The use of a sentinel cerebral protection system during Impella CP removal in a patient with left ventricular thrombus.

Percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (pMCS) devices are commonly being utilized for hemodynamic support in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions or stabilization for those in cardiogenic shock. Left ventricular (LV) to ascending aorta (Ao) rotodynamic pumps such as the Impella devices allow for rapid hemodynamic stabilization or support in such instances. The use of such devices is contraindicated in patients with known LV thrombus. However, it remains unclear on how to manage patients who develop an LV thrombus while on prolonged Impella support. While there are currently no cerebral embolic protection devices (CEPDs) approved for use in conjunction with LV to Ao pMCS devices or other short-term mechanical support devices, there is a theoretical benefit for the use of such technology in the right circumstances. We present a case describing the use of the sentinel cerebral protection system (SCPS) in a patient who developed LV thrombus while on Impella CP support. The use of the SCPS in this patient suggests a potential role for CEPD in prevention of thromboembolism while on Impella support.

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Utility in Postpartum Patients.

Although extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been used in many different populations, its use in pregnant or postpartum patients has not been widely studied. This article reviews the ECMO experience in this population at a large urban hospital. Electronic medical records for all pregnant or postpartum patients who required ECMO between 2012 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Data on clinical characteristics, outcomes, and complications were gathered. Comparisons between survivors and nonsurvivors were completed. Ten postpartum patients were identified. The patients presented as follows: four with cardiac arrest, one with a massive pulmonary embolism, three with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), one with combined ARDS and cardiogenic shock, and one with suspected amniotic embolism. Survival to decannulation was 70%, and survival to discharge was 60%. When comparing survivors vs. nonsurvivors, ECMO survivors tended to have shorter support times vs. nonsurvivors. Otherwise, no differences were noted in age, mechanical ventilation time, or length of stay. Disseminated intravascular coagulation was a common phenomenon in this patient cohort. After initiation of ECMO, elevated serum lactate levels, lower systolic blood pressure, and acute renal failure were predictors of mortality. In a single institution at a large metroplex, we present data regarding the use of ECMO in postpartum patients. ECMO can be successfully used in selected postpartum patients with severe cardiac or respiratory dysfunction. Multidisciplinary collaboration on a regular basis will streamline the ECMO referral in a timely manner. Furthermore, larger studies are indicated to understand the utility of ECMO in larger cohorts.

Low-flow, Low-gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Review.

Aortic stenosis (AS) is a common valve pathology experienced by patients worldwide. There are limited population-based studies assessing its prevalence; however, epidemiological studies emphasize that the burden of disease is growing. Recognizing AS relies on accurate clinical assessment and diagnostic investigations. Patients who develop severe AS are often referred to the heart team for assessment of aortic valve intervention. Although echocardiography has traditionally been used to screen and monitor the progression of AS, there can be discordance between measurements in a low-flow state. Such patients may have truly severe AS and potentially derive long-term benefit from aortic valve intervention. Accurately identifying these patients with the use of ancillary testing has been the focus of research for several years. In this article, we discuss the contemporary approaches and challenges in identifying and managing patients with low-flow, low-gradient severe AS.

Comprehensive Review of Complete Versus Culprit-only Revascularization for Multivessel Disease in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Several organizations have developed guidelines for the management of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, the optimal strategy regarding revascularization in the setting of multivessel disease, specifically with regards to culprit vessel versus complete revascularization, continues to evolve. While previous observational studies promoted culprit vessel-only intervention in patients with STEMI, recent randomized controlled trials suggest potential benefits with multivessel revascularization, either at the time of the index event or in a staged fashion, in patients without cardiogenic shock. This may be due to the known instability of non-culprit lesions in the setting of acute coronary syndrome, and the diffuse coronary processes involved. As additional literature examines culprit vessel versus multivessel revascularization strategies, clinicians continue to be tasked with determining optimal treatment plans for their patients and understanding the factors that promote selected revascularization strategies. This review summarizes and discusses observational studies, randomized control trials and current guidelines in order to evaluate optimal reperfusion strategies for patients presenting with STEMI in the setting of multivessel disease.

Preparing the Next Generation of Code Blue Leaders Through Simulation: What's Missing?

INTRODUCTION: Despite the increasing reliance on simulation to train residents as code blue leaders, the perceived role and effectiveness of code blue simulations from the learners' perspective have not been explored. A code blue Simulation Program (CBSP), developed based on evidence-based simulation principles, was implemented at our institution. We explored the role of simulation in code blue training and the differences between real and simulated code blues from the learner perspective. METHODS: Using a thematic analysis approach and a purposeful sampling strategy, residents who participated in the CBSP were invited to participate in one of the three focus groups. Data were collected through small group discussions guided by semistructured interviews. The interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. Interview transcripts were coded to assess underlying themes. RESULTS: Thematic analysis revealed that participants believed that the CBSP enhanced preparedness by capturing aspects of real codes (eg, inclusion of precode scenarios with awake patients, lack of readily available information) and facilitating automatization of code blue processes. Despite efforts to develop a high-fidelity simulation, participants noted that they experienced more anxiety, observed more chaos in the environment, and encountered different communication challenges in real codes. CONCLUSIONS: The CBSP enhanced resident preparedness to serve as code blue leaders. Learners highlighted that they valued the CBSP; however, differences remain between simulated and real codes that could be addressed to enhance the fidelity of future simulations.