Clinical and echocardiographic predictors of embolism in infective endocarditis: systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Prediction of embolic events (EEs) in infective endocarditis (IE) could inform clinical decisions, such as surgical timing. We conducted a systematic review to more precisely define associations between risk factors and EEs. METHODS: We searched two bibliographic databases (1994-2018) for observational studies that reported EEs in IE patients and considered clinical, microbiological or echocardiographic risk factors. Studies that did not use Duke criteria or only investigated a subset of IE patients were excluded. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. A pooled risk ratio (RR) for each risk factor was estimated using random-effects models; statistical heterogeneity was estimated using I2. RESULTS: Of 3862 unique citations, 47 cohort studies (11 215 IE cases) were included; 54 risk factors were analysed in at least two studies, with nine studies reporting other individual factors. Most studies were of high methodological quality. Major predictors of EEs were intravenous drug use (RR 1.69, 95% CI 1.32-2.17; I2 = 46%), Staphylococcus aureus infection (RR 1.64, 95% CI 1.45-1.86, I2 = 32%), mitral valve vegetation (RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.11-1.37, I2 = 30%), and vegetation size >10 mm (RR 1.87, 95% CI 1.57-2.21, I2 = 48%). EE risk was also higher with human immunodeficiency virus, chronic liver disease, elevated C-reactive protein, Staphylococcus spp. infection, vegetation presence, and multiple, mobile or prosthetic mechanical valve vegetation, and lower with Streptococcus spp. infection. Most findings were unchanged in sensitivity analyses that removed studies with pulmonary EEs from the outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Given the serious consequences of embolism, surgical evaluation may be considered in patients with these risk factors.

International experts' practice in the antibiotic therapy of infective endocarditis is not following the guidelines.

OBJECTIVE: The management of infective endocarditis (IE) may differ from international guidelines, even in reference centres. This is probably because most recommendations are not based on hard evidence, so the consensus obtained for the guidelines does not represent actual practices. For this reason, we aimed to evaluate this question in the particular field of antibiotic therapy. METHODS: Thirteen international centres specialized in the management of IE were selected, according to their reputation, clinical results, original research publications and quotations. They were asked to detail their actual practice in terms of IE antibiotic treatment in various bacteriological and clinical situations. They were also asked to declare their IE-related in-hospital mortality for the year 2015. RESULTS: The global compliance with guidelines concerning antibiotic therapy was 58%, revealing the differences between theoretical 'consensus', local recommendations and actual practice. Some conflicts of interest were also probably expressed. The adherence to guidelines was 100% when the protocol was simple, and decreased with the seriousness of the situation (Staphylococus spp. 54%-62%) or in blood-culture-negative endocarditis (0%-15%) that requires adaptation to clinical and epidemiological data. CONCLUSION: Worldwide experts in IE management, although the majority of them were involved and co-signed the guidelines, do not follow international consensus guidelines on the particular point of the use of antibiotics.

Value of CMR in quantification of paravalvular aortic regurgitation after TAVI.

AIMS: To assess the value of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) using phase-contrast velocity mapping for paravalvular aortic regurgitation (PAR) quantification. METHODS AND RESULTS: All patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in our centre between November 2012 and August 2013, without CMR-contraindication were included. PAR severity was assessed 5 days after TAVI using: transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and CMR [regurgitant volume (RV), regurgitant fraction (RF)]. Aortic regurgitation (AR) index was obtained during TAVI. Thirty of 51 patients who underwent TAVI were included (COREVALVE, n = 10; or EDWARDS SAPIEN XT, n = 20). At TTE, PAR was mild in 22, moderate in 3, and severe in 5 patients. Reliable phase-contrast images were acquired at the sino-tubular junction for SAPIEN and at the tubular portion of the ascending aorta for COREVALVE. The reproducibility of CMR was high (coefficient of correlation = 0.99 for intra- and inter-operator variability). At CMR, RV, and RF were significantly (P < 0.0005) correlated with AR severity at TTE, with mean RF values at 9.2 ± 7.6% in mild, 20.3 ± 4.2% in moderate, and 46.8 ± 10.8% in severe PAR. A cut-off value of RF < 14% at CMR accurately discriminated mild from moderate/severe (sensitivity: 100%, specificity: 82%). The mean AR index was 29.4 ± 6 for mild and 13.8 ± 5 for moderate/severe PAR. Three patients had a RF > 14% and a low AR index <25 despite a mild PAR at TTE, suggesting an underestimation at TTE. CONCLUSION: CMR is a reproducible, accurate, and reliable method to assess PAR severity. CMR may allow correcting an underestimation at TTE when AR index is doubtful.