A Collaborative Effort to Define Classification Criteria for ATM Variants in Hereditary Cancer Patients.

BACKGROUND: Gene panel testing by massive parallel sequencing has increased the diagnostic yield but also the number of variants of uncertain significance. Clinical interpretation of genomic data requires expertise for each gene and disease. Heterozygous ATM pathogenic variants increase the risk of cancer, particularly breast cancer. For this reason, ATM is included in most hereditary cancer panels. It is a large gene, showing a high number of variants, most of them of uncertain significance. Hence, we initiated a collaborative effort to improve and standardize variant classification for the ATM gene. METHODS: Six independent laboratories collected information from 766 ATM variant carriers harboring 283 different variants. Data were submitted in a consensus template form, variant nomenclature and clinical information were curated, and monthly team conferences were established to review and adapt American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) criteria to ATM, which were used to classify 50 representative variants. RESULTS: Amid 283 different variants, 99 appeared more than once, 35 had differences in classification among laboratories. Refinement of ACMG/AMP criteria to ATM involved specification for twenty-one criteria and adjustment of strength for fourteen others. Afterwards, 50 variants carried by 254 index cases were classified with the established framework resulting in a consensus classification for all of them and a reduction in the number of variants of uncertain significance from 58% to 42%. CONCLUSIONS: Our results highlight the relevance of data sharing and data curation by multidisciplinary experts to achieve improved variant classification that will eventually improve clinical management.

A New Set of in Silico Tools to Support the Interpretation of ATM Missense Variants Using Graphical Analysis.

Establishing the pathogenic nature of variants in ATM, a gene associated with breast cancer and other hereditary cancers, is crucial for providing patients with adequate care. Unfortunately, achieving good variant classification is still difficult. To address this challenge, we extended the range of in silico tools with a series of graphical tools devised for the analysis of computational evidence by health care professionals. We propose a family of fast and easy-to-use graphical representations in which the impact of a variant is considered relative to other pathogenic and benign variants. To illustrate their value, the representations are applied to three problems in variant interpretation. The assessment of computational pathogenicity predictions showed that the graphics provide an intuitive view of prediction reliability, complementing and extending conventional numerical reliability indexes. When applied to variant of unknown significance populations, the representations shed light on the nature of these variants and can be used to prioritize variants of unknown significance for further studies. In a third application, the graphics were used to compare the two versions of the ATM-adapted American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and Association for Molecular Pathology guidelines, obtaining valuable information on their relative virtues and weaknesses. Finally, a server [ATMision (ATM missense in silico interpretation online)] was generated for users to apply these representations in their variant interpretation problems, to check the ATM-adapted guidelines' criteria for computational evidence on their variant(s) and access different sources of information.