RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Perioperative anaphylaxis is a serious and often life-threatening immediate hypersensitivity reaction. There are few published data on paediatric perioperative anaphylaxis (pPOA). We evaluated the incidence of and risk factors involved in the occurrence of pPOA within a large US national database. METHODS: Deidentified data from the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2005 to 2014 were used to identify pPOA cases and to conduct a retrospective multivariate analysis of preselected independent variables. RESULTS: Among 3,601,180 surgeries and procedures in children aged 0-18 yr, 297 pPOA cases were identified for an incidence of one in 12,125 surgeries and procedures. Compared with controls, pPOA cases had an increased median length of stay (6 vs 2 days; P<0.001) and median hospital cost ($54 719 vs $5109; P<0.0001). The age groups between 6 and 12 yr (odds ratio [OR] 7.1; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.9-12.9; P<0.001) and 13 and 17 yr (OR 8.5; 95% CI 4.7-15.2; P<0.001) were associated with increased odds of pPOA. Transplant (OR 46.3; 95% CI 20.8-102.9; P<0.001), cardiac (OR 16.4; 95% CI 7.5-35.9; P<0.001), and vascular (OR 15.2; 95% CI 7.5-30.7; P<0.001) procedures posed the highest risk for pPOA. Chronic pulmonary disease, coagulopathy, and fluid and electrolyte disorders were also associated with pPOA (OR 2.2; 95% CI 1.5-3.3; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of pPOA was one in 12,125 cases. Risk factors included age, procedure type, and comorbidities.
Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Humanos , Criança , Anafilaxia/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Pré-Escolar , Lactente , Incidência , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Recém-Nascido , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Período Perioperatório , Bases de Dados Factuais , Fatores Etários , Complicações Intraoperatórias/epidemiologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to identify recent advances in our understanding and management of immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated antibiotic allergy. RECENT FINDINGS: Antibiotics remain a leading cause of fatal anaphylaxis reported to the FDA. However, recent advances have defined the features of adult and pediatric patients without true IgE-mediated allergy or any mechanism of anaphylaxis when tested. This has created opportunities to use direct challenges to disprove these allergies at the point-of-care and improves antibiotic stewardship. Additional advances have highlighted cross-reactive structural considerations within classes of drugs, in particular the R1 side-chain of cephalosporins, that appear to drive true immune-mediated cross-reactivity. Further advances in risk-based approaches to skin testing, phenotyping, and re-exposure challenges are needed to standardize antibiotic allergy evaluation. SUMMARY: Recent advances in defining true IgE-mediated drug allergy have helped to identify patients unlikely to be skin-test positive. In turn, this has identified patients who can skip skin testing and proceed to direct ingestion challenge using history risk-based approaches. The ability to identify the small number of patients with true IgE-mediated allergy and study their natural history over time, as well as the vast majority without true allergy will facilitate important and novel mechanistic discoveries.
Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas , Adulto , Humanos , Criança , Imunoglobulina E , Anafilaxia/tratamento farmacológico , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/complicações , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/tratamento farmacológico , Testes Cutâneos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Even though 8%-25% of most populations studied globally are labeled as penicillin allergic, most diagnoses of penicillin allergy are made in childhood and relate to events that are either not allergic in nature, are low risk for immediate hypersensitivity, or are a potential true allergy that has waned over time. Penicillin allergy labels directly impact antimicrobial stewardship by leading to use of less effective and broader spectrum antimicrobials and are associated with antimicrobial resistance. They may also delay appropriate antimicrobial therapy and lead to increased risk of specific adverse healthcare outcomes. Operationalizing penicillin allergy de-labeling into a new arm of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) has become an increasing global focus. METHODS: We performed an evidence-based narrative review of the literature of penicillin allergy label carriage, the adverse effects of penicillin allergy labels, and current approaches and barriers to penicillin allergy de-labeling. Over the period 1928-2018 in Pubmed and Medline, search terms used included "penicillin allergy" or "penicillin hypersensitivity" alone or in combination with "adverse events," "testing," "evaluation," "effects," "label," "de-labeling," "prick or epicutaneous," and "intradermal" skin testing, "oral challenge or provocation," "cross-reactivity," and "antimicrobial stewardship". RESULTS: Penicillin allergy labels are highly prevalent, largely inaccurate and their carriage may lead to unnecessary treatment and inferior outcomes with alternative agents as well as adverse public health outcomes such as antibiotic resistance. CONCLUSIONS: Operationalizing penicillin allergy de-labeling as an aspect of ASP has become an increasing global focus. There is a need for validated approaches that optimally combine the use of history and ingestion challenge with or without proceeding formal skin testing to tackle penicillin allergy efficiently within complex healthcare systems. At the same time, there is great promise for penicillin allergy evaluation and de-labeling as an individual and public health strategy to reduce adverse healthcare outcomes, improve antimicrobial stewardship, and decrease healthcare costs.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/etiologia , Penicilinas/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Antibacterianos/química , Gestão de Antimicrobianos/métodos , Cefalosporinas/efeitos adversos , Cefalosporinas/química , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Reações Cruzadas , Dessensibilização Imunológica , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/imunologia , Humanos , Testes Intradérmicos , Penicilinas/químicaRESUMO
Vaccination continues to be the single most important and successful public health intervention, due to its prevention of morbidity and mortality from prevalent infectious diseases. Severe immunologically mediated reactions are rare and less common with the vaccine than the true infection. However, these events can cause public fearfulness and loss of confidence in the safety of vaccination. In this paper, we perform a systematic literature search and narrative review of immune-mediated vaccine adverse events and their known and proposed mechanisms, and outline directions for future research. Improving our knowledge base of severe immunologically mediated vaccine reactions and their management drives better vaccine safety and efficacy outcomes.
Assuntos
Hipersensibilidade Tardia/induzido quimicamente , Hipersensibilidade Imediata/induzido quimicamente , Vacinação/efeitos adversos , Vacinas/efeitos adversos , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/induzido quimicamente , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/imunologia , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade Tardia/imunologia , Hipersensibilidade Imediata/imunologia , Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido/efeitos dos fármacos , Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido/imunologia , Imunoglobulina E/sangue , Testes Cutâneos , Linfócitos T/efeitos dos fármacos , Linfócitos T/imunologia , Vacinação/mortalidade , Excipientes de Vacinas/efeitos adversos , Vacinas/química , Vacinas/imunologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Pediatric drug hypersensitivity is a rapidly evolving field. The purpose of this paper is to review the current state of pediatric drug hypersensitivity and highlight new developments in diagnosis and management. RECENT FINDINGS: This paper will discuss the safety and use of risk stratification to proceed directly to oral challenge without prior skin testing for ß-lactam reactions. We review unique aspects of pediatric drug challenges and desensitizations. It is important to accurately diagnose pediatric drug hypersensitivity reactions through a detailed history, physical examination, and available diagnostic testing. Understanding of the underlying mechanism leads to appropriate classification which is necessary to direct management. The decision to perform drug challenge, desensitization, or recommend avoidance of a medication can have a significant impact on a patient's treatment. Utilization of weight-based dose and infusion rate adjustments for current drug challenge and desensitization protocols optimize success.
Assuntos
Dessensibilização Imunológica/métodos , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/diagnóstico , Testes Cutâneos/métodos , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , HumanosAssuntos
Anticonvulsivantes/efeitos adversos , Anticonvulsivantes/imunologia , Dessensibilização Imunológica/métodos , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/terapia , Oxcarbazepina/efeitos adversos , Oxcarbazepina/imunologia , Adolescente , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêutico , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/imunologia , Exantema/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Oxcarbazepina/uso terapêutico , Síndrome de Stevens-Johnson/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Stevens-Johnson/patologiaAssuntos
Eosinofilia , Gastroenteropatias , Instalações de Saúde , Recursos em Saúde , Humanos , Análise Espacial , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: US-based perioperative anaphylaxis (POA) studies are limited to single-center experiences. A recent report found that a serum acute tryptase (sAT) >9.8 ng/mL or mast cell activation (MCA) can predict POA causal agent identification. Urinary mast cell mediator metabolites (uMC) have not been studied in POA. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the epidemiologic data of POA, to determine if sAT or MCA can predict suspected causal agent identification, and to evaluate uMC utility in POA. METHODS: This study is a retrospective multicenter review of POA cases that were subcategorized by suspected causal agent identification status. sAT, MCA (defined as sAT >2 + 1.2 × serum baseline tryptase), and uMC (N-methylhistamine [N-MH], 11ß-prostaglandin-F2α [11ß-PGF2α], leukotriene E4 [LTE4]) were recorded. RESULTS: Of 100 patients (mean age 52 [standard deviation 17] years, 94% adult, 50% female, 90% White, and 2% Hispanic) with POA, 73% had an sAT available, 41% had MCA, 16% had uMC available, and 50% had an identifiable suspected cause. POA cases with an identifiable suspected cause had a positive MCA status (100% vs 78%; P = .01) compared with POA with an unidentifiable cause. An elevated median sAT did not predict causal agent identification. Positive uMC were not associated with suspected causal agent identification during POA. Patients with positive uMC had a higher median sAT (30 vs 6.45 ng/mL; P = .001) and MCA status (96% vs 12%; P = .001) compared with negative uMC patients. Patients with POA had an elevated acute/baseline uMC ratios: 11ß-PGF2α ratio > 1.6, N-MH ratio >1.7, and LTE4 ratio >1.8. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of MCA in POA is associated with suspected causal agent identification. Positive uMC possibly correlate with a higher sAT level and MCA status but require further study. The authors suggest applying an acute/baseline uMC ratio (11ß-PGF2α ratio >1.6, N-MH ratio >1.7, and LTE4 ratio >1.87) in patients with POA for MCA when a tryptase level is inconclusive during POA evaluations.
Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Período Perioperatório , Triptases , Humanos , Anafilaxia/epidemiologia , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Triptases/sangue , Adulto , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Idoso , Mastócitos/imunologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Maximal skin testing (ST) nonirritant concentrations (NICs) are consistent for penicillin and aminopenicillin amongst guidelines. However, there is variability amongst guidelines for maximal ST NICs of cephalosporins. OBJECTIVE: To determine maximal immediate and delayed ST NICs of 15 ß-lactams in ß-lactam-tolerant and ß-lactam-naïve participants. METHODS: We performed a single-center, nonrandomized prospective study between September 2019 and January 2022 in adult participants. Participants received skin prick testing (SPT) and intradermal test (IDT) injections at six increasing concentrations of 1 or more ß-lactams. A concentration was considered irritant when more than 5% of participants had a positive test. A positive test was defined as a wheal ≥3 mm than negative control accompanied by a ≥5 mm flare for SPT/IDT and induration ≥5 mm with associated erythema at 48 hours for delayed readings (dIDT). Sensitivity analyses using 3 alternative IDT positive criteria were conducted. RESULTS: A total of 747 participants with a median age of 64 (IQR 54-72), 52% males, 85% White, and 92% Non-Hispanic underwent 20,858 skin tests. All undiluted SPT concentrations were nonirritant. We found the following maximal IDT/dIDT NICs (mg/ml): ampicillin (41.6/125), ampicillin-sulbactam (93.8/187.5), aztreonam (6.3/25), cefazolin (55/165), cefepime (35/140), cefoxitin (45/90), ceftaroline (7.5/15), ceftriaxone (58.3/175), cefuroxime (55/110), ertapenem (16.6/50), imipenem-cilastin (6.3/25), meropenem (8.3/25), nafcillin (31.3/62.5), oxacillin (20.9/83.5), and piperacillin-tazobactam (112.5/225). dIDTs were almost all completely non-irritant close or at undiluted concentrations. There were no differences when we applied 3 IDT positivity criteria to our raw data. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that SPTs with undiluted stock ß-lactam antibiotic concentrations are nonirritant. Compared to previously published nonirritant concentrations, we propose a 2 to 50-fold increase to the maximal IDT and dIDT NICs of 15 ß-lactam antibiotics. When performing dIDTs, a higher concentration should be used rather than the same IDT concentration.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Using the reaction history in logistic regression and machine learning (ML) models to predict penicillin allergy has been reported based on non-US data. OBJECTIVE: We developed ML positive penicillin allergy testing prediction models from multisite US data. METHODS: Retrospective data from 4 US-based hospitals were grouped into 4 datasets: enriched training (1:3 case-control matched cohort), enriched testing, nonenriched internal testing, and nonenriched external testing. ML algorithms were used for model development. We determined area under the curve (AUC) and applied the Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) framework to interpret risk drivers. RESULTS: Of 4777 patients (mean age 60 [standard deviation: 17] years; 68% women, 91% White, and 86% non-Hispanic) evaluated for penicillin allergy labels, 513 (11%) had positive penicillin allergy testing. Model input variables were frequently missing: immediate or delayed onset (71%), signs or symptoms (13%), and treatment (31%). The gradient-boosted model was the strongest model with an AUC of 0.67 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.57-0.77), which improved to 0.87 (95% CI: 0.73-1) when only cases with complete data were used. Top SHAP drivers for positive testing were reactions within the last year and reactions requiring medical attention; female sex and reaction of hives/urticaria were also positive drivers. CONCLUSIONS: An ML prediction model for positive penicillin allergy skin testing using US-based retrospective data did not achieve performance strong enough for acceptance and adoption. The optimal ML prediction model for positive penicillin allergy testing was driven by time since reaction, seek medical attention, female sex, and hives/urticaria.