vigorous physical activity than their peers in the GN group. Vigorous physical activity in the GO group was associated with modeling and parental policies regarding physical activity. A multiple regression analysis revealed that 21% of the variance of weight status of children was explained by sex, vigorous physical activity and maternal body mass index. CONCLUSIONS: The levels of vigorous physical activity and the family environment differ between children with obesity and normal weight. Therefore, it is important to continue working on the awareness of illness and the promotion of healthy habits from Primary Care and the school and institutional context

Diseño mixto de evaluación de la iniciativa Salud Mesoamérica 2015 / Mixed design for the evaluation of the Mesoamerica Health 2015 initiative

El propósito de la iniciativa Salud Mesoamérica 2015 (SM-2015) es mejorar el estado de salud y nutrición de la población con mayor grado de vulnerabilidad en Mesoamérica. El objetivo de la evaluación es generar evidencia sobre la efectividad conjunta de un paquete de intervenciones diseñadas para mejorar las condiciones de salud en la región. Se propone una evaluación de impacto con métodos mixtos, para conocer la magnitud de los cambios atribuibles a la SM-2015, e identificar los significados de estos cambios para la población objetivo, en el contexto de cada país. El eje conductor es un panel de localidades con el que se colectará información de individuos, hogares y unidades de salud de primero y segundo nivel de atención. El diseño que se describe en este documento fue desarrollado entre junio y diciembre de 2009, y su articulación se llevó a cabo en talleres realizados en Cuernavaca (México), Managua (Nicaragua), y San José (Costa Rica). El diseño propuesto permitirá generar evidencia sobre la efectividad conjunta del paquete de intervenciones propuesto en los planes maestros mesoamericanos. El éxito de este diseño radica en la voluntad y en el compromiso político de los países y los donantes.

Since the Salud Mesoamerica 2015 initiative (SM-2015) aim is to improve health and nutrition conditions of those most vulnerable in Mesoamerica, the goal of the evaluation is to generate evidence of the joint effectiveness of a package of interventions designed to improve the health conditions. We propose a mix design for the evaluation, which will allow to know the magnitude of changes attributable to the interventions, as well as the meanings of these changes for the target population, taking into account the specificities of each country. The main axis of this design is a locality panel where information about individuals, households, and health facilities (first and second level) will also be collected. The evaluation design described in this paper was developed between June and December, 2009, and it was integrated during workshops in Cuernavaca (Mexico), Managua (Nicaragua), and San Jose (Costa Rica). The proposed design will allow to generate evidence about the joint effectiveness of the package of interventions proposed for the SM-2015. The success of this design rests on the political commitment of countries and donors.