Optimal breast reconstruction type for patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, mastectomy followed by radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: To explore the optimal type of breast reconstruction and the time interval to postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) associated with lower complications in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 300 patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, mastectomy with breast reconstruction and PMRT at our institution from 2000 to 2017. Reconstruction types included autologous flaps (AR), single-stage-direct-to-implant and two-stages expander/implant (TE/I). The primary endpoint was the rate of reconstruction complications including infection, skin and fat necrosis. Subgroup analysis compared rates of capsular contracture, implant rupture, implant exposure and overall implant failure in single-stage-direct-to-implant to TE/I. The secondary endpoint was identifying the time interval between surgery with immediate implant-based reconstruction and PMRT associated with lower probability of implant failure. Logistic regression models, Kaplan-Meier estimates and Polynomial regression were used to assess endpoints. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 43.5 months. 29.3%, 28.3% and 42.4% of the cohort had AR, TE/I and single-stage-direct-to-implant D, respectively. The 5-year cumulative incidence rate of complications was 14.0%, 29.7% and 19.4% for AR, TE/I and single-stage-direct-to-implant, respectively (Log rank p = 0.02). Multivariate analysis showed significant association between TE/I and higher risk of infection (OR 8.1, p = 0.009) compared to AR, while single-stage-direct-to-implant and AR were comparable (OR 3.2, p = 0.2). On subgroup analysis, TE/I was significantly associated with higher rates of implant failure. The mean wait time to deliver PMRT after immediate reconstruction with no adjuvant chemotherapy was 8.4 and 10.7 weeks in single-stage-direct-to-implant and TE/I, respectively (p < 0.005). Delivering PMRT after 8 weeks of surgery yielded 10% probability of reconstruction failure in single-stage-direct-to-implant versus 40% in TE/I. CONCLUSION: In comparison to two stages reconstruction, single-stage-direct-to-implant following neoadjuvant chemotherapy has lower complications and offers timely delivery of PMRT.

Evaluation of radiation-induced cardiac toxicity in breast cancer patients treated with Trastuzumab-based chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Patients with Her2-positive breast cancer treated with trastuzumab have higher rates of cardiotoxicity (CT). Left-breast radiation might increase the risk for CT from cardiac exposure to radiation. The goal of our study is to evaluate the contribution of radiotherapy (RT) in the development of CT in breast cancer patients receiving trastuzumab. METHODS: Two hundred and two patients were treated with RT and trastuzumab from 2000 to 2014. The RT plans for left-side disease were recalled from archives. The heart, each chamber, and left anterior descending artery (LAD) were independently contoured. New dose-volume histograms (DVH) were generated. Their serial left-ventricular ejection fractions (LVEF) were studied. CT for left and right side were compared using Fisher's exact test. The DVH data were correlated with the predefined cardiac events using actuarial Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: Compared to the right sided, the left-side cases showed statistically significant development of arrhythmia (14.2%) versus (< 1%) (p < 0.001). Cardiac ischemia was found in 10 patients in left and one patient in right side (p = 0.011). The equivalent uniform dose (EUD) to the left ventricle (LV), right ventricle (RV), and LAD was significantly associated with decrease in LVEF by > 10% (p = 0.037, p = 0.023 and p = 0.049, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients treated for left-sided lesions, there were no significant differences in EF decline. However, there was a higher rate of ischemia and arrhythmia compared to those with right-sided disease. The EUD index of LV, RV, and LAD could be considered as a parameter to describe the risk of radiation-induced CT.

Predictors of surveillance mammography outcomes in women with a personal history of breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To identify predictors of poor mammography surveillance outcomes based on clinico-pathologic features. METHODS: This study was HIPAA compliant and IRB approved. We performed an electronic medical record review for a cohort of women with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Stage I or II invasive breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy who developed subsequent in-breast treatment recurrence (IBTR) or contralateral breast cancer (CBC). Poor surveillance outcome was defined as second breast cancer not detected by surveillance mammography, including interval cancers (diagnosed within 365 days of surveillance mammogram with negative results) and clinically detected cancers (diagnosed without a surveillance mammogram in the preceding 365 days). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were performed to identify predictors of poor mammography surveillance outcome, including patient and primary tumor characteristics, breast density, mode of primary tumor detection, and time to second cancer diagnosis. RESULTS: 164 women met inclusion criteria (65 with IBTR, 99 with CBC); 124 had screen-detected second cancers. On univariate analysis, poor surveillance outcome (n = 40) was associated with age at primary cancer diagnosis < 50 years (p < 0.0001), AJCC stage II primary cancers (p = 0.007), and heterogeneously or extremely dense breasts (p = 0.04). On multivariate analysis, age < 50 years at primary breast cancer diagnosis remained a significant predictor of poor surveillance outcome (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Women younger than age 50 at primary breast cancer diagnosis are at risk of poor surveillance mammography outcomes, and may be appropriate candidates for more intensive clinical and imaging surveillance.

Breast-cancer subtype, age, and lymph node status as predictors of local recurrence following breast-conserving therapy.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: Advances in breast-conserving therapy (BCT) have yielded local control rates comparable or superior to those of mastectomy. In this study, we sought to identify contemporary risk factors associated with local recurrence (LR) following BCT. METHODS: We analyzed a multi-institutional cohort of 2233 consecutive breast-cancer patients who underwent BCT between 1998 and 2007. Patients were stratified by age, biologic subtype (as approximated by receptor status and tumor grade), and nodal status. Patients who received HER2/neu-directed therapy were excluded due to variations in practice over the study period. The association of clinicopathologic features with LR was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 106 months, 69 LRs (3 %) were observed. On univariate analysis, LR was associated with non-luminal-A subtype (hazard ratio [HR] for luminal-B = 3.01, HER2 = 6.29, triple-negative [TNBC] = 4.72; p < 0.001 each), younger age (HR of oldest vs. youngest quartile = 0.43; p = 0.005), regional nodal involvement (HR for 4-9 involved nodes = 3.04; >9 nodes = 5.82; p < 0.01 for each), positive margins (HR 2.43; p = 0.005), and high grade (HR 5.37; p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression demonstrated that non-luminal-A subtypes (HR for luminal-B = 2.64, HER2 = 5.42, TNBC = 4.32; p < 0.001 for each), younger age (HR for age >50 = 0.56; p = 0.01), and nodal disease (HR 1.06 per involved node; p < 0.004) were associated with LR. The 8-year risk of LR was 2.8 % for node-negative patients and 5.2 % for node-positive patients. CONCLUSION: BCT yields favorable outcomes for the large majority of patients, although increased LR was observed among those with non-luminal-A subtypes, younger age, and increasing lymph node involvement. Risk factors for LR after BCT appear to be converging with those after mastectomy in the current era.

Using machine learning to parse breast pathology reports.

PURPOSE: Extracting information from electronic medical record is a time-consuming and expensive process when done manually. Rule-based and machine learning techniques are two approaches to solving this problem. In this study, we trained a machine learning model on pathology reports to extract pertinent tumor characteristics, which enabled us to create a large database of attribute searchable pathology reports. This database can be used to identify cohorts of patients with characteristics of interest. METHODS: We collected a total of 91,505 breast pathology reports from three Partners hospitals: Massachusetts General Hospital, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Newton-Wellesley Hospital, covering the period from 1978 to 2016. We trained our system with annotations from two datasets, consisting of 6295 and 10,841 manually annotated reports. The system extracts 20 separate categories of information, including atypia types and various tumor characteristics such as receptors. We also report a learning curve analysis to show how much annotation our model needs to perform reasonably. RESULTS: The model accuracy was tested on 500 reports that did not overlap with the training set. The model achieved accuracy of 90% for correctly parsing all carcinoma and atypia categories for a given patient. The average accuracy for individual categories was 97%. Using this classifier, we created a database of 91,505 parsed pathology reports. CONCLUSIONS: Our learning curve analysis shows that the model can achieve reasonable results even when trained on a few annotations. We developed a user-friendly interface to the database that allows physicians to easily identify patients with target characteristics and export the matching cohort. This model has the potential to reduce the effort required for analyzing large amounts of data from medical records, and to minimize the cost and time required to glean scientific insight from these data.

Precautions for breast cancer-related lymphoedema: risk from air travel, ipsilateral arm blood pressure measurements, skin puncture, extreme temperatures, and cellulitis.

Precautionary recommendations conveyed to survivors of cancer by health-care practitioners to reduce the risk of breast cancer-related lymphoedema are indispensable aspects of clinical care, yet remain unsubstantiated by high-level scientific evidence. By reviewing the literature, we identified 31 original research articles that examined whether lifestyle-associated risk factors (air travel, ipsilateral arm blood pressure measurements, skin puncture, extreme temperatures, and skin infections-eg, cellulitis) increase the risk of breast cancer-related lymphoedema. Among the few studies that lend support to precautionary guidelines, most provide low-level (levels 3-5) or inconclusive evidence of an association between lymphoedema and these risk factors, and only four level 2 studies show a significant association. Skin infections and previous infection or inflammation on the ipsilateral arm were among the most clearly defined and well established risk factors for lymphoedema. The paucity of high-level evidence and the conflicting nature of the existing literature make it difficult to establish definitive predictive factors for breast cancer-related lymphoedema, which could be a considerable source of patient distress and anxiety. Along with further research into these risk factors, continued discussion regarding modification of the guidelines and adoption of a risk-adjusted approach is needed.

A comprehensive review of bioimpedance spectroscopy as a diagnostic tool for the detection and measurement of breast cancer-related lymphedema.

As treatment for breast cancer improves and the threat of life-long chronic lymphedema becomes more prevalent, the need for effective screening tools emerges as crucial. This review was conducted using literature beginning in 1992 to analyze primary research testing the accuracy of bioimpedance spectroscopy as a diagnostic and early detection tool for breast cancer-related lymphedema. We concluded bioimpedance is an accurate diagnostic tool for pre-existent lymphedema, however, it has not been validated for early detection. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;114:537-542. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Left Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain in HER-2 + Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Anthracyclines and Trastuzumab Who Develop Cardiotoxicity Is Associated with Subsequent Recovery of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction.

AIM: The combination of anthracyclines (AC) and trastuzumab (TRZ) is highly effective in patients with aggressive HER-2 + breast cancer, but has a significant risk of cardiotoxicity (CT). Trastuzumab-induced CT may be reversible. The aim of this study was to identify echocardiographic parameters associated with recovery of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients who developed CT after AC and TRZ treatment. METHODS AND RESULTS: Women with newly diagnosed breast cancer treated with AC followed by TRZ and monitored with serial echocardiograms were retrospectively studied. Left ventricular end-diastolic and systolic volumes, LVEF, and global longitudinal strain (GLS) were examined. Development and reversibility of CT were defined based on changes in LVEF according to the 2014 ASE/EACVI recommendations. Cox analysis was used to determine the association of echocardiographic variables with the subsequent development and reversibility of CT. Ninety-five patients underwent 5 echocardiograms or more in a 17-month (13-28 months) follow-up period. Nineteen patients (20%) developed CT. Left ventricular volumes, LVEF, and GLS measured after AC completion identified the subsequent development of CT. Of the 19 patients with CT, the LVEF partially or fully recovered in 13 (68%). GLS at the time of CT diagnosis was associated with subsequent recovery of LVEF (P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: In patients with breast cancer treated with AC and TRZ who develop CT, GLS at the time of CT diagnosis is associated with subsequent recovery of LVEF and may be useful for risk stratification and to guide treatment.

Showers of emboli from a large aortic root thrombus.

It is rare to find aortic root thrombi in the absence of aortic root aneurysm or extensive aortic atherosclerosis. Up to this date, only a few cases have been reported. The etiology has been mainly attributed to hypercoagulable disorders. Herein, we present a case of a large thrombus obliterating the aortic root in a patient presenting with acute abdominal pain and noted to have showers of emboli to the kidneys. Hypercoagulable workup failed to reveal any congenital or acquired clotting disorder. The thrombus was thought to have developed spontaneously, and was removed surgically. Two months later, however, she had an arterial clot in the left popliteal artery that was removed surgically. The patient was seen for follow-up three and six months later and was stable with no complaints. This case highlights the importance of considering the ascending aorta as a source in cases of systemic embolization. In addition, the different diagnostic options, management protocols, and potential complications are discussed.

Fibrosing mediastinitis mimicking postpartum heart failure.

Fibrosing mediastinitis, also known as sclerosing mediastinitis and mediastinal fibrosis, is an uncommon disease characterized by the proliferation of a dense fibrous tissue in the mediastinum. This article describes a patient who presented to the ED with atypical signs and symptoms that initially seemed like heart failure but were eventually diagnosed as fibrosing mediastinitis.

Evaluating Patient Experience in a Multidisciplinary Breast Cancer Clinic: A Prospective Study.

Background: Multidisciplinary clinics (MDCs) are a care model in which patients see several physicians across specialties and/or other allied health professionals in a single appointment in a shared space. This study sought to better understand patients' experiences with breast cancer (BC) MDC. Methods: A total of 429 patients diagnosed with BC and seen in a MDC between November 2020 and November 2021 were invited to participate in a patient experience survey. Results: In total, 116 patient respondents (27%) with representative demographics described their experience. Most patients report feeling "somewhat prepared" for the BC MDC experience (67%, median = 3.7, interquartile range [IQR] = 1.9), but with variability. The major areas of positive feedback were that the MDC was convenient (89.3%), efficient use of time (65.2%), and a good way to get questions answered (65.2%). Major criticisms included that the MDC was overwhelming (16.1%) and/or too long (4.5%). When asked to rate the top three satisfaction areas of MDCs, patients chose seeing multiple providers during a single visit (80.4%), communication about the process before and throughout the MDC (48.2%), and inclusivity of their support system (38.4%). The highest rated dissatisfiers were the volume of information presented (42.9%) and patients' emotional comfort (anxiety/stress) during MDC appointment (30.2%). Overall, 83% of patients with BC rate the MDC experience as excellent (median = 4.8, IQR = 0.9) and would be "very likely" to recommend BC MDC (median = 4.8, IQR = 0.9). Conclusion: Patients value seeing multiple providers simultaneously in an environment inclusive of their support systems, which is described as convenient and efficient. Improving emotional distress is a key opportunity to improve patient experience.

Radiation Modality (Proton/Photon), Timing, and Complication Rates in Patients With Breast Cancer Receiving 2-Stages Expander/Implant Reconstruction.

PURPOSE: Our purpose is to explore the effect of postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) modality and timing on complication rates in breast cancer patients receiving immediate 2-stages expander/implant. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We reviewed the charts of 661 patients who underwent immediate 2-stages expander/implant with/without PMRT at our institution from 2000 to 2019. Patients were divided into 3 cohorts: no radiation, PMRT to expanders (RTE), and PMRT to implants after expander exchange (RTI). PMRT was delivered either with 3-dimensional conformal photon with or without chest wall boost (CWB) or proton therapy. Reconstruction complications were defined as infection/necrosis requiring debridement, capsular-contracture requiring capsulotomy, and reconstruction failure requiring prothesis removal. Logistic regression and Cox models were used to assess the effect of different radiation therapy modalities on complication rates and local control. RESULTS: Among 661 patients, 309 (46.7%) received PMRT, 220 of the 309 (71.2%) received RTE before exchange, and 89 (28.8%) received RTI after exchange. Seventeen out of 309 (5.5%) patients received proton therapy. The complications among RTE versus RTI cohorts were 22.7% versus 15.7% for infection/necrosis, 13.6% versus 19.1% for capsular-contracture, and 39.5% versus 31.5% for overall reconstruction failure, respectively. Among proton patients, 8/17 (47%) developed capsular contracture compared with 16.4% (24/146) and 10.3% (15/146) in CWB and non-CWB groups, respectively. Adjusted multivariable analysis showed no significant difference between RTI and RTE in terms of infection/necrosis and capsular contracture. Yet, RTE significantly increased overall reconstruction failure compared with RTI (39.5% vs 31.5%; odds ratio [OR], 2.11; P = .02). Protons significantly increased capsular contracture compared with both CWB and non-CWB groups (OR, 5.4; P = .01 and OR, 10.9; P < .001, respectively). Moreover, proton significantly increased overall reconstruction failure. The 5-year local control rates were 95.3% and 97.7% for RTE and RTI, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.2; P = .7). CONCLUSIONS: Early radiation to the expander before the exchange to implant significantly increased overall reconstruction failure without improving local control. Protons significantly increased capsular contracture rates and overall reconstruction failure leading to more revision surgeries.

Risk of Developing Breast Reconstruction Complications: A Machine-Learning Nomogram for Individualized Risk Estimation with and without Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to create a nomogram using machine learning models predicting risk of breast reconstruction complications with or without postmastectomy radiation therapy. METHODS: Between 1997 and 2017, 1617 breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy and breast reconstruction were analyzed. Those with autologous, tissue expander/implant, and single-stage direct-to-implant reconstruction were included. Postmastectomy radiation therapy was delivered either with three-dimensional conformal photon or proton therapy. Complication endpoints were defined based on surgical reintervention operative notes as infection/necrosis requiring débridement. For implant-based patients, complications were defined as capsular contracture requiring capsulotomy and implant failure. For each complication endpoint, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator-penalized regression was used to select the subset of predictors associated with the smallest prediction error from 10-fold cross-validation. Nomograms were built using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator-selected predictors, and internal validation using cross-validation was performed. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 6.6 years. Among 1617 patients, 23 percent underwent autologous reconstruction, 39 percent underwent direct-to-implant reconstruction, and 37 percent underwent tissue expander/implant reconstruction. Among 759 patients who received postmastectomy radiation therapy, 8.3 percent received proton-therapy to the chest wall and nodes and 43 percent received chest wall boost. Internal validation for each model showed an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 73 percent for infection, 75 percent for capsular contracture, 76 percent for absolute implant failure, and 68 percent for overall implant failure. Periareolar incisions and complete implant muscle coverage were found to be important predictors for infection and capsular contracture, respectively. In a multivariable analysis, we found that protons compared to no postmastectomy radiation therapy significantly increased capsular contracture risk (OR, 15.3; p < 0.001). This was higher than the effect of photons with electron boost versus no postmastectomy radiation therapy (OR, 2.5; p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Using machine learning, these nomograms provided prediction of postmastectomy breast reconstruction complications with and without radiation therapy. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.

A retrospective analysis of commonly prescribed medications and the risk of developing breast cancer related lymphedema.

OBJECTIVES: Breast cancer related lymphedema (BCRL) is a common complication of current breast cancer treatment modalities, significantly lowering quality of life for these patients and often leading to recurrent infections. Here, based on pre-clinical literature, we aim to retrospectively evaluate the risks of prescribed medications on BCRL development. METHODS: All post-operative breast cancer patients who received radiotherapy from 2005-2013 at Massachusetts General Hospital and developed lymphedema(n=115) were included in the analysis. Comparable patients without lymphedema(n=230) were randomly selected as control. The following classes of medications were analyzed: NSAIDs, corticosteroids, angiotensin system inhibitors, calcium channel blockers and hormonal therapy. Known risk factors for lymphedema development were included as variables, including BMI, age at diagnosis, type of surgery, number of lymph nodes removed and radiation therapy. Outcomes were BCRL development and lymphedema severity. RESULTS: Similarly, to previous studies, we found that an increase in BMI increases the risk of BCRL(p=0.006) and axillary lymph node dissection has a higher risk of developing BCRL compared to sentinel lymph node biopsy(p=0.045). None of the drugs studied increased the risk of BCRL development or lymphedema severity. However, lymphedema severity was positively correlated with the number of lymph nodes removed(p=0.034). CONCLUSION: We found that anti-inflammatory drugs, anti-hypertensive drugs and hormonal therapy taken during the year postoperatively do not increase the risk of BCRL development or lymphedema severity in breast cancer patients. While others have demonstrated that the number of lymph nodes removed during surgery increases the risk of BCRL, we found it also correlates to lymphedema severity.

Quantifying the Impact of Axillary Surgery and Nodal Irradiation on Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema and Local Tumor Control: Long-Term Results From a Prospective Screening Trial.

PURPOSE: To independently evaluate the impact of axillary surgery type and regional lymph node radiation (RLNR) on breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) rates in patients with breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 2005 to 2018, 1,815 patients with invasive breast cancer were enrolled in a lymphedema screening trial. Patients were divided into the following 4 groups according to axillary surgery approach: sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone, SLNB+RLNR, axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) alone, and ALND+RLNR. A perometer was used to objectively assess limb volume. All patients received baseline preoperative and follow-up measurements after treatment. Lymphedema was defined as a ≥ 10% relative increase in arm volume arising > 3 months postoperatively. The primary end point was the BCRL rate across the groups. Secondary end points were 5-year locoregional control and disease-free-survival. RESULTS: The cohort included 1,340 patients with SLNB alone, 121 with SLNB+RLNR, 91 with ALND alone, and 263 with ALND+RLNR. The overall median follow-up time after diagnosis was 52.7 months for the entire cohort. The 5-year cumulative incidence rates of BCRL were 30.1%, 24.9%, 10.7%, and 8.0% for ALND+RLNR, ALND alone, SLNB+RLNR, and SLNB alone, respectively. Multivariable Cox models adjusted for age, body mass index, surgery, and reconstruction type showed that the ALND-alone group had a significantly higher BCRL risk (hazard ratio [HR], 2.66; P = .02) compared with the SLNB+RLNR group. There was no significant difference in BCRL risk between the ALND+RLNR and ALND-alone groups (HR, 1.20; P = .49) and between the SLNB-alone and SLNB+RLNR groups (HR, 1.33; P = .44). The 5-year locoregional control rates were similar for the ALND+RLNR, ALND-alone, SLNB+RLNR, and SLNB-alone groups (2.8%, 3.8%, 0%, and 2.3%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Although RLNR adds to the risk of lymphedema, the main risk factor is the type of axillary surgery used.

Single Stage Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction Has Lower Complication Rates Than Tissue Expander and Implant and Comparable Rates to Autologous Reconstruction in Patients Receiving Postmastectomy Radiation.

PURPOSE: To compare single-stage direct-to-implant (DTI) immediate reconstruction to the commonly used 2-stages expander and implant (TE/I) or autologous reconstruction with focus on postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) setting. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We reviewed the charts of 1,286 patients who underwent 1,814 breast reconstructions at our institution with and without PMRT from 1997 to 2017. Patients were divided into 6 groups according to type of reconstruction and PMRT status. Primary objective was reconstruction complications defined solely on surgical reintervention operative notes such as infection, skin necrosis, and fat necrosis across all groups. Implant-related complications such as capsular contracture, implant rupture or exposure, or implant failure were compared between TE/I and DTI. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to calculate 5-year cumulative incidence of complications. The secondary objective was to compare the 3 reconstruction types in settings of immediate reconstruction followed by PMRT on multivariable analysis. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 5.8 years. Among 1286 patients, 41.1% (N = 529/1286) received PMRT. Among 1814 reconstructed breasts, autologous, single-stage, and TE/I represented 18.7%, 34.8%, and 46.2%, respectively. With no PMRT, the 5-year cumulative incidence of any reconstruction complication was 11.1%, 12.6%, and 19.5% for autologous, DTI, and TE/I reconstructions, respectively. The addition of PMRT resulted in 5-year cumulative incidence of 15.1%, 18.2%, and 36.8%, respectively. The multivariable analysis showed that DTI was associated with lesser complications compared with TE/I, whereas no significant difference was noted between DTI and autologous. CONCLUSIONS: Single-stage DTI reconstruction had significantly lower complication rates than TE/I with and without PMRT. Single-stage complication rates were not significantly different from autologous complication rates in PMRT settings. Single-stage reconstruction may offer a valuable option for patients receiving PMRT.

The Impact of Chest Wall Boost on Reconstruction Complications and Local Control in Patients Treated for Breast Cancer.

PURPOSE: Giving an additional radiation dose to the incision or chest wall has been a practice, but it has never been studied in a randomized setting, and it might lead to inferior cosmetic outcomes. This study aims to evaluate whether delivery of a chest wall boost (CWB) to the mastectomy scar or chest wall is independently associated with reconstruction complications and to assess its disease control efficacy in the setting of breast reconstruction. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 746 patients with breast cancer who underwent mastectomy, breast reconstruction, and PMRT; all underwent treatment at our institution during 1997 to 2016. Various reconstruction techniques were used among this cohort including autologous reconstruction, single-stage direct-to-implant reconstruction, and 2-stage tissue expander implant. Cohorts were divided by administration of CWB. The primary objective was comparing the rate of reconstruction complications including skin necrosis, fat necrosis and infection between groups. Subgroup analysis for patients with implant-based reconstruction was performed to evaluate the effect of CWB on implant-related complications such as capsular contracture, implant exposure, and implant failure. The secondary objective was comparison of the cumulative incidence of local failure between groups overall and within clinically high-risk subgroups. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 5.2 years. Most clinicopathologic features were well balanced between the 379 (51%) patients who received CWB and the 367 (49%) who did not. On multivariate analysis, CWB was significantly associated with infection, skin necrosis, and implant exposure. For implant reconstruction patients, CWB independently increased risks of implant failure. CWB administration was not associated with local tumor control benefits, even in high-risk subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that omission of chest wall boost in postmastectomy radiation improves breast reconstruction outcomes without compromising local tumor control.

Timing of Lymphedema After Treatment for Breast Cancer: When Are Patients Most At Risk?

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to determine when the risk of lymphedema is highest after treatment of breast cancer and which factors influence the time course of lymphedema development. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 2005 and 2017, 2171 women (with 2266 at-risk arms) who received surgery for unilateral or bilateral breast cancer at our institution were enrolled. Perometry was used to objectively assess limb volume preoperatively, and lymphedema was defined as a ≥10% relative arm-volume increase arising >3 months postoperatively. Multivariable regression was used to uncover risk factors associated with lymphedema, the Cox proportional hazards model was used to calculate lymphedema incidence, and the semiannual hazard rate of lymphedema was calculated. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 4 years, the overall estimated 5-year cumulative incidence of lymphedema was 13.7%. Significant factors associated with lymphedema on multivariable analysis were high preoperative body mass index, axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), and regional lymph node radiation (RLNR). Patients receiving ALND with RLNR experienced the highest 5-year rate of lymphedema (31.2%), followed by those receiving ALND without RLNR (24.6%) and sentinel lymph node biopsy with RLNR (12.2%). Overall, the risk of lymphedema peaked between 12 and 30 months postoperatively; however, the time course varied as a function of therapy received. Early-onset lymphedema (<12 months postoperatively) was associated with ALND (HR [hazard ratio], 4.75; P < .0001) but not with RLNR (HR, 1.21; P = .55). In contrast, late-onset lymphedema (>12 months postoperatively) was associated with RLNR (HR, 3.86; P = .0001) and, to a lesser extent, ALND (HR, 1.86; P = .029). The lymphedema risk peaked between 6 and 12 months in the ALND-without-RLNR group, between 18 and 24 months in the ALND-with-RLNR group, and between 36 and 48 months in the group receiving sentinel lymph node biopsy with RLNR. CONCLUSIONS: The time course for lymphedema development depends on the breast cancer treatment received. ALND is associated with early-onset lymphedema, and RLNR is associated with late-onset lymphedema. These results can influence clinical practice to guide lymphedema surveillance strategies and patient education.

Diagnostic Methods, Risk Factors, Prevention, and Management of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: Past, Present, and Future Directions.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a chronic, adverse, and much feared complication of breast cancer treatment, which affects approximately 20% of patients following breast cancer treatment. BCRL has a tremendous impact on breast cancer survivors, including physical impairments and significant psychological consequences. The intent of this review is to discuss recent studies and analyses regarding the risk factors, diagnosis, prevention through early screening and intervention, and management of BCRL. RECENT FINDINGS: Highly-evidenced risk factors for BCRL include axillary lymph node dissection, lack of reconstruction, radiation to the lymph nodes, high BMI at diagnosis, weight fluctuations during and after treatment, subclinical edema within and beyond 3 months after surgery, and cellulitis in the at-risk arm. Avoidance of potential risk factors can serve as a method of prevention. Through establishing a screening program by which breast cancer patients are measured pre-operatively and at follow-ups, are objectively assessed through a weight-adjusted analysis, and are clinically assessed for signs and symptoms, BCRL can be tracked accurately and treated effectively. Management of BCRL is done by a trained professional, with research mounting towards the use of compression bandaging as a first line intervention against BCRL. Finally, exercise is safe for breast cancer patients with and without BCRL and does not incite or exacerbate symptoms of BCRL. SUMMARY: Recent research has shed light on BCRL risk factors, diagnosis, prevention, and management. We hope that education on these aspects of BCRL will promote an informed, consistent approach and encourage additional research in this field to improve patient outcomes and quality of life in breast cancer survivors.