Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion: impact on left atrial deformation indices.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is an accepted alternative to thromboprophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who are: (i) intolerant to oral anticoagulation (OAC) (e.g. life-threatening haemorrhage), (ii) non-adherent to OAC, or (iii) at a high bleeding risk with OAC. Improvement in LA mechanics was shown post-LAAO in the LAFIT-LARIAT study, using the Lariat device. No significant change was seen in LA mechanics after LAAO with the Watchman device in the LAFIT-Watchman study. The impact of LAAO with the Amplatzer or Amulet device on LA deformation mechanics has not been investigated. PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of LAAO with the Amplatzer or Amulet device on echocardiographic LA deformation indices. METHODS: All patients undergoing percutaneous LAAO from 2013 to 2021 at a single centre were included from an ongoing clinical registry. LA reservoir (εreservoir), conduit (εconduit) and contractile strain (εcontractile) and strain rate (SRreservoir, SRconduit, SRcontractile) were assessed with two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography from an apical four-chamber view. Conduit and contractile strain and strain rates were only recorded for patients without AF at the time of echocardiography. Changes in LA deformation indices over time were compared with a linear mixed model. RESULTS: 28 LAAO recipients (mean age 73 ± 12 years, 68% male) were analysed. 5 (18%) patients had AF pre- or post-procedure. After a mean follow-up of 1.6 ± 1.4 months, the mean LA εreservoir increased from 10.15 ± 6.44% to 10.18 ± 8.72% (p = 0.985), the mean LA εconduit increased from 5.12 ± 5.48% to 5.31 ± 6.11% (p = 0.891) and the mean LA εcontractile decreased from 5.14 ± 4.32% to 4.95 ± 5.30% (p = 0.898). During the same time interval, the mean LA SRreservoir decreased from + 0.54 ± 0.23.s- 1 to + 0.48 ± 0.43.s- 1 (p = 0.566), the mean LA SRconduit remained stable: -0.47 ± 0.41.s- 1 to -0.47 ± 0.32.s- 1 (p = 0.997) and the mean LA SRcontractile decreased from - 0.66 ± 0.50.s- 1 to -0.55 ± 0.46.s- 1 (p = 0.660). CONCLUSION: No significant improvement in LA mechanical function was seen after LAAO with the Amplatzer or Amulet device. Different LAAO devices therefore appear to have divergent effects on LA deformation, the clinical implications of which may warrant further study.

Renal denervation prevents subclinical atrial fibrillation in patients with hypertensive heart disease: Randomized, sham-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Catheter-based renal denervation (RD), in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), reduces atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence in hypertensive patients. Whether RD, without additional PVI, can prevent subclinical atrial fibrillation (SAF) in patients with hypertensive heart disease (HHD) is unknown. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of RD in preventing SAF in patients with HHD. METHODS: A single-center, randomized, sham-controlled pilot trial, including patients >55 years in sinus rhythm, but with a high risk of developing SAF was conducted. Patients had uncontrolled hypertension despite taking 3 antihypertensive drugs, including a diuretic. The primary endpoint was the first SAF episode lasting ≥6 minutes recorded via an implantable cardiac monitor scanned every 6 months for 24 months. A blinded independent monitoring committee assessed electrocardiographic rhythm recordings. Change in SAF burden (SAFB), and office and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (BP) at 6-month follow-up were secondary endpoints. RESULTS: Eighty patients were randomly assigned to RD (n = 42) or sham groups (n = 38). After 24 months of follow-up, SAF occurred in 8 RD patients (19%) and 15 sham patients (39.5%) (hazard ratio 0.40; 95% confidence interval 0.17-0.96; P = .031). Median [interquartile range] SAFB was low in both groups but was significantly lower in the RD vs sham group (0% [0-0] vs 0% [0-0.3]; P = .043). Fast AF (>100 bpm) occurred less frequently in the RD than sham group (2% vs 26%; P = .002). After adjusting for baseline values, there were no significant differences in office or 24-hour BP changes between treatment groups. CONCLUSION: RD reduced incident SAF events, SAFB, and fast AF in patients with HHD. The observed effects may occur independent of BP lowering.